Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 22°C
City

The new St. Clair streetcar ROW shows signs of sloppy construction and lack of standards

Posted by Matthew Harris / July 11, 2010

Streetcars waiting on Gunns LoopOn June 28th, buried deep on the TTC's website under its construction tab, was an interesting announcement: "On Wednesday, June 30, 2010, streetcar service will resume to the community and local businesses on St. Clair Avenue West between Lansdowne Avenue and Gunns loop." In other words, for the first time in five years, streetcar service would run the entire length of St Clair. I decided to take a test drive of the newly "complete" line.

The good news is that the line is relatively fast. I hopped on Gunns Loop at 3:38. We arrived at St Clair West station at 3:54, and we coasted into St Clair station at 4:01. In other words, it took about 23 minutes to travel the whole line. Admittedly, the car I was riding in was not particularly busy. However, I took a fuller streetcar back part of the way and it ran nearly as fast.

The right-of-way (ROW) also helps improve one of the biggest headaches about streetcars: bunching caused by traffic congestion. This makes the service more consistent and reliable.St Clair Streetcars driving byThe performance of the streetcar is definitely the good. But as most people know, the St Clair streetcar ROW construction and street beautification has not been all smiles and sunshine. On this site, we've already noted the negative effect drawn-out construction had on the local businesses. This has probably improved recently - the street seemed fairly lively when I rode the streetcar.

But from an urban planning and design perspective, there is another issue with the streetscape improvements. They show a lack of professionalism. First, a caveat: these are clearly a work in progress. There are traffic cones along many sections of the street, particularly near Gunns Loop, indicating where future work needs to be done. The shelters at Old Weston Road have no glass for the roofs, but these will likely be fixed.

But what has been completed does not make the city's organizational abilities look good. Various parts of the street's furniture show shoddy construction, poor design, a strict adherence to a plan rather than common sense, a lack of funds, and likely, a politically expedited construction to avoid embarrassment at the polls.

Here is a list of things I noticed:St Clair Two Lights Next to each otherLight standards. Although it is to be expected that there will be a mixture of light standards in the city, the mixing of light standards often happens right next to one another on St. Clair: the old "acorn" light standards and the more "futuristic" ones. Although the acorn standards are generally on the side streets when they meet St Clair, sometimes they have been replaced by the new standards, and sometimes they haven't.St Clair Two Lights Across From Each OtherSt Clair Three LightsSometimes, there are two different ones on either side of the same street. In the Corso Italia section of St Clair, there are three light standards: along with these two are the "old-timey" ones that the BIA put in. Even worse, east of Bathurst, some of the new light standards are attached to old wooden hydro poles.Crumbled precast on St Clair ROWStreetcar stops. The very seventies-looking precast on the outside of the stops is already crumbled and damaged. Although some wear-and-tear is to be expected, the entire line is still relatively new. What will it look like in two years?St Clair Cracked PlanterCracked Planter on St Clair ROWThe planters for the trees at the streetcar stops look like they have been hastily assembled. The blocks that compose the planters sometimes have no gaps, and sometimes they are fairly far apart. Mortar is sometimes used, and sometimes not. Chips and cracks are already evident.Missing rails in streetcar stops along St Clair ROWWhen a light standard is next to the streetcar stop's railing, the middle rail of the railing is left out. However, the holder for the rail remains. Could they not have had posts made without that middle holder?Pavers change colour on St Clair ROWPavers. Along the edge of the street, surrounding some of the trees, and in the streetcar stops are decorative pavers. They are usually dark grey and light grey. However, starting in Corso Italia and heading west, they become pinkish and dark grey. At about this point, the pavers are no longer used to edge the plots around the trees. Instead, pre-cast slabs are used with cutouts for the trunks. When you reach Keele, the pavers have switched back to dark grey and light grey, but the cutouts are still being used for the trees.

Although the change in colour may be a decorative choice, the fact it switches back, but the edging for the trees does not, seems to indicate some sloppiness of standards. It is also not clear - from a design standpoint - why the colour suddenly changes.Lack of bicycle locks along St ClairBicycle locks. There are very few bicycle locks the entire length of St Clair, particularly around Winona. When there are bicycle locks, it appears that the business owner requested them, because there is occasionally one on an otherwise empty stretch of block. I saw a lot of bicycles locked to parking signs.Utilities fixes on St ClairShoddy utilities fixes. Even though these streetscape improvements are fairly brand new, I already spotted one classic utilities fix (likely Toronto Hydro): dig hole in improved pavers, repair utility, fill hole with unattractive, mismatched splotch of asphalt. With some of the city's own employees destroying work that has been accomplished by another department, how can we hope to achieve anything?

Some of these issues may seem minor, and hopefully some of them remain to be fixed. Overall, the improvements are a step forward for St Clair. But, taken as a whole, these issues with the details of the streetscape show how poorly co-ordinated the whole project was. After all, if after five years of construction and millions of dollars, the city has difficulty ensuring planters are assembled correctly, it doesn't say much about its ability to get more complicated tasks accomplished.

Discussion

29 Comments

embean / July 11, 2010 at 12:58 pm
user-pic
Seriously? You are comparing mismatched pavers to the issues which were raised at the G20?
masha / July 11, 2010 at 01:08 pm
user-pic
One thing you forgot to mention is the benches. It's almost as though they made them as uncomfortable as possible on purpose. I'm not very big or tall and there's barely room for me to sit on one.
Torontonian / July 11, 2010 at 01:13 pm
user-pic
Typical of Toronto, isn't it?

In the 5 years it took to achieve the
St. Clair ROW, central Berlin underwent
a major rebuild!

Other cities surge ahead and we're still
having trouble getting ticketless transit
into operation. London has its Oyster
card and Montreal has a card payment system.
Why can't we?

There is virtually nothing inspiring in
or about this city.
Major Bob / July 11, 2010 at 01:32 pm
user-pic
1. If they're not broken, why pay more $ to make the lights look futuristic?
2. Are those cracks due to regular wear?
3. Is the choice to use mortar in some places and not others the result of an engineering choice?
4. It's harsh to say Toronto Hydro's work was shoddy. How can we know whether the problem was or whether it could have been fixed before construction started?

Bottom line: if it gets you from A to B in 23 minutes who cares what it looks like. I don't want the whole city to look like Yonge & Dundas.

Jimmy / July 11, 2010 at 02:26 pm
user-pic
Can we have Councilor Mihevc's comments on this story please. I believe he was overseeing this.
Jimmy / July 11, 2010 at 02:28 pm
user-pic
I believe it is Blogto's responsibility to actually TRY and get the answers to the questions they are posing. Why not call or email the Councilor? Or is that too much journalism?
dale39 replying to a comment from Torontonian / July 11, 2010 at 04:59 pm
user-pic
@Torontonian

"There is virtually nothing inspiring in
or about this city."

Ain't it the truth... All the travel I've always done has me wondering why Toronto is so lacking with design idea's. While Museum station was a small small step in the right direction, it doesn't take much to see examples around the world of really great stuff.

For example:

http://www.leenks.com/gallery1213.htm
Keith / July 11, 2010 at 05:15 pm
user-pic
to dale39 re: Swedish subway link... That's f'n awesome - wowsa!
W. K. Lis / July 11, 2010 at 05:27 pm
user-pic
The roads department is in charge of traffic signals. And they do an overkill with signage saying "transit signals" or "left turn" when other cities do without and use specific transit signals that are different from automobile traffic signals. Also, no real transit priority, which means transit get the go ahead before the left turn vehicles.
markus / July 11, 2010 at 07:21 pm
user-pic
here are some more beautiful subway stations of the world:
http://mic-ro.com/metro/metroart.html
sure puts ours to shame.
Z / July 11, 2010 at 09:27 pm
user-pic
Is it really so hard to figure out why the bricks change to red in Corso Italia? We've never seen a design feature customized to a specific neighbourhood before?

Also, the street car does not run the entire length of St.Clair.
bubba / July 11, 2010 at 09:37 pm
user-pic
Yeah well your talking about a transit system that is more concerned about having cell phone service on their system and building subway stations in the middle of no where, instead of improving service and securing funds for the future. good luck!

as i said in the past and the ttc seems to always live up to the let down, i'll beleive it when i see it.
mike replying to a comment from markus / July 11, 2010 at 09:39 pm
user-pic
Yup, short of the Chicago L, the TTC is ugliest transit system I've ridden. It's certainly the most mundane.
Jordan / July 11, 2010 at 11:24 pm
user-pic
You do realize that Spacing makes great buttons of the tile patterns in TTC stations - and that they've been incredibly successful. While most stations could use a little TLC, many of them are nice reflections of 50's era design - sleek and simple.

And when you point out many of the other 'beautiful' subway stations around the world - remember that for every one that's beautiful, there are likely 15 down the line that are in a decrepit state. Toronto is more or less on average with aesthetics with every other subway line in the world - if not a bunch cleaner and safer than most. I'm still always amazed by how clean the inside of the subway cars and stations are here - things can really get a lot worse than they are (rats, garbage, graffiti...)

As for the St. Clair ROW, I completely agree - it's a complete mess. The TTC should not be designing or managing these projects. I mean - why are there poles holding up the streetcar wires? Could they not just hang them off buildings as they do everywhere else in the city. I think it'll be a great comparison once the Queen's Quay line is in - one designed by the TTC, the other by design professionals.






warmflash replying to a comment from dale39 / July 12, 2010 at 12:48 am
user-pic
Torontonians have a taste for conformity and mediocrity. They clearly do not like anything stylish or attractive in the public realm.
Torontonian replying to a comment from dale39 / July 12, 2010 at 05:46 am
user-pic
Wouldn't it be interesting if we could
"localise" the transit stops and subway
stations in the same way as the guerrilla
gardeners do to bits of land?

Could a Business Improvement Area encourage
local "vernacular" designs or features to
transit stops and their subway stations
and still conform to union regulations?

Hmmmmmmmmm.
gadfly / July 12, 2010 at 08:05 am
user-pic
Give the ROW 5 years and they'll need to start ripping it up again to replace the rusting rails and heaving concrete. The length of time some of those rails sat rotting in piles (blocking traffic), they went into the ground 'pre-rusted.' Lost in all this mess is the fact that we have no business having streetcar tracks in our climate! But, hey - aren't streetcars cute and the tourists love them. [Rolls eyes.]
In the past 6 months, I have witnessed no less than a half dozen endless lane closures while the TTC uses those lanes to stage their track replacement; not to mention the disruption the actual track replacement itself costs! Lower Parliament has been shut for a few months already, with no notice to any of those local residents. Richmond St. was a disaster for 6 months last Fall while the TTC farted around with track replacement. Do the fans of All That Is the TTC not have eyes to see what their beloved streetcars inflict on the city as a whole?
This city is a hodgepodge patchwork of conflicting roadways and transitways. While the ROW (Rest of the World) has 6 lane arterial roads, Toronto is the only city that brags about destroying the few that we have! There is actually only ONE thru-lane at St. Clair/Yonge these days. ONE. At the hub of the city!
Way to go Toronto: shave off 5 minutes in a cross-town transit commute and add 10 to the drive. That's progress!
Start at Home / July 12, 2010 at 08:23 am
user-pic
BlogTO - if you nitpicked your own site as much as you do the TTC, this would be a much better place.

ttc / July 12, 2010 at 08:56 am
user-pic
i for one could careless how it looks, as long as the street cars are running on time and fast i am happy. I just want a good service, not a pretty one.
stopitman / July 12, 2010 at 11:47 am
user-pic
As Crombie said in an interview on Torontoist this weekend, if the TTC cleaned the stations and got rid of the few surly employees, it wouldn't seem so bad anymore. And if all of those 'ugly' stations that people complain about were built differently, they would be in horrible condition right now. The tiles used on the BD line has held up against years of neglect and only need a power wash to make them look brand new. Meanwhile, the original Yonge line stations were horribly retiled after the Vitrolite tiles were cracked (the walls of Eglington station still have these), while the Museum reno looks incomplete and chintzy. Other than improving signage, the old stations should just be well cleaned. Why should we use the very limited amount of money to tear off tiles (they're actually more like 2-3 inch thick bricks) that are very resistant to wear and tear?

Plus, it should be noted that the TTC doesn't receive an operating subsidy from any higher levels of government, which many large and small transit companies do. That certainly doesn't help with its predicament when compared to the former TTC and other transit systems.

@gadfly - you live in the city and are championing wasteland-inducing 6 lane arterial roads? If you want to see how horrible a 6 lane road makes a city and how bad the traffic gets, go drive on Hespeler Road in Cambridge and have fun sitting in gridlock amongst big box stores. I grew up in Burlington and even there there's only one small portion of a road that reaches 6 lanes due to the highway interchange. They are generally avoided by even suburban planners because of the mess they create. Furthermore, the "rest of the world" in your case is the USA, a horrible example of planning on a broad scale.
Marc / July 12, 2010 at 11:48 am
user-pic
Projects such as this one on the St. Clair, was done in vain and is not about improvements or innovation, but projects like this are about making and creating KICKBACKS. That's all. It ruins a city and it rapes it.
jayz / July 12, 2010 at 11:49 am
user-pic
REALLY?

Complaining about the concrete blocks and the railings and lights? COME ON. Does the streetcar run, does it have doors, can people use it? Yes? GOOD. Stop staring at the ground and get on with life.
tl / July 12, 2010 at 02:08 pm
user-pic
Wow seriously? You're complaining aobut cosmetic differences and what you think may be wrong???
Drew / July 12, 2010 at 08:52 pm
user-pic
I am a resident on St. Clair West. I live more-or-less in the centre of the streetcar portion of the road.

I moved to St. Clair because of the Right-Of-Way. Granted, I had no idea how (impossibly?) long it would take for said right-of-way to be completed, but I am GLAD it is here. It makes the start of my daily commute a breeze, even … fun.

The discussion of failed design elements is completely irrelevant to that experience. But it is certainly one of the most compelling and necessary discussions to have.

If the TransitCity lines are built (or any version of dedicated on-surface rights-of-way) I shudder to think of visual-vomit stretching from Hwy 27 to Yonge Street on Finch, or across the entire city (with an underground exemption) on Eglinton!

Design is absolutely as important as form and function.

Why remove functional lighting for "futuristic lighting"?

Because "futuristic lighting" is going to be put in anyway. Save some money, develop a line-aesthetic. Each incremental increase of the Yonge, University-Spadina and Bloor-Danforth lines have a common "theme" or design concept, which I would suggest values function over aesthete, but it is unifying none-the-less.
ao / July 12, 2010 at 10:42 pm
user-pic
what a waste of an article for blogto. i ride this line everyday, and although you notice these imperfections, lets look at other subway stops and bus shelters/streetcar shelters that are ridiculously abandoned looking or look like shit. plain and simple...they're trying to make st.clair west a more approachable area and a place where people will come to spend their hst money. therefore all these little cracks and things you found wrong with it ARE irrelevant to the fact you travelled in 23 minutes vs. the 40 that used to be spent.

ao / July 12, 2010 at 10:44 pm
user-pic
also: this whole article should just be taken down because of of its sloppy construction and lack of standards in its arguments.
Ned Sanchez replying to a comment from Start at Home / July 13, 2010 at 11:10 am
user-pic
@ Start at Home: TOTALLY AGREE!

This site seems to be like many Torontonians - better at complaining than at enjoying what this city has to offer.
Nick / July 13, 2010 at 11:33 am
user-pic
I think ao, Ned Sanchez, Start at Home, ttc, jayz, and others that you miss the point of the article: given that this infrastructure is brand new, and that we as taxpayers have paid for it, it is in our interest to get the best value for money: cracked planters and shitty precast concrete shelters that look like temporary G20 security barriers are not the best value for money. Honestly, someone should be chastized for the design of those shelters. Can we at least retrofit aluminum strips along the bottom to cover the anchor points to make them look less temporary?!? Sheesh.
jl / July 16, 2010 at 02:27 am
user-pic
Thanks for the article. Design is important and we need such attention to detail. These things contribute to the character of the city and aesthetics of the streetscape.

I disagree with those who dismiss this article as simple complaining. I see it as a sign of someone who cares about Toronto, appreciates its public space and wants to see it improved.

Yes, the quality of the streetcar service is important but so are the street features. The Internet's big enough to engage both concerns.

More articles like this please.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal