City
Morning Brew: April 8th, 2009
Photo: "afternoon.rush" by jonathancastellino, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.
What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):
Getting mugged for your valuables, at gunpoint, must really suck. Having a gun pointed at you while getting mugged for your valuables AND your pants [Star] must suck even worse.
Looking to get wealthier? Leaving Toronto for greener pastures in the 905 [G&M] might be a start. The drawbacks? You wouldn't be able to claim that you hate going north of Boor, you'd have to blame your neighbours for the surly behaviour at downtown bars and clubs, and it'd be hard to find a nearby place that sells great indoor scarves and tapered jeans.
--
Should parents be able to "shop" for schools for their kids [Star] by using data on income, parental education levels, and immigration info made public on a government web site? This appears to be a heated debate, with Education Minister Kathleen Wynne agreeing to yank the data and Premier Dalton McGuinty vowing to keep it on the site. If I were a parent, I'd want to know that my kid was attending a school made up of students with the greatest diversity possible.
The City of Toronto's recently revealed investment in Filmport continues to cause a stir with a number of other studios, who are peeved that the taxes they pay are essentially being used to prop up a competing enterprise [NP]. It's kind of like how our taxes pay for the (free) glossy Food & Drink magazine, making the LCBO a direct (and unfair according to some) competitor to private-sector publishing companies. Is it fair for Filmport to be partially financed by the City?
And in hyper-local media news, there's a good news announcement that Torontoist is here to stay [TOist]. The newly-formed company Ink Truck Media takes over financial control but Torontoist continues its affiliation with Gothamist. With financing controlled by a local company (rather than an American one), Torontoist is now more hyper-local than ever. The rumour mill had been turning for months, and Torontoist editor David Topping remained tight-lipped on details at a panel discussion at the annual Mesh web conference yesterday, prompting plenty of conjecture in the audience.


Discussion
16 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I am a teacher, Jerrold. Trust me, most parents do not think in so enlightened a manner. There is a lot of social-Darwinism out there.
But the private ones are really getting hard on their students. Most of them do the IB high school system (they all ignored the better structured AP system). So now it is a scramble to get kids into non-IB, non-AP private schools.
Also for public schools, parents may want some reassurance that their kids don't end up doing the thug life. Private schools have that type of monitoring and they actually CARE for their students.
Where I went to high school, we had 4 schools (not including separate). One was an 'arts' school, with an auditorium and well funded arts and music programs (they also focused on athletics, but this generally wasn't reflected in the results of football games and the like). Another was known for its focus on math, science and technical programs. One had an extensive French immersion program and the other wasn't really known for anything in particular and was just a well rounded school.
This sort of setup didn't happen by accident. The school board can't afford to give every school an auditorium, running track, greenhouse or elaborate welding and automotive labs. So you could either have 4 average schools where no student gets an opportunity to experience above average education in any particular field, or you could adjust funding so some schools spend more on some programs and less than others and let the kids and parents decide which school is best for them.
It wasn't uncommon for kids to take classes at other high schools that they were not primarily enrolled in and the board even had 'transfer' busses running between schools for those who wanted to attend one of the other schools, but weren't on one of those school's bus routes.
So if your child is interested in
I did a lot of checking out schools before my kids started. I didn't use the TDSB site for anything except addresses. The best way to "shop" for schools is to go to the schools for their open houses, talk to the teachers, principal and parents.
Tron - while this may be a perceived notion - that private schools = better education, it also comes hand-in-hand with kids growing up in *extremely* sheltered environments, and NO assurance that they will not one day wind up in the "thug life" or so-to-speak. Additionally - it should be noted that private schools do not CARE about the students, they CARE about the insane tuition money being paid by the parents of said children, and further donations being handed to the school.
Also - I attended both private and public high schools - AND did the IB program. Today, I'm no better or worse than any other student I went to school with.
Yes, many parents do still "parent". However, parenting only goes so far. You can't hover over your kids 24/7. If you send your kids to a school with serious problems, your kids have a much better chance of picking up some of those problems. You know, peer pressure from those kids with lousy parents who don't give a fuck.
I doubt these parents want to slack off; they just want to make sure they're not starting in a hole.
I do find it troublesome that people would pick a school based on factors like income or parental education. Onegirl's advice is bang-on: Visit the school, talk to teachers, and chat with other parents attending and you'll get enough of a feel to know if the school is the right fit.
The best performing schools tend to be in neighbourhoods with very successful parents and/or where the vast majority of parents value education highly (certain ethnic & religious groups, highly educated low-wage professionals...). Involved parents know these things and will do all that they can to ensure their kids get the best education possible.
Toronto Life had a great article in September 08 about the competitiveness of parents around highly rated schools http://www.torontolife.com/features/ps-i-love-you/ A very tiny few will, like Jerrold claims, live out their professed values about diversity and send their kids to a horrible school, damaging them for life (like Jimmy Carter sending his daughter to a DC public school), while most will profess the PC nostrums while fighting like ferrets to get every advantage possible.
Not sure why there's the hate for IB here - there are a large number of public and catholic schools in Torono that offer IB (including Vaughan Road and Michael Power). IB is the most advanced academic standard available, recognized internationally and offered globally, making it far easier to find a school when a family has to move cities or continents. AP doesn't have the structure and the offerings at AP level are idiosyncratic. Some of the best private schools in the world have gone IB, including Cheltenham Ladies' College and Fettes (Tony Blair's alma mater). In Toronto Branksome, UCC, TFS, and The York School are all IB.
The whole idea that by removing this information from a Ministry of Ed site would do anything is hilarious. It would just serve as another leg up for higher socioeconomic status parents by increasing the barriers to getting the information. All of the data is public (from Stats Can, school report cards, etc) and can be fairly easily integrated by layering census tract information with school catchment zones. In some cases free information isn't sufficiently detailed, but anyone with access to (expensive) commercial GIS info can do it very easily. This is all public information, just presented in a more manageable way - having the government "protecting" us by making public information harder to use is quite hilarious.
If one does have to send one's children to public school (shudder), the easiest way to sort schools is by looking for proximity to synagogues and French Immersion programs. Jewish culture puts an especially high value on education, and the shabbos requirements mean that synagogues have dense clusters around them. Early Immersion is very challenging, with any children who struggle for any reason being sent to English programs. Immersion is also only sought out by highly involved parents with a serious commitment to their children's education - it's basically free private school with more restrictive demographics than UCC (much lower immigrant %ge and basically no one who doesn't speak English at home). These are rough heuristics, but the best available if you don't have GIS data and certain lobby groups are successful in hiding information.
Other heuristics besides synagogues and EFI are to avoid areas with rental housing occupied by families and aim for the highest possible property values. School systems with fairly stringent catchment restrictions see school quality highly correlated with property values through a tightly coupled positive feedback loop. This can be seen in the DC suburbs, Chicago suburbs, and in real estate ads for certain midtown Toronto neighbourhoods (houses in Allenby and John Ross Robertson catchments advertise that fact prominently). Rosedale, Forest Hill, Hogg's Hollow, and Bayview don't see that as much since the houses are fairly differentiated as it is, residents can generally afford multiple private school tuitions, and they have monopolies on neighbourhood schools or have multiple excellent options (i.e. Rosedale sending pupils to Rosedale PS or Whitney PS).
From the moment my kids were born, people have felt it their right to criticize the choices I have made, or to give advice when it isn't asked for. Most of this has come from people who don't have kids. Sometimes from people I don't even know. So, for anyone out there that doesn't have kids, I'd just like to ask you to reserve your judgement. Parenting, even for the laziest of us out here, is a very difficult job. Most of us try to the best we can... which might mean different choices for different people.
Ok. Done venting. Off to get my kids from school.
Thought this was relevant.
"The handful of Oakville schools that only offer French immersion are driving students out of their neighbourhood in search of an English program and are also leading to "segregation" based on gender and ability, a group of parents charge"
...
"When school systems are segregated along social class lines or by student ability, then children from families of a low socioeconomic status and children of lower ability on average learn at a slower pace while students from families of higher socioeconomic status and with higher abilities tend to do only slightly better, he added."
How dare we let our kids reach their full potential while other kids are lagging behind because they (and their parents) don't give a shit about education!!