City
Couple takes to Twitter over alleged discrimination
Heather Gold is a self-professed web veteran. She regularly communicates on Twitter and Facebook, and competes to be mayor of check in points on FourSquare. That experience came in handy recently when she used her social media savvy to draw attention to an incident involving her and her partner Mariko Tamaki last Saturday. The couple allege they were victims of discrimination due to their sexual orientation on December 4th. According to Tamaki and Gold, they were kicked out of a toy store called the Toy Terminal in Queen's Quay Terminal for a same sex public display of affection, which the owner of the store allegedly deemed "inappropriate for families."
According to Gold, she and Tamaki were "hugging with our hands clasped behind each others backs and [engaged in] a rated G kiss." They were then evicted from the store amidst threats of police involvement. Gold immediately took to Twitter, informing her 6,230 followers of the situation. She used her mobile phone to start a stream, share a photo of the store, and call for a boycott.
Her first tweet was: "Hey #LGBT #Toronto. In Toy Terminal in Queen's Quay on date w @MarikoTamaki & guy is throwing us out bc of affection @blogTO @farrowjane #fb"
What followed was an outpouring of support from Gold's virtual community, messages were soon after sent to her and Tamaki, and the retweets piled up. The platform allowed Gold to retell her side of the story as wells a to ask and answer questions and to take suggestions for courses of action from her many followers and other interested parties who had taken note.
The same day that the confrontation occurred, the couple received a series of tweets from the management of Queen's Quay Terminal itself (the building where the Toy Terminal is located). They tweeted: "Thank you all for your support for @heathr and @marikotamaki, weʼre sorry you didnʼt feel welcomed today. Rest assured we have heard your concerns, and are taking steps to address the situation. EVERYONE is welcome here, no exceptions."
Queen's Quay Terminal then requested that future communication between the parties be done in private. The couple refused this request, as they felt everyone had the right to know how the situation would be addressed. Queen's Quay Terminal declined to comment for this article, as did the American company Brookfield Global Real Estate, which owns them.
When reached by phone, the owner of the Toy Terminal (who would not give his name) said that it was a family store and what he had witnessed was not good for families. He told me that he is far from homophobic, but felt that the couple had gone too far with their affection in the store, claiming that there was some grabbing of body parts that went on.
This is a statement that the couple vehemently deny (they say they were wearing winter coats at the time). They say they tried to engage the proprietor in conversation to understand the situation better, but according to their version of events, he would not speak to them about it, look them in the face, nor shake their hands.
The couple question what exactly made the display of affection "not good for families." They feel targeted due to their sexual orientation. "We do not accept that hugging while lesbian is in any conflict with a family appropriate environment," Gold explains.
It has been over a week since the incident occurred. Followers of @Heathr and @Marikotamaki have called for action, and many have agreed to boycott the store. Gold has encouraged her followers to tell the owner why.
Will this have any effect? In the absence of commentary from Queen's Quay, will this all blow over like our mayor's 911 call last month? Last week the couple toyed with the idea of a hug-in at Queen's Quay Terminal, but they've also gone the more traditional route. In addition to filing a complaint with the property management company, Gold and Tamaki have started work on a human rights complaint.
Writing and photo by Alex Rao


Discussion
86 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Why not take this privately? Not everything needs to be done so publicly.
Gotta love the difference-of-opinions in the same city!!
It's easy to create a twitstorm online, when you run a business and people rail against you, it's hard to plug your ears and not listen to the noise but in the end, you have to pay attention to your customer base.
The LGBT community is an easy one to whip into a loud screaming frenzy, but how many are true and real customers of this store that are offended?
The fact that being a "web veteran" is considered relevant to this story speaks volumes about the quality of it. I'm sure all 6,230 of her followers know her quite well and will be just as righteously indignant over her tweet but it hardly makes her into a reliable source of information.
Also, I'm sure this one sided story happened exactly as Ms. Gold has described, and I'm sure she didn't react in any way that may have exacerbated the situation. Seems totally plausible.
On another realistic note, we're going to have 400 ft. of snow downtown on Christmas this year.
As for Ms. Gold, I have no idea why she wants the matter to be resolved in full view of the public eye. It seems that she'd rather make this a spectacle than actually get any kind of restitution or apology.
And to the writer of this article, what does Ms. Gold being a "web veteran" have to do with anything? If there was discrimination here, then that's the issue. Casting her as a Twitter junkie only fuels the idea that many earlier posters have that Ms. Gold is simply looking for attention.
I was walking by not long ago with several co-workers and we all wondered how it is they manage to stay open. It's a ghost town, even in the summer when you would expect it to be packed with hordes of tourists.
They have some cool junk in there, but they are overpriced significantly, and for sure the staff there have no idea how to treat customers - it's a cold place.
They own many of Toronto's tallest buildings. They also owns Zucotti Park in Manhattan, site of the Occupy Wall Street protest.
Let's start a list:
1. human trafficking
2. psych patients getting beat up and killed in Parkdale
3. kids being abused by their parents in public
4. closeted gay or lesbian ppl living in rural communities
5. and so on ...
I have no idea what happened in this store, but it sounds to me like they are jumping to conclusions to assume that they can read the mind of the store owner about the meaning of his words. Even if he refused to discuss it further with them, that doesn't give you carte blanche to fill in the blanks how you see fit - especially when your lives or livelihoods were never in danger. "Not family-friendly" could be referring to what they were doing, not that they were a same-sex couple.
Seriously, get over yourselves.
FOREVER ALONE
BRASCAN
The mother or father of all Canadian Conglomerates!
This sounds like a she said/he said, they claiming discrimination and he claiming they groped each other in a family store. Brandon up top got it right - someone so obsessed with promoting themselves in social media isn't likely to be the most credible of sources
please get these attention seekers out of the way. we have enough problems in this city without these so-called web professionals. these days you are web professional and new media expert if you tweet and post regular updates on your facebook wall for all your 20 friends (you have never met). it would be good if we could all just ignore these attention whores. is there nothing else happening in toronto more interesting?
is this a human rights case? can i sue someone here? i didnt even get to eat my belgian waffle.
That said, why would anyone be hugging and kissing in a toy store? Maybe I'm especially conservative about public displays of affection, but it seems inappropriate behaviour on the part of anyone.
Brookfield owns Zucotti park in NY, the old home of occupy Wall Street.
I actually thought this post was about the couple who had sex on the TTC platform and they were trying to defend themselves on twitter...
If I was the owner of a toy store and I saw a couple making out in my aisles I might ask them to leave too regardless of genders involved.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookfield_Office_Properties
I would go in and make out with a girl in teh store to see how the owner would react, but, I don't make out in toy store..
He then has 2 employees there (and only there for that) to follow you around the store to make sure you are NOT stealing.
The atmosphere is tragic. Cold. And this is why the store is ALWAYS EMPTY...
Sometimes folks to it to 'egg on people' to say "look at us" or to say 'we are equal' etc.
Tone it down. We get it
She (they) were asked to leave.
She tweets "kicked us out for affection"
Later tweets (and keeps repeating this line from this point forward): "kicked us out for being LGBT"
Clearly, she's trying to incite outrage, in the same way she was trying to troll the owner of the store when confronted - disingenuously.
I wonder if anyone has thought of sending in a str8 couple to kiss and hug each other in the store? Or is the outrage more important then actually proving this guy is homophobic. Which isn't something you should just throw around w/o any proof. She's failed to provide any proof whatsoever.
Also she won't deal with the QQT through DM but has no problem dealing with media through DM?
Hmmm...
BlogTO: Dumbest. post. ever.
Writer (assuming it's NOT one of the two lesbo's the story is about): Go back to Centennial and learn how to write an interesting article, There could be MANY ways to spin this story however, your research is all wrong and the format is lousy. It's a big reason why the comments are negitive.
The two Lesbo's: If you were hotter and more TV friendly, and not jumping all over the place instead of focusing on your "cause" maybe people would care. STAY ON MESSAGE. You can't call for a boycott and then tweet about the muppets movie being awesome.
MAYBE you had a case...but since you don't...stop wasting our time so we can get back to the Best Falafel in Toronto and how much Rob Ford sucks - you know things that matter to Torontonians
Oh no, those uppity queers are getting upset about their "rights"! They need to STFU because us heteros think they have enough "attention"!
Shut up, you delusional fucks, have some compassion.
Maybe me and my boyfriend can come to Heather Gold's house and make out there. Post your address and I'll come tomorrow. You won't because you don't want us making out in your house.... because it's your house, not mine. Get it? See how that works? Now apply it to this situation. Feel like less of a victim now? Good. Now get off the foursquare and back to reality.
As for me, I won't be going to Toy Mountain myself any time soon, or even, and it's too bad, because there were some toys that I wanted from there.
Wow. Also, public display of affection compared to wearing clothes is pretty funny. So funny, you should just STFU you uppity hetero.
I hate the assholes at Toy Mountain, I think we should all #boycotttoymountain
Can you tell me one thing that you'd like at Toy Terminal?
Because I thought that only us homophobic, bigot, intoleraant adults have toy wish lists. I never knew you bike riding pinko's did as well.
#MaybeWeAreNotSoDifferentAfterAll
I have been to this shop many times. I often deliberately go out of my way to go here to pick up games (even though the experience has always the same: Shop-owners suspicious of every customers) but after my experience on Easter Sunday I will NEVER shop here again!!
I was followed by the (Female) shop-owner as usual; I couldn’t remember the name of the game, so I texted my boyfriend for the name.
I asked the woman (who was standing two steps away, watching me like a hawk) if they carried it, she took me to the section.
There were so many new versions, that I texted my BF “which one”. Out of nowhere, the (Male) shop-owner told me to get off my phone – I had to lean sideways to keep his face away from touching mine. Taken back I stepped outside to await my BF’s reply. I went back in to pick up the game.
I went to the counter to speak to the male shop-owner and asked him why he approached me in such a manner. He told me it was because he didn’t want his competitors knowing what he carried in his store. I told him: I wasn’t a competitor or a spy, I was customer. He continued to repeat his point. I tried to explain to him that in this day and age of technology, everyone will be on their mobile, I wasn’t take picture, and I was only in there for under 2 mins when it all happened; that I didn’t appreciate being followed, as if I was some sort of thief/shoplifter. I was asked to leave. Talk about paranoia!