Monday, February 13, 2012Partly Cloudy -2°C
City

Ad Man Terry O'Reilly on Marketing Toronto, Illegal Advertising and Russell "Cashman" Oliver

Posted by Tim / November 20, 2009

I don't watch a lot of Citytv programming but when I do I inevitably get nailed with a Cashman commercial. You know, the one with the dancing girls, club beats and aging Russell "Cashman" Oliver wanting to trade cash for my used gold and jewellery. His ads have been running for years and actually have garnered him a fair amount of publicity including an interview on CBC last year when DC Comics sued him for one that had a Superman theme.

His ads keep appearing which means they must be successful enough for him to keep paying his bills. When Terry O'Reilly, famed ad man on CBC Radio's the Age of Persuasion spoke at Marketing Week in Toronto last week I fugured he'd be the perfect person to ask about them. Keep reading for our Q&A in which we discuss these ads plus other salient Toronto advertising related topics like marketing the city, ad creep and the influx of illegal advertising.

As a Toronto area resident, you may be familiar with some of the really awful (but perhaps effective?) Ads that run during off-peak hours on Citytv and some of the other news channels. One in particular stands out - Oliver Jewellery. These ads (see above and below) are so bad they're almost good, and based on the fact they keep running, I assume successful. Are you a fan?

I am not a fan of this kind of advertising. That kind of hard-sell retail, with no real idea, just loud, aggressive selling gives all of advertising a black eye. It isn't pleasing, and I don't think it respects the viewer. Yes, Oliver may find it is successful in the long run for him, but it is the lowest form of advertising.



What makes these bad ads?

I feel all ads should give something back. At the very least, an ad should reward the viewer/listener for sitting through an ad with a smile, or a laugh. These hard-sell ads don't do that. They don't respect the audience's intelligence. I truly believe that when people say all advertising is bad, these are the ads they have in mind. Plus, these ads are also aired with high frequency, so hammer the audience.

If you were brought in to run Oliver's advertising strategy what would you change?

I would sit down with him and try and figure out what kind of a brand he really wants to be. If it is, in fact, a loud, hard-sell guy, i would try and bring some wit to it. Right now, it is silly and almost juvenile in its execution. I also think you can be hardcore retail but still have intelligence at work.

Toronto Tourism and the City of Toronto in general are also much derided for what many residents feel is their inability to effectively market the city. If you were tasked with marketing Toronto, what would you do differently?

I can't really say, because I'm not privy to their strategy. Oliver Jewellery aside, i don't like commenting on how I'd change ad campaigns without having a lot of knowledge about the product. I will say this - tourism campaigns are very tough to do well. It's tough because you are caught between projecting the image tourists already have about you, or projecting a completely new one that may not appeal to them.

Canada, for instance, is widely thought to be mountains, snow, rivers and moose. Europeans love this imagery of Canada, but that is hardly all that Canada is. Plus, Montana could also claim that imagery. It's not unique to Canada, but Italians, for example, dream of coming to Canada to see the mountains and the moose. I also think there are too many masters to please in a tourism campaign, too much vested interest. One of my first demands would be to streamline the approval process, so that it isn't left in the hands of a committee.

How do you feel about the increasing incidents of illegal, guerrilla marketing tactics in the city. Since these incidents often generate publicity (albeit not necessarily favourable) do you think it's paying off for marketers? Or is it ultimately bad for their business?

I think guerrilla advertising is a creative way for smaller advertisers to get attention. I don't think it is tolerated from bigger advertisers. The great thing about guerrilla advertising is that it is usually not paid media - therefore it levels the playing field for smaller advertisers. Some of it is highly creative, and I admire it. That said, illegal advertising is not smart. It can come back and bite an advertiser, as it did Ikea.

Toronto has a very active community aiming to keep ad creep in check. In particular, illegalsigns.ca works tirelessly to get the city to remove illegal billboards and now the city has introduced a sign and billboard tax by-law. Heroic work perhaps. But do you think more can be done to get marketers or industries to act more ethically or police themselves?

I think regulations and rules are very good things. Any industry needs to be regulated. There will always be companies that push the boundaries, or test the limits. Regulations make the industry behave responsibly.

You've just released a new book. What can you tell us about it? Can loyal listeners of your radio show on CBC expect to read some of the same or similar anecdotes?

Mike and I want people to judge advertising by the best, most creative advertising, not by the worst, bad ads. Most of your questions above focus on the worst of advertising, I want to celebrate the best of advertising. What if the music industry were only judged by the worst songs? Or the book industry by the most terrible books? There is some incredible advertising out there. Just look at the Advertising & Design Club of Canada Awards that were given out earlier this month - amazing work.

Canada ranks in the top five countries in the world when it comes to creative advertising. We have an incredibly high level of creativity here. That's what the radio show and the book celebrate: the stories behind the best campaigns ever done. We have over 600,000 listeners a week, so clearly, there is enormous curiosity when it comes to the 'behind the scenes' stories of Madison Avenue. Our biggest wish is that people start spending their money with the great advertisers, and stop buying from the worst advertisers.

Anything else you'd like to add?

Yes, there is too much advertising in the world. But remember that advertising does play an important role in a free-market economy. Almost everyone is connected to marketing. Most people work for companies that have to market their products. The marketing of those products keeps companies profitable and healthy, and consequently keeps lots of people employed. When Mike and i celebrate excellent advertising, it is advertising that is honest, smart and hopefully entertaining. That's the goal. And it is the kind of advertising most of the people I know in this business aspire to. We don't always hit the bullseye, but we try every time out.

Discussion

42 Comments

Karl Mercial / November 20, 2009 at 09:50 am
user-pic
You should add some more background about Terry - he was a great copywriter for years and then with some partners started Pirate Radio, an audio production company that writes music for commercials/records radio and tv spots...
He's a goddamn genius and his radio show is awesome.
Christ even my old parents listen to it.

And he's right - if Oliver's was willing to let smart people write some spots for him that take the piss out of him, they would actually become brilliant.
Ratpick / November 20, 2009 at 10:07 am
user-pic
"(Cashman ads) don't respect the audience's intelligence."

"That kind of hard-sell retail (Cashman again) ...isn't pleasing, and I don't think it respects the viewer."

Don't you just love it when admen make this distinction, as though "bad" advertising comes from the gutter and "good" advertising advances us as a people?

Didn't admen feed us a similar line back in the 1960s, telling us that cigarettes with filters are healthy?

'Scuse me while I scrape the shit off my shoes and get back to work. I have an ad to write by end of day.

Brad J. / November 20, 2009 at 10:07 am
user-pic
Terry O'Reilly is awesome--I have been listening to his show for years on the CBC. One of my top 10 Torontonians I'd like to meet randomly.
lmfao / November 20, 2009 at 10:08 am
user-pic
Russel Oliver's ads are absolutely hilarious and everyone I know is delighted when they appear on TV.

"These hard-sell ads don't do that. They don't respect the audience's intelligence. I truly believe that when people say all advertising is bad, these are the ads they have in mind."

This is incorrect. The man doesn't "get" ironic humour and probably has no business talking about this industry.

Also, the illegalsigns people have opposed some really great ads in the past with real artistic value. In their eyes, if it's illegal, it's illegal, regardless of any other merits. I'm sure there's an anti-illegalsigns website out there.
Jeff / November 20, 2009 at 10:10 am
user-pic
If Terry is so offended by Oliver Jewelry ads, he's probably not someone I'd be interested to meet...
conscious / November 20, 2009 at 10:11 am
user-pic
Over the years I've read numerous accounts from horrified customers of Oliver's. He supposedly makes people wait in between the front door area and main part of his store in a kind of trapped limbo. When finally let in after several minutes, acts surly and short tempered with his clientèle with an aire of condescension. His poor attitude aside, in my opinion it's his salient advertising approach in which he tries to come across the jovial everyman that works against him when it comes down to finding out who the real Russel Oliver is. It could also be how he's perceived by folks who smirk at his tv spots that have given him such a poor attitude, realizing he's unable to keep up the level of energy he projects.

In any case all his ads have made me want to do is punch him in the face.
Karl Mercial / November 20, 2009 at 10:16 am
user-pic
Ratpick on November 20, 2009 at 10:07 AM

"(Cashman ads) don't respect the audience's intelligence."

"That kind of hard-sell retail (Cashman again) ...isn't pleasing, and I don't think it respects the viewer."

Don't you just love it when admen make this distinction, as though "bad" advertising comes from the gutter and "good" advertising advances us as a people?

Didn't admen feed us a similar line back in the 1960s, telling us that cigarettes with filters are healthy?

'Scuse me while I scrape the shit off my shoes and get back to work. I have an ad to write by end of day.
------------
Apples and oranges.

Oliver does what he does because he doesn't know any better.
He thinks his ads are awesome. He thinks people think he's some kind of celebrity but doesn't realize it's for all the wrong reasons.

Good advertising with an actual idea doesn't advance us as a people like, say, the Mona Lisa, but it does raise the intelligence bar a millimeter and God knows in this knuckle draggy stupid world where adults can't find Iraq on a map, we need that.
heh replying to a comment from Karl Mercial / November 20, 2009 at 10:32 am
user-pic
Dude, I'm pretty sure Russell understands the absurdity of his ads and is playing it up like nobody's business. His ads are a cut above the other jewelers, who are plainly oblivious, but their ads are still very funny to watch.

Take Harold the Jewelry Buyer, for instance. I would take your assessment of Oliver and place it squarely on Harold, because he seems to be taking himself seriously. That's what make his ads even funnier.
Steve replying to a comment from Jeff / November 20, 2009 at 10:33 am
user-pic
Agreed. It's amazing what people get uptight about. Oliver is the best!!
rek / November 20, 2009 at 10:34 am
user-pic
Oliver's ads are crude and irritating, but they aren't insulting.

If you want ads that insult the intelligence of the audience, look no further than those that use fear/uncertainty/doubt to prey on people. GERMS ARE EVERYWHERE AND THEY'RE KILLING YOUR BABIES! Or the "buying better" wrappers, thinly disguised "tips" that give you the product boilerplate as if it came from some impartial assessment agency.

There's something refreshing about ads that straight up tell you what they're for, instead of pushing a ridiculous lifestyle angle (drink this beer and you'll get all the ladies, drink this scotch and you'll be a manly man with great wisdom), or something old as new (recent car commercials that proclaim "game changers" they're no different from what they were selling two years prior).
Mel / November 20, 2009 at 10:36 am
user-pic
A friend of mine once went to Oliver's store and told me he couldn't believe how rude and sexist he was to his customers and staff. He said he was almost tempted to file a complaint and would definitely never go there again.

Regarding Oliver's ads, they're terrible. The problem is he's trying to be ironic and kitschy but he doesn't realize that when it's done deliberately it has the opposite effect. Rather than appearing funny in a cheesy way, his ads are just pathetic and boring. Anyone who finds his ads appealing is too easily amused.
Steve replying to a comment from Jeff / November 20, 2009 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Well, his ads anyway.
truth / November 20, 2009 at 10:48 am
user-pic
ilegalsigns.ca are just a bunch of totalitarian marxists who oppose free speech and the free market. The only restrictions on advertising on private property should be obscenity - no taxation, no regulation. They want us in a Stalinist environment of no commercial speech, no personal speech. It's the same impetus that bans political speech and it is vicious and illiberal.
MelS replying to a comment from heh / November 20, 2009 at 11:08 am
user-pic
Couldn't agree with you more. Harold the jewelry buyer is hilarious. The cheesy drum machine background music, customers that barely speak English ("now i'm going to shop lady" I'm looking at you) I never found Russel Oliver's commercials as annoying as Marineland...friendship cove? beluga whales? i didn't like the original commercial but they keep making it worse by tacking on more lame lines...

Illegal lines can try, but will ultimately fail. I for one accept our postering alien-lizard overloards...
MelS replying to a comment from MelS / November 20, 2009 at 11:11 am
user-pic
by 'illegal lines', i was sure to mean illegalsigns...
Karl Mercial / November 20, 2009 at 11:18 am
user-pic
truth on November 20, 2009 at 10:48 AM

ilegalsigns.ca are just a bunch of totalitarian marxists who oppose free speech and the free market. The only restrictions on advertising on private property should be obscenity - no taxation, no regulation. They want us in a Stalinist environment of no commercial speech, no personal speech. It's the same impetus that bans political speech and it is vicious and illiberal.
-----

Uh, no.

They're the only people who give enough of a shit to call out when an ad is placed where it is illegal to do so.

They're the only people who give enough of a shit to read the city's own bylaws about what is allowed to go where and how big it's allowed to be.

The city is completely incompetent when it comes to enforcing its own bylaws, so I'm glad illegalsigns exists, even if they're doing the city's job that we all already pay for with our f*cking taxes.

There has to be regulation of outdoor advertising or else the city will end up looking like some piece of shit tacky vegas strip nightmare. But hey- maybe that's what you'd prefer.
W. K. Lis / November 20, 2009 at 11:20 am
user-pic
Those ads pay the salary of the people working at those stations. Else there will be nooooobody with jobs. And noooobody will go to those stores.
kat replying to a comment from conscious / November 20, 2009 at 11:21 am
user-pic
This is absolutely bang-on. The man is a despicable person who is insulting to anyone with a mind to conduct a fair transaction and with a degree of intelligence. I turned around, walked out and went home to take a shower. What a dirty bad feeling that man gives off!
yup replying to a comment from truth / November 20, 2009 at 11:22 am
user-pic
Agreed. Illegalsigns are at least 65% scum themselves.
jack / November 20, 2009 at 11:35 am
user-pic
to me advertising has to generate sales, 'cause ultimately you need that to fund your advertising.. the fluffy and pretty stuff should be left to the creative agencies to pay for themselves so they can enter them at Cannes.. noone has the time now to wait for several years to build equity and hopefully that would turn into sales down the road in economy like today..
as for respecting consumers, you need to be honest with your ad.. Oliver jewellery is execellent, it breaks through, it sustains awareness, and obviously people respond to it.. it might not be movie quality, but then he is not selling an image(or a hollywood image).. he is a businessman.. the message is simple and clear and consumer gets it....he doesn't have a million dollars production budget.. and it works.. so what more do you need to ask for
jack / November 20, 2009 at 11:38 am
user-pic
if creative people like to do fluffy pretty ads, maybe they should come up with a compensation model that ties with sales with the advertiser and share the gains or loss, instead of charging advertisers on every single little thing! so they dont propose TV ads for any business issues
jack / November 20, 2009 at 11:41 am
user-pic
re: insulting and rude..
so I guess Marlboro commercials were good even they were selling you products that kill?
Brian McKechnie / November 20, 2009 at 11:48 am
user-pic
We did a piece on Oliver (and a few other local guys with bad advertising) last year. You can read/watch the piece here:

http://www.citytv.com/toronto/citynews/entertainment/movies/article/3198--a-look-behind-local-commercials-pt-1-russell-cashman-oliver

He knows they are annoying but they work for him and he's making cash.
Brian! / November 20, 2009 at 11:49 am
user-pic
Whether the ads are annoying or not, they are effective...look at the discussion they have created here...which was created by an article about the ads.

I think Russell is trying to become a Youtube cult star by making these videos. He is getting recognition for these outrageous ads but a good question would be how successful are they?
Jennifer / November 20, 2009 at 01:04 pm
user-pic
ALL the "sell your jewellery for cash" ads are irritating, by the sheer fact that they run them ALL THE TIME!! I watch CP24 in the mornings to get my weather, transit and headlines before work, and every time they go to commercial it's either Oliver, Harold or Oren telling me to bring in my old jewels. When the time came to sell an old necklace, I went elsewhere.
Lori / November 20, 2009 at 01:08 pm
user-pic
I hate Russell Oliver's ads. They are very cheap-looking and I have also heard that he is not a nice person at all.
Moneesha / November 20, 2009 at 02:46 pm
user-pic
Of course Terry would be against Russell's ads.

Russell is the epitome of a very successful ad campaign that didn't involve the hiring of high-priced ad experts like Terry. Terry wants you to believe that only experts can create good ads. If he didn't, he would be out of a job.

And let's not forget that Terry is not as impartial as people like to think he is. He has a company in the marketing/ad business, so he has something financially to gain in all of this.

I like ads / November 20, 2009 at 02:55 pm
user-pic
He never said only ad agencies could make good ad, he just said he doesn't like Oliver's ads and said what he would do to change them.
He's right though - 99.999% of awesome ads are made by "high-priced experts", which is why they're high-priced experts. I doubt highly that he thinks he's gonna get big leads on business from an article in BlogTO.
m / November 20, 2009 at 02:56 pm
user-pic
Can someone tell me what those hand-sized robot figures painted on the streets in either black or white, downtown are advertising?

I saw them on Queen West, then one on John St between urbane and CityTV. And figured it was something local, but when I went to Montreal I saw a few on the streets there too. So I figure its a company promoting something. Don't know what it is. Can anyone give me a clue?

Moneesha replying to a comment from I like ads / November 20, 2009 at 03:05 pm
user-pic
I like ads on November 20, 2009 at 2:55 PM

I doubt highly that he thinks he's gonna get big leads on business from an article in BlogTO.

---------------------------------------------------------

Terry gets big leads from his radio show. He knows how to create his brand, which is why he started his show. And now b/c of his show, and his brand as an expert to be trusted, his marketing/ad business is booming.

It's too bad that the suckers at CBC Radio didn't catch on. Nice to know that my tax dollars are being well spent!
Karl Mercial replying to a comment from Moneesha / November 20, 2009 at 03:35 pm
user-pic
Pirate Radio has been around since the early 90's. O'Reilly has made more than enough money, so no, he's not doing the radio show to try to drum up business.
He does the show because he loves advertising and I think he was probably bored with it all and needed an outlet for his love of the craft. He has been an expert for a lot longer than the radio show has been around. The only reason he got to do the radio show was because of his enormously successful career on the advertising side and the audio side.

Pirate isn't a marketing/ad business.

It's an audio post production house.

They will, on occasion, write radio ads directly for a client (Toronto Symphony Orchestra a few years ago, for example), but that's not what has made them successful. So no, Pirate ain't "booming" from the radio show. Pirate does well because they do a great job at what they do: all aspects of audio for radio/tv ads.

Here's a link to his company's work:
http://www.piratetoronto.com/thework.aspx

No offense intended, but you don't really get how advertising clients are won or lost, or how the business works.
Moneesha replying to a comment from Karl Mercial / November 20, 2009 at 04:00 pm
user-pic
Karl Mercial on November 20, 2009 at 3:35 PM , replying to a comment from Moneesha

No offense intended, but you don't really get how advertising clients are won or lost, or how the business works.

------------------------------------------------

No offense, but I suspect you either work for Terry or are friends with him, eh? Or, maybe it's Terry himself trying to paint a rosier picture? Anyway, enough of your spin. I would much rather listen to "Cash Man", who is more genuine than your bud, Terry.

Karl Mercial replying to a comment from Moneesha / November 20, 2009 at 04:06 pm
user-pic
I'm just someone who knows a couple of things about a couple of things trying to straighten out someone who doesn't.

Believe what you want. Have a nice day.
dobermanmom / November 20, 2009 at 04:24 pm
user-pic
i went there a few years ago to sell an old engagement ring.
he offered me literally $50 for a $1900 ring that was less than 1 yr old, with proof of purchase (and ring stats).

he was extremely rude to me. and my experience was exactly as described above in a few posts.

i know he's a douche bag -and he ad's clearly reflect that.
Ratpick replying to a comment from Karl Mercial / November 20, 2009 at 04:59 pm
user-pic
"Good advertising with an actual idea doesn't advance us as a people like, say, the Mona Lisa, but it does raise the intelligence bar a millimeter..."

80% of scientists agree that your statement is untrue!


Ratpick / November 20, 2009 at 05:01 pm
user-pic
Sorry, I was just heckling with that last comment.

Here's the serious reply:

We, as a society, should not expect/ask/allow the snake oil salesman to teach us ANYTHING except not to believe everything we hear.

Moneesha replying to a comment from Ratpick / November 20, 2009 at 05:11 pm
user-pic
Ratpick, I totally agree with you!

Terry's in the business of manipulating the masses. I suspect Karl Mercial is too.

Terry (and Karl), you may think that what you're creating is intelligent and witty. However, at the end of the day, all you're creating is propaganda, pure and simple.
Sean / November 20, 2009 at 06:03 pm
user-pic
Oliver Jewellery, now that's an oxymoron. They don't sell rings or watches!
rek replying to a comment from m / November 20, 2009 at 10:32 pm
user-pic
Those are Stickman's stickers. He's a New York street artist.
tax marketing and operations coaching / November 21, 2009 at 02:11 pm
user-pic
yeah,if creative people like to do fluffy pretty ads, maybe they should come up with a compensation model that ties with sales with the advertiser and share the gains or loss, instead of charging advertisers on every single little thing! so they dont propose TV ads for any business issues.
Sky Captain replying to a comment from truth / November 22, 2009 at 04:13 pm
user-pic
And you would know this because....? Have you even ever studied Marxism/Leninism? Or do you just pick up bullshit from Faux Noise/<i>The National Post</i> and then make that the basis of your statement? Come on, let us know!
Tex / November 29, 2009 at 03:51 am
user-pic
Come on down to Tex and Ednoa Boyle's Prairie Warehouse and Curio Emporium...just 5 miles off Route 42! C'mon down and see Chucky the Wonder Chicken.... Pay five bucks and watch Chucky hit a home run! See Jo-Jo the Giant Groundhog....eight feet tall! So, c'ome on down to Tex and Edna Boyle's Praire Warehouse and Curio Emporium! We'll see y'all real soon!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal