Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 22°C
City

Morning Brew: 2010 Operating Budget Fee Hikes and Service Cuts, Provincial Funding of TTC, Feline Cesspool in Etobicoke, Whole Foods Expansion, Mounting Household Debt

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / February 17, 2010

filmore's hotelPhoto: "Let our lap dancers..." by Loozrboy, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

The City of Toronto's operating budget was launched yesterday, and as expected, there will be fee hikes including a 4% property tax increase, minimum $350 billing for false alarm calls that result in emergency response, and a one-time $50 fee to register children in City-run recreation programs. There will also be service cuts, including reduced hours at city courts and libraries, reduced overtime work hours and bylaw enforcement, and hiring freezes. According to Mayor Miller, city assets won't be sold, but "you can't have a great city for free." (See embedded videos below). Most of the declared mayoral candidates have weighed in on the budget issue in armchair quarterback style.

When will we see the City and Province deal with the problem of the grossly underfunded TTC? Maybe next year. Talks are ongoing, and hopefully we'll see a renewed commitment from the provincial government to put more money into our lagging and struggling transit system.

How anyone could let things get so out of control is the question. An elderly woman and her adult daughter, living together in an Etobicoke bungalow, shared the space with 28 cats (along with thousands of cockroaches and a staggering amount of festering urine and feces). After repeated attempts, the Humane Society finally gained entry and removed the animals. No charges are pending, but if you ask me, someone needs a serious head check.

Organic supermarket chain Whole Foods plans to double its presence in the GTA by adding two new stores: one in Square One shopping centre in Mississauga, and one in North York's Hullmark Centre. The move comes as larger, more ubiquitous chains like Loblaw and Sobeys move to increase their downtown markets, primarily on the form of boutique stores in condominium-dense areas.

Canadians like to spend. Too much. Even through periods of recession. The average household debt in 2009 was over $96,000, and the ratio of debt-to-income stood at 1.45 - the highest recorded in the 11 years the Vanier Institute of the Family has been compiling this data. How these folks are going to send their kids to university is a concern, and will likely spell more debt for young people as they require loans to finance their schooling. Rinse, repeat.

--

Mayor Miller's opening comments at the Toronto 2010 Operating Budget Launch:

Discussion

46 Comments

langford / February 17, 2010 at 07:55 am
user-pic
I can't imagine having 90+ grand in debt. I heard on CBC Radio this morning that baby boomers will be inheriting $41 trillion from their parents (in cash, not debt). I believe that figure is American, but should help curb some debt. :/ Sad to rely on that.
Torontonian replying to a comment from langford / February 17, 2010 at 08:27 am
user-pic
One sad observation is how many people of my age group
have squandered their inheritances in less than a year.
Absolutely squandered . . .nothing to show of it.
It must be endemic to the 50+ set.
agentsmith / February 17, 2010 at 09:06 am
user-pic
Reduced bylaw enforcement? So we're going from almost-zero to zero then?
jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 09:16 am
user-pic
Mayor Miller and his budget-making city councillors are all a bunch of scumbags!

They're so ready to take money away from the children (and their parents), charging for them to go swimming, raising the costs of summer camps and charging a new fee for families to even join these recreational activities.. And then at the same time they still want to keep all of their irresponsible perks, like TTC commissioners travelling for transit conferencess and etc??!!

(http://www.torontosun.com/news/columnists/joe_warmington/2010/02/17/12911151.html)

Absolutely Disgusting!! Especially after all of the controversy surrounding the TTC, Mayor Miller continues to show that he's completely out of touch with the population of Toronto.

Defenders of Mayor Miller -the king douchebag himself- should be ashamed of themselves, and their hero.. He's a disgrace, and the entire city is counting the days until he's gone.

--jackandcokewithalime
Xavier / February 17, 2010 at 09:19 am
user-pic
Does household debt include mortgages? I'd think that as the housing market continues to boom, that would be a major contributing factor to high household debt. If it doesn't include mortgages what are these people doing?
hmm / February 17, 2010 at 09:37 am
user-pic
So who pays the $350 when it happens in a school or a building? Or will the schools and buildings be forced spend precious time to first determine if the fire is real or not? I don't see this charge being seriously used, and it is getting too much press.
langford replying to a comment from hmm / February 17, 2010 at 09:40 am
user-pic
Believe me, it is used. I used to be a property manager in Toronto and if we didn't know who was the cause of the false alarm, which was most of the time, the owners of the building would fit the bill. I would account for it in my budget for each property.
Peter K replying to a comment from langford / February 17, 2010 at 09:51 am
user-pic
Actually, that estimate of what the baby boomers will inherit has been shrinking fast as their parents live longer and spend more on health, drugs, nursing care, etc.
Colin / February 17, 2010 at 09:52 am
user-pic
Ahhh, tax hikes and user fees. A parting gift from Mayor Miller to his contemptuous subject.
MrPotato / February 17, 2010 at 09:59 am
user-pic
Only a potato would think this budget makes sense!
Ratpick replying to a comment from Peter K / February 17, 2010 at 10:05 am
user-pic
Exactly, and don't forget that most boomers have very little saved for retirement ... and no pension. They DO have lots of real estate, which they will all be trying to liquidate at the same time.





jamesmallon / February 17, 2010 at 10:34 am
user-pic
Mounting debt, 10% unemployment and growing in Toronto, high real estate prices: sounds like the 80s real estate bubble to me. Oops, I said the 'b' word.
TO Rocker / February 17, 2010 at 10:35 am
user-pic
Nov, 2009: Governments across N. America tell the public to spend-spend-spend. "It's the only way to bring us out of a recession."

Feb, 2010: Government - "You're all debt-ridden! What's wrong with you? Now we have to take away your loan privileges"

Glad the people we elected to run things are doing such a great job *insert sarcasm here*
Malcolm Tucker replying to a comment from Ratpick / February 17, 2010 at 10:38 am
user-pic
Well don't worry -- the one-two punch of a property tax hike and the HST will take care of any leftover inheritence and retirement savings.
Simba / February 17, 2010 at 10:43 am
user-pic
-4% property tax increase----didnt we just have a increase put through last year with MPAC?
-minimum $350 billing for false alarm calls that result in emergency response- no problem with this- though I thought this was already done.
-There will also be service cuts, including reduced hours at city courts and libraries- this blows. The library is amazing.
So overall ..we'll pay more, for less...
Now lets get screwed by the province next month.
JL / February 17, 2010 at 10:53 am
user-pic
This an election budget. I am suspicious of ANYTHING coming out of Silly Hall on a normal day, but this one TRULY smells fishy.
Perhaps we will all need to wait until after the election to be sure...but by then it may be too late...



dry heave / February 17, 2010 at 11:06 am
user-pic
Just 1 cat makes your house stink like piss.

The idea of 28 cats makes me retch.
mr hate / February 17, 2010 at 11:09 am
user-pic
People are in debt because they're stupid.

They carry balances on their credit cards.

They get into bidding wars for houses and POOF they rationalize spending 50 grand more than planned because they just HAVE to have that house.

They don't bother to save up for a decent downpayment on their first house.

etc

etc

etc

Smarten the hell up, people.

Shawn replying to a comment from mr hate / February 17, 2010 at 11:15 am
user-pic
They spend 50K on a wedding (WTF) when they have student loans outstanding...

They have kids when they're not in a position to afford it.

They need that moronic crossover SUV that's shittier than a car in every way, but without the positives of a truck.

etc :)
mr hate / February 17, 2010 at 11:19 am
user-pic
Yeah people buy cars way beyond their means and have massive car payments.

Expensive weddings blow my mind too.

ETC
Peter K replying to a comment from mr hate / February 17, 2010 at 11:25 am
user-pic
How about people in debt who spend upwards of $3,000 a year on cigarettes and another $2,000+ on buying lunch instead of bringing it to work.
MP / February 17, 2010 at 11:53 am
user-pic
I'm with Peter K on the lunch-bringing, though; if people learned to cook more for themselves, and it's not hard while being rewarding, then they'd cut down dramatically on everyday expenses. The dinner you make is much cheaper than the one you buy, and results in yummy leftovers for lunch.

Also: nice lead pic; way to be topical, Filmores!
cocoa / February 17, 2010 at 12:09 pm
user-pic
Isn't by-law enforcement a source of revenue? Should maybe keep that one.
Dan replying to a comment from jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
Jackandcoke, do you even understand city finances? Here's a primer - http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/766665--queen-s-park-shares-blame-for-city-s-troubles

Cause you'd think if you were writing a blog that was more than just a personal rant, you'd try to get the facts first.

cocoa replying to a comment from Dan / February 17, 2010 at 01:06 pm
user-pic
And <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/silver-powers/the-jabba-the-hutt-of-cities/article1469654/";>another view</a> of the province's responsibilities.

Dawn replying to a comment from mr hate / February 17, 2010 at 01:21 pm
user-pic
I never understood expensive weddings either! What a waste of money.
Dan replying to a comment from cocoa / February 17, 2010 at 01:25 pm
user-pic
Interesting how Robert Silver leaves out a great deal of the province's role. Wouldn't have anything to do with his background would it?

From his bio on the Globe - http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/silver-powers/

An active federal and provincial Liberal, Robert was Gerard Kennedy's National Policy Director during the 2006 Liberal Leadership Campaign. Prior to returning to the private sector, he worked for Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty as a special policy advisor.
jackandcokewithalime replying to a comment from Dan / February 17, 2010 at 01:31 pm
user-pic
Dan,

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here... What facts do I have wrong?

Did Miller and his cronies NOT create new user fees for families and children?? Did they NOT allow for further perks for TTC Commissioners???

Oh, I think I see what's going on here... Did I upset one of King Douchebag's loyal followers?? Eh, Danny-mc-douche?

Why don't you go cry to someone who cares..

--jackandcokewithalime
Dan replying to a comment from jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 01:39 pm
user-pic
I'm saying you're not contributing to any meaningful debate. And your reply to my criticism just reiterates that.

Actually, on that note here's a timely overview of the problems with online comment sections. Wonder if Chantal Hebert has seen any of your posts jackandcoke.
Dan replying to a comment from Dan / February 17, 2010 at 01:41 pm
user-pic
Ooops - here's the column I'm referring to - http://www.thestar.com/opinion/article/766674--hebert-truth-comes-last-in-olympic-dustup-over-french?bn=1
jackandcokewithalime replying to a comment from Dan / February 17, 2010 at 02:16 pm
user-pic
Dan: "Oh, I didn't say that, I was just saying this..."

Yes yes... Sounds like some typical Miller Back-Pedalling Doucheness to me..

Why don't you get YOUR facts right first, and then make comments about other people.

--jackandcokewithalime

PS: "Wah wah wah wah wah", cried the douche while he ran away with his tail between his legs....
Mike W replying to a comment from jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 03:18 pm
user-pic
Actually Dan's made more of a point than you have. Are you just copying and pasting your blog to this blog's comment section?

Frankly I don't like Miller (or Giambrone for that matter), however I'd be genuinely interested to hear your thoughts on balancing the budget, because you can't just "reduce fee's, reduce taxes" and be done with it.
mr hate / February 17, 2010 at 03:27 pm
user-pic
Increased by-law enforcement = increased revenues

This is not rocket science.
keven replying to a comment from jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 03:34 pm
user-pic
Do you really have to be so abusive?
jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 04:04 pm
user-pic
Mike W/Keven,

Here's an idea for you both, why don't you try commenting on the story, instead of just chasing me around like star-crazed teenaged girls...

I mean, seriously.. You guys are so sad..

--jackandcokewithalime

PS: Your autographed pictures of me are in the mail! Have Patience guys, they're coming... ;)

PPS: Keven, Dan attacked me. I only defended myself. It's very typical of you to turn a blind eye to that.
Ratpick / February 17, 2010 at 04:37 pm
user-pic
Wow, this is like Grade 9 all over again.
Mike W replying to a comment from jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 04:37 pm
user-pic
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 04:48 pm
user-pic
Mike W,

Let me repeat: Here's an idea for you, why don't you try commenting on the story, instead of just chasing me around like a star-crazed teenaged girl...

--jackandcokewithalime

PS: A Douche is defined as irrigation with a jet of water or medicated solution into or around a body part (especially the vagina) to treat infections or cleanse from odorous contents.

Try it. Your friends will thank me.
Colchester2 replying to a comment from Mike W / February 17, 2010 at 04:51 pm
user-pic
Sorry jackandcokewithalime, I'm with Dan and Mike W. Here's something to consider: For years Metro Toronto soaked the business sector with taxes to subsidize the residential sector. The result has been business moving out to the burbs and the city forced to raise property taxes. Lastman didn't have the guts to do it. Miller was forced to. With provincial downloading and rising costs of policing, etc. where do you make significant cuts? And don't waste our time with talk of efficiencies. Don't get me wrong; I can't stand Miller and all his Dipper cronies. He missed a great opportunity with last year's garbage strike. But what's the answer; where's the magic bullet? Low IQ Tea-Party rhetoric can only go so far - unless the objective is to cheapen a good website.
jackandcokewithalime / February 17, 2010 at 04:58 pm
user-pic
I love how all of you Miller supporters are all going undercover now, pretending that you "can't stand him"...

Yeah! All I hear is you defending him, and I continuously see you popping up everytime I call out his stupidity (knocking me for saying it, and then defending him all the way).

It's all good.. You remind of those McCain supporters who claimed to be voting for Obama (to look good in public), but when they actually went into the voting booths, they voted for McCain.

The first step in being anti-Miller, is to stop making up excuses for his failures.

--jackandcokewithalime
yummymuffins / February 17, 2010 at 07:44 pm
user-pic
Did somebody mention Mel Lastman

Here's food for thought.

Nothing, NOTHING Miller has done, or will do, can compare to the idiocy of Sheppard Line.

$1 Billion subway line to nowhere.



Peter K / February 17, 2010 at 08:24 pm
user-pic
Yes, that line seems stupid now...but if Bob Rae hadn;t scuttled the Eglinton line in 1990 the Sheppard line would've made a lot of sense.
cocoa replying to a comment from Peter K / February 18, 2010 at 01:09 am
user-pic
Bob Rae did that? Weird, an NDP guy cancelled a major expenditure at the height of a recession...nowadays NDP guys expand service during recessions. How things change!
Rob replying to a comment from yummymuffins / February 18, 2010 at 07:34 am
user-pic
To be fair, the line, which I use every morning, is packed in the morning coming into Yonge-Sheppard and packed going east to Don Mills in the afternoon. People are using it. However, you are still right, it does go nowhere. It should have been extended to Downsview, at the very least.
keven replying to a comment from Rob / February 18, 2010 at 09:48 am
user-pic
Yea I've noticed that too. At first there didn't seem to be a lot of people using it, but even on the weekends it's pretty busy. It's also given me an alternative route. It does perplex me too, that its not all the way to Downsview.

Ahhh the Lastman legacy. How long will it take for us to forget it?

And to the Editor's of BlogTo: Can a "report this" feature be added to comments?
mikeb replying to a comment from Peter K / February 18, 2010 at 12:06 pm
user-pic
Bob Rae didn't kill the Eglinton line. Mike Harris did it. Bob Rae proposed the line and was for it big time--it went right to his riding.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal