City
Morning Brew: Blue Bin Overflow, Hit-and-run and Purse Snatch, Body Scanners coming to Pearson Airport, Stray Voltage on Sidewalks, Case Ootes to quit City Council, Proroguing Political Games
Photo: "Cheers, to light bulb people" by ip.sebastian, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.
What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):
Making a lot of trips to the recycling blue bin, especially at this time of year? Many Toronto residents are finding that they have more packaging to recycle than they have room for in their City-issued blue bin, and the City wants everyone to know that they can put out excess recyclables in clear plastic bags and/or upgrade to a bigger bin at no cost if this continues to be a problem. Don't slow the shopping though... it's good for the economy.
A wacky crime went down in the Bathurst & Lawrence area last night. A woman driving a stolen minivan first struck a pedestrian, then got out of the vehicle, approached the injured victim, and audaciously snatched her purse before getting back into the minivan. Shortly after, the suspect then had to flee on foot after striking a hydro pole and crippling the vehicle. Seems like a crime motivated by, and carried out in, serious desperation.
In an announcement yesterday, the federal government revealed that body scanning security equipment is coming to a number of Canadian airports, including Pearson. The high-tech imaging system allows security staff to see though clothing and visualize the passenger's body with 3D realism, which has some people crying out about invasion of privacy and rights. I wonder to what extent these concerns are a result of self-consciousness about body image, and what extent privacy is even a real issue here. It's not like security scans of John Baird's naked bits or Joan River's plastic thighs are going to end up on the front page of TMZ, right?
Despite a massive, expensive effort by Toronto Hydro to solve all of the "stray electricity" problems on city sidewalks (some $3-million is now spent annually to patrol and fix aging handwells that leak voltage), it would appear that not all have been curbed. A dog and a responding veterinarian were both zapped on the Danforth on Monday and have recovered.
In municipal politics, city councillor Giorgio Mammoliti has officially signed on as a candidate for mayor (and the Star has selected a few choice quotes from him, that involve Godzilla and monkeys). Also, veteran councillor Case Ootes won't be running for city council in October, instead opting to retire from the position (which may open the door for Jane Pitfield's return to city politics).
And at the federal level, and in a move likely aimed at ruffling feathers and getting media attention (look, it worked!), the Liberal party is planning to return to work on January 25th despite Harper having prorogued parliament until March 3rd. In related news, Harper appeared on The National last night and told Canadians that the alleged torture of Afghan detainees under Canadian watch isn't an issue that's on our radar. Too bad most Canadians were too glued to the (amazing) hockey game to even know about the interview or hear Harper sweep yet another damaging but soon-to-be-forgotten scandal under the rug.


Discussion
34 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Mammoliti certainly fits. He once memorably suggested we turn the Toronto Islands into a Red Light Zone for prostitution. Has he ever been there? It's one of Toronto's best summer family-friendly spots, with Centerville, Franklin's Garden, and loads of park space. The ferries are jammed with biking enthusiasts and strollers. And Georgie thought it would be a good idea to throw that away? What a clown.
And Giambrone? The disasterous handling of the fare increase can't help his chances. Touted as a "policy wonk", the guy couldn't lead or manage his way out of a paper bag.
David Pylyp
Living in Toronto
You're kidding right? Why don't we have video cameras in toilets and showers rooms then? It's not because we're self conscious.
To be honest all the years of going through an airport, they could have had a secret x-ray set-up & I wouldn't be the wiser. I see no harm in an x-ray that will be able to show them whether or not someone has something that could compromise the safety of the passenger & staff on the airplane. If someone seeing my business avoids a disaster so be it.
It is in no way as bad as what is being proposed in the United States, where they are actually discussing strip searching every Muslim man between the ages of 18-28. THAT actually violates human rights.
If it's civil rights in exchange for "avoiding disaster" what's the problem. You agree with that philosophy.
Man...if thats not the story to beat in 2010 i dont know what is.
Good for the perp though. She knew she was upsh*ts creek so why not go for broke!!
Kudos to her.
We all have seen the naked form before. He aint sitting there thumping one out to you, he is protecting you.
Every airport should have this devises.
It is moronic to think that endless security checks will make a difference if when something of note actually crops up nothing is done about it.
It is crazy to trade privacy and liberty blindly and willingly for the illusion of safety. Way more people have died as a result of airplane crashes than terrorists blowing them up and that certainly isn't because of airport security vigilance. It is just a rare thing statistically - millions of flights and very few hijackings and bombings. We take more risk riding bicycles. - http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/2002/html/table_02_01.html
You can scare all the lemmings into obedience with the threat of danger, fear tends to override the more rational parts of the brain.
How does someone seeing YOUR junk prevent disaster? Do you posit that the man at the scanner would go "postal" if he doesn't get a look at your balls?
Man...people are great!
Don't waste your time though, turns out Facebook User (Matt) is too stupid to teach.
The point is, people are going to see us naked if we want to get on a plane. If we don't want to get on a plane they won't. I don't care if someone sees me naked if it means I can get on with whatever vacation I am taking.
It employs terahertz radiation ....
"- Under various exposure conditions no biological effects could be detected.
- However, under some specific conditions of exposure, an induction of genetoxicity was observed to occur in lymphocytes.
- Medical Imaging employing appropriate exposure parameters is probably unharmful at least for single exposures." http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/284691
For those ladies afraid of having your private bits exposed by these scanners, consider abstaining from wearing TIGHTS on the street!
You and a lot of other people can't seem to grasp how much this ib overblown to frighten us into compliance. It is just a fact that hijackings and bombings on planes over the last 30-40 years are but a statistical blip overall compared to the number of flights a year. You have more chance of being killed on a bicycle than a plane, or in a car, or having a household accident.
The small number of incidents involving planes had been a fact prior to 9/11 and prior to all this security BS. The fact is, none of this extra shit means a thing if it is staffed by morons. Morons like the ones who let a guy with a one-way ticket, no luggage, who was on a watch-list and who was reported by his own FATHER get on a plane. Could scanners have seen this stuff in his underwear? Could they see it jammed up his ass? Probably not, therefore you are going to be seen naked and wait longer in an airport for the ILLUSION OF SECURITY.
But, because of people like you, when they push the RFID chips and other tracking devices we can be assured they will pass largely unopposed while idiots make the "I'll give up my rights to not die" sophist arguments.
You could be killed by a guy with a rifle from a balcony (and it has happened) at any time. If you are going to eat it, you are going to eat it, nothing you can do. I would rather eat it with my rights intact than die a controlled lamb.
Seems the passengers are the real security anyway. Last two attempted bombings, passengers stopped the guy. I am for Air Marshalls instead of this other, probably useless, extra screening. El Al doesn't do this crap, they have armed marshalls and alert security at the airport instead and they haven't had a highjacking or bombing in decades.
This is what happens with people they work with. You think travellers are going to get more respect?