Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 18°C
City

Snowmafriggingeddon and the Scarborough RT

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / December 19, 2008

scarborough rt snowThis is what the TTC's Scarborough RT looks like... on a good, snow-free day. Running. Relatively smoothly.

But as we know, the system isn't very well able to handle heaps of snow. Consider it a very, very unfortunate, geo-specific design flaw. So with the first big winter storm of the season, I'm wondering if it'll make it through the evening rush hour.

What do you think?

Photo by Stephen Gardiner.

Discussion

23 Comments

Matt / December 19, 2008 at 02:01 pm
user-pic
Didn't even bother going to work today (I work near McCowan station, the end of the RT line). What's the point, with the success rate of the RT being what it is? Nothing worse than being at the office, and discovering you can't leave.
jack / December 19, 2008 at 02:02 pm
user-pic
whoever came up with the RT and street car systems in toronto is an idiot
Inferno / December 19, 2008 at 02:04 pm
user-pic
Coming to toronto from kitchener today.
Its going to be a fun trip to scarborough
Sketchees / December 19, 2008 at 02:29 pm
user-pic
I'm not a frequent traveller on the RT so i wouldn't know about snow slow downs there.

But how does the TTC handle this problem?(*when the subway goes above-ground) They don't seem to have snow problems do they?
Matt in the Pits / December 19, 2008 at 02:30 pm
user-pic
replace the RT with an extension on the Bloor Line.
Stephen / December 19, 2008 at 02:33 pm
user-pic
@Sketchees, the Subways don't use a linear induction motors though. When snow builds up on the track and the centre strip of the RT, it causes the motors to not function. The subway works the traditional way of steel wheel on steel rail relying on adhesion, in the winter and during storms the TTC has 8 trains in service equipped with a Glycol system that helps to provide adhesion and prevent iceups on the traction or the power rails. The subways are prone to snow delays in the open areas, but not as badly as the RT which can get so snowed up it completely shuts down.
Brad Ross / December 19, 2008 at 02:59 pm
user-pic
Here's what the TTC does:
- on subways, it uses glycol (de-icing fluid) in the open areas to ensure the power rails remain clear of snow and ice. Specially-fitted trains apply the glycol as they move along the outdoor lines
- likewise, on the SRT. Last year, the TTC did experience problems on the SRT due to heavy snowfalls and snow drifts. However, glycol is being applied to the power rails on the SRT as we type. That is sufficient to keep the trains running, provided heavy accumulations of snow do not occur - 20 centimetres should not prove problematic.

Brad Ross
Director - Corporate Communications
TTC
W. K. Lis / December 19, 2008 at 03:00 pm
user-pic
Streetcars and LRT actually handle the snow better. It's the automobiles that don't and delay everyone.
There is a suggestion that the SRT be replaced with an LRT.
Jer / December 19, 2008 at 03:21 pm
user-pic
The obvious solution is to replace the cheap-skate LRT with a true subway system. Also to convert many (not all) Transit-City proposed lines into subways. We are not a third-world country. If London, Beijing, New York and other real cities can afford to run hundreds of miles of subways on the back of tax payers, so also can we. Our tax rate is far less per sq.ft property than most other GTA municipalities and certainly less than most cosmopolitan cities. If you are so tight that you can't afford a 10% rate increase than you need to reassess your lifestyle priorities or perhaps head out to Guelph or something. If we have to wait an extra 5 years - fine. Society only progresses when we put passion and future-planning and investment into it-especially convenient transport. I cannot even count how many people simply drove to work because of the transit system's mediocrity and half-assish-reliability. The unending compromises, cheap-skatism, and mediocrity will mean that no-one is happy and then we have Detroit - a hollow useless people-less core, devoid of any of a city's most important features. People have to wake up to the get-what-you-pay-for reality system.

Sniderscion / December 19, 2008 at 03:22 pm
user-pic
Never mind the SRT; the Viva buses in York region were atrocious today. I waited 20 minutes watching as the projected arrival time kept creeping backwards before giving up and climbing on the Vaughan transit bus that eventually came along.
And let me tell you that as poorly placed and geographically challenged as the TTC bus shelters are at least they keep the snow and wind out. The "shelters" on the Viva line seem as though they were designed to funnel wind directly at you no matter where you stand. The most sheltered spot is actually behind these things. These must have been chosen based on looks rather than practicality.
Jer / December 19, 2008 at 03:24 pm
user-pic
@W. K. Lis :

...Streetcars and LRT actually handle the snow better. It's the automobiles that don't and delay everyone...."

Its not automobiles that delay everyone. It is stupid people that delay everyone - whether its pedestrians who jay-walk or cyclists who drive in snowy roads right in the centre of a line endangering everyone or transit riders who run after buses in the middle of traffic or drivers who can't handle the difficult conditions. Everyone shares the responsibility. Your anti-car attitude is not welcome here.
Jer replying to a comment from Sniderscion / December 19, 2008 at 03:28 pm
user-pic
my favourite VIVA story (ongoing) is how the VIVA and TTC buses can't get up Yonge street just north of Centre road north of Steeles. The hill near the golf country clubs forces them to stall. And then - hilariously they try to pass each other and then get stuck and block all lanes...and then spin their wheels and ice up the road at their wheels... time to clue into the fact that we are in Canada and we need Canada-proof solutions.
Torontonian replying to a comment from jack / December 19, 2008 at 03:47 pm
user-pic
Actually, Jack, service would be streets better if there were more
streetcar routes. Sadly, routes and vehicles were removed from service over the last decades and now we're paying the price.

Why high-speed rail transit wasn't put on Sheppard, Finch and others at the time of their widening back in the late '60s or early '70s beats me. It could have helped immeasurably now.
Reality Check / December 19, 2008 at 05:08 pm
user-pic
King Street laughs at your claims that street cars handle snow better. One street car got stuck on King at Bathurst. Passengers were disembarked and the driver got out sweeping the tracks to try to get traveling again. Traffic was backed up from Bathurst to SPADINA and 6 streetcars were stacked up along King (together with a ton of cars) on the way to Spadina.

If a car has a problem, it doesn't block the ENTIRE street. Because of the tracks and the tight streets we have streetcars on (i.e. old, narrow, commercial streets with parking and just 4 lanes) whenever there's a problem there a total nightmare. Problems on Queen, King, College and Dundas mean that entire street gets shut down. Streetcars and LRT are a horrible idea and they all need to be removed. Transit should only use buses and subways. Rails and roads are a horrible combination, never mind being horribly dangerous to cyclists and pedestrians.
jack / December 19, 2008 at 07:31 pm
user-pic
we have money to hand over to the stupid auto industry to bail them out so they can continue to make cars that nobody wants(just wait and see how they collpase completely in a few months even with the bailout money now), but we don't have money to build a proper subway system so we don't have to rely on driving and have less air pollution, ie fewer cars on the road.. the two governments are run by idiots..
Briony / December 19, 2008 at 08:18 pm
user-pic
Ugh! This is my biggest beef with the TTC!

I have to work in bloody Scarborough, and I dread battling the damn LRT every day. Come winter, it gets waaaaay worse.

It's as if they built it in deliberate ignorance of the fact that Toronto has bad and often-snowy winters. It's not as if they built the LRT in balmy Victoria and then all of a sudden teleported to Scarborough.

Why was it not built with the long-known winter conditions in mind!?

I shudder thinking of the inevitable mornings where the LRT breaks down and they bring in those shuttlebuses that take around an hour to cross 10 minutes' worth of LRT distance.

Blurg!

PS: And another thing: being above-ground, the LRT stops are bone-chilling wind tunnels of freezing hell, which is then made even worse when you get on the train: the heat is often turned off, and the doors have big gaps at the bottom, where the -20 winds roar in, making your already lowered set-temperature even more intolerable. Down with the winter LRT!
gloria chik / urbanebloc.com / December 20, 2008 at 12:06 am
user-pic
how did it go?! the roads really WERE treacherous. depressing.
Jerrold / December 20, 2008 at 10:04 am
user-pic
As far as I know, there were no stoppages during evening service, but <a href="http://transit.toronto.on.ca/archives/weblog/2008/12/20-ttc_shuts_.shtml";>this morning the RT was shut down</a> for about an hour.
Justin / December 20, 2008 at 11:33 am
user-pic
these mini subways are the main rail system in Vancouver, but in this weather a bit of snow shuts down the ol LRT in no time.
matts replying to a comment from Jerrold / December 20, 2008 at 01:04 pm
user-pic
Jerrold, I think there was a problem. I was coming home around 7pm and when I was exiting the subway station I caught a bit of a garbled announcement warning Bloor-Danforth riders about some RT trouble. Due to poor acoustics I couldn't make out the details, though.
Ed / December 20, 2008 at 04:16 pm
user-pic
What a nightmare (i.e. the TTC in general) it was on Friday. I waited for a bus at the corner of Lawrence and Don Mills for almost an hour...a couple came before that, but one was out of service and the other was too full for anyone to get on. I understand that there was a snowstorm, BUT...if all of the buses are slowed down equally, shouldn't they still be coming at roughly the same pace (this was right at 5:00)? I HATE THE TTC BUT I AM TOO POOR TO HAVE A CHOICE IN THE MATTER
Sketchees / December 21, 2008 at 02:35 pm
user-pic
Many thanks to everyone who helped me define how the TTC and RT lines differ:)

To make my final point though, it's obvious Toronto needs to re-think it's public transportation system. Subways, especially in Canada's climate, are the way to go(*w/assistance of LRT's and eco-bus specific lanes)



Dave / December 22, 2008 at 08:27 pm
user-pic
I'm visiting Vancouver right now. They've had an atypically large amount of snow this weekend and SkyTrain (what they call the implementation of the same technology used for the Scarborough RT) has managed to keep running.

Probably the difference is that they run it frequently enough here that snow doesn't pile up on the tracks. They can do that because, as Justin points out, it is the main system here, and also because they run it without drivers. It's amazing: it was designed as driverless system, but they insist on using drivers on the Scarborough RT. Why?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal