Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 21°C
City

Morning Brew: George Smitherman to Run for Mayor, New Generation Sushi Kitchen Murder, 407 ETR Billing Problems, King & Spadina LCBO too Short and Stout

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / November 9, 2009

mural torontoPhoto: "Mural - DSC 0926 ep" by ericparker, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

George Smitherman has declared that he will be resigning from his post as minister of energy and infrastructure in the provincial cabinet to prepare for his bid to be Toronto's next mayor in 2010. He's either banking on memories being short, forgiveness being widespread, or his own ability to convince the public that his performance through the eHealth spending scandal was acceptable.

Murder in a sushi restaurant kitchen has a particular B-movie-esque plot ring to it, but this weekend it actually happened at one of the most popular sushi joints in Toronto - New Generation in the Annex. A minor dispute turned violent, one chef is dead, and I'm sure some people will have a hard time shaking the visual and eating raw fish any time soon.

Does the 407 Express Toll Route have a billing problem? Is the problem worthy of official investigation? Hundreds of people have come forward to tell their stories to the Toronto Star, many involving massive, interest-accrued bills from disputable road use dating back several years. In some cases, the 407 has issued invoices to the deceased even though the license plate in question hasn't been on the road for some time.

A potential strike by contract teaching staff at the University of Toronto, who collectively do about 3% of the teaching, was averted this weekend and a ratification vote goes to the union on November 16th. Details of the tentative agreement haven't been released, but the core issues were job security and wages.

Urban architecture critic Christopher Hume doesn't like the new LCBO at the corner of King and Spadina, particularly because it's just one-storey at an intersection that should accommodate taller buildings. He writes that the LCBO "has its own way of doing things and fails to see beyond that," and I couldn't agree more on both the (urban sprawl-like) building and (million bottles all the same) product selection fronts.

And this weekend, while I was up in the nation's capital enjoying the 24th annual Ottawa Food and Wine Show, blogTO was busy in Toronto:

Discussion

19 Comments

Xavier / November 9, 2009 at 08:39 am
user-pic
Smitherman's work at eHealth make him the ideal person to take over for Miller
Reality Check / November 9, 2009 at 09:19 am
user-pic
The scuttlebutt is that the King/Spadina LCBO is a temporary location. The expectation is that there will be a condo there eventually, but a project that combines that site with the Winners and possibly the PetroCan would be more valuable.

Since that current stretch of King already has a number of projects in construction or about to break ground, this lot would have to wait a number of years before it was developed. Far better to have a retail outlet as a temporary location than to keep it as it was - a parking lot.

The idiotic thing is that Hume then goes to tear in to Shoppers for not going into large buildings. I know why Shoppers isn't in the Ryerson building: they have a location in 10 Dundas (fka Toronto Life Square) as well as in the Eaton's Centre. Since one is attached to Rye Biz and the other is kitty corner, there is of course no chance (nor a need) to put a Shoppers in the building. Shoppers has other stores on Bay street that further demonstrate their aversion to tall buildings - Lu Cliffe Place, TD Centre, Royal Bank Plaza, Brookfield Place (fka BCE Place), and 69 Yonge.

Hume is an idiot and spouts off without even trying to be logical or consistent, much like environmentalist density advocates who then rail at condo development in Toronto (i.e. everyone at Spacing). I'm rather sure he isn't a fan of surface lots and is aware of a minor depression in real estate as well as the large glut of units just on that stretch of King (never mind the huge projects going up just south on Front: Fly and 300). But don't let that get in the way of yet another communist rant. And then he'll bitch that no one builds modernist houses or buildings that ignore the needs and desires of residents but please architectural students and are intriguing theoretically if not practically.
Reality Check / November 9, 2009 at 09:31 am
user-pic
As to LCBO product selection - it's abominable, but it's because its a government run monopoly. Abolish the LCBO and let chains and boutiques flourish. You'll have different selection in different places, people pursuing their passions, and stores that stock substantial verticals. We can get our equivalents of Berry Brothers & Rudd, or maybe an outpost. We can have liquor stores that don't run out of Crystal and other Champagne during TIFF. We won't have the government trying to put a nearly 3 decade old restaurant out of business when it moves do to the govenrment's crappy record keeping.

Finally, we'll free ourselves from the ridiculous threats of a cosseted union that threatens a dry summer unless their wage demands are met.
Ratpick replying to a comment from Reality Check / November 9, 2009 at 09:42 am
user-pic
I'll agree that Hume is often an idiot, but he's right on the money about the LCBO and their approach to building in the city.

My local BIA tried for years to get the LCBO to locate in the local shopping district. Didn't work because no location fit the LCBO's current template, which was designed for the suburbs, not for downtown. If you want wine, you gotta drive to get it. Is that good city-building?

Anyway, the King/Spadina building is a quick-slap booze stand on a major downtown corner. It's the kind of building that nobody could ever give a shit about, and it'll never capture anyone's imagination. Opportunity wasted.

But that's the Canadian way, isn't it? Aim low.



Ryan L. / November 9, 2009 at 09:44 am
user-pic
Smitherman is going to have a battle ahead of him. I'm sure we all remember how John Tory likes to do his campaigning.
hbr replying to a comment from Ryan L. / November 9, 2009 at 09:59 am
user-pic
Yes but lets not ignore the bigger picture.Smitherman's declaration almost insures that the F***head Mammolitti( or however you spell that ridiculous name)doesnt have a chance.
mark. / November 9, 2009 at 10:08 am
user-pic
As usual, Hume is right on the money. He made two points in the article. One is that a single story building at this intersection is a waste of space. That doesn't mean it should be an unimaginative glass tower. His other point is that this LCBO building is going to be removed in ten years. Here we all are recycling and reducing waste and an ENTIRE BUILDING is going to end up in landfill.
Roger / November 9, 2009 at 10:16 am
user-pic
In other news this morning, <a href="http://www.640toronto.com/Channels/Reg/NewsLocal/Story.aspx?ID=1163018"; target="_blank">Road Rage Lands a Car in the Humber</a>. I wonder what she went back to her car for? The bottle of sambuca or mickey of vodka?
Jon replying to a comment from Reality Check / November 9, 2009 at 10:18 am
user-pic
I think Hume's main beef with Shoppers is probably with their big ugly box near Danforth and Broadivew, as well as Queen and Parliament... and probably other similar instances where multi-storey mixed use would have been more appropriate than single-storey retail only. Of course both Shoppers and LCBO do sometimes locate in malls, in addition to their crappy indifferent boxes.
mr hate / November 9, 2009 at 10:19 am
user-pic
Dim Ontarians loves them some soulless brain dead Home Depot architecture.

Whoever designed the LCBO template is a talentless hack and just doing what the market wants/expects and what the boss wants/expects, as opposed to doing his/her job to f*cking use his/her imagination.

Wouldn't it be awesome if we could trade all these hacks with Scandinavia and take all their architects? A year or two later, all the Scandinavians would still have jobs and we'd have an urban landscape that wasn't embarrassing. Meanwhile all the Canadian hacks would be unemployed (and probably run out of the country).
rowdyroddypiper replying to a comment from Ratpick / November 9, 2009 at 10:22 am
user-pic
I thought the Canadian way was to "strive for mediocrity".
thatguy replying to a comment from rowdyroddypiper / November 9, 2009 at 10:54 am
user-pic
I think it's 'Strive for the lowest common denominator'.
mikeb / November 9, 2009 at 11:01 am
user-pic
"The explanation may be that having the LCBO as a tenant allows the landowner to bide his time; in that scenario, the store won't be around for more than a few years, maybe a decade, at which point something else gets built."

Bingo! That's the way the LCBO works. North Toronto is a good example. The store was evicted by development twice--Yonge and Blythwood, then again after it moved to St Germain and Avenue Road Look for a small condo to be built at Deloraine and Avenue Road in the next ten years.
RBeezy replying to a comment from mr hate / November 9, 2009 at 11:10 am
user-pic
methinks you need a hug.
Mark Dowling / November 9, 2009 at 01:09 pm
user-pic
I have no problem with product selection at LCBO, not least because with their website you can search for selections they have at other stores. The ability to bring back gifted stuff for exchange is worth so much.
Chris / November 9, 2009 at 01:39 pm
user-pic
Why do we constantly have to choose from the bottom of the barrel for politicians in this city,province and country. I wonder if the new council will be able to take a picture on the 1st try this time. But looking at how much weight they are all carrying they might not all fit!! And he was the Minister of Health go figure!
Roger replying to a comment from Chris / November 9, 2009 at 02:20 pm
user-pic
Who would you rather see run as Mayor of Toronto?
gahgolf / November 9, 2009 at 02:55 pm
user-pic
With Smitherman declaring his intention, it will require all other serious contenders to stake out their postions. This could turn out to be an exciting election.
Jacob replying to a comment from Chris / November 9, 2009 at 03:53 pm
user-pic
There's an old expression: Anyone who wants to run for office is the wrong person for the job.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal