City
Election 2008: Parkdale-High Park Candidates in Tight Race
The Parkdale-High Park riding is a tight race this election with local favourites Peggy Nash (NDP) and Gerrard Kennedy (Liberals) squaring off for the first time. Green candidate Rob Rishchynski and Conservative Jilian Saweczko are running visible campaigns, but are really just battling for bronze.
Nash was first to hit the streets and distribute signs - using leftovers from her previous campaign with "re-elect" stickers added - but Kennedy quickly countered with signs of his own. In a sort of candidate love-fest, it's become standard to see signs for both candidates in the same window or yard.
The campaign took a strange turn with recent vandalism in the riding, but neither candidate seems to be ahead of the other. It's hard to predict what this election will turn on as constituents weigh their loyalty to the incumbent (Nash) and their longtime former MPP (Kennedy).
It's hard to identify ways in which Nash or Kennedy would be remarkably different and both have demonstrated a strong commitment to the riding and the city. The most natural differences are found looking at the candidate's backgrounds.
Nash spent many years as a labour negotiator for the CAW as a colleague of the infamous Buzz Hargrove, and consistently works to protect Canadian manufacturing jobs. Naturally, she also puts an emphasis on the environment, and promises to "build a green economy." She has also garnered a lot of attention as a global activist, including being a leader in making the Dalai Lama an honourary citizen.
Kennedy first made his mark in food banks, most notably being the top executive of Toronto's Daily Bread Food Bank before holding elected office. Although Nash is the incumbent, Kennedy is also running a 'name you know' campaign, as he served as Parkdale-High Park MPP from 1999-2006, when he stepped down to run for the federal Liberal Party leadership.
Kennedy focuses on childcare and higher education, the latter not surprising as Kennedy just concluded his year as a visiting professor at Ryerson University. Along with the rest of his party, Kennedy is also pushing the Green Shift, and in general the economy and green issues. He also promises investment in transit systems.
Although Kennedy was a longtime and well-liked MPP, he played the crucial role in making Stephane Dion the Liberal leader, besting both Bob Rae and Michael Ignatieff. Whether his role, along with the generally low appeal of Dion, will hurt Kennedy's election bid also remains to be seen.

Rishchynski and Saweczko have both run and lost in the riding previously, albeit with disparate platforms. Naturally, Rischynski focuses on the environment and is enjoying a boost in popularity from Elizabeth May's national spotlight. Saweczko, on the other hand, has mostly been quiet, skipping a CBC Metro Morning debate with the other candidates and only recently getting yard signs in a visible number of homes.
After watching some local business owners enthusiastically add Peggy Nash signs to their windows shortly after the election call, now each of those windows feature a Kennedy sign, and some hit a left-wing trifecta with a Rishchynski sign as well. Although some businesses may be doing this to cater to as many clients as possible, the same trend is seen in many front yards; perhaps families are split on where to send their allegiance.
"Harper cannot remain Prime Minister," says my landlord, who is still unsure which way he wants to vote within the left-leaning contingent. Unlike most of his neighbours, he hasn't put any signs in his yard.


Discussion
21 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
The NDP have yet to explain how they will reconcile those two (currently) opposed values. Simply saying "we'll build a green economy" isn't enough, but that's all they have to offer, along with a hodge-podge of 'kitchen table' this and 'corporations are evil' that. They're very big on empty rhetoric and small on practical plans, but it seems to work well with a lot of people, for whatever reason.
Or maybe the Liberals trying to gain some sympathy and votes?
What a disappointment he has been is the last decade. His food bank / good reputation is long gone. He for my money is on the debutant tract just like Bob Rae.
I don't know. At the Polish festival Kennedy got a louder cheer than Nash when introduced. I think it's going to be very close.
And if Kennedy wins, I think he'll play a prominent role in Dion's party, one way or another.
I wrote Peggy Nash to ask her how she would be voting on C-61 and to express my concerns with it and never heard back. I keep hoping she'll come to my door so I can ask what's up with that.
Definitely that lost her some cred in my books.
<p>I wrote Peggy Nash about Iraq war resisters (one of my former coworkers is one) and never heard back from her either.
<p>
It's disappointing but given that she does seem to do a pretty good job of handling community matters I suspect it points to a problem with her constituency office --- you'd think someone there could at least manage to mail back a form letter.
At first I thought it was a group of people trying to give me information about a church of some kind until one guy approached me and said "Hi, I'm [couldn't remember at the time], your local MP" shook my hand and said a bunch of other stuff that I wasn't paying attention to.
I am relatively new to the area, so I just accepted it at face value and went on my way.
Over the next week I started seeing more and more signs pop up on lawns in the area...and one thing struck me as odd. The Liberal in the area was Maria Minna, the NDP, Marilyn Churley and the Conservative, Caroline Alleslev. There were no male candidates. I thought at first that perhaps he was an independent, but there were no signs anywhere.
I went home and tried to remember the name he gave me. And after some searching, I found it.
Tom Wappel. The current Liberal MP in the riding BESIDE mine.
I'm guessing in looking for a spot to campaign, Tom Wappel and the candidate that would be replacing him chose a spot near the busy Victoria Park subway station.
They picked a spot near the subway station, in a little courtyard area that lead to several tall highrises. The station itself is in the riding, but where they were standing was not as they had crossed Victoria Park (the boundary).
Bill C-61:
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/tags/c-61 (Ms. Nash is a signer of the Copyright pledge)
http://www.itworldcanada.com/a/Daily-News/2ea4d00b-3de4-462b-877d-fb7b0949deee.html
I can't find Peggy Nash specifically speaking out about the war resisters but I know it was the NDP that moved a motion to let them stay in Canada. It passed but being only a motion, is symbolic and has no legal effect.
http://www.ndp.ca/page/6482
It's not my riding however.
On Gerard's involvement in the community, it seems like many of the critics on this site have forgotten (or perhaps never knew) about the Runnymede Critical Care Centre, which Gerard kept open. Also recall that the Daily Bread food bank, which Gerard founded in 1986, was located in the Junction; that St Joseph's hospital used to have the longest wait times in Toronto and now it has the shortest and is fully revitalized. And I could go on. I mean, a film screening is nice and all, but the difference here speaks to both priorities and tactics.
Lastly, the OP Joshua omits that Gerard's passion for and experience in education comes not from his recent years as a business professor at Ryerson University, but from his time as Ontario's Minister of Education following Mike Harris defeat at the hands of the Liberals. It's an omission of 4 significant years.
Thanks for pointing out Kennedy's Minister of Education gig. I didn't really intend to omit that, but I thought it was important to touch on what Kennedy has done since resigning as MPP and not holding another public office.
I don't believe speeches are a good example of how strong a leader is. It's not like the candidate wrote them themselves.
This is where there can be found significant differences can be found. If you support Canada's continued war effort in Afghanistan, you like Kennedy. If you want us out of Afghanistan, then Nash is your candidate.
Housing policy sees both doing more than the Conservatives, the difference here that the NDP have more money for this. Transit again sees both parties planning to spend more on this.
Taxes see the Liberals continuing with Harper's planned 50 billion tax cut to business. The NDP will cancel these announced tax cuts for corporation and banks and invest in more Child care, transit, housing student aid, and also invest in more green technology.
The Liberals Green shift will put a tax on carbon, then use the funds to invest in green technology and reduce income taxes to assist in offsetting the carbon tax.
Dion has said they would look at banking fees and pay loans shops but would not want to interfere inappropriately to use his words.
The NDP have said they would address ATM fees, bank charges and credit card interest and cell phone charges.
Canadians pay the highest fees in the western world for ATMs and cell phones.
So as I said, both candidates in this riding are good. Look at the policies and then decide.
The one thing that is not an issue in this riding is Harper. The Conservatives can not win here.
I can't find any specific statements from her on the issue of american war resisters, but I know that she has been active in the community in support of them. The torontoist article on this riding has a photo of her giving a speech at a rally in support of war resisters, but I don't know if there are any quotes in any media from Nash.
On a side note, Nash went to Ukraine as an election monitor in 2004 and 2007. Also, she was an election monitor in South Africa in the 1994 post-apartheid elections.
May the best woman win indeed.
Prediction: Nash by 1000 votes.