Sunday, September 5, 2010Partly Cloudy 16°C
City

The future remains a long way away at the Port Lands

Posted by Rick McGinnis / March 12, 2010

Ships at dockside near Polson PierI have a souvenir book published in 1959, on the occasion of the city's 125th anniversary. Nathan Phillips -- he of the square -- was mayor, TV featured stars like Juliette and Robert Goulet, and the city's port, profiled in a chapter all its own, was considered a vital part of its lifeline to the world. Of course, when they talked about the port, they were talking mostly about what we call Harbourfront today, and what the map now calls the Port Lands was a "broad, unoccupied beach area" to the east, held in reserve for future expansion.

Fifty years later, that prospective port's heyday has already come and gone, or so it would seem if you take a walk along Cherry Street and along streets like Villiers and Commissioners and Unwin Avenue, which might seem cheerier at any other time but an overcast weekday in March, though it's hard to imagine how.

There's a lot of activity going on just north, where the Don Lands are being prepared for development, but once you cross the Keating Channel and head east, you're in a world of aggregate silos, mountains of salt under black plastic tarps, and metal recyclers, which punctuate fenced-off, empty fields.

Waterfront Toronto concept drawing of the future Port LandsAcross Keating Channel to the Essroc silosWaterfront Toronto CEO John Campbell says that it'll probably stay that way for at least another fifteen years. His organization, tasked with the redevelopment of huge swaths of lakeside land either owned by the city or passed on to it by the feds and the province, has an impressive set of conceptual drawings imagining the Port Lands in the future. There are park lands with bike paths and boardwalks, quayside shopping strips and streetcar tracks rolling over paths of grass, not to mention innumerable condo and office towers where the rusty tanks and gravel mountains are today.

Former bank buildings on Cherry StreetThere are fascinating signs of former prosperity in the Port Lands, like the impressive neoclassical bank building at Villiers and Cherry just across from the Keating Channel Pub, now occupied by Quantex Technologies, an environmental remediation company. A block down Cherry there's another former bank building -- barely discernible as the onetime home of a Dominion Bank branch -- being renovated for the new Cherry Restaurant, just across the street from the driving range and go-kart track at Polson Pier, and a boneyard of yachts and sailboats shrinkwrapped in white plastic.

John Campbell says that the tenants at Polson Pier have an 80-year lease on their property, but that those in other parts of the Port Lands will probably be on shorter leases as development plans become more concrete, with the land just south of Keating Channel being the first priority, and two further lots further along Commissioners likely to get progressively longer lease deadlines as renewal moves eastward.

Bulk terminals at the north side of Unwin Ave.The problem, he tells me, is that land in Toronto is still relatively cheap compared to cities like Vancouver, and that managing its value is a waiting game -- there's no point trying to begin infrastructure improvements like soil remediation or re-grading of the roads until it's worthwhile. But what of the port itself, now mostly located between Cherry Beach and the Ship Channel, where rusting hulks of lakeboats like the Canadian Miner and another ship, chopped in half but still floating, sit forgotten?

Port Lands officeWaterfront Toronto's sketches of the future Port Lands don't feature a lot of big boats, but Campbell says that the worst city shorelines are ones that feature nothing but forests of condo towers, and the city has always imagined the presence of a working port to keep the lakefront vital, though it's hard to imagine tractor trailers plying the leafy boulevards in the architect's renderings.

"With issues of sustainability we won't be seeing cargo arriving in the bellies of 747s as much," Campbell tells me. "If anything I can imagine the port seeing much more traffic in the future." It's an intriguing possibility, but it might be that, fifty years ago or now, Toronto is having a hard time letting go of its image of itself as a port town.

Discussion

12 Comments

David Tabor / March 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM
user-pic

part of the problem is the ridiculous amount of contamination lurking below... much of which is not discussed in public.

next time after a rainfall or a really hot day stand at the lights near cherry and lakeshore - that heavy heavy permuting oil smell is leaching from below... it was dumped back in the 50s and 60s under the cloak of darkness compliments of shell, bp and esso. my father was one of the drivers who was tasked to dump the sludge... i've heard the stories from him time and time again whenever we walk tom thompson.

further east towards the hearn, some of those open fields are also a dark horse in waiting. they are fenced off with reason.

developmentally, it'll be very costly to remediate and make the land useful beyond what it is now - a wasteland. that and also most of it being in-fill - digging footings for any kind of condo work will be a very wet undertaking. someone with balls of steel and deep pockets could make a killing cleaning it up and redevelopoing many parts around there - but IMO its best left for the industry that occupy it - which also translates into jobs.

rick mcginnis In replying to a comment from David Tabor / March 12, 2010 at 10:31 AM
user-pic

David - John Campbell of Waterfront Toronto did tell me that one of the prospective projects going forward at the Port Lands is an area set aside for experimental soil remediation - a processing depot, as it were, to test out different methods of cleaning up the earth that, as you've pointed out, is a real toxic stew. He also said that the specific contamination varies from area to area in the Port Lands, and that each project that goes on there will have to proceed on a case-by-case basis. Which does underline the cost that any developer will likely incur. So yeah - I don't imagine the area being good for much more than industrial use for a long time, but if the cost of land per square foot in downtown Toronto finally rises well above $100/per, this might change.

Another project he mentioned is the likelihood of having to raise the grade of streets like Cherry and Commissioner, as the flood plain around the mouth of the Don is still an issue. hat's what they're doing at the West Don Lands right now, thought to the layman it looks like they're just moving piles of dirt around, admittedly.

HUK / March 12, 2010 at 10:49 AM
user-pic

Where are the photo credits for thsi piece?

rick mcginnis In replying to a comment from HUK / March 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM
user-pic

We don't normally put up photo credits unless someone other than the writer took the pix, which is a roundabout way of saying that the photos are mine.

Chester Pape / March 12, 2010 at 11:34 AM
user-pic

Mr. Campbell appears to be somewhat misinformed about some of the properties in question. In particular the Polson Pier complex and the Lafarge Cement depot on the North side of Polson. Are shown as privately owned, not leased on the ownership map of the portlands:

http://www.tplc.ca/pdfs/Ownership-Map-2009.pdf

jamesmallon / March 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM
user-pic

15 years?! The boy my wife is carrying we'll have $%# by the time this is done. The pace of urban renewal is excruciating in Toronto, and why we'll always lag.

jamesmallon / March 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM
user-pic

Woah. Should be 'will have'.

HUK In replying to a comment from rick mcginnis / March 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM
user-pic

They are great pictures Rick. I have not seen one of the Metis so up close. You shoudl give yourself credit!!!

Jimmy / March 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM
user-pic

The Quantex Technologies building is a music studio called Bonspiel run by a couple o' nice guys. They do sound/music for tv and commercials...They just left the sign up because they thought it looked ridiculous/cool.

www.bonspiel.tv/

felix / March 12, 2010 at 3:27 PM
user-pic

What about the building that housed the hovercraft service to Rochester ?
The portlands operates that. Its been siting empty for many years only to be rented by film crews and the police training. A bloody waste of money.
I've lived in the west toronto most of my life and always wanted to see the Portlands grow and be financially rewarding to the city?
The Pics by the way are beautifully done.

felix

IHBD / March 13, 2010 at 12:13 AM
user-pic

The Port Lands has one more issue that no one seems to talk about: the whole are sits right underneath the flight path to the Island Airport. If you've ever been there when a Porter plane is passing by you'll know that it is quite loud. (the noise from Porter is much worse there than at the harbourfront.) In a few years, there will be one plane flying over the area every 5 minutes. And if demand keeps up, the Port Authority will simply allow more planes- perhaps one day you'll see one plane per minute!

I know I would not want to buy a place right under the flight path of Porter. And I suppose that many others will not either.

rick mcginnis In replying to a comment from IHBD / March 13, 2010 at 4:26 PM
user-pic

IHBD - I think I'm stating the obvious when I say that, were Porter to land a plane a minute at the Island Airport - or even just one every other minute, counting the alternate minute for take-offs - the place would have to be the size of O'Hare.

I walked around the Port Lands for several hours the other day, and can say with confidence that the noise level from Porter planes was negligible; low-flying Cessnas and floatplanes were more noticeable.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal