Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 24°C
City

Couple takes to Twitter over alleged discrimination

Posted by Guest Contributor / December 13, 2011

Sex discrimination queens quayHeather Gold is a self-professed web veteran. She regularly communicates on Twitter and Facebook, and competes to be mayor of check in points on FourSquare. That experience came in handy recently when she used her social media savvy to draw attention to an incident involving her and her partner Mariko Tamaki last Saturday. The couple allege they were victims of discrimination due to their sexual orientation on December 4th. According to Tamaki and Gold, they were kicked out of a toy store called the Toy Terminal in Queen's Quay Terminal for a same sex public display of affection, which the owner of the store allegedly deemed "inappropriate for families."

According to Gold, she and Tamaki were "hugging with our hands clasped behind each others backs and [engaged in] a rated G kiss." They were then evicted from the store amidst threats of police involvement. Gold immediately took to Twitter, informing her 6,230 followers of the situation. She used her mobile phone to start a stream, share a photo of the store, and call for a boycott.

Her first tweet was: "Hey #LGBT #Toronto. In Toy Terminal in Queen's Quay on date w @MarikoTamaki & guy is throwing us out bc of affection @blogTO @farrowjane #fb"

What followed was an outpouring of support from Gold's virtual community, messages were soon after sent to her and Tamaki, and the retweets piled up. The platform allowed Gold to retell her side of the story as wells a to ask and answer questions and to take suggestions for courses of action from her many followers and other interested parties who had taken note.

The same day that the confrontation occurred, the couple received a series of tweets from the management of Queen's Quay Terminal itself (the building where the Toy Terminal is located). They tweeted: "Thank you all for your support for @heathr and @marikotamaki, weʼre sorry you didnʼt feel welcomed today. Rest assured we have heard your concerns, and are taking steps to address the situation. EVERYONE is welcome here, no exceptions."

Queen's Quay Terminal then requested that future communication between the parties be done in private. The couple refused this request, as they felt everyone had the right to know how the situation would be addressed. Queen's Quay Terminal declined to comment for this article, as did the American company Brookfield Global Real Estate, which owns them.

When reached by phone, the owner of the Toy Terminal (who would not give his name) said that it was a family store and what he had witnessed was not good for families. He told me that he is far from homophobic, but felt that the couple had gone too far with their affection in the store, claiming that there was some grabbing of body parts that went on.

This is a statement that the couple vehemently deny (they say they were wearing winter coats at the time). They say they tried to engage the proprietor in conversation to understand the situation better, but according to their version of events, he would not speak to them about it, look them in the face, nor shake their hands.

The couple question what exactly made the display of affection "not good for families." They feel targeted due to their sexual orientation. "We do not accept that hugging while lesbian is in any conflict with a family appropriate environment," Gold explains.

It has been over a week since the incident occurred. Followers of @Heathr and @Marikotamaki have called for action, and many have agreed to boycott the store. Gold has encouraged her followers to tell the owner why.

Will this have any effect? In the absence of commentary from Queen's Quay, will this all blow over like our mayor's 911 call last month? Last week the couple toyed with the idea of a hug-in at Queen's Quay Terminal, but they've also gone the more traditional route. In addition to filing a complaint with the property management company, Gold and Tamaki have started work on a human rights complaint.

Writing and photo by Alex Rao

Discussion

86 Comments

Brandon / December 13, 2011 at 02:12 pm
user-pic
"Heather Gold is a self-professed web veteran. She regularly communicates on Twitter and Facebook, and competes to be mayor of check in points on FourSquare." That alone made everything that came after immediately invalid.
Alex / December 13, 2011 at 02:21 pm
user-pic
"Queen's Quay Terminal declined to comment for this article, as did the American company Brookfield Global Real Estate, which owns them" An American company owns Queen's Quay Terminal?! The whole terminal? That's awful! A part of our waterfront, and it's owned by foreigners! Why doesn't Canada own anything of our own? We sell our highways, our malls...we need some more Canadian retail.
PrimevilKneivel replying to a comment from Brandon / December 13, 2011 at 02:22 pm
user-pic
as invalid as your comment
really? / December 13, 2011 at 02:23 pm
user-pic
@Brandon: way to jump on the least important part of this entire post.
Les / December 13, 2011 at 02:30 pm
user-pic
Not really suprised by this at all. I've been to Toy Terminal a few times to look for board games and I've been subject to being followed around the store by an employee as I picked up things I was checking out. They definitely seem to be really protective and a bit touchy.
William / December 13, 2011 at 02:31 pm
user-pic
BlogTO..getting more crappier by the day. I bet the Guest Contributor of this excerpt is the said "victims" in this piece. #NobodyFuckingCares
Jad / December 13, 2011 at 02:32 pm
user-pic
Is it important to point out that Queen's Quay is owned by American's? I don't see how that's relevant.
Emma / December 13, 2011 at 02:37 pm
user-pic
+1 to what Brandon said.

Why not take this privately? Not everything needs to be done so publicly.
WebRookie replying to a comment from Brandon / December 13, 2011 at 02:37 pm
user-pic
So if she wasn't an active tweeter or foursquare user, you're cool with it? Give your head a shake.
green / December 13, 2011 at 02:37 pm
user-pic
yay! twitter and foursquare and facebook mean we can all be activists now! I think there should be an Occupy Toy Store. Seriously now, isn't this just a simple case of shesaid/hesaid? In the absence of more information, why should be take the twitterers' word over the shop owners'? I'm sorry these two women feel affronted, but unfortunately the ease with which we can broacast that affront in online echo chambers makes me yawn at stories like this one.
Tiff / December 13, 2011 at 02:43 pm
user-pic
Seconding Toy Terminal's terrible atmosphere and workers. They stared at my out-of-town friends and I as though we were about to steal something at any moment and kept hovering around us. We didn't even remotely look like we have no money, as we were in formal wear.
whatsex / December 13, 2011 at 02:44 pm
user-pic
So let me get this straight, I can have sex at a TTC station with a different sex partner, but cant hug the same-sex partner.
Gotta love the difference-of-opinions in the same city!!
George / December 13, 2011 at 02:46 pm
user-pic
Why not stick to the TTC and TTC platform to show your affection? Gets you much more media coverage too!
Chuck replying to a comment from WebRookie / December 13, 2011 at 02:46 pm
user-pic
Shake yours while he's at it. Being LGTB doesn't immediately give you the right to grope each other in a toy store anymore than it gave that straight couple the right to screw on a subway platform. Try some discretion and common sense people.
Steve replying to a comment from whatsex / December 13, 2011 at 02:48 pm
user-pic
Agreed, the city is screwed.
Mr Cranky / December 13, 2011 at 02:48 pm
user-pic
I don't think this couple was asked to leave due to their orientation... It sounds like they were asked to leave due to their behavior.. I really wouldn't even want to see that from a straight couple.. It's amazing how many people will use the "Discrimination" card... There's a time and place for everything...
Buzz Bishop / December 13, 2011 at 02:53 pm
user-pic
While the couple may think they've been horribly wronged, the fact remains the call to arms will have little effect on the toy store. They're not the target demo. Bitch all you want, it won't affect the bottom line.

It's easy to create a twitstorm online, when you run a business and people rail against you, it's hard to plug your ears and not listen to the noise but in the end, you have to pay attention to your customer base.

The LGBT community is an easy one to whip into a loud screaming frenzy, but how many are true and real customers of this store that are offended?
WebRookie replying to a comment from Chuck / December 13, 2011 at 02:58 pm
user-pic
According to the story, they were hugging. Different from groping, wouldn't you say? If they were making out or whatever then fine, probably shouldn't do it in a toy store. But a hug? Relax.
Mark / December 13, 2011 at 02:59 pm
user-pic
Wait, that last part: "...have started work on a human rights complaint." Really? Is that not a little excessive? A guy kicked you out of a store once, he didn't hurt you physically, he didn't verbally assault you, he didn't even ban you for life, he just asked you to leave. Grow up and get over yourselves instead of going online and making yourself the center of attention for your 15 minutes of infamy. Oh, and maybe suck face in private, because I for one would rather not see anyone suck face in public, whether hetero, gay, bi, or transgendered.
Avoid the herd instinct, please / December 13, 2011 at 03:09 pm
user-pic
It's amazing how quickly people will judge based on one side of the story, and it continues in the comments here. It's like the word "alleged" in the title never existed and its yet another reason why trusting the Internet for your facts is as foolish (or more so) than trusting the mainstream media.

The fact that being a "web veteran" is considered relevant to this story speaks volumes about the quality of it. I'm sure all 6,230 of her followers know her quite well and will be just as righteously indignant over her tweet but it hardly makes her into a reliable source of information.
person replying to a comment from Brandon / December 13, 2011 at 03:13 pm
user-pic
so wrong, but so true. bhahah!
gr1 replying to a comment from Buzz Bishop / December 13, 2011 at 03:15 pm
user-pic
Ohhhh, it's not THAT kind of toy store? This article become a whole lot less interesting suddenly.
Andrea / December 13, 2011 at 03:15 pm
user-pic
Having been in Toy Terminal a few times, I believe that the employees (possibly owners) are not particularly warm to anyone. As mentioned in others' comments, I've witnessed the staring, following/hovering around. Definitely an unwelcoming place and I've avoided going into the store as much as I can because of that vibe. Due to my experience, I don't believe what happened with the couple was discrimination, but just another unpleasant experience at Toy Terminal. The negative attention the store is receiving hopefully changes their customer service for the better. I think that is enough. The human rights complaint, in this instance, is a little much.
AV / December 13, 2011 at 03:16 pm
user-pic
"Urban know-it-all smooches with femme friend in Toy Store, asked to leave by mgmt". Yep... I can see the CHRC jumping allll over this one.

Also, I'm sure this one sided story happened exactly as Ms. Gold has described, and I'm sure she didn't react in any way that may have exacerbated the situation. Seems totally plausible.

On another realistic note, we're going to have 400 ft. of snow downtown on Christmas this year.
Mike / December 13, 2011 at 03:22 pm
user-pic
We've heard one side of this story and one side only. I understand the writer of this article did his/her due diligence and contacted the store's proprietor, but I can understand his unwillingness to discuss the matter with somebody who was going to write about it for a blog.

As for Ms. Gold, I have no idea why she wants the matter to be resolved in full view of the public eye. It seems that she'd rather make this a spectacle than actually get any kind of restitution or apology.

And to the writer of this article, what does Ms. Gold being a "web veteran" have to do with anything? If there was discrimination here, then that's the issue. Casting her as a Twitter junkie only fuels the idea that many earlier posters have that Ms. Gold is simply looking for attention.
Randy / December 13, 2011 at 03:23 pm
user-pic
who makes out in a toy store?
Dianne / December 13, 2011 at 03:27 pm
user-pic
I'm lesbian and can wait until we get home to cop a feel, have a hug or show my SO that I adore her. Let's not start drawing the "Gay Card" every time someone looks at us funny . . .
George / December 13, 2011 at 03:28 pm
user-pic
I bet there's a security video. Let's have a look and see who's telling the truth. CP24 where are you!
Trollbait replying to a comment from Randy / December 13, 2011 at 03:29 pm
user-pic
If the alleged incident took place at the same mall the article's photo was taken at, was there a witness? Who took that photo?
w-hat / December 13, 2011 at 03:31 pm
user-pic
I work in the Terminal building and I can tell you that a boycott will have no affect on the Toy Terminal - it is empty all the time already.

I was walking by not long ago with several co-workers and we all wondered how it is they manage to stay open. It's a ghost town, even in the summer when you would expect it to be packed with hordes of tourists.

They have some cool junk in there, but they are overpriced significantly, and for sure the staff there have no idea how to treat customers - it's a cold place.
Richard / December 13, 2011 at 04:02 pm
user-pic
There's two sides to every story...imo if two people are making out, regardless of their genders or orientations, it might not be best for a (children's) toy store.
Phil / December 13, 2011 at 04:23 pm
user-pic
Brookfield is based in Toronto.
john / December 13, 2011 at 06:31 pm
user-pic
Toronto is a city of professional victimhood. Guess what? No one cares if you're a same sex couple. I'm staright and I've been kicked out of a mall for getting overly affectionate, it happens. This is equality, you wanted it, now live with it. You shouldn't get special treatment just cuz you cry wolf. The owner has every right to throw you out if you were acting inappropriately, just like everyone else.
BAM replying to a comment from Phil / December 13, 2011 at 06:38 pm
user-pic
I think Brookfield is ultimately a Toronto company, but their corporate structure is complex and confusing. The Globe and Mail published an article about it that left me even more confused: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/investment-ideas/the-brookfield-name-is-confusing-its-value-less-so/article2260808/

They own many of Toronto's tallest buildings. They also owns Zucotti Park in Manhattan, site of the Occupy Wall Street protest.
ramona replying to a comment from Brandon / December 13, 2011 at 07:06 pm
user-pic
my thoughts exactly.
ramona replying to a comment from ramona / December 13, 2011 at 07:11 pm
user-pic
that comment was directed @ Brandon.
Jay / December 13, 2011 at 07:40 pm
user-pic
Just highlights the intelligence of most people on Twitter. Someone Tweets something and everyone takes it as fact even though they have no context or have not heard the other side of the story. I don't believe this couple for a minute. The fact they took every opportunity to downplay their actions but scream bloody murder about the store owner tells me they were lookin to raise a stink. No credibility at all. Typical cry wolf entitled mentality of most young adults these days.
Taliba / December 13, 2011 at 08:13 pm
user-pic
If these two women are as pro-human rights and internet savvy as all that, they should get involved in a human rights issue where the victims are experiencing real suffering and are in actual danger. Use your internet capital for those who don't have the means to raise a holy stink using their public twitter 'image'.

Let's start a list:
1. human trafficking
2. psych patients getting beat up and killed in Parkdale
3. kids being abused by their parents in public
4. closeted gay or lesbian ppl living in rural communities
5. and so on ...

I have no idea what happened in this store, but it sounds to me like they are jumping to conclusions to assume that they can read the mind of the store owner about the meaning of his words. Even if he refused to discuss it further with them, that doesn't give you carte blanche to fill in the blanks how you see fit - especially when your lives or livelihoods were never in danger. "Not family-friendly" could be referring to what they were doing, not that they were a same-sex couple.

Seriously, get over yourselves.
Elizabeth replying to a comment from Brandon / December 13, 2011 at 08:18 pm
user-pic
Actually, I take this completely differently than Brandon does. I find the "self-professed web veteran" who "checks in on FourSquare" pretty disparaging to someone like Heather Gold, who is actually a well-known figure in the Internet and social media world. She's a lot more than "self-professed": she's fairly famous, and has every right to use that platform to expose mistreatment in a store. To cast this as some kind of overuse of social media isn't fair. She's an Internet expert and is using the "sunlight is the best disinfectant" approach.
Lisa Chung / December 13, 2011 at 08:33 pm
user-pic
GET A ROOM LADIES! Gay or straight - kissing, fondling, groping is not appropriate in a childrens toy store.
. / December 13, 2011 at 08:54 pm
user-pic
"and competes to be mayor of check in points on FourSquare'

FOREVER ALONE
Eh? replying to a comment from Elizabeth / December 13, 2011 at 08:57 pm
user-pic
She's fairly famous? By what measure? From where I stand most people who are well-known figures "in the Internet and social media world" but not in the real world are shameless self-promoters, and one look at her website confirms this.
Brad / December 13, 2011 at 08:58 pm
user-pic
Very confusing indeed. American Brookfield Global Real Estate is owned by Brookfield Asset Managment a Toronto based company. You might remember them better by their nom du voyage from back in the day:

BRASCAN

The mother or father of all Canadian Conglomerates!
Dykes no more / December 13, 2011 at 09:12 pm
user-pic
I'd rail them both.
Gays replying to a comment from Randy / December 13, 2011 at 09:14 pm
user-pic
Za gays.
Tired / December 13, 2011 at 09:45 pm
user-pic
So some LGBT parents will boycott a toy store? That should be devastating when they lose 0.002 percent of their business.

This sounds like a she said/he said, they claiming discrimination and he claiming they groped each other in a family store. Brandon up top got it right - someone so obsessed with promoting themselves in social media isn't likely to be the most credible of sources
AV replying to a comment from Elizabeth / December 13, 2011 at 10:26 pm
user-pic
"I'm famous on the internet" has never made me laugh as hard as when you just wrote it. EPIC
Jim / December 13, 2011 at 10:45 pm
user-pic
Yet another cry for justice from the self-absorbed. Someone hand the "mayor of check in points" a soother and a blanky. She has suffered such a trauma. Imagine...her behaviour was commented on. In public! Poor boo-boo. But never fear, Barbara Hall and her merry band of thought police will take the case. The OHRC loves these battles, 'cause there's no limits when it comes to healing the wounds of hurt feelings.
dugger / December 13, 2011 at 10:56 pm
user-pic
Oh for God sakes, go get a room at one of the hotels! Just another pair of losers looking to cash in through Babsie Hall and her legion of Doom.

n / December 14, 2011 at 01:30 am
user-pic
zzzz. that store is well known for awful customer service as pointed out. I was closely followed around like i would steal anything and as i touched a few things here and there the saleslady frowned and was clearly displeased. they did not throw me out of the store, but they did point out rather rudely that items should not be touched. crazy, i don't know how they exist at that location for so long. conclusion: poor customer service, not sexual orientation bias.

please get these attention seekers out of the way. we have enough problems in this city without these so-called web professionals. these days you are web professional and new media expert if you tweet and post regular updates on your facebook wall for all your 20 friends (you have never met). it would be good if we could all just ignore these attention whores. is there nothing else happening in toronto more interesting?

DON / December 14, 2011 at 02:02 am
user-pic
one time i was getting blown near the buffet counter at Golden Griddle when the waiter came over and forced my homeless companion and myself out of the restaurant.

is this a human rights case? can i sue someone here? i didnt even get to eat my belgian waffle.
MH / December 14, 2011 at 02:32 am
user-pic
The owner's account of events sounds very much like the typical 'casual' brand of homophobia -- a same-sex couple doing something that would be considered 'social' or 'romantic' when done by an opposite-sex couple will automatically be viewed as 'being sexual'. It's not necessarily a conscious anti-gay view -- he probably genuinely sees it that way, because perception is always filtered through lenses of beliefs and values.

That said, why would anyone be hugging and kissing in a toy store? Maybe I'm especially conservative about public displays of affection, but it seems inappropriate behaviour on the part of anyone.
LTMP replying to a comment from Alex / December 14, 2011 at 05:09 am
user-pic
Not just any company either.
Brookfield owns Zucotti park in NY, the old home of occupy Wall Street.
Soren / December 14, 2011 at 07:10 am
user-pic
Attention seekers got attention. WIn-win. Back to Foursquare.
dnr / December 14, 2011 at 08:30 am
user-pic
This is so f*$^%ing boring. These adults are acting like high school kids. Grow up already. Grope in the car. Your sexuality is not interesting. Really.
Jer replying to a comment from Mr Cranky / December 14, 2011 at 10:34 am
user-pic
Agreed... I don't think it has to do with orientation either...

I actually thought this post was about the couple who had sex on the TTC platform and they were trying to defend themselves on twitter...

If I was the owner of a toy store and I saw a couple making out in my aisles I might ask them to leave too regardless of genders involved.
Jer replying to a comment from Mr Cranky / December 14, 2011 at 10:38 am
user-pic
And I wouldn't say Brookfield in as "american" company. North American maybe... It started in Montreal, and has a long history in Canadian real estate. They recently made some USA acquisitions but no real need to point out that they are "american".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookfield_Office_Properties
Jer replying to a comment from Mr Cranky / December 14, 2011 at 10:48 am
user-pic
And reading Heather's twitter feed ... it was a "Date". They aren't a couple and aren't "partners".

I would go in and make out with a girl in teh store to see how the owner would react, but, I don't make out in toy store..
Its a setup / December 14, 2011 at 11:32 am
user-pic
Reading the twitter feeds and looking at her actions, it is obvious that Heather set out to create this "controversy" from the start. I would not be surprised if she "made out" in numerous stores before she got the reaction she wanted. Sham on blogto for allowing an anonymous contributor to slag this store owner.
Moi / December 14, 2011 at 11:50 am
user-pic
I live in the area. When I first moved here, I went to the Toy Store.....the Owner does smile and say Hello etc.....but the moment you walk in, he needs to know what you want.

He then has 2 employees there (and only there for that) to follow you around the store to make sure you are NOT stealing.

The atmosphere is tragic. Cold. And this is why the store is ALWAYS EMPTY...

Moi replying to a comment from Its a setup / December 14, 2011 at 11:52 am
user-pic
I agree with what you are stating.
Sometimes folks to it to 'egg on people' to say "look at us" or to say 'we are equal' etc.

Tone it down. We get it
Jack Pratt replying to a comment from w-hat / December 14, 2011 at 11:56 am
user-pic
DITTO....amazing how they stay open!
Jack Pratt replying to a comment from George / December 14, 2011 at 11:57 am
user-pic
LOLOLOLOLOLOL. Priceless!
Jessica replying to a comment from Alex / December 14, 2011 at 11:58 am
user-pic
YEP......QQTerminal is a ghost town. Wonder how they stay open. The only businesses that have traffic are Sobey's and Tim Horton's
Miguel / December 14, 2011 at 02:01 pm
user-pic
Thankfully now that all the problems of the World have been solved we can focus on this injustice. Get a room. Straight people doing this is annoying enough. Show some class ladies.
org / December 14, 2011 at 02:15 pm
user-pic
These two are taking away from what a human rights council is for. Pulling the gay card on this one is pretty sad. Nothing can ever happen to a gay person now without them thinking it is because they are gay. Public displays of affection are not acceptable in kids stores. We accept that you are gay now accept that some of us are pretty conservative(regardless of sexual orientation) and stop abusing human rights councils.
Taliba replying to a comment from dnr / December 14, 2011 at 02:22 pm
user-pic
@dnr Well said. Bor-ing.
Jay / December 14, 2011 at 04:22 pm
user-pic
Wow, a vet!! I wonder if she served in www 1.0?
keven / December 14, 2011 at 04:59 pm
user-pic
If you read the tweets from Dec 4th on @heathr it's clear this chick is just insane.

She (they) were asked to leave.
She tweets "kicked us out for affection"
Later tweets (and keeps repeating this line from this point forward): "kicked us out for being LGBT"

Clearly, she's trying to incite outrage, in the same way she was trying to troll the owner of the store when confronted - disingenuously.

I wonder if anyone has thought of sending in a str8 couple to kiss and hug each other in the store? Or is the outrage more important then actually proving this guy is homophobic. Which isn't something you should just throw around w/o any proof. She's failed to provide any proof whatsoever.

Also she won't deal with the QQT through DM but has no problem dealing with media through DM?
Joe / December 14, 2011 at 06:21 pm
user-pic
I've never read anything more childish than this article in my life... I've never seen anyone go to such great lengths to draw attention to themselves..
seanm / December 14, 2011 at 08:24 pm
user-pic
Brookfield is a Toronto-based property and asset management company that has buildings and portfolios all over the world. It does get confusing though, especially regarding their Brazilian assets which are held by Brazilian companies. Ultimately they are a Canadian company, though by value, the largest amount of their assets are in America (66 of 150 billion).
Ἀντισθένης / December 15, 2011 at 01:45 am
user-pic
Most heteros and queers I know don't crave attention. "She regularly communicates on Twitter and Facebook, and competes to be mayor of check in points on FourSquare."

Hmmm...
Pooooop / December 15, 2011 at 09:03 am
user-pic
Why is this news? I come to BlogTO to check on cool thangs and I find a picture of two gross people bitching about being kicked out of a children's toy store for making out?

BlogTO: Dumbest. post. ever.

Writer (assuming it's NOT one of the two lesbo's the story is about): Go back to Centennial and learn how to write an interesting article, There could be MANY ways to spin this story however, your research is all wrong and the format is lousy. It's a big reason why the comments are negitive.

The two Lesbo's: If you were hotter and more TV friendly, and not jumping all over the place instead of focusing on your "cause" maybe people would care. STAY ON MESSAGE. You can't call for a boycott and then tweet about the muppets movie being awesome.

MAYBE you had a case...but since you don't...stop wasting our time so we can get back to the Best Falafel in Toronto and how much Rob Ford sucks - you know things that matter to Torontonians

Pork Chop Sandwhiches / December 15, 2011 at 09:05 am
user-pic
TAKE OF THAT SILLY HAT.
anon / December 15, 2011 at 10:34 am
user-pic
I, along with the dozens of people that frequent this site, burst out laughing at the description of her "internet savvy". Cringe-inducing, seriously.
Brenk / December 15, 2011 at 11:33 pm
user-pic
If I were the parents of either of these two I would be ashamed. Not of their sexuality, but of their self-absorbed, grandiose stuntery.
dolce / December 17, 2011 at 11:05 am
user-pic
Wow, the victim blaming and covert homophobia in the comments is disgusting.

Oh no, those uppity queers are getting upset about their "rights"! They need to STFU because us heteros think they have enough "attention"!

Shut up, you delusional fucks, have some compassion.
Diana / December 17, 2011 at 10:21 pm
user-pic
Public displays of affection are inappropriate if the owner of a private store deems them to be. It is his store, he doesn't want people kissing in it. Get a hotel room and quit playing the victim card.

Maybe me and my boyfriend can come to Heather Gold's house and make out there. Post your address and I'll come tomorrow. You won't because you don't want us making out in your house.... because it's your house, not mine. Get it? See how that works? Now apply it to this situation. Feel like less of a victim now? Good. Now get off the foursquare and back to reality.
Gigot replying to a comment from Diana / December 17, 2011 at 10:42 pm
user-pic
Diana, how would you like it if I said that you couldn't wear a miniskirt and sandals in a public place? Or that you couldn't hug your boyfriend in in my store? Have a heart, and see the other side for a change instead of being an intolerant homophobe.

As for me, I won't be going to Toy Mountain myself any time soon, or even, and it's too bad, because there were some toys that I wanted from there.
Darla replying to a comment from Gigot / December 18, 2011 at 01:14 pm
user-pic
You're the intolerant one calling someone a bigot based on them disagreeing with you. Makes your argument automatically worthless. And do you really think anyone believes there were some toys you were just about to buy from them until you read this story? "I was going to buy 10 train sets and two bikes, you just lost yourself a ton of business mister!" Right. Wacky weird people who yell at managers in stores always say that.
keven replying to a comment from Gigot / December 19, 2011 at 10:44 am
user-pic
Anyone disagreeing with this non-story is a covert and intolerant homophobe?

Wow. Also, public display of affection compared to wearing clothes is pretty funny. So funny, you should just STFU you uppity hetero.
BlogTOHomophobe replying to a comment from Gigot / December 19, 2011 at 11:16 am
user-pic
@gigot

I hate the assholes at Toy Mountain, I think we should all #boycotttoymountain

Can you tell me one thing that you'd like at Toy Terminal?

Because I thought that only us homophobic, bigot, intoleraant adults have toy wish lists. I never knew you bike riding pinko's did as well.
#MaybeWeAreNotSoDifferentAfterAll
Marie replying to a comment from Gigot / December 20, 2011 at 09:04 am
user-pic
Gogot, you're an intolerant idiot. Sorry, but it's true.
Maybie / December 22, 2011 at 02:18 pm
user-pic
This does not surprise me. Toy Terminal is seriously one of the worst stores I have ever been to. As other posters have stated, you feel like a criminal as soon as you step into the store. All eyes are on you (as there are no other customers in the store) and an employee follows 5 feet behind you. I refuse to buy anything there, as there are plenty of other shops in the city (or online) that are helpful, courteous and cheaper (they are overpriced by a minimum of 25%).
Kyle / December 24, 2011 at 06:52 pm
user-pic
Dec 24, 2011 at 12:45pm Coming back from Ikea I was at Leslie station (the end with no attendant) I had a cart with furniture on it so I put a token in the wheel chair entrance and it did not open, I pushed the to talk button and the attendant told me I need to deposit a token? I clearly put in a token I even heard it drop into the machine! The attendant started talking like I was trying to rip him off, after bitching back and forth he said “it did not fall you need to bang it FAGOT” then a bit more bitching back and forth then I ask him if there is a washroom I can use, he then stated “shit yourself FAGOT” I ended up having to walk for an hour with furniture to get to my lovers home. This is clearly discrimination and this guy knows I am gay (I am quite sure this is the same person) because 3 months ago on a Saturday around the same time I was with my lover and his 12 year old son and before we paid our fair I kissed my lover to say good-bye. The attendant stated, “You should not do that.” I stated “Do what?” He stated, “Kiss a guy in front of a child” I stated, “I kissed his father and there is not one thing wrong with showing his child we love each other” All this is complete discrimination this man should not be working with people! I really don’t care if people call me a faggot but I do think I should be able to pay and use the TTC like everyone else!
Tell It Like it Is / April 9, 2012 at 01:45 pm
user-pic
"Toy Terminal" has the worst customer service I've ever experienced!

I have been to this shop many times. I often deliberately go out of my way to go here to pick up games (even though the experience has always the same: Shop-owners suspicious of every customers) but after my experience on Easter Sunday I will NEVER shop here again!!

I was followed by the (Female) shop-owner as usual; I couldn’t remember the name of the game, so I texted my boyfriend for the name.
I asked the woman (who was standing two steps away, watching me like a hawk) if they carried it, she took me to the section.
There were so many new versions, that I texted my BF “which one”. Out of nowhere, the (Male) shop-owner told me to get off my phone – I had to lean sideways to keep his face away from touching mine. Taken back I stepped outside to await my BF’s reply. I went back in to pick up the game.

I went to the counter to speak to the male shop-owner and asked him why he approached me in such a manner. He told me it was because he didn’t want his competitors knowing what he carried in his store. I told him: I wasn’t a competitor or a spy, I was customer. He continued to repeat his point. I tried to explain to him that in this day and age of technology, everyone will be on their mobile, I wasn’t take picture, and I was only in there for under 2 mins when it all happened; that I didn’t appreciate being followed, as if I was some sort of thief/shoplifter. I was asked to leave. Talk about paranoia!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal