Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 22°C
City

Morning Brew: TTC Essential Service Bill Stalls, $50k Reward in String of Bank Robberies, New Porter Terminal, G20 Summit Security Costs, Highway 401 Morning Closure, Ice Dance Gold

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / February 23, 2010

20100223_mb.jpgPhoto: "hitch" by jentse, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

So much for that. Liberal backbencher David Caplan's private member's bill, which aimed to declare the TTC an essential service (and thereby prevent labour strikes) has been instantly squashed by the provincial government. In order for the province to consider the declaration, a request must first come from City Hall, and since City Hall's stance is that it'll cost us more to deal in arbitration under essential service status, the request is highly unlikely. Interestingly, both George Smitherman and Rocco Rossi welcome the bill, and a large majority of polled blogTO readers also support the bill.

A total of seven armed bank robberies within a span of just a few weeks are believed to be the dirty work of the same people, and the Canadian Banker's Association is now posting a $50,000 reward for information leading to their arrest. The robberies have all been confined to northern parts of (and north of) Toronto, and authorities have expressed concern in the past - particularly about their tendencies to get violent.

Porter Airlines, which has essentially been handed a four-year monopoly on civilian passenger traffic in and out of the Billy Bishop (Island) Airport via the federal government's Toronto Port Authority, previewed its new $50-million terminal (set to open on March 7th). Just 5 years ago, the island airport had a mere 22,000 passengers per year flow through, and now it's up to 1.3million annually - almost all being Porter customers. The TPA plans to allow additional carriers to scoop up a limited number of flight spots onto the island, but Air Canada has already cried foul and is already actively in court on the issue.

It's being billed as part of the largest security event in Canadian history, and it's going to cost Torontonians a fair amount of time and frustration because the feds want to do it at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre (i.e. right in the heart of the city). While prepared to share in the burden, David Miller is looking to the feds to sign a bond, ensuring City Hall that it won't be stuck with huge costs for security and vandalism. Good call, Miller. We shouldn't be stuck with these costs.

The 401 and other arteries are a commuter mess this morning, after a transport truck carrying particle board crashed and spilled its load (and diesel) onto the westbound express lanes near Yonge. The cleanup and repairs won't be completed before the morning rush hour.

And while many Canadians are still riling after hugely disappointing results in downhill skiing, bobsled, men's ice hockey, speed skating and more, there is some solace to be found in a gold medal in... ice dance! Canadians Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir became the youngest pair to ever win an ice dance Olympic gold. Watch the magic, folks.

Discussion

22 Comments

P4L / February 23, 2010 at 08:58 am
user-pic
God Love Porter!
Greatest thing to happen to aviation in this city!
Rob / February 23, 2010 at 08:58 am
user-pic
I'm not shocked the private members bill did not pass.

However, what is to stop the city from letting the contract with the union run out and hire other people and not having a union?
DS / February 23, 2010 at 09:00 am
user-pic
Go Porter!
Uninformed commenter replying to a comment from Rob / February 23, 2010 at 09:21 am
user-pic
I'm not gonna quote or link to any references, but I think the answer to your questions is "labour laws". From my vague understanding, any company looking to 'break' a union in that manner would have to shut down for a period of at least 12 months.
DW / February 23, 2010 at 09:33 am
user-pic
Wait a sec, your poll was misleading. You illustrate the potential benefits of making the TTC an "essential service", but none of the costs.

Is it true that it is more costly to administer labour relations on an arbitration basis? Maybe unlikely, but let's not fool ourselves into thinking there won't be any potentially adverse consequences to redesignating the TTC.
Doug / February 23, 2010 at 09:42 am
user-pic
The administration of labour relations costs is not the only "cost" factor involved in a labour disruption. Other factors include the disruption cost to millions of taxpayers who "own" the system, as well as the market opportunity cost of lost ridership for months following a disruption. It is time that the public made an emphatic statement that shutting down any public infrastructure "service" is unacceptable at any time and for any reason. Why "withdrawal of services" to support untenable labour positions is considered a democratic right that supersedes the democratic right of citizens to have unfettered access to services that they pay for is not clear. It is time that our preoccupation with giving credence to whining labour leaders is ended.
Jon replying to a comment from Rob / February 23, 2010 at 10:14 am
user-pic
This suggestion came up a lot during the city workers strike too, and it seems to be based on a misunderstanding of the word "contract". A collective agreement is not a contract for services; when the agreement expires the employees are still employees, and the employer can't simply replace them by tendering out the contract to somebody else instead. It's not that kind of contract.
Simba / February 23, 2010 at 11:07 am
user-pic
suck it Air Canada..there is no space for you on the island!!!
Lucas Medina / February 23, 2010 at 11:14 am
user-pic
Air Canada and Porter are apples and oranges. It's like Holt Renfrew opening a location next to a successful Old Navy. Air Canada doesn't even try to be competitive in their pricing and they have horrific costumer service issues. They won't offer competitively priced flights, they'll just take away from the number of affordable flights Porter will be able to offer. I love flying with Porter, but I'd do anything possible to avoid ever flying with Air Canada again.
Dawn / February 23, 2010 at 11:18 am
user-pic
GO CANADA!!!
I have been so sucked in by the Olympics, I tried to stay up to watch the gold win last night.
Nnnn replying to a comment from Dawn / February 23, 2010 at 11:28 am
user-pic
I think you mean The Hockey Tournament, with some time fillers showing between games.

Go Team Canada.
keven replying to a comment from Nnnn / February 23, 2010 at 11:42 am
user-pic
You don't like the ski and skating (not hockey) events?
Jerrold replying to a comment from Lucas Medina / February 23, 2010 at 11:50 am
user-pic
Apples and oranges, you say? Then how is that they have created schedules to Air Canada cities, at near identical departure and arrival times, at exactly the same prices (down to the penny after all taxes and fees in)?

They are already competing remotely with Air Canada, but given exclusivity to operate out of Toronto Island.
mark. / February 23, 2010 at 12:01 pm
user-pic
I find a bit strange that the province wants to legislate TTC wages and benefits, yet doesn't provide any money for wages or benefits.
JM replying to a comment from Simba / February 23, 2010 at 12:28 pm
user-pic
Air Canada isn't the greatest but there is no reason why one company should have a monopoly on an island airport run by the Toronto Port Authority and paid for by us.

Competition is always good. Prices will go down and service will increase, and after all the way AC got thrown out of the island was pretty unfair.
John / February 23, 2010 at 01:13 pm
user-pic
Oh, enough with the Air Canada hate. They have great in-flight entertainment and perfectly acceptable service. And Westjet's been sliding lately anyway.
langford / February 23, 2010 at 01:52 pm
user-pic
That is if the entertainment system is actually working for your flight. I used to travel a lot for work - and I've seen a lot of half films.
Sam / February 23, 2010 at 03:49 pm
user-pic
Air Canada has been better than any other airline I've been on.
Alison / February 23, 2010 at 10:40 pm
user-pic
Porter is one refined airline. You actually feel like a human being on this flight & not part of the cargo hold (read Air Canada). I think Air Canada had a chance years ago to secure a spot on the island, but they rejected it. Now they want "in" after seeing how many people fly out of this location & love the convenience of it. It's sickening that this so-called "world-class" city does not have a link from downtown to Pearson - WTF, seriously?
Even if Porter asked for more $$$ to fly than Air Canada, they still get my vote. GO PORTER GO!
Joel M replying to a comment from Alison / February 24, 2010 at 07:57 am
user-pic
uhh no that's totally incorrect. Air Canada was evicted from the island airport against their will. Porter's owners purchased City Centre Aviation Ltd and evicted Air Canada from the airport, terminating their contract in 2006. Air Canada has fought the whole way, but lost in court. Right after that loss, Porter was created. AC has been fighting to get back ever since. They definitely did not "reject" a spot on the island, they were thrown out and Porter was given a monopoly.

AC have been fighting tooth and nail to get back ever since, and they could be back as early as April.

Even if you like a company, you really shouldn't root for a monopoly. We have enough of those in Canada already.
POS replying to a comment from Sam / February 24, 2010 at 08:07 am
user-pic
Liar.
pmb / February 25, 2010 at 02:08 pm
user-pic
Well, regarding the places I travel to, I can't use Porter anyway. In the last few years, I've had improved experiences with Air Canada.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal