Saturday, May 18, 2013Mostly Cloudy 17°C
City

Morning Brew: Sleeping TTC Worker Photo Goes Viral, Rocco Rossi on Transit City, Gun Found on Bus, Paraplegic Patient Arrested for Dealing Drugs from Hospital, Raw Milk Victory

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / January 22, 2010

dupontPhoto: "Dupont" by jamonation, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

It's still January, but I'm ready to declare this snoozing TTC collector's snapshot the most widely known Toronto photo of 2010 after it was passed around through social networking sites, reported on dozens of blogs and pretty much every mainstream news web site, and even came as the lead story on the 11pm news on Global TV.

Mayoral candidate Rocco Rossi had a lot to say yesterday, and appears to be looking a little right of center on a few issues. Putting a halt to the city's ambitious and costly Transit City plan (to explore other options), curbing spending and the stranglehold that unions have on city function, replacing city councillors who are on the TTC board with private sector people, and selling city assets to curb debt were issues he spouted. Hmmm. We're listening.

When you accidentally disembark a TTC bus and leave something of value behind, it's usually a far cry to expect to be lucky enough to get it back - especially if it's a semi-automatic gun. Some poor thug is going to have to get a new gun, which in this city should be easy enough.

Here's one for the weird but true list. A paraplegic patient wearing a hospital gown and in a wheelchair (and who already has a criminal rap sheet) was arrested at a coffee shop within St. Michael's Hospital for dealing coke, ecstasy and marijuana. Police also found and seized a loaded gun and bullet-proof vest.

North of the city, a Newmarket court has found raw milk activist Michael Schmidt not guilty on a long list of charges related to selling unpasteurized milk. Eating or drinking raw milk products in Canada is fine, but you can't sell them. Schmidt appears to have gotten around this by creating a co-op of people that buy into shared ownership of the cows that provides the raw milk. Now if only we could buy shares in cows at supermarkets, and get free samples of raw milk cheese with those shares.

And tomorrow is the big day for those opposed to Harper proroguing parliament. Hopefully the turnout at the Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament Toronto Protest event is substantial.

Bob Rae sings "Stephen Harper: He Prorogues":

Discussion

44 Comments

Ratpick / January 22, 2010 at 09:07 am
user-pic
The snoozing TTC collector is a terrifically composed photo. Looks like a Norman Rockwell.

Absolutely brilliant.
Val / January 22, 2010 at 09:18 am
user-pic
I posted this on BlogTO before, but here's another one of a collector doing crosswords: http://www.new-media.ca/blog/ttc-collector-the-best-job-in-the-world/
geg / January 22, 2010 at 09:27 am
user-pic
I wonder if the michael schmidt case can now be used as a wedge to grant exemptions to any other industries.. as I understand it, as "coop owners" these purchasers were being technically identified as "farmers".

If I buy into a law coop am I a lawyer now?
MadMax replying to a comment from Val / January 22, 2010 at 09:35 am
user-pic
I like the "Bobo clown" comment on your link. Maybe we should staff the ticket booths with those.
Dan / January 22, 2010 at 09:49 am
user-pic
Rossi's "a little right of centre," and "we're listening"?? When did BlogTO become the Toronto Sun? And did you hear what he said about bike lines or were you just so entralled with "the stranglehold that unions have on city function." Jeeze.
Jerrold / January 22, 2010 at 09:53 am
user-pic
Yeah, he said that bike lanes shouldn't be added to major streets, and I couldn't agree more!
Dan / January 22, 2010 at 09:56 am
user-pic
So Jerrold, you got any arguments to support why removing bike lanes from major streets would be a good thing? I mean actual data that isn't just knee-jerk rhetoric. Cause that's what journalism is supposed to be about, giving people facts. I'm listening.
Jerrold / January 22, 2010 at 10:00 am
user-pic
Bike lanes on major roads are a major nuisance and impedance to transit and cars in an already congested and worsening traffic situation. I saw Dupont go from speedy to a crawl in the fall, when car lanes were removed for a fat bike lane that few people use for several months of the year.
Dan / January 22, 2010 at 10:03 am
user-pic
So I take that as a no then, you've got nothing to base your argument on. Well done Jerrold, you've clearly done your homework!
Mark / January 22, 2010 at 10:09 am
user-pic
Jerrold, what about the major roads whose transit is located underground? Bloor? Danforth? Yonge? The University-Spadina line? The subway lines take more cars off the road than buses and streetcars and yet where are the bike lanes? And why do you think there shouldn't be any bike lanes on the roads that feature our highest order of transit?
Mad Max replying to a comment from Dan / January 22, 2010 at 10:09 am
user-pic
About as much as you've based your argument on, Dan?
rob / January 22, 2010 at 10:10 am
user-pic
Can anyone tell me what the definition of "viral" is? When does a piece of media become viral? What are the criteria? Views? Distribution? Comments?
Jerrold / January 22, 2010 at 10:10 am
user-pic
I've been harassing the TTC for *months* to provide me with Dupont bus data pre- and post- bike lane introduction to confirm my observations, but my requests have so far not been granted.
Dan / January 22, 2010 at 10:15 am
user-pic
Here's one local study showing how bike lanes on Bloor St would benefit local businesses - http://spacing.ca/wire/2009/02/18/study-finds-that-removing-parking-to-install-bike-lanes-or-widen-sidewalk-would-benefit-businesses-on-bloor/

Sounds like a positive to me! Your turn Mad Max.
Dr. Frink / January 22, 2010 at 10:16 am
user-pic
Going "viral" generally refers to a reoccurring practice or pattern of Internet use that moves from person to person. Someone posts a photo, like the sleeping TTC booth boob, people re-post it, caption the photo, photoshop it ... and it spreads from there.

For a great example, of this, Google "Sad Rat" that appeared on Gothamst in NYC.
Xavier replying to a comment from Dan / January 22, 2010 at 10:19 am
user-pic
Wouldn't removing bikes lanes from major streets increase capacaity and allow traffic to move at a more reasonable rate?
business owner / January 22, 2010 at 10:29 am
user-pic
Hey Dan, How many of those cyclists are stopping and shopping along Bloor. I don't consider jumping the curb to get around a car shopping? Do you?
Jacob / January 22, 2010 at 10:34 am
user-pic
"Putting a halt to the city's ambitious and costly Transit City plan (to explore other options)"

Yes, that's exactly what we need. Years and years of more "exploration of options", rather than something actually happening right now.

Pardon my language, but we seriously don't want to fall into that fucking trap again. TransitCity may not be ideal, but it's SOMETHING. Something that's long overdue, and can't reasonably be put off any longer.
Dan / January 22, 2010 at 10:38 am
user-pic
Hey business owner, did you read the actual study, cause that's the point - cyclists were more likely to be customers than drivers.

And Xavier, the way the law works in Ontario drivers, transit and cyclists all have the right to use the road. They're all traffic.
Anon / January 22, 2010 at 10:52 am
user-pic
Despite having ridden in the Dupont bike lanes many many times since their installation, I might actually agree with Jerrold on this point. I'd like to see the TTC data, at least.

But I'm more than a bit wary of generalizing from Dupont to every other street in Toronto.
business owner / January 22, 2010 at 11:19 am
user-pic
Hey Dan,
As we all know, you can twist statistics and studies into whatever you want the answer to be.

If you look at the article that you posted:

"46% walk, 32% take transit, 12% cycle, and only 10% drive. Not surprisingly, walkers were also the most frequent visitors to the area, followed by cyclists, transit users, and finally drivers."

They surprisingly forget about the 32% that take transit and leapfrog the 12% who cycle to the 2nd most frequent shoppers. Cars account for 10%. So, in the small study...maybe one more person cycles as opposed to drives? Not really an argument anymore is it?
Dan / January 22, 2010 at 11:30 am
user-pic
Business Owner, I gotta ask again, did you actually read the study, specifically page 18 - http://www.cleanairpartnership.org/pdf/bike-lanes-parking.pdf


12% of customers bike, that's the mode of transportation. However in terms of frequency of visits the order is walkers, cyclists, transit users then drivers. Sheesh, read before you post.


So yeah, the argument that there are economic benefits to bike lanes on major roads remains.


Nice try though. Too bad just like Jerrold you didn't do your homework.
truth / January 22, 2010 at 11:35 am
user-pic
Bike lanes, and bike traffic in general, should be directed to secondary streets. Traffic is at its most disfunctional and dangerous when you have very different speeds mixing. It's true on 400 series highways - which is why there are express and collector lanes that are separated and why crashes occur around exits. Traffic doesn't suddenly handle speed differentials better because there are bikes involved.

Cyclists are usually hitting 10-25km (very fit roadbikes can go 40+, but that's not very achievable in the city). They mesh much better with traffic on residential streets where drivers are going 30-40 and are inherently paying much more attention as they worry about kids, pedestrians, and parking spots.

Directing cyclists away from major streets will reduce door prizes, improve traffic flow, improve safety, and save space for traffic. Bike lanes eat up space but are little used 8 months of the year. Major roads where they may be useful is where there are no close alternative routes, there are more than 2 lanes per direction, and speeds are 50 or less (i.e. Wellington and Adelaide are major routes but could live with a bike lane (err once adelaide goes back to its normal width). Avenue is a bad place for bike lanes since there are far superior alternative routes (Poplar Plains, Forest Hill, Oriole Parkway, Rosewell...).
Casey Jones / January 22, 2010 at 11:41 am
user-pic
Daniel, I guess you must be on the clean air partnership committee. So, if you'd like people to say..."great job Daniel, I am really glad the government spent millions of dollars on a study that sent some people with clipboards around the streets for a day to prove that bicycles should be able to do whatever they like...then, here you go." Great job, Daniel. All of your work and pretty graphs were worth it.
Dan / January 22, 2010 at 11:59 am
user-pic
Um, Casey, I'm not at all. Just someone who cares about living in a progressive healthy city.

But your criticisms are really interested. Screw studies. Let's base public policy on what we see through our wind shields as we zoom by.
cocoa / January 22, 2010 at 12:14 pm
user-pic
So as soon as someone says something slightly right of centre they're the abominable Toronto Sun?

We need to think about cutting costs and it's not going to be pretty. The reason everyone loves Miller is because he didn't bother to have these difficult discussions or do any of the ugly cutting we needed. That's the easy way out. I hope more mayoral candidates are frank about harsh fiscal reality we face.

We will <i>have</i> to do things like cut services and sell off assets to make up for the massive annual deficits and to cut our debt. We can't keep piling it on and hoping the Toronto of the future can pay it all down.
Ryan L. / January 22, 2010 at 12:16 pm
user-pic
One problem with taking bike lanes off major streets is that it makes biking less convenient.

After living in an area that had zero bike lanes, but suggested side street routes, I can say that it is a hassle. If I wanted to go anywhere, I'd have to map out the route since side streets were usually not continuous. I'd also end up going out of my way, have to back track and end up being forced to bike small distances on very bike unfriendly streets because two bike friendly streets were not connected.

Suffice to say, the amount of recreational biking I did was minimal unless I was sticking to a route I knew well.
aaron / January 22, 2010 at 12:18 pm
user-pic
It drives me nuts that we have a serious candidate who's in favor of freezing transit expansion and making life easier for cars. I am a car driver, and I still think drivers are the last people my tax dollars should be spent on. I'd actually be in favour of the municipal government going all Amsterdam on our asses and making car driving in the core as miserable as possible. I recognize a lot of people won't agree with me on that. But, really... this is a candidate's views in 2010? Return our priorities to what they were in the 70s? Ridonkulous.
m / January 22, 2010 at 12:38 pm
user-pic
I don't think selling off assets -- wasn't he talking about Toronto Hydro among others? -- is necessarily the answer to defecits. If we are sans hydro revenue (which, I pay A LOT for hydro, and many other people do too), then how will we make up that revenue on a yearly basis after a sale? People pitch fits when Toronto levies a new tax, but if Hydro is sold then brace yourselves..
Politics / January 22, 2010 at 12:59 pm
user-pic
You may not agree with Rocco Rossi's view on Transit City, etc. but at least he made some kind of statement about his vision for our City and its deficit since he threw his hat into the mayoral ring. I have heard nothing from the other candidates.
Eric / January 22, 2010 at 01:20 pm
user-pic
Don't you think taking bike lanes out of main routes will be dangerous? Bikers are still going to use those roads, except now they don't have a dedicated lane and they are mixing in with the faster cars. I still see bikers out using bike lanes every day. With winter in toronto like this, with no snow and temperatures hovering around the 0 mark, why would they not keep biking?
Ratpick replying to a comment from aaron / January 22, 2010 at 01:28 pm
user-pic
BS. I've driven a car in central Amsterdam. It's not hellish whatsoever -- but it's not as good as walking, biking or riding the tram/metro.

The idea should never be to make driving "miserable." The idea should be to make transit excellent.

Transit City might accomplish that, but too many of its proponents see the issue as pro-car and anti-car. I hope we can find somebody who sees the bigger picture.



Anonymous / January 22, 2010 at 01:30 pm
user-pic
It gets curiouser and curiouser...

http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/January2010/22/c3221.html
mondayjane / January 22, 2010 at 01:51 pm
user-pic
back to the snoozing TTC collector ...

these dudes/ladies are often so astonishingly grumpy that perhaps a little nap would do those surly old darlings a world of good. I would expect Mr. ZZZZZ in the pic there would have woken up feeling fresh as a daisy and full of good cheer towards everyone dropping their $3 in the pail for a smelly, stale subway ride. All hail an on-the-job-siesta for TTC drivers and collectors in the name of even-slightly civilized service!



Ben / January 22, 2010 at 01:52 pm
user-pic
Dan and Aaron, agree with you 100%. The priority should always be, in order: walking, cycling, public transit, then cars. Obviously walking/cycling may not always be possible especially for long distances, but, generally speaking, cars should be given the least priority. It may be inconvenient for car owners for a while, but over time it will encourage moving to other forms of transportation.
MattAlexander replying to a comment from Mark / January 22, 2010 at 01:56 pm
user-pic
So if the bike lane on Dupont west of Lansdowne is the cause of congestion over there, why is there congestion on Dupont east of Ossington?

There's no bike lane there and the cars are always backed up during rush hour in the morning anyway.

In fact, Dupont is usually so congested that I ride my bike (every day, throughout the year) on Davenport where congestion is just as bad, except there is a bike lane, which means the smart folks on two wheels can safely bypass the unfortunate people on four wheels.
aaron@stasis.org replying to a comment from Ratpick / January 22, 2010 at 02:11 pm
user-pic
you can call bs if you want, but in amsterdam after a referendum to curb traffic by 50 per cent in the core passed in 1992, they decided to curb car use by making parking spaces both unavailable and extremely expensive. it was a deliberate measure taken to make car use less attractive. fewer cars makes transit, cycling, walking more efficient. we only have so much space for commuting, and giving that space to cars takes it away from everything else. you may be able to drive around in amsterdam now if you need to, but that's because most people won't make that choice.

anyways, you can agree/disagree with that.. and that I can understand. but why a leader would look forward by freezing transit boggles my mind. we're years behind now.

that said, I still have no idea who I would actually vote for. rossi's at least stated his platform.. it's just one I'll never vote for. i haven't heard an alternative yet that I will.
Ryan L. / January 22, 2010 at 02:13 pm
user-pic
I have a feeling Rocco is just pandering to the people who would have voted for John Tory. With so many Liberal candidates this is an easy way to get a lot of votes.
Mark replying to a comment from MattAlexander / January 22, 2010 at 02:21 pm
user-pic
I think you meant to reply to Jerrold. I never mentioned Dupont, although I do like the bike lanes that run from Jane and Annette all the way west to Lansdowne.
handfed / January 22, 2010 at 03:26 pm
user-pic
Why waste time protesting Harper? Lets get the angry mob together and show our appreciation of the TTC UNION!!
onegirl replying to a comment from business owner / January 22, 2010 at 08:17 pm
user-pic
I'd love to know what business you run. I used to be a year-round biker. Now, I ride in the fair weather and walk/ttc/drive a car depending on where I'm going and what I'm buying. But, shopping by bike is by far my favorite method... fast (often faster than by car or ttc many times), gives me freedom (don't have to search for parking or be at the whim of ttc schedules), and costs me nothing. But, if you really don't want my business while I'm biking, let me know the store/restaurant/whatever and I'd be glad to avoid it.

I'm so disgusted by Jerrold's take on bike lanes that I think I'll have to stop reading Morning Brew. Way too Toronto Sun for me. Maybe I'll give Torontoist a try.
Alogon replying to a comment from Val / January 23, 2010 at 11:24 am
user-pic
You know, I don't so much have a problem with someone doing crosswords while waiting in between customers at the crash gate because, really, all they do is look as you drop your fare or show your transfer. It isn't something that requires constant vigilance unless there is a crowd. It is insulting that they get paid so well to do what one of those chickens that plays tic-tac-toe against you for pellets at the county fair could do slightly better.
The sleeping ones are brutal though. I have personally woken up collectors in the days before the ubiquitous camera phones. "So sorry, but may I please purchase some tickets?" I think one guy that I can remember looked sort of grateful, like "whew, good thing you woke me" and the rest were slightly to very pissed I disturbed nap time.
I think the photo of the guy in the booth sleeping should have a night cap drawn on it, encircled in a wreath and made into their new logo.
Rico replying to a comment from Jerrold / January 23, 2010 at 01:34 pm
user-pic
Jerrold, your logic is truly flawed. Bikes ARE traffic. I could say the same about car lanes impeding my ability to ride my bike in the city. I could say that the 7 killed pedestrians in 7 days by 7 cars, is a clear demonstration that cars are the problem for congestion. You don't see people blaming bikes for congestion. Never has been the case. Your world is about nothing but cars. No public transit and no bikes. So you actually think you'll get anywhere in that situation, or will you then ban other cars but yours? That isn't a city, that's you. You that ignorant? Are Torontonians that bloody narrow minded? Next time you see some bikers, put them into cars in front of you, then see if you like that.
Rico replying to a comment from business owner / January 23, 2010 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
Hey business owner: My parents lived at Yonge & St. Clair for 30 years. My Mum stopped driving in the city because there was no point. It was much easier to get onto transit to achieve the same. It is much easier to get around this city by bike. I've bought all kinds of things by bike. I have had bikes stolen while I was shopping. Have you seen some of the bikes designed just for hauling crap? What about bike trailers? Panniers? Shopping by car is a waste in a lot of circumstances. That was recognized by the design of huge parking lots and super malls. Eglinton Ave. East in Scarbage is a fine example of what you are thinking. That's a horrible place.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal