Tuesday, February 14, 2012Cloudy -1°C
City

40 Days and 40 Nights (and Women's Rights)

Posted by Joshua / February 25, 2009

Today marks the beginning of 40 Days for Life, a pro-life event bringing prayer, fasting, peaceful vigil and community outreach. At least 130 cities in Canada (including Toronto), Australia, Northern Ireland and the USA are participating in the events that run until April 5th.

By using Lent in this way, pro-lifers are trying to mobilize an effort to end the practice of abortion. Personally, I don't support their cause; women (and men) have fought hard for reproductive rights for women and if our politicians ever got close to removing them, I think pro-choice supporters would come out in huge numbers, dwarfing whatever crowds 40 Days For Life may see.

But the benefits of living in our country includes the right for people to speak their mind, organize around whatever cause they like, and in this case, rally around their cause against abortion by outreaching at the Women's Care Clinic at Dufferin & Lawrence (note their use of quotations about the clinic's name).

Perhaps this Easter we will know just how many people are mobilized, and if a noteworthy clash over abortion is in our future. Hopefully they're not as morbid in their ways as previous anti-abortion protesters have been in this city.

Discussion

9 Comments

Andrew / February 25, 2009 at 04:00 pm
user-pic
Makes me wonder why you bothered to write this at all
Steve / February 25, 2009 at 04:10 pm
user-pic
I agree with your opinion as far as pro-life goes. I was going to get all uppity about the article, but then read the motivation for it.

As some sort of journalist, I guess it's a matter of integrity to post things like this. After all, while you (or I) may disagree with the pro-life movement, it's happening in Toronto and others may want to know. I appreciate the fact that you posted it regardless.
Rick / February 25, 2009 at 06:47 pm
user-pic
I don't agree with the movement either, but I definitely appreciate that an alternate viewpoint was covered in a serious way.
Jonathan@blogTO / February 26, 2009 at 09:30 pm
user-pic
I am so glad that blogTO covered this; there are so many things regarding the 'A' word that people do not know.

- There is NO abortion law in Canada - abortion is legal, and practiced, for the full 9 months of pregnancy in our country.

- There are over 100,000 abortions in Canada, every year (Statistic Canada only goes until 2005, by my last check, but it hovers around this mark)

Despite people's personal views, there are many issues surrounding this matter that people are unaware of, or do not want to discuss.

Believe it or not, abortion is NOT a 'closed matter' in Canada.

I am signing up for several hours for the 40 Days For Life in Toronto - for more information about the Toronto witness, please visit:

www.40daysforlife.com/toronto

It is a difficult topic, and unfortunately a silent one; if abortion has touched you or anyone you know, you owe it to yourself to look 'beyond the veil', as they say...

jonathan@blogto.com
Jason / February 27, 2009 at 04:02 pm
user-pic
Hi there,
I'd like to respond to the article you posted on the '40 Days for Life'. I think you did a fair job of presenting the campaign. I was pleased to see it on this Blog. I'm involved in the 40 Days. I'm pro-Life. I stand up for the unborn's right to life. I believe that abortion is murder.

A couple of notes in your post I wanted to comment on:

You mentioned that people have fought hard for women's reproductive rights. I find this to be a strange term. The reproductive rights you are speaking about...are you not taking about an unborn child here? So in other words, you've fought hard for women to have the right to kill their unborn child? That doesn't sound right does it?

Another thing you mentioned was your hope that those involved were not as morbid as anti-abortion protestors have been in the past. Just to clarify, the 40 Days for Life Campaign Life doesn't use picture of aborted babies if that is what you mean. Something to consider is this. The morbid pictures are photographs of the reality. Some people call them 'Show the Truth' etc... Therefore, wouldn't that make the reality of abortion morbid? Please don't put the blame on pro-life people for the brutality of those pictures. The question I have for you is this. Shouldn't the responsibility go to those involved in the abortions? The doctors, the boyfriend or parents who cohearsed the girl into having the abortion, the rich couple who thought the baby was inconvenient etc.

And finally. In response to your comment on the 'pro-choice' supports coming in in huge numnbers....Something to consider is this. One of the largest, if not THE largest gatherings on parliament Hill in Ottawa each year is a pro-life March. It's called the National March for Life.

Check it out on youTube.

Peace.

Thanks for posting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkyLgXe1AyM

Jason.
Joshua replying to a comment from Jason / February 27, 2009 at 04:24 pm
user-pic
The word morbid was added by the editor as he was familiar with the article linked and thought to add it to the post before publishing. I don't think I would've used that word on my own, but it is reasonable enough because pro-life (actually, anti-choice) campaigns that use graphic images don't do much to advance the dialogue. And when I've seen those campaigns on busy street corners they do a lot to endanger the passing motorists and pedestrians as a distraction.

As to the first point you raise, no, I don't see a problem. There are many, many reasons why I see it beneficial to the woman, society and even the fetus to have abortion as an option. Nobody is pro-abortion, but it is an invaluable and important option to have available to women. People are pro-choice for this reason, even though many people may not personally choose to have an abortion.

And so I maintain that if that right were seriously threatened, you'd see bigger protests than the anti-choice folks stage each year.
Gloria / February 27, 2009 at 04:46 pm
user-pic
"Shouldn't the responsibility go to those involved in the abortions? The doctors, the boyfriend or parents who cohearsed [sic] the girl into having the abortion, the rich couple who thought the baby was inconvenient etc."

I see it's easier to deny options to people when they're stereotyped as a homogenous group of monied privilege and oppression. You forgot "freewheeling slut who uses abortion as a form of surgical birth control", though.
Corina replying to a comment from Gloria / February 27, 2009 at 05:18 pm
user-pic
How narrow minded to think that a large number of people are just aborting inconvenient babies, or that women are being easily and maliciously coerced into abortions... lol how can anyone take this tunneled vision seriously?
Andrew replying to a comment from Corina / February 27, 2009 at 05:22 pm
user-pic
Probably the same people who blog about a pro-life event but can't hold in their views and throw it in there for moral superiority.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal