Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 20°C
City

Morning Brew: Union Threats, Reactionary Photoshoppery, Juror Racial Bias

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / June 12, 2009

ttc streetcarPhoto: "The Real Jerk..." by chewie2008~, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

Remember how stinky things got in 2002, when a strike by unionized city workers lasted several weeks and garbage piled up on our streets? Certain parts of the city were essentially unvisitable. If that's not leverage for having demands met, I don't know what is. Hopefully reasonable contractual agreements can be made this time, avoiding a possible June 22nd strike, and the hoarding of clothespins within city limits.

When news got out on Wednesday that the city had digitally altered the front cover of the Summer Fun Guide, by creating a more ethnically diverse picture (by quite poorly swapping out a white man for a black man using Photoshop), the people responded. With hilarious Photoshops of their own.

Should non-citizens be allowed to vote in municipal elections, or should that privilege be reserved for those that are dedicated enough to have pursued the process of becoming a Canadian citizen? It's a tough one. In many cases, non-citizens (i.e. permanent residents that haven't obtained citizenship) contribute to the same or more extent than many citizens do, by being engaged in their communities, paying taxes, etc. And the issue is on Mayor David Miller's radar as he hopes to be re-elected.

Ever wonder how easy or how difficult it is to drive a TTC bus? I have. And this afternoon, I'll get to learn first-hand, when I actually drive an Orion VII! The TTC is hosting the 38th annual "Bus and Maintenance Roadeo", where the best drivers on staff take on obstacles and vie for top driver status. I've been invited to try my hands and feet and eyes behind the wheel, and I'll be sure to let you know what it's like.

A Toronto judge wants to change the wording in juror questioning regarding racial bias. As it stands, potential jurors are asked if their ability to arrive at an impartial verdict may "be affected by the fact the accused is black." Instead, something along the lines of "be affected by the race of the accused" would be far more 2009 racist and less 1960 racist. All sarcasm aside, and sadly, I think it's a reasonable move because people of all races have the potential to be biased against all other races.

And local Jewish groups are mad at gay rights activists for allowing an outspoken Muslim who is against Palestine apartheid to marshal the Pride Parade. Or something like that. My head is spinning after reading the Sun article.

Discussion

18 Comments

Matt / June 12, 2009 at 09:07 am
user-pic
Holy crap. I wanna drive a bus too!!!
meh / June 12, 2009 at 09:18 am
user-pic
Should non-citizens be able to vote? No - that's why they are called non-citizens. If you want to do more than just pay taxes and want to have a say in how the place is run, then you HAVE to take the steps to become a citizen. Otherwise, what does it mean?
RBeezy / June 12, 2009 at 09:54 am
user-pic
Yes. The Stilepost user Photoshops were hilarious. Especially the one about the black guy saying he was going to rape the woman? Outstanding.

Funny how the National Post turns the story of a bad and obvious Photoshop job into a dissertation on race.
Jerrold / June 12, 2009 at 10:10 am
user-pic
The ones selected by the NP were funny. The rest of the thread on Stillepost is the usual crap.
d / June 12, 2009 at 10:13 am
user-pic
I'd be for non-citizens to vote in municipal politics... there'd have to be some criteria first though i.e... landed immigrant, or been living in the City for 10 years. It couldn't hurt having more people come out to the polls either.
Ryan / June 12, 2009 at 11:14 am
user-pic
Re: Juror questioning

Potential juror's should be put to the racism test from Ricky Gervais' Extras.
RBeezy replying to a comment from Jerrold / June 12, 2009 at 12:32 pm
user-pic
Yes, OJ repping for the brothers? Side-splitting.
dp replying to a comment from meh / June 12, 2009 at 01:31 pm
user-pic
whats the difference between a permanent resident and a citizen? nothing but a piece of paper
thatguy replying to a comment from dp / June 12, 2009 at 02:20 pm
user-pic
so why give non citizens the right to put an x on another piece of paper ?

if you don't care to be a citizen, don't vote, simple

i got my citizen ship as fast as i could
to me landed immigrants are not Canadians, they are just people that live here

gadfly / June 12, 2009 at 02:27 pm
user-pic
Well, citizenship ain't what it used to be: witness the 'Canadians' that had to be shuttled out of Beirut 2 years ago, at the cost of $100M to the taxpayers in Canada.
So, really - what's another chip in the armor?

As to the remark about more voter turn out at the municipal level: Let's start talking about the issues that are important to the 60% who don't bother to vote, rather than catering to the vocal 3% that seem to monopolize all of Council's time.
RobertsonJ / June 12, 2009 at 02:40 pm
user-pic
Why let immigrants into the country if you aren't going to treat them as part of the community. We are talking municipal government involvement here - not provincial or federal. This effects the local community which is made of mixed breeds. There are some immigrants, like those from commonwealth countries, who are active within their local surrounds here - more so than some Canadian citizens who don't even bother to vote come election time.
Joel / June 12, 2009 at 03:24 pm
user-pic
Re: non-citizens voting

To me, it's a bit of a slippery slope. If you say you will let non-citizens vote, what about representation? Will you let a non-citizen run for councillor or mayor? What's the difference between being eligible to vote and being eligible to run for office? It's probably not a huge worry, but if you take it to the extreme, eventually you could end up with the city being run by citizens of foreign countries.
mikeb / June 12, 2009 at 03:38 pm
user-pic
Given that for most permament residents, it currently takes 3 1/2 years for to obtain citizenship once they decide to take the plunge, I don't know why this is even an issue. A new permament resident on the citizenship track will likely miss voting in one and if they are very unlucky two local elections before they obtain citizenship.

Heck, I might accecpt that someone on that path to citizenship is showing their commitment to Canada and deserves to have the vote, but for those not on that track, I don't see why they should be voting in Canada if they are not interested in becoming a Canadian.
i'm so high i have no idea what's going on / June 12, 2009 at 03:43 pm
user-pic
that summer fun guide is like a bad katt williams joke...
somechick / June 12, 2009 at 04:59 pm
user-pic
Maybe the man in the photo was hispanic, Mediterreanean or a Middle Eastern person. Does the man have to be "black" to prove that Toronto is diverse? This whole ordeal is silly!
Richard S / June 12, 2009 at 09:38 pm
user-pic
Oh god. Giving non-citizens the right to vote is almost as bad as the retarded "no one is illegal" crap perpetuated by a bunch of radicals who have never seen life outside of academia.
Rudy / June 14, 2009 at 04:28 pm
user-pic
What's next on Chairman Miller's agenda? Only NDP supporters, and city unionized workers can vote, along with non-citizens? Oh,oh. Come July if anyone dares to criticize a city councillor, he or she can be sued, but the councillor will be reimbursed $25,000 in legal fees, while the citizen in question has to pay for his own lawyer. Talk about a great democratic process! Luckily this policy hasn't passed yet, but is up for a vote in July.
Born&RaisedInTO replying to a comment from i'm so high i have no idea what's going on / June 15, 2009 at 04:15 pm
user-pic
You're 37 mins too early LOL

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal