Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 21°C
City

Morning Brew: Man's Pants on Fire, Grocers Go Independent, Caribana Launches, Striking Teenager's Perspective

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / July 15, 2009

ultimate frisbee torontoPhoto: "Too High" by sevennine, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

A man standing accused of arson has also brought back childhood memories of the phrase "liar, liar, pants on fire." While nothing is conclusive until a court of law makes its judgment, a man arriving at hospital with burns to his legs claimed to have had a late night barbecue propane accident, but police believe he may be involved in starting a nearby industrial fire.

Undesirable purchasing policies and a drive to buy and sell locally sourced meats and produce have caused a number of southwestern Ontario grocers to sever their ties to the large grocery chain Sobeys and go independent. Meat doesn't need to be federally inspected in far away locations and then trucked here to be safe, does it?

Ontario is looking to give electric and hybrid vehicles a boost by announcing new strategies for promoting them. The plan includes a large purchaser incentive for consumers (which could bring down the cost of hybrid cars like he Volt down by about 25%), and a commitment to make the government's fleet 20% hybrid by 2020.

And in mandatory city union strike-related news...

Caribana will go on despite the ongoing strike. The annual festival kicked off yesterday at a crowded Yonge-Dundas Square, leaving Nathan Phillips Square lonely and pouting.

The Star has an intriguing piece about a 16-year old girl named Tamie Dolny who was supposed to be a city-employed lifeguard this summer but is instead on strike. I'm not so sure that the posed (straight-faced, armed folded) photo will evoke much sympathy, but it must really suck to be in her shoes.

And striking workers shut down Terra-Green Recycling & Transfer (a private Etobicoke hauling company) for several hours yesterday, until the owner came out and signed a hand-written agreement stating that his company wouldn't pick up any park or residential waste in Toronto. His lawyers are calling it blackmail.

Discussion

44 Comments

J / July 15, 2009 at 09:04 am
user-pic
RE: Independent grocers - good for them.

We all know how great Federal meat inspectors are at doing their jobs...
loco416 / July 15, 2009 at 09:18 am
user-pic
They are calling it blackmail only because it is blackmail.
loco416 / July 15, 2009 at 09:19 am
user-pic
Could picketers who prevent someone from leaving a location be charged with forceable confinement or kidnapping? That would be fun.
that guy / July 15, 2009 at 10:12 am
user-pic
Isn't there a planned protest against the mob, .. i mean the union ?
Ryan L. / July 15, 2009 at 10:17 am
user-pic
Wow, the union continues to fail to understand that perhaps pissing the public off isn't the best way to get what they want.

Most people I've talked to seem to be of the opinion that while the strike is annoying they would rather wait it out then have the city give in to the union. A few people I know were on the fence for a while, but then eventually had to dispose of the garbage that was piling up. After trying to dump their waste at transfer stations any sympathy for the city workers had been thrown out with their trash.
Mark Dowling / July 15, 2009 at 10:25 am
user-pic
"it must really suck to be in her shoes."

I think being in the shoes of a laid off Centre Island student trying to make tuition sucks more.
Louis Armstrong / July 15, 2009 at 10:30 am
user-pic
RE: the Star article:

Police, Fire, etc.. get raises each year, and the strikes, who sit around comparing tattoo's, and swearing and smoking, and who throw bags of garbage in a truck for a living think they are just as important as the police and fire, that they deserve the same raise?

haha.
Louis Armstrong / July 15, 2009 at 10:32 am
user-pic
@ that guy:

I REALLY HOPE SO, like a protest to protest the protesters. Find a way to stop them from illegally blocking the transfer stations.
that guy / July 15, 2009 at 10:35 am
user-pic
Is there any other solution to this other than voting conservative ?
Or is that even a solution.
The main choices are.

Corrupt over promising Liberals that will do nothing about unions. But they will talk a lot.

Than there is the NDP that will unionize puppies and demand free education for raccoons.

Than there are the conservatives, they will actually do what they say. Which includes selling pretty much all of our right to the highest bidder.

Diane / July 15, 2009 at 10:39 am
user-pic
Anybody want to bet that the sticker price for electric cars in Ontario just jumped by as much as $10,000 to suck up McGuinty's $10,000 "purchase incentive"?

There's a lot of money to be made by painting yourself green.
Non-CUPE union member replying to a comment from Louis Armstrong / July 15, 2009 at 10:40 am
user-pic
You do realize, Louis, that paramedics are in the union you're talking about? And people who care for children all day? It's not just garbage workers on strike.
SayBlade / July 15, 2009 at 10:47 am
user-pic
Amazing that in 36 hours since this story broke, I have only found this story on the CBC and this blog. The other media are not carrying this story (yet). Why?

Actually, the former Sobeys stores have joined together to form a co-operative. Good for them! A small step for them is a step in the right direction towards protecting our food security and supporting local economic infrastructure.

Did you know that co-operatives have a higher success rate and are more stable than other businesses? The bottom line includes far more than just profit. Since workers are members they have a say in the operation of the business. They are more productive and have higher motivation to make the business work. Co-ops give back to their communities far more than other businesses because they ARE those communities.

Perhaps the co-operative model should be explored by the City of Toronto, TTC and the unions to which its workers belong. This model could stop the constant tension that erupts in management/labour action that inconveniences or imperils the rest of us. We would have vastly improved service and a positive leadership example for youth and newcomers.
Louis Armstrong / July 15, 2009 at 10:50 am
user-pic
@ Non-CUPE union member

Paramedics should not even be remotely in the same category as garbage collectors. They are just a 'tad' more important. That doesnt make sense either.
that guy / July 15, 2009 at 10:54 am
user-pic
How about a tax payer union that refuses to pay cupe until certain demands are met. I mean might as well.

keven replying to a comment from Louis Armstrong / July 15, 2009 at 10:57 am
user-pic
If garbage collectors are so un-important, why the hell is everyone so mad then? Why are daily, countless stories being published to cover the 'unimportant' people striking? Wouldn't the strike then be unimportant too?
Mike W replying to a comment from keven / July 15, 2009 at 11:04 am
user-pic
I think it's because in addition to not doing the jobs we pay them for (which is the city's responsibility to reimburse or do whatever with that money) they're preventing people from doing it themselves. At that point you're at the very least disruptive.

I actually didn't mind dropping off my garbage, I would trade the equivalent taxes and do it myself if the option were available.

Not to mention blocking private firms, and constantly shirking the responsibility of their actions.
mick replying to a comment from SayBlade / July 15, 2009 at 11:20 am
user-pic
Further to SayBlade's comments, it's a shame this story came to light during a rare busy summer news cycle. Those Sobeys grocers breaking away from the fold is a HUGE development, and an important sign of how public opinion is shifting towards safer, healthier and more sustainable food practices. I hope everyone that agrees with this sentiment will at the very least forward this item and/or talk this story up amongst their friends to help get the word out.
Yan / July 15, 2009 at 11:29 am
user-pic
Re: Electric cars

Worth watching.

http://www.ted.com/talks/shai_agassi_on_electric_cars.html

http://www.betterplace.com/

Mike W / July 15, 2009 at 11:30 am
user-pic
This girl Tamie Dolny is in an unfortunate situation but she's still naive and needs a reality check from someone other than fellow strikers.

Boo hoo some lady goes to the strike, blocks cars, and complains about car fumes? Someone can't make enough to live because they choose to strike (I know they don't ALL have a say in striking or not)? Someone can't find daycare for their child because they're follow union members are on strike?!
Talk about making your own bed.

And comparing yourself to police and firefighters? At this point your age is showing. TTC... can argue either way.

Can't argue about City councillors self-raise, but how many of them are there. Now how many of you? And I hate to say it the ugly truth but the councillor (is supposed) to represent me. You just haul my garbage.

I didn't know we have the right to annual raises to match inflation. Is that part of labour laws? It isn't??? No wonder I didn't expect it in my job.

"so painfully wrong to be malicious, rude and spiteful to a group of people who just want to make a point for 15 minutes of your day."
And you get 15 minutes of my day why? Tell it to the Island worker Mark Dowling mentioned. Cold hard truth is that people have prioritize the issues in their lives, you're not high on that list.

And guess what, 15 minutes for each car in a 5 car lineup is not "just a couple of minutes later".
CB / July 15, 2009 at 11:46 am
user-pic
Re: Sobeys.

Here's something else you might be interested to learn about this chain. You can shop at their upscale "Urban Fresh" stores and request a paper bag instead of plastic at the checkout - for a cost of $0.05! Yes, they actually have the nerve to nickel and dime you for requesting a recyclable paper bag. Totally clueless about their customers and what an "upscale" shopping experience means!
o_O replying to a comment from Mike W / July 15, 2009 at 11:50 am
user-pic
To Mike W and the others who use the argument that garbage collectors can't be compared to police and fire personnel: Have you ever heard CUPE 416 say that they should be? No, you haven't. All they're saying is that the gap between their salaries and those of fire/police should be about the same this year as it was last year.

That Mike W isn't good enough at his job or the art of negotiation to get an inflationary increase each year speaks more to Mike W than it does to CUPE. The reality is that the vast majority of people who don't make minimum wage see some sort of annual pay increase, usually in line with inflation.
CB / July 15, 2009 at 12:00 pm
user-pic
o_O, those police and fire salaries were negotiated before the collapse of the economy, and even then it was questionable as to whether the city could afford it. To expect to be entitled to the same increase in the current economic climate, affecting many more workers, is simply asinine and gives a collective finger to Toronto taxpayers. An inflationary increase should be considered generous - and your assertion that the "vast majority" of people see some sort of annual pay increase is utter bullshit. Right now, the "vast majority" are at some risk of being laid off!
Samantha replying to a comment from o_O / July 15, 2009 at 12:17 pm
user-pic
Not this year we don't. Salary freezes, lost jobs, and in many many cases, a 10% paycut is what we are experiencing.

But thanks for demonstrating once again how out of touch the Unions seem to be.
Mike W replying to a comment from o_O / July 15, 2009 at 12:25 pm
user-pic
I think you misread the part I didn't write about whether I got a annual raise or not. I said I don't expect a raise because no labour law guarantee's a raise. The raise that CUPE thinks they should be guaranteed.

The girl in fact did compare garbage collectors to police and firefighters. Did you read the article? Search for the phrase "Under their current contract", it's right there, only takes a few minutes to read the whole thing.

It's interesting you assume and imply I'm bad at my job or negotiating without knowing anything about me, because that speaks volumes about you and your ability to make logical arguments.
Loozrboy replying to a comment from Samantha / July 15, 2009 at 01:10 pm
user-pic
I think anybody taking a 10% pay cut is being hosed by an opportunistic employer, taking advantage of The Recession to slash their labour costs.

That said, I don't think it's unreasonable to ask CUPE to accept a temporary wage freeze or near-freeze, like the one that was imposed on the non-union workers. (Council would have a lot more credibility demanding this if they rolled back their own increase, but that's another issue :P).

But I think the really sticky issue is in the long-term benefits the city wants to revoke (i.e. the "sick bank"). They're using the current economic climate to justify eliminating benefits that in many cases wouldn't have to be paid out of years (or decades). Ludicrous system though it may be, these sick day "banks" are people's retirement nest eggs... I'm hardly surprised to see them digging in their heels when those are threatened.

It'll be interesting to see whose side the inevitable arbitrator takes on that.
CB / July 15, 2009 at 01:28 pm
user-pic
"Ludicrous system though it may be, these sick day "banks" are people's retirement nest eggs... "

Really? I thought their retirement nest egg was the costly, fully inflation-indexed defined benefit pension plan.
that guy replying to a comment from CB / July 15, 2009 at 02:08 pm
user-pic
Wait a store acts responsibly by charging for any container and you whine ?

I think this is great.
Sure paper is better than plastic, but waste is waste. Paper bags may be better, but reusable bags are even better.
Loozrboy replying to a comment from CB / July 15, 2009 at 02:11 pm
user-pic
<i>"Really? I thought their retirement nest egg was the costly, fully inflation-indexed defined benefit pension plan."</i>

Yeah, that too. Still, people were expecting their "sick day banks" to be worth thousands of dollars upon their retirement. I can see the argument that they never should've been given that benefit in the first place, but the fact remains they were. The city is effectively saying "we want to evaporate thousands of dollars of your future income because of current economic conditions". It's naive to expect the workers to say "No problem, I'm just happy to have a job in these Tough Economic Times" or "Go ahead, I don't deserve it, I'm just a lowly garbage man*!"

I suspect there are plenty of places the city could have saved more money (especially in the short term), without causing so much labour unrest. But the sick bank made a good target because it's easy to sell to the voting public as a cushy frill.

(* Notwithstanding the fact that most of them are not actually garbage men.)
Jonathan replying to a comment from that guy / July 15, 2009 at 02:19 pm
user-pic
Agreed. No matter how recyclable they are, both paper and plastic bags use an extremely large amount of resources for their production given their purpose and the fact that, even in places with very high recycling, the overwhelming majority of both wind up in landfills.
Jonathan replying to a comment from Loozrboy / July 15, 2009 at 02:24 pm
user-pic
"The city is effectively saying "we want to evaporate thousands of dollars of your future income because of current economic conditions"."

Are they? The only publicly knows offer is from the city includes a present day payout of accumulated sick days. What is being evaporated?
jt replying to a comment from CB / July 15, 2009 at 02:32 pm
user-pic

too quick to be cynical? Paper bags are not a better choice than plastic bags:

they use more carbon in transport

use more energy to produce: 2511 BTUs vs 594 BTUs

In 1999, 14 million trees were cut to produce the 10 billion paper grocery bags used by Americans that year alone.

It takes 91% less energy to recycle a pound of plastic than it takes to recycle a pound of paper. But recycling rates of either type of disposable bag are extremely low, with only 10 to 15% of paper bags and 1 to 3% of plastic bags being recycled, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Paper sacks generate 70% more air and 50 times more water pollutants than plastic bags.

maybe just put your groceries in your backpack.
o_O / July 15, 2009 at 02:50 pm
user-pic
Mike W: You read the article. The girl compared the two jobs for the express purpose of the salary increases they're to receive. But this notion that the reason police and fire got what they got was because it happened before the collapse is BS. Police got their deal because the union forced arbitration. Fire had the same leverage. If CUPE were to get to arbitration they would also get 3%.
Loozrboy replying to a comment from Jonathan / July 15, 2009 at 03:07 pm
user-pic
The city's latest offer (which, frankly, I think the union would've been wise to accept) included a <i>partial</i> payout of the sick bank.

Based on foggily-recalled media reports, my understanding is that the earlier city offers (before the strike) included no such provision.
CB replying to a comment from jt / July 15, 2009 at 03:20 pm
user-pic
Then why are they bothering to offer paper at all? Why has Wholefoods, who position themselves as champions of the environment, always offered a choice between paper and plastic?

I get the idea of charging for plastic bags, and maybe even for paper. I don't for a second though buy the argument that Sobeys charging for paper is doing it "for the environment" and not for cost recovery/revenue. If the former was true, why didn't they start doing it a decade ago? Why are they STILL giving away plastic bags in other markets outside of the GTA?

"maybe just put your groceries in your backpack."

Just how large a backpack are you expecting people to carry with them? I'm picking up a few items on the way home from *work*, not an expedition up north. :-) I'll just pay the money if I don't have a reusable shopping bag handy. Speaking of which, the grocers have to be making a killing from the sales of those things. A quick search on alibaba.com shows that you can buy those in bulk from China for as little as $0.15, which some stores resell for up to $1.99 (or more).
Mike W replying to a comment from o_O / July 15, 2009 at 03:32 pm
user-pic
Yes she is comparing the two jobs for the express purpose of the salary increases they're to receive. So she's comparing the salary increases for Firefighting and Policing to the salary increases of garbage removal.
So yes, she in fact did make a comparison between garbage handlers (yes, important) to police and firefighters (more important, sorry).

And to the other posters: yes, the Sobey's story is a very big deal, and I will try to frequent the store more than I do now.
Alogon replying to a comment from Mike W / July 15, 2009 at 03:41 pm
user-pic
Actually the councillor's increase can be argued. As it has been already pointed out on this blog somewhere, the councillors were being underpaid compared to even much smaller municipalities. Our mayor doesn't even make as much as the Police Chief of Sudbury. Whereas the CUPE members are already betterpaid than other workers doing the same jobs.

But I otherwise agree with you. I wonder after the strike if these workers mind while every citizen in Toronto stops them each day for 15 minutes to bitch & moan. How rude if they can't give us that out of their day.
o_O replying to a comment from Mike W / July 15, 2009 at 03:46 pm
user-pic
I'm not sure what your point is, Mike W. My point is that no one is making the case that police/fire deserve to get paid less or even equal to garbage collectors. CUPE, and the 16-year-old, are simply making the point that the the gap (in terms of percentage) between garbage and police/fire salaries should remain the same. How is that unreasonable?
Alogon replying to a comment from o_O / July 15, 2009 at 03:49 pm
user-pic
Wow, assuming a guy doesn't get an increase, then explicitly stating that he isn't good at his job or can't negotiate - way to go. Of course, your words assume that CUPE is good enough at their jobs, which I disagree, and that they are good at negotiating, seems not this time.

And let's be real, by constantly crying about the police and firefighters raise these CUPE 416 & 79 dummies ARE comparing themselves to these groups. They aen't saying the difference should be the same, they are just saying "hey, me too".

Time to shove the argument you are trying to make that if we aren't getting what the union is getting then we suck or aren't as smart. We all know that it is because these unions hold cities hostage and negotiate with bosses who are not concerned with economics but re-election. Politicians don't usually worry about where the money will come from like a private business does, they just increase taxes. It is infinitely easier to pressure a boss when the people who will decide whether he has a job next time are yelling because the union is screwing them. We are not fooled by your type of 4th grade reasoning.
Alogon replying to a comment from Loozrboy / July 15, 2009 at 03:54 pm
user-pic
Using sick days as a "retirement nest egg", are you serious? These people get a generous pension AND a payout at retirement ON TOP of the sick day payout. Should they all retire like kings for doing lacklustre jobs?
No argument can justify this nonsense. The sick day pay is a safety net for a person, not a retirement vehicle. Try asking your employer to pay you 20k when you retire because you actually showed up for work when you were able to. i am sure he/she will be so thankful for taking the time out of your life to actually do the job you are being paid for they might throw in a gold watch.
Jonathan replying to a comment from CB / July 15, 2009 at 04:14 pm
user-pic
"Then why are they bothering to offer paper at all? Why has Wholefoods, who position themselves as champions of the environment, always offered a choice between paper and plastic?"

Because they do know their customers very well. They know their customers are ignorant morons who desperately want to pretend they are "upscale" and "environmentally aware".
Loozrboy replying to a comment from Alogon / July 15, 2009 at 04:49 pm
user-pic
<i>"Using sick days as a "retirement nest egg", are you serious?..."</i>

I'm not arguing that it's a reasonable or sensible benefit. I'm saying that given that they were awarded it years ago (in exchange for giving up pay immediate raises at the time, I believe), you're not going to get them to give it up retroactively without a fight. And I'm suggesting that the city knew that, and knew how it would play with the public, and used the issue to push the union into a strike -- not because it was the best and most sensible place to cut costs, but to score political points.
Reality Check / July 15, 2009 at 05:20 pm
user-pic
There is very little skilled work being done by city employees.

Most of what is done shouldn't be. What little that should be done, most shouldn't be done by the government. Of what tiny bit that should be done by the government, most is vastly overpaid.

Unskilled labor shouldn't get the wages and benefits that they do get, and they definitely should never get a raise. EVER. Paramedics should be essential services and prevented from being part of a general union.

The city should pay Fire, Police, and Ambulance workers handsomely. They should pay the rest virtually nothing. Government shouldn't be the highest paid option, nor should it be a career. It should be the last resort and barely above welfare.

Libraries shouldn't be government run, the city shouldn't do daycare. Garbage should be private contracted and not run by council (i.e. idiotic green bin and bag programs).

Why we're paying people so much to cut grass, when it should be done by shelter residents as part of getting them off the streets and into work, I have no idea.
SayBlade replying to a comment from Reality Check / July 15, 2009 at 10:40 pm
user-pic
"Libraries shouldn't be government run, the city shouldn't do daycare. Garbage should be private contracted and not run by council..."

Says who? Against whose religion is this? Where is the moral justification for privatising these things? No. If these were privatised, they would become more expensive and we would not necessarily get good service as the bottom line of anything privately run is profit. Referring to my earlier comment, perhaps they could be organised co-operatively.

Ryan L. replying to a comment from CB / July 16, 2009 at 09:44 am
user-pic
Sorry for the lateness, didn't read this yesterday.

Whole foods is the definition of green washing.

Paper takes more energy to produce than plastic, more chemicals are used (surprisingly), more raw materials are required, it takes more energy to transport paper bags in every part of the system (to the processing plant, store, to your home, to the recycler, etc), they require an enormous amount of energy to recycle (and more chemicals still) and while they CAN biodegrade they most certainly don't (the dump environment stops this from happening and even if they did biodegrade they'd be leaching chemicals).

This is the same company who would rather offer you frozen 'organic' food imported from across the planet than from nearby farmers with standards just as good, if not better than these organic South American ones.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal