Saturday, May 26, 2012Cloudy 23°C
City

Twitter reaction to Doug Ford's dream of ultimate mayoral authority

Posted by Derek Flack / February 17, 2011

Doug Ford Mayor VetoA day after it was revealed that the mayor's office has something of a plan to build a Sheppard Avenue subway extension via (as yet unsecured) private financing, comments made by Doug Ford to a Globe and Mail reporter regarding the nuisance that city council poses to the mayor have dominated municipal politics discourse today. The statements in question have been widely quoted by now, but just for the record, this one sums up his position quite well. "I believe in a strong mayor system, like they have in the States. The mayor should have veto power ... so he has enough power to stop council."

Insofar as subway funding and the direction that "Transportation City" takes will continue to occupy the media as more specific information comes to light, I tend to doubt that Doug Ford's plan was to direct attention away from yesterday's news. So why say it then? Well, I would assume he made these comments because, here and now (i.e. while his brother is the mayor), he would indeed love to be able to by-pass council.

It's probably not really necessary to explain why this is problematic, particularly when one considers how frustrating such a situation would have been to his brother when he was a lowly councillor during David Miller's mayoralty. So let's see what the #TOpoli people on Twitter had to say about today's developments. Sure, the follwing reaction is bound to bear a left-wing slant, but that's what makes it funny. After all, how could such remarks be taken seriously in the first place.

@blogTO I'm with Doug Ford on this: I wish Councillor Doug Ford had no say in anything. #TOpoliless than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone

@DougFord is on to something we need to adjust. Mayor should have veto power over LEFTWING KOOKERY. #topoliless than a minute ago via web

@blogTO Nice to see Ford has been paying attention to the recent Middle East situation. Give us more of a reason, Doug. #TOpoliless than a minute ago via web

So the Globe thinks Doug is the real mayor. But who is the puppet master of Doug? Harris? #topoliless than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone

@blogTO
Ford wanted to decrease the size of #TOCouncil, just didn't think he meant down to one.less than a minute ago via web

Why would we give a mayor veto power if he didn't even get a majority of the votes of citizens? Maybe we should address that first. #TOpoliless than a minute ago via web

@blogTO If Doug Ford loves American politics so much, he can go live there #TOpoliless than a minute ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

@blogTO Did he mean veto or Devito powers? The latter would be kinda cool actually.less than a minute ago via web

Note to Doug Ford: the current "weak mayor" system is OUR veto power. It protects us from incompetents like you & your brother. #TOpoliless than a minute ago via web

For the record: the only thing I ever veto'd as mayor was my choice of sandwich at lunchtime. Council voted for whitefish, I wanted lox.less than a minute ago via web

In a shocking development, the Fords have me all ragey today. #TOpoli #StrongArmFatHeadless than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone

The Fords would have cried bloody murder if @iamdavidmiller had a veto. What makes it right now? http://bit.ly/hWcf4L #TOpoli #TOcouncilless than a minute ago via web

I'm thinking Doug Ford "didn't come back for you", Toronto - apparently, he came back to turn us into Chicago! #TOpoliless than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone

Doug Ford is an appalling, offensive hardcore ideologue.http://bit.ly/dXy1d7 #topoliless than a minute ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

Discussion

31 Comments

Sean / February 17, 2011 at 03:59 pm
user-pic
Ken Wood's comment is by far the best.
Shannon / February 17, 2011 at 04:03 pm
user-pic
@Derek

Before all the right wingers say it! Derek your anti-fordism is showing. now that we got that out of the way. rofl :p
mike / February 17, 2011 at 04:08 pm
user-pic
Can we veto the election?
mike / February 17, 2011 at 04:09 pm
user-pic
http://sixthestate.net/?p=760
hendrix / February 17, 2011 at 04:16 pm
user-pic
classic power struggle.. fight to get into power, then try to change the rules to give yourself more power. it would be hilarious if he somehow got the rules changed, and then in the next election a left winger wins as mayor and vetoes everything from the right wingers.
qwerty replying to a comment from Shannon / February 17, 2011 at 04:19 pm
user-pic
You must be new here.
david davidson / February 17, 2011 at 04:23 pm
user-pic
This shit sucks
Yawn / February 17, 2011 at 04:55 pm
user-pic
Hey look -it's more pissy pantesd south of Bloor people complaining about Ford again.
Mike W / February 17, 2011 at 05:06 pm
user-pic
You realize as information outlets like blogTo or the Star continue these shenanigans people looking to be informed about issues regarding Rob Ford will have to find their information at places like the Sun right? The <i>Sun</i>.
Welshgrrl replying to a comment from Yawn / February 17, 2011 at 05:11 pm
user-pic
Hey, I think Ford is a moron and I live WAY north of Bloor ...
Ozzie Ossington / February 17, 2011 at 05:41 pm
user-pic
Before clicking this link I already knew it had to be a Derek story. This anti-Ford shit needs to stop. Seriously it's getting old now. Move city's already.
Shannon replying to a comment from Mike W / February 17, 2011 at 05:47 pm
user-pic
but mike, that is where i thought the right went to get their news to begin with :p :p :p
DC replying to a comment from Ozzie Ossington / February 17, 2011 at 05:50 pm
user-pic
So you're saying NO MORE CRITICISM of anything the Ford's say or do.

Sounds a lot like like a dictatorship to me. Right up the Fords' alley as per the conversation the actual mayor (Doug) had with reporters today.
andrewS / February 17, 2011 at 06:05 pm
user-pic
No more criticism of the Fords! Give them unilateral power over the city! Jail the dissidents!
o.k. / February 17, 2011 at 06:22 pm
user-pic
Toronto does need a strong Mayor system. Doug is right in a way, nothing in this City will ever get done until it does.

BUT. It will never happen, and not in Rob Fords tenure anyways. Ontario makes to much money of are backs, they will never cut us loose.
bob / February 17, 2011 at 06:37 pm
user-pic
Sure, let's turn this city into a dictatorship... it's not like Hitler or Mussolini ever did anything wrong..... right?
o.k. replying to a comment from bob / February 17, 2011 at 06:58 pm
user-pic
And New York city is really just like Stalingrad or Hitler's Berlin right?

A strong mayor system gets things done. Ford would have never been elected Mayor if Toronto had one... he wouldn't of even run. Toronto would of been in a scenario where it's Mayor seat would be more lucrative then being Prime minister.

A Strong mayor can mean a lot of things. Possibly more voting power in council, or a system where a public elected committee works with the Mayor to implement policies.

Toronto needs to be in a position where Ontario is working in the best interests of the GTA not just sucking it dry for cash. New York states goes like this

NYC ----- > <--Albany--> <-----NYC

Not

Queen's Park ----->Toronto

Toronto will never be more than a joke until it can yield the power to govern it's self. Central cities all across the globe either control there own destinies or are in direct power-sharing relationships with the top levels of the state.
DC replying to a comment from o.k. / February 17, 2011 at 07:28 pm
user-pic
A strong mayor definitely can mean a lot of things. Veto power and financial independence are not the same thing.

Toronto needs more control over its financial position. It needs a share of income tax, it needs a share of a National Transit Strategy and a National Affordable Housing Strategy. A mayor having a veto will not make Toronto a better city, to live in OR in terms of its budget deficit.
The Spellchecker replying to a comment from o.k. / February 17, 2011 at 07:47 pm
user-pic
O.K. -- You may have some points here, but I was too busy marveling at your butchering of the English language to notice them.

"he wouldn't of even run" -- It's "he wouldn't HAVE even run."

"Toronto would of been in a scenario where it's Mayor seat would be more lucrative then being Prime minister." -- Again, it's would HAVE. Not "would of." And it's "scenario where ITS Mayor seat... etc."

Also, what are you talking about when you say "lucrative?" Lucrative means, "producing a great deal of profit." Are you implying our Mayor would make more money in a strong mayor system than the PM? What are you even saying? Because all I'm hearing is, you're either sloppy or too dumb to pass high school English.

Also, it's "THAN" the Prime Minister. Not "then."

I could go on about your misuse of its/it's and there/their, but I think you get the idea. English... love it, learn it, use it.
bingbangbong replying to a comment from o.k. / February 17, 2011 at 08:25 pm
user-pic
Hah, let's use American as a model government why don't we. Why, the government under Bush was a spectacular, wasn't it?
bingbangbong replying to a comment from o.k. / February 17, 2011 at 08:27 pm
user-pic
By the way, the way NYC operates and is layed out is nothing like Toronto. Not to mention it's a city that has hundreds of years on us, so the municipalities are all pretty uniform.
j.reb / February 17, 2011 at 10:01 pm
user-pic
so... he wants "a strong mayor system, like they have in the States. The mayor should have veto power - so he has enough power to stop council."

Like the grifter ex mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, I presume? Who changed bylaws, that no building permits were needed anymore, then built an arena. At the same time, she happened to be building a large house for her family on a lake. Trouble is, that the windows and interior second floor balcony had a remarkable similarity to the ones in the new arena.

Needless to say, there are no records of who the suppliers were for either of those buildings, because of the new bylaw change.

There's a bloody good reason why I live in Canada, not the States, nor the State of Ontario, ever.

I don't suffer bullies well and neither should you [all].

Match the windows and glass balcony for yourselves.
Cite:
www.themudflats.net
or
www.theimmoralminority.blogspot.com
Carole J. Paul replying to a comment from andrewS / February 17, 2011 at 11:40 pm
user-pic
Why did I ever vote for this man? He did a good job when I lived in Etobicoke and I guess becoming mayor of a big city has gone to his hMead! Carole J.P.
mike replying to a comment from Carole J. Paul / February 18, 2011 at 12:31 am
user-pic
its ok carole alot of people are sobering up. He is a fraud and a joke
He is a one term mayor for sure. All we can do now is stay in contact with local council and try to keep ford in check. Still need 23 voes to pass things
o.k replying to a comment from bingbangbong / February 18, 2011 at 12:56 am
user-pic
You still have council committees guide the direction of the City.It wouldn't be wise a Mayor to veto a proposal which has council, committee, and the public's support now would it? In most cases the Mayor is only solely responsible to a budget. If the Mayors numbers are way off council votes it down.

This isn't a 'American' City system versus a 'Canadian' System... plus age has little to do with it either. Most American Cities are the same age as Toronto. Seoul governance structure didn't materialize till after it's occupation. Melbourne doesn't even have a "Mayor". London governance structure is a complicated mess that somehow works quite well.

But one difference links all of these world class cities together and distances them from Toronto. They all have control over there own destines and have the capacity to raise the necessary funds to build infrastructure and maintain civil services.

@ Spellcheck... I meant lucrative in a power sense. you get more votes for Toronto Mayor then you would to become PM.
lonewolf / February 18, 2011 at 03:02 am
user-pic
Miller already created a version of mayoral veto. He created the executive committee,and city of Toronto act[?]. The latter gave the Mayor the ability to pass legislation like that stupid municipal car tax. If used in a "non partisan" manner, veto for the Mayor's office could expedite bylaws,and such.Stop some of the silly posturing that occurs when councillors seem to be engrossed with their own voices:( Yet have something like a municipal Ombudsman with oversight,allow for checks,and balance.
S / February 18, 2011 at 05:49 am
user-pic
Doug Ford should run for mayor of Chicago. american-style politics is frowned in Canada.
Adam / February 18, 2011 at 08:26 am
user-pic
I'd rather nothing get done at all in the next 3.5 years... All I can hope for is some competent people to run for the spot come next election.
So happy! replying to a comment from Carole J. Paul / February 18, 2011 at 11:15 am
user-pic
I am so happy to see that some people that voted for Ford are turning around!!
Yes replying to a comment from o.k / February 18, 2011 at 01:21 pm
user-pic
Um I think what s/he meant by the age is that those cities mostly don't have suburbs with completely different political views.
Mesonto / February 18, 2011 at 01:54 pm
user-pic
I think since Toronto is the major Canadian city, I too think the mayor should have more power. I think it would be best if our mayor had the same types of powers as Bloomberg has in NY.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal