City
Morning Brew: March 2nd, 2009
Photo: untitled by Torontogal Photos, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.
What's happening in the GTA (and sometimes beyond):
There are ongoing concerns that the new speed limiter law for large trucks (topping them out at 105km/hr) is actually making our highways less safe. Truckers will be staging a convoy protest at Queen's Park today, so the inner city roads will likely be snarled some. I wonder if they'd settle for 110 km/hr. Or 115 km/hr.
Another weekend, another brazen daytime shooting. This time police have been really quick to release security video footage (embedded below) that shows two men walk up to an Etobicoke apartment complex and fire several rounds each, wounding but not killing their target. Seeing this makes me feel both ashamed and ill that this kind.
Those fluorescent-lettered portable pop up signs that we see pretty much everywhere in the city are almost all illegal, but enforcement has been slow and challenging. Now the city's municipal licensing and standards department is cracking down on illegal signs, and hopes to have twice as many removed this year over last.
A couple of teens were fatally run down by a car in Ajax, and it appears that it was done intentionally. Police are investigating a car wreck that came after a brawl, and believe that the two are directly related. It's a grave situation, but being young offenders might make the consequences laughable.
And scientists at Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital have made some significant progress in stem cell research. They can now use for research adult human skin cells (rather than embryonic cells), without using viruses that are associated with increased cancer risk.


Discussion
28 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
a) 100 is the limit
b) It's a limit, not a guideline
CN and CP have their issues and safety could be tighter on the railroads but if they caused a major smash due to exceeding their line limit there would be a Public Inquiry. It happens about once a week on the 400s and nobody gives a damn.
Anytime there is a major railway incident (such as a derailment) compensation is given to the other companies affected. ie, If a CN train derails and causes delays with VIA Rail trains, then CN gives VIA a bunch of money. They then also give CP a bunch of money to reroute the CN trains onto CP tracks and give more money to compensate for the added congestion.
Good luck getting the same kind of response from trucking companies.
cars are expeced to go above the limit when passing, it would not be possible to safely pass vehicles on single lane highways otherwise
Is it really legally ok to go above the speed limit in order to pass? I tried to find the info online but there is a lot to wade through. Just curious.
We have a socialist mayor who loves to spend, so you can expect more user fees and permit fees like the one required here.
Y'all should check out the emerging school in road design that proposes we can make things safer simply by designing roads that encourage motorists to slow down. The upside is that these roads are more appealing to other users, such as pedestrians and cyclists.
Most accidents happen at intersections, not where people are going extremely fast. Limiting people to 100kph (such an arbitrary number -- why not 60?) on roads designed for much higher speeds is just plain silly.
Disclosure: I drive a tiny roadster that isn't fun above 100kph, so I'm arguing this from the point of view of somebody who doesn't really speed anyway.
The one thing that worries me about this is in areas where the 401 is only 2 lanes in each direction (Pretty much everywhere except Toronto). At 105, the trucks will have to stick to the right hand lane. With the number of trucks on the highway I see this creating a nice little impentrable wall of steel.
Drivers will get the choice of driving in that lane, sandwiching their car between the tractor trailers or driving in the left lane amongst the people doing 130. It'll also be fun for those in the left lane to get through that wall when trying to get to an upcoming exit. Especially when those truck drivers can't speed up to let someone in.
The likely end result is likely going to be 1) Truck drivers driving in the left lane, pissing countless people off and causing car drivers to unsafely pass on the right. 2) Slower drivers who are too timid to drive in the right lane with the trucks slowing down the left lane traffic and resulting in the same situation as #1.
A better solution would be stricter laws on truck drivers.
My retired father drivers chartered buses from time to time, mostly for school kids. The buses don't have limiters (some companies might use them, but I'm pretty sure it's not universal). The 100km/h limit is <b>strictly</b> enforced. Police do not hesitate pulling over bus drivers going 110 or 115. As a result, the vast majority of bus drivers wouldn't dare going over 105 for fear of losing their job/license.
I do believe the problem is more of education than anything, i grew up in germany with the autobahn, there is no max speed, but there is minimum speeds for lanes. What i never saw was people passing on the right, everyone is going at insane speeds, but there is a very strict order to things.
Nothamerican highways are the slowest i have seen but also the most chaotic in it's random patters, people flying around at 140 in the ramp lanes.
Anyways, now i just ride my bicycle. It was rather cold today.
Really? Can you post one of the stories please?
LORDY your som above everyone else. I really should just have a text file for quick responses to your wanna be high brow comments.
" Ontario and Quebec now require electronic speed limiters on large trucks, but other provinces are rejecting the concept, saying the devices can sometimes actually make roads less safe.
Even a study commissioned by the federal government has concluded there are safety questions about speed limiters, especially in heavy traffic."
But I do enjoy the logical fallacies being posted here.
So the training standards as they exist now are sufficient?
Sorry you find my comments too "wannabe highbrow" there, friendo. Frankly, I can't recall reading any of your comments in the past.
I do not like the limiters being implemented on trucks.
@Stephen, regarding making faster delivery times. Doesn't just about everyone do this when they drive, no matter what kind of vehicle they drive? People race to get to work on time, or just race for the hell of it.
I think the bottom line is this isn't limited to truck drivers. We can't penalize one set of drivers and let others off.
again
CASH GRAB.. just like the other 50km/h over rule ...
In the end though, speed isn't the real issue on the road. It's paying attention to the road instead of everything else.