Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 21°C
City

Morning Brew: Mandatory Helmets for Cyclists, School Starts at 10am, Leafs Enter Camp with High Hopes, Platform Changes at Union, More KISS for Oshawa?

Posted by Derek Flack / September 14, 2009

Massey Hall TorontoPhoto: "massey hall" by Jay Morrison, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

With the death of Darcy Allan Sheppard still fresh in many citizens and politicians' minds, Councillor Michael Walker's push for mandatory helmet and bike licences will be reviewed during a Public Works and Infrastructure committee meeting tomorrow. In the meantime, The Star has yet another article -- this time an instructional Q and A -- on how cyclists and motorists need to follow some basic rules in order to effectively and safely share the road. If only it were that simple. The majority of North American cities just aren't built to accommodate this sharing of the road, and while following the rules helps, it doesn't ensure that accidents won't happen at an alarmingly high rate.

In a move that comes about fifteen or so years too late (at least for me), the Toronto high school, Eastern Commerce, is piloting a project in which classes don't begin until 10am. Needless to say the students are thrilled, but there's actually compelling research to indicate that teen brains just aren't programmed for early classes. Perhaps, then, I'm still a teenager because it's feeling altogether too early this morning.

Hope springs eternal this time of the year, as my beloved (and often despised) Toronto Maple Leafs kicked off training camp over the weekend. With a revamped roster that bears Brian Burke's blueprint (how's that for alliteration?), expectations are back up in Leafland. At a very minimum, news about actual hockey games -- pre-season or not -- might help to turn attention away from that other saga.

GO commuters traveling through Union station will find that renovations now allow for increased access to the transit hub. But there's just one problem: the change to the platform means that a significant number of departures and arrivals have changed location, which is set to cause some confusion. Nevertheless, early indications from 680 News are that commuters are quite pleased with the progress.

Oshawa Councillor Robert Lutczyk is pushing for another KISS concert after tickets for a first one sold out in a matter of minutes. After having won an online competition for a live date from the band, the 'Shwa had to fight to bring the band to their small venue in the first place, so I'm thinking this ain't gonna happen. And this is too bad, Oshawa deserves a little good news every once in a while. And that's not smarmy downtown Toronto B.S. -- I mean it.

Discussion

28 Comments

jamesmallon / September 14, 2009 at 08:20 am
user-pic
The streets are fine for cars and bikes to share, if people would get off their phones and stop thinking they are the centre of the universe. Roads are narrower and more crowded with cars and bikes in Japan, and pedestrians too as sidewalks are often missing, yet it is far safer to walk, ride or drive there. The problem is not our rather wide roads, but the people on them!
Jerrold / September 14, 2009 at 08:24 am
user-pic
Thanks for rising early to bring us the M'Brew, Derek! In other news, Pearson airport is a zoo this morning. Boarding without coffee!
jeff replying to a comment from jamesmallon / September 14, 2009 at 08:48 am
user-pic
I couldn't agree more!

No patience. No courtesy. No regard for anyone or anything beyond oneself. This problem behavior applies to cyclists and drivers et al.
nick d / September 14, 2009 at 08:55 am
user-pic
Teenagers need to be pushed, prodded, and abused. Otherwise they'll just be unprepared for real life. Suck it up, sleepyheads.
bikesandcarsohmy replying to a comment from jamesmallon / September 14, 2009 at 09:04 am
user-pic
I agree with what you are saying, but at this point we have to deal with the drivers we have, not the ones we want. To increase the competency of the drivers on our roads would require a complete and massive overhaul of our licencing system, and many people would lose their right to drive.....which will never, ever happen in our society, where people seem to think that the 'right' to drive is in the consitituion.
everyonehatesteens replying to a comment from nick d / September 14, 2009 at 09:06 am
user-pic
You are 'pushed, prodded, and abused' in your daily life? Wow, that must suck. In MY real life, none of those things are happening, so perhaps your shitty view of the 'real world' isn't universal.
Ryan L. replying to a comment from nick d / September 14, 2009 at 09:09 am
user-pic
Teenagers are tired in the morning because they stay up too late. If I were 10 years younger I'd probably look at the 10am start time and say 'sweet, now I can stay up an hour or two later' and little would change.
anastassia / September 14, 2009 at 09:41 am
user-pic
My highschool started at 8:20 and it was fine. In fact, it made room for after school activities. many more people joined sports teams because there was more time in the day for it. It might have helped that I walked to scool, but that doesn't change the fact that even after practice students got home by 4 with enough time to spare for homework and social life. Ten is just too late.
TokyoTuds / September 14, 2009 at 09:42 am
user-pic
I was cycling on The Danforth yesterday, and a driver did a goofy maneuver and came to a stop, and as I passed him on the left he said out his open window "Sorry, man ... " and I replied with a friendly "No problem.... ". That really made my day, a neighbourly exchange between 2 people sharing the road, and giving each other a break. Stress-free sharing of the road is within our grasp if we all make the effort.
gorf / September 14, 2009 at 09:46 am
user-pic
It bothers me that the bicycle portion of this blog starts off immediately in reference to DAS. No helmet or license would have saved his life in that situation.

That said, I don't see how a law can be enforced when there are so many grey areas to the subject.

Would bike licenses mean that parents can no longer teach their children how to ride out front of their house, in an alley, or on a cul de sac in suburbia?

Do we need to buy a book to study before we take a test? How much does the test cost?

How often does the license need to be renewed? What is that cost of that renewal?

Do we physically have to put a plate on our bikes? How much is the plate going to cost as well as the attachment to fix it to our bikes?

Can you get more than one plate if you own more than one bike?

Is the license an acceptable form of ID and proof of age?

Does it only allow you to ride a certain type of bike?

There are many oblivious people walking around the streets and sidewalks who carelessly walk out of shops and bump into groups of people. Others who stop seemingly randomly to peer into a shop window causing sidewalk congestion etc etc. Perhaps we should introduce walking licenses too?

Hell, people are killed in household fires due to lack of attention in their kitchen as well. Perhaps it is also a good idea to make people get a cooking license before they can feed themselves. That would save lives right?

Get real.
TokyoTuds / September 14, 2009 at 10:01 am
user-pic
I too am against bicycle licenses: it would take away a lot of what is great about biking.

But I did have an idea that would be a good compromise: a free, but mandatory short course and test for all high-school students. You get your license once, and it is valid for life. Many of the students who will go on to be avid drivers will have more empathy for cyclists, and the cyclists will know that the drivers know how to expect cyclists to maneuver on the road.
Mike W replying to a comment from bikesandcarsohmy / September 14, 2009 at 10:23 am
user-pic
You have a good point if by "drivers" you mean the drivers of both cars and bicycles. Believe or not some cyclists would lose the privilege to cycle if it was enforced like driving is.
tripper / September 14, 2009 at 10:35 am
user-pic
As long as we're adding more red tape and bureaucracy to the process, how about if we roll the two licenses into one? Anyone wishing to have a cycling license must also pass the drivers test (at least the written part) and vice versa. That way everyone gets a sense of the other's rights and responsibilities on the road.
jon / September 14, 2009 at 11:16 am
user-pic
If you have a Car drivers license, then you can use the road on your bicycle. Otherwise you should be limited to the sidewalk at a speed of 5km/h yielding to pedestrians 100% of the time.

No need for a separate bicycle license. That is retarded.
sadtimes / September 14, 2009 at 11:28 am
user-pic
on my ride to work along queen west today, i saw a little white haired lady wearing a helmet sitting in a plastic chair with her own blood pooling on the sidewalk. she was talking to three police officers, and had clearly just been hit by a car. all i heard as i passed was her say "and then he shouted at me."

and i have no idea what happened, but even if was ENTIRELY her fault, but please don't shout at the person that was just hit, bleeding on the pavement. it's not cool. help them first, then get mad later, once they stop bleeding.
Dianne / September 14, 2009 at 11:43 am
user-pic
My highschool in Brampton has late starts on Wednesdays from now on. 10am-3:02pm. I think it's more helpful for hump day, rather than everyday. They need to get used to waking up early in preparation for Uni classes
Diane / September 14, 2009 at 11:47 am
user-pic
tripper, that's a brilliant idea!

It'll never happen, but it should.

As a bonus, it would help erase the battle lines between cyclists and motorists, and make each "side" realize that they're more alike than they might care to admit.
jamesmallon replying to a comment from bikesandcarsohmy / September 14, 2009 at 12:06 pm
user-pic
Oh, we can bring civility back to the roads with the narcissistic drivers we have: get the cops to enforce the laws that are already on the books maybe! As for narcissistic pedestrians and cyclists: they don't kill many people except themselves, so let Darwinism take care of them.
nick d replying to a comment from everyonehatesteens / September 14, 2009 at 12:22 pm
user-pic
Wait. hold up. Are you sure you properly read my comment everyonehatesteens?
Cause I sure didn't say I was being 'pushed, prodded, and abused'. Surely you'd have enough sense to properly read, process, and understand what you've read. I think I was pretty clear in implying that doing things you don't necessarily want to do at a young age builds character, contributes to your sense of responsibility, and ability to respect others (things you surely know nothing about).
They say "Ignorance is bliss". You, my friend, must be one blissful motherfucker. Must be nice to be uneducated and unemployed!
Reality Check / September 14, 2009 at 12:31 pm
user-pic
The problem is that self righteous cyclists don't abide by any laws. Vigourously enforce and prosecute them, then in 5-10 years when they get out they'll have learned their lesson.

DAS' death is a good thing. Lots more violent couriers to go, but a start.

As to 10AM school - the real students are at school far earlier. Huge numbers of sports have morning practices at 7 or 7:30, as do many extra other extra curriculars - typically band. This lets people be involved in many things at the same time, though the writers here were all slacking, smoking dope, and cutting themselves. Real students went to football practice high or made sure to fit their drinking and drugs into their other commitments.
o_O replying to a comment from nick d / September 14, 2009 at 12:33 pm
user-pic
I'm missing the problem with later school start times. Scientifically it has been proven that teens learn better starting a bit later in the morning and that that changes as teens move out of puberty. Since this puberty only lasts so long and it will end at or around the time they enter the workforce, what is the danger here? I think it's about time we started looking at how to help kids learn better instead of making school about training kids to conform to some one-size-fits-all job that most of them will never end up doing.
Kane replying to a comment from jamesmallon / September 14, 2009 at 12:40 pm
user-pic
You don't know what the word 'narcissistic' means do you ?
Kane replying to a comment from jamesmallon / September 14, 2009 at 12:43 pm
user-pic
In other news a 17 year old robber was struck and killed by a car.

1. We should enforce helmets, licenses for all robbers.
2. possibly ban all robberies
3. charge the victim the robber for making the robber feel like he has to get away quickly

I'm content with appreciating instant karma though. My friend had a store in that hood, and robberies were a daily occurrence. Increasing the speed limit in that stretch may be a solution to the problem.
everyonehatesteens replying to a comment from nick d / September 14, 2009 at 12:49 pm
user-pic
You Wrote:

"Teenagers need to be pushed, prodded, and abused. Otherwise they'll just be unprepared for real life."

Implication: 'Real Life' (as defined by you) involves being "pushed, prodded, and abused". I take issue with this, because I don't believe it.

As for the other stuff you wrote, if you think you know that much about me from a random comment, you have bigger problems then can be addressed here.
jamesmallon replying to a comment from Kane / September 14, 2009 at 01:35 pm
user-pic
It would seem you don't realize that the word means more than only vain about appearance. Look it up.
jamesmallon replying to a comment from Kane / September 14, 2009 at 01:36 pm
user-pic
Confusing. I can't tell what you mean to say, so I don't know if I agree or disagree. Well, I'm done with this subject. Bye.
Gloria replying to a comment from Dianne / September 14, 2009 at 02:32 pm
user-pic
Dianne, I, and several of my friends, specifically built our schedules so we wouldn't *have* early classes wherever possible. It doesn't mean we weren't prepared for jobs -- a lot of us worked in the summer or had part-time jobs during the school year. (Hell, I worked during most of my university career, getting up at 4:30 AM every week day.)

What it did mean is that we *recognized* the luxury school systems afforded to us, and took advantage of it. If I took classes every day at 8AM, I wouldn't have gotten my job.

As for other arguments: School has never, ever prepared any of my peers for "real life." If you think learning in an isolated, controlled environment -- where your schoolmates and teachers are often the same ones for years -- is appropriate preparation, you're dead wrong.

As studies have pointed out (sigh), teens stay up late because they function better during the latter part of the day and so instinctively stay up later, not necessarily because they're young and stupid (even if they are).

(My boyfriend himself says he works better later. He's lucky, because he gets to work 10-6.)

And yes, please don't forget that not all of us work 9-5. Many people, if they have the choice, set their own hours, or their workplace just sets later hours.

My feeling is that a lot of working adults are just bitter that they weren't accommodated during their schoolyears and think that young'uns should just suck it up and pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Later hours for high school students doesn't mean they don't have to do the same work, and punctuality still matters. Giving them that leeway of an extra hour just tells kids we trust them and we expect them to improve accordingly.

Don't act like kids are enemies that need to be browbeaten in order to teach them a lesson.
Picard102 replying to a comment from gorf / September 14, 2009 at 10:38 pm
user-pic
I agree, and lets extend that sort of lawlessness due to laziness to automobiles. I shouldn't have to pay for a license or plates or be forced to prove I know how to operate a vehicle.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal