Thursday, February 23, 2012Mostly Cloudy 1°C
City

A brief history of the Dufferin Gate at the CNE grounds

Posted by Chris Bateman / January 28, 2012

Toronto Dufferin Gate CNE Ex 1937Over the last 133 years the Canadian National Exhibition has evolved from a travelling agricultural show into Canada's largest fair, the one and only "Ex." Once the main entrance to the exhibition grounds, the Dufferin Gate at the foot of Dufferin Street has welcomed excited visitors to a world of innovative, thrilling, ingenious and bizarre exhibits for over well over a century.

The original Dufferin Gate was built in 1895, seventeen years after the first permanent exhibition was held on the site, to serve as the principal route into the exhibition grounds. The area in front of the small wooden structure served as a natural meeting place for groups preparing the enter the Ex.

Toronto Dufferin Gate CNE Ex CrowdIn the first years of the 20th century major renovations at the exhibition grounds added several new structures — including Manufacturers' Building in 1902, Art Gallery and Administration Building in 1905, Horticultural Building in 1907, Railways Building in 1908 and Government Building in 1911 - reflecting the increasing popularity of the annual show.

In 1910 the wooden entrance was torn down and replaced with architect G. W. Gouinlock's grand structure. Designed to act like a funnel, single-storey wings curved away from the towers on either side of the entranceway ending in small, domed pavilions. Complete with a streetcar and railway stop, the new gate was decorated with flags, lightbulbs and garlands, lending the place a "deliberately theatrical" look, according to William Dendy in his book Lost Toronto. Once inside, visitors were presented with a tree-lined view leading down to the lakeshore.

The area between the towers was filled with electric bulbs in the shape of two maple leaves in 1927 to celebrate the 60th anniversary of confederation. That same year the Dufferin Gate ceased to be the principal entrance to the Ex as the Princes' Gate at the east end of the grounds was completed and dedicated to the Prince of Wales.

Toronto Dufferin Gate CNE Ex 1922The second incarnation of the Dufferin Gate was demolished in 1959 during construction of the Gardiner Expressway and replaced with the arch currently on the site. William Dendy, always a critical voice when it comes to the destruction of historic buildings, describes the concrete arch as "meagre, cheap and trite" in comparison.

Dufferin GateLooking like a scaled down version of St. Louis' Gateway Arch (though it preceded it by four years), the current Dufferin Gate is intentionally narrower by necessity due to the space consumed by the Gardiner. Interestingly, the current gate might actually be repositioned in the near future to accomodate renovation work on the bridge immediately to the north.

Comparing the various structures, it's hard not to mourn the loss of the festive second Duffern Gate with its lights and flags to the stern parabolic arch.

Toronto Dufferin Gate CNE Ex DemolitionPhotos from the Toronto Archives

Discussion

18 Comments

Dr. Shrinker / January 28, 2012 at 11:00 am
user-pic
I wish that I could get a picture of the current Princess Gate, but there seems to be too much fracking traffic around when I can get it at night.
Splash / January 28, 2012 at 11:19 am
user-pic
I'd once had sex at the CNE.
M replying to a comment from Dr. Shrinker / January 28, 2012 at 12:16 pm
user-pic
That and the crack heads...
Adaax / January 28, 2012 at 12:24 pm
user-pic
The old arch is a gem, but you have to understand that in the 50s this would have looked cheap and old-fashioned. The aesthetic at the time demanded sleek and modern...we were in a Cold War and determined to demonstrate our progressive and futuristic society. Ironically many of the structures built at that time are the ugliest in town, St. James Town being an obvious example.

But what I'm trying to say to that we have to respect how people felt in those days and why they eschewed older designs, even if we can see the folly in their thinking now.
W. K. Lis / January 28, 2012 at 04:17 pm
user-pic
The pre-1950's Dufferin Gates fit in with the architecture of the buildings in the west end of the exhibition grounds. The current gates may fit with the expressway when it was new, but over time has lost it.

When or if they have to redesign the gates when the streetcar tracks are connected along the north edge of the exhibition grounds, I hope they fit the gates with the architecture of grounds again.
Adaax / January 28, 2012 at 09:27 pm
user-pic
On a quasi-related note, check out the exhibition grounds on Google Maps. The satellite photos were taken when the midway was completely set up, though there are no crowds. Maybe right before or after the Ex was open? Quite crazy to see all the games tents lined up like soldiers.
Sean / January 29, 2012 at 02:15 am
user-pic
Hope they can rebuild the gates just like the old days. At least the arch had a clock way back then.
Dr. Shrinker replying to a comment from M / January 29, 2012 at 05:28 am
user-pic
Excuse me? I walk through Parkdale a few times, there are no more crackheads there than there are anyplace else in Toronto .Parkdale is quite a nice neighborhood actually, and I love walking through it and taking pictures. Please check out the place before saying that.
steve replying to a comment from Sean / January 29, 2012 at 07:13 am
user-pic
Is the arch being replaced? If it is why not do what has been done in the past, build to represent the new or the future.
namehijacked replying to a comment from Adaax / January 29, 2012 at 10:50 am
user-pic
St. Jamestown is ugly? The lack of maintenance has made it ugly, but then all architecture tends to look its worst 40 or 50 years on out - before someone wakes up and realizes it will be missed one day.
Oscar Niemeyer designed half of 'modern' Brazil, including much of their capital city. From afar, those buildings still look gorgeous, but they have not aged well. Concrete is a cheap building material, but needs attention even in a tropical climate. Old City Hall was dowdy and many wanted it torn down in the mid-60s. We would view that with horror today, but the same attitude that dismisses St. Jamestown as 'ugly,' was applied to City Hall and other major buildings 50 years ago.
Just saying....
Iluvtoronto / January 30, 2012 at 11:12 am
user-pic
The old Dufferin Gates are a "ba-billion" times more pleasing and interesting than the new Dufferin arch. William Dendy had it right....Sometimes it is the right thing to do to look to the past and simply rebuild what we have lost. Europe has re-built itslf time and time again with great success. It is time we take that approach as well when we ultimately realize that the what we lost should truly be rebuilt for the good of the city.
Jordan / January 31, 2012 at 01:58 am
user-pic
I for one, actually really like the current gate - it's inviting and recognizable without all that cheap bric-a-brac in the previous versions.
Teach 101 replying to a comment from Jordan / January 31, 2012 at 04:38 am
user-pic
Me too, although it's hard to ge a picture of most of the time.
mike in parkdale replying to a comment from Jordan / January 31, 2012 at 09:32 am
user-pic
I bet that if the photos of the old gate weren't in black&white, there would be a lot less nostalgia talking.
kateRMT replying to a comment from Dr. Shrinker / February 1, 2012 at 08:38 am
user-pic
I believe it is The Prince's Gate to the South East, not Princess Gate.
the lemur replying to a comment from kateRMT / February 1, 2012 at 09:08 am
user-pic
It's actually the Princes' Gates, as they were opened by and named for Prince Edward (King Edward VIII, the one who abdicated) and Prince George.
Greg / February 2, 2012 at 06:20 pm
user-pic
I always thought it was the "Princess Gates" too until I learned otherwise. Ask anyone (I did), 90% of Torontonians will think it's "Princess Gates"!
Mobobliz / February 15, 2012 at 08:31 am
user-pic
best for you buy chanel bags , just clicks away

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal