Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 20°C
City

Morning Brew: Smoker Nabbed, Pipes Leaking, Beaches Open

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / June 11, 2009

book salePhoto: "Book sale" by Miguel Navarrete, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):

On Monday at 6pm, a driver was clocked doing 105km/h in a 50km/h zone - on the Bloor Street Viaduct (a section of road that utilizes marked bike lanes). How the driver managed to get up to that speed during rush hour traffic is a bit of a head-scratcher, but why he would feel compelled to do so is even more mind-boggling. Toronto Police have issued over 1000 driver suspensions under the speeding/stunt driving law since it was introduced in September 2007.

A Vaughan woman has the (dis)honour of being the first person in Ontario to be caught and ticketed for smoking in a car with children on board. The legislation came into effect over 4 months ago, which confirms what many have been saying all along - that it's a tough one to enforce.

Aging infrastructure is to blame for what a new study is revealing - that about one-quarter of treated water doesn't make it to our taps because of old, leaking pipes. It's claimed that Toronto sees about 25% losses (a figure that's disputed by the head of the city's water department), while our younger neighbour to the north, Vaughan, sees just 10% losses.

Most of Toronto's beaches have been opened for the summer season, although a few are testing too high for E. coli and remain closed. I've never swam (only waded) in Lake Ontario right off the shoreline of Toronto, but if I did, I'd be certain to keep my mouth held firmly closed the whole time.

The province is aiming to set strict standards for wind turbine deployment. For a single unit to be installed, it must be no closer than 550m from any home, and for clusters of turbines, that minimum required distance from dwellings increases. The new rules may put a quick end to plans aiming to add another turbine or two near the existing one at Exhibition Place.

When the gas station price board reads .02, it doesn't mean gas has plunged to 2 cents per Litre. Just in time for summer, gas prices are really close to rolling over $1/L, representing the highest price since back in October 2008.

Discussion

21 Comments

windy / June 11, 2009 at 08:54 am
user-pic
The wind regulations are even worse than that, actually. It is a minimum of 550m from any property line, road, or railway. That will knock out a lot of potential locations. Few, if any, existing windmills would comply.
mattc / June 11, 2009 at 09:25 am
user-pic
I wonder who has been hit the hardest by the "street racing" law. My bet is on soccer mom's in mini-vans.
Ratpick / June 11, 2009 at 09:28 am
user-pic
Re: Beaches open!

I spend a lot of time in boats around here and believe me, I'd never swim at any of those beaches.

To me, the syringes, condoms and tampon applicators that wash onto the beaches from the storm sewers are a bigger "barrier to enjoying the lake" than the Gardiner Expwy ever will be.

Rob / June 11, 2009 at 09:29 am
user-pic
I think I understand why these wind turbine regulations are the way they are. They're more for outlying regions. I was in Windsor this weekend and while driving on the 401 between Chatham and Windsor there were wind farms out in the distance. I thought I was seeing things but, in fact, there were several wind turbines that were out in the open and away from residencies and other property. So while it would be nice for the city to have more of them, maybe it makes sense to have farms dedicated to these turbines.

Also, I'm surprised no one has come up with a "personal" turbine you can store in your backyard (assuming you live in a house - of course). I would think that would make as much sense as having solar panels on your roof.
thatguy replying to a comment from Rob / June 11, 2009 at 09:36 am
user-pic
http://gizmodo.com/162770/

There is stuff like this, they get bigger.
There is usually a lot redtape around those though and people can't install them. At least there is in the US, i read a few personal case studies.
David Levy / June 11, 2009 at 09:45 am
user-pic
Jerrold, would going 55km over the limit be less of a problem if there weren't bike lanes on the road? Just curious... that bike comment seemed unnecessary and out of place (imho). Maybe BlogTO is engaging in a War Against Cars (sorry, couldn't resist... j/k)
Jack S. replying to a comment from windy / June 11, 2009 at 09:46 am
user-pic
The wind regulations are "even worse than that"?

I think you're using the wrong adjective. Would you really want a tall, loud, and vibrating wind turbine right next to the property line of your house in the city or the country? This is just about not being a nuisance to your neighbours. If you have a big farm and want to plunk some in the middle, go nuts.
Dave / June 11, 2009 at 09:55 am
user-pic
Actually, the reason for the setback from homes may have a legitimate safety reason. Imagine how ice may build up on the propellor in winter - and then be launched off of it in high winds. I could see that as a freak accident waiting to happen.
DJ / June 11, 2009 at 10:07 am
user-pic
@Rob - There are personal turbines for purchase, however, I recall reading in a recent Dutch report that they are completely uneconomical, even in Holland where there is a LOT more wind. They have a nasty tendency to break down long before you recoup your investment. The laws of physics tend to favour power production at a larger scale.
Ryan L. replying to a comment from David Levy / June 11, 2009 at 10:10 am
user-pic
I know I sure as hell wouldn't want to ride my bike on the 401 or DVP. I also would be less than impressed if a driver brought the 401 or DVP to me in an area where I'm supposed to feel safer.

I think it is more than relevant to point out that the person was going 50km/h on a mixed use roadway as it is much different than someone doing 50km/h on a country road or highway with little in the way of cyclists and pedestrians
windy replying to a comment from Jack S. / June 11, 2009 at 10:13 am
user-pic
I went back and re-read the proposed regulations, and I was mistaken... they aren't as bad as I first thought (though, I think they will still put a significant damper on wind power in the Province). The 550m separation distance is only from "points of receptors", i.e. houses, and not property lines.

Dave: The regulation does not mention safety.
Jerrold replying to a comment from David Levy / June 11, 2009 at 10:27 am
user-pic
@David Levy Do you think the Toronto Police are waging a war against cars? Because the bike lane mention is included in the linked press release.
Marshall Leslie replying to a comment from Rob / June 11, 2009 at 10:33 am
user-pic
The "backyard" wind turbine that your refer to is coming - to the US. On Monday, Ace Hardware - a national US hardware retailer - announced that it and EarthTronics/Honeywell will launch in the autumn a 2-kilowatt wind turbine that can generate power with wind speeds as low as 2 MPH and as high as 45 MPH. Cost estimates are USD$4,500 and USD$1,500 to install - still cheaper than putting solar on your garage to heat domestic water.
Ace Hardware as some distribution/wholesale agreements with Canadian organizations, so I predict you will see this here at about the same time.
See also: http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/earthtronics-to-launch-small-wind-turbines-for-the-rooftops/
kcmall / June 11, 2009 at 10:54 am
user-pic
Typos. So many typos.
Oileanach / June 11, 2009 at 12:53 pm
user-pic
Well of course it's no surprise that much newer pipes in Vaughan are less leaky than much older pipes in Toronto, but it does illustrate the common mentality that maintenance is not really necessary. Just as people get surprised when their 20 year old washer dies, politicians seem to think you can build roads and bury pipes and never think of them again. If I had the time it might be interesting to look in some municipal budgets for new infrastructure to see if the annualized cost of replacement is included whenever a new subdivision is planned. I'd like to see how Vaughan's leakage rates in 50 years. I think Montreal is losing over 40% if I recall correctly.
Andrea / June 11, 2009 at 01:33 pm
user-pic
Re. smoking in motor vehicles: The government is aware that it's a difficult law to enforce. All the stakeholders do.

I'm thrilled that the woman was ticketed. It's not like the government (Ministry of Health Promotion/Smoke Free Ontario) didn't do any advertising. Perhaps this news will serve as a cautionary tale and advertise the Act.
jack / June 11, 2009 at 01:49 pm
user-pic
they should give tickets to those smokers outside Atrium on Bay, right underneath Red Lobster. Even there is a sign there clearly saying no smoking within 15 meters of the entrance, people still stand in front of the sign and smoke like a chimney. It is digusting when you exit or enter the building there on your way to work...the cops can have a lot of fun there just standing there all day and giving out tickets rather than raising our tax
tyler / June 11, 2009 at 03:17 pm
user-pic
loses? really?
Ryan L. replying to a comment from Andrea / June 11, 2009 at 03:32 pm
user-pic
I doubt the law was ever introduced to be enforced.

It acts better as a statement of fact, which should hopefully discourage the behavior. Smoking in cars with children present is bad: Fact.

There should now be no question as to whether it is okay to smoke with your kids in an enclosed area or not. Yeah, people will still do it, but now it can give the CAS an outlet to look into the mother/father's parenting abilities.

Paulo / June 11, 2009 at 03:32 pm
user-pic
The recently opened Lisgar GO Transit station in Mississauga has a wind turbine that provides a good portion of the station's power.

The station is one side of the tracks, and on the other is a sound barrier and an entire subdvision. If this legislation has been in place at the time, the turbine would be illegal since it's <50 meters from houses.

The irony is that it's okay to build a train line right next to houses, but not a wind turbine??

This smells stupid.
Born&RaisedInTO / June 12, 2009 at 12:03 pm
user-pic
I have a lot of mixed emotions about the 'no smoking in the car with children under the age of 16' provincial law. Age 16? Seriously...kids are polluting their own lungs voluntarily at 12. Parents are smoking in their homes - an enclosed area for much of the year in Ontario *brrr* - should we have legislation prohibiting that as well? Or should people generally have to apply for licenses to parent - similiar to the strict standards already set for adoptions?
One of the comments posted on the linked article states that he/she rolls down his/her window to yell at people smoking with children in the car. Wow...that's brave if you travel on GTA's road-raged highways and bi-ways.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal