Saturday, May 26, 2012Partly Cloudy 17°C
City

Heather Mallick Gets Her Hate On

Posted by Tim / September 24, 2008

We're a little late on this story, but for the past two weeks Fox News commentators have been up in arms in response to an article published by the CBC's Heather Mallick on September 5th comparing US Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin to a porn actress. She also went on to refer to Republican Men as sexual inadequates who must think that women would vote for Palin just because she has a vagina.

Comments are now numbering more than 1550 on the article including a recent gem from someone named Michael Collins who wrote:

I was torn between voting for Obama or voting for McCain but since Heather Mallick's bottom of the barrel and hateful comments about Sarah Palin I have made my decision. As a protest to this type of despicable characterization I will be voting for McCain/Palin.

A commenter named Ex_VanBC rightly responds:

Is that really how you'd determine who should be President of the United States? Scary.

Mallick herself and the CBC seem to be sticking to their guns, although formally the CBC has suggested they are reviewing complaints. Surely, everyone inside our national broadcaster is having a good laugh about this - the article is also getting lots of buzz around the blogosphere as well as commentary in other Canadian media like this mention (366 comments and counting) in the Globe and Mail.

All of us here were planning on just letting this blow over except we started getting emails sent to us as well - apparently some think that Mallick is a writer for blogTO. Someone named Jeff Norton wrote us the following note:

I want the contact info for the sorry excuse for the human being named Heather Mallick. She is pure middle east TRASH probably an illegal alien who came to bum f**k, Canada to work the welfare system. She clearly only has a job because of the communist Canadian government steals the taxpayers money to fund garbage like her. How do WE get to tell her more??? She has a trashy mouth so I wanted to throw some garbage in it.

Uhgh....Personally, I think everyone should just chill out and continue to enjoy the brilliance of Tina Fey and the SNL video below.

Discussion

27 Comments

Jonathan / September 24, 2008 at 11:46 pm
user-pic
Hm.
http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=1642

Jonathan.
Erin.F / September 25, 2008 at 12:59 am
user-pic
That broadcast footage made me feel sad inside, what with its subjective presentation of facts and the alarmist tone. The host was riling up some good anger and fear in me but I think she could have done better. The story needed some killer bees. Yeah, that's it. The next writer to be unleashed upon us by the CBC is going to express opinions AND shoot bees out of their mouth. Killer bees. I know I don't want MY tax dollars going towards such a thing.
I am outraged.
David E / September 25, 2008 at 02:17 am
user-pic
What's worse?

Heather Mallick's column about Palin or
Fox's indignation while ignoring its tendency
to do exactly the same thing to others?
Mark Dowling / September 25, 2008 at 08:50 am
user-pic
Irrespective of the effect it had on Fox News and its rather gullible viewership, I think this shouldn't take away from the fact that the Mallick article was ridiculous ad hominem and unworthy of a public service broadcaster - particularly the part directed at Bristol Palin, who isn't running for anything. ('Bristol has what is known in Britain as the look of the teen mum, the "pramface."')

It's ironic that at the time of the Couillard affair, Mallick took a different view of a woman's looks and their significance to public debate:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_mallick/20080602.html
Despot / September 25, 2008 at 08:56 am
user-pic
Everyone is missing just how funny David Warren was on this. He crumbled under the big scary American woman every time! All he had to do was throw her opinions of the CBC back at FOX. Despite this particular case, and I'm sure there are others, in my experience the CBC has done a lot more (good) for culture than FOX has. And FOX permeates more borders than the CBC does.
Bubba / September 25, 2008 at 10:03 am
user-pic
I thought it was funny and fantastic, i could not stop laughing at how the FOX reporter was making such an effort to make it sound like it was some kind of crime against humanity or woman in general!
RBeezy / September 25, 2008 at 10:37 am
user-pic
Heather Mallick just managed to become the doppleganger to Ann Poulter.

it's good to see a left wing mouth foaming diabtribe to counteract all that Republican swill.
Jonathan / September 25, 2008 at 10:52 am
user-pic
slightly off topic, but how is this a "City" story? Whatever happened to that tech/media/web category? Maybe a media category is in order?

hoping that this time, my comment actually gets through

Jonathan R. (not the one that posted the link)
Kate / September 25, 2008 at 10:58 am
user-pic
Although I don't agree with all of Mallick's points I think she is largely spot on identifying that the Palin pick was really rather cynically done to appeal to a certain female demographic who probably won't look further into Palin's politics than her appearance and soccer mom speeches. Talking about Bristol's appearance may have been a step to far even if she is most definitely a ?pram'.
Jonathan / September 25, 2008 at 11:09 am
user-pic
OK, some replies:

Erin F -- kinda lost you there -- you're outraged at Fox, right? Or at CBC?

David E -- given that Mallick's job is opinion and commentary, while the Fox clip reporting on reactions to those comments is supposed to be "fair and balanced" (their own News Corp. slogan), in my opinion Fox's hypocrisy -- and I think opportunistic and partisan alarmism -- is worse.

Despot -- "And FOX permeates more borders than the CBC does." -- I don't quite follow that last part.

I think Mallick's reaction to the threats etc. that have come her way following her opinion piece speak volumes here.

<quote>"The responses to my column proved me correct about the extreme right in the United States: they have a great misogynist rage in them," Ms. Mallick said in an interview from Toronto on Saturday.</quote> (from CP story quoted here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/23/84014/7542)
tim / September 25, 2008 at 11:58 am
user-pic
@despot - i agree, david crumbled big time
handfed / September 25, 2008 at 12:18 pm
user-pic
Thanks for reading my article on CBC.

Sincerely,
Karl Rove
leprechaun / September 25, 2008 at 12:19 pm
user-pic
Well. Mallick just got what she was asking for.
soren / September 25, 2008 at 12:45 pm
user-pic
YAY Heather! YAY David!

"I'm surprised you're surprised" Just awesome.
Despot / September 25, 2008 at 01:04 pm
user-pic
Hi Jonathan,

Granted the CBC content in question was disseminated through their website, but I'll ask you who you think has a greater weight in culture consumption on a global scale - FOX or CBC? I understand the difference between how the CBC is funded vs FOX, but I don't think anyone can argue that our little CBC is on more folk's radars than FOX.

Maybe one day we can resort to a fair and balanced MSCNNBBCBC to get our news.

In the meantime - http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/1245/arguingef4.jpg
gtr / September 25, 2008 at 02:02 pm
user-pic
I don't know what to watch now, Fox News, or Inside Edition.
I'll choose the Enquirer tabloid instead for its higher journalistic qualities.
Jonathan / September 25, 2008 at 02:34 pm
user-pic
Despot -- once again I fail to understand the point you wish to make.

And ftr, I didn't think we were arguing. I was looking for clarification and I think you provided it in saying you believe NewsCorp casts a wider coverage net worldwide (I don't have stats. on that -- tho' from what I understand, cbc news is generally well-regarded and quite well-read incl. outside of Canada; in fact the reactions to Mallick's article seems to support that notion -- but to me it's beside the point).

At any rate. I also agree David Warren appeared a tad spineless in this clip, but then again, it's not surprising to him to see these kinds of reactions to cbc news.
Jerrold / September 25, 2008 at 05:55 pm
user-pic
I've been in Boston all week and have limited TV channels here at my hotel. Watching FOX is very difficult. They're such right-leaning nuts, and most of what they "report" on is either conjecture or lunatic opinion. I don't think David crumbled so much as he appeased with a grin. And I don't know how much better I'd do in an interview with that nut.
wb / September 26, 2008 at 10:42 am
user-pic
Why is that woman yelling? Did someone forget to tell Fox News that they were supposed to be objective? I guess that's why she doesn't understand why the CBC would leave the article on their site -- that's what you get from free speech. Sometimes people don't agree with you.
Elle Driver / September 26, 2008 at 12:16 pm
user-pic
"THEY DO??" That shrieky robotic Barbie-doll just made my ears bleed.

Unrelated, but I can't help but post this:

Chris Rock responding to Larry King if he's "proud" to see a black man running for president:

"Um, you know what? I'm proud Barack Obama's running for president. You know? If it was Flavor Flav, would I be proud? No. I don't support Barack Obama because he's black."
robo / September 29, 2008 at 11:11 am
user-pic
It amazes me that people rush to Heather Mallick's defense after she made what should be viewed as repugnant remarks. Yes, there is such a thing as freedom of speech (at least here in the States... you in Canada only have freedom of leftwing speech) but that doesn't excuse her stupidity and hatred.

For example, if I refer to Heather Mallick as a disgusting looking puke, who I wouldn't fu*k with my dog's dick, some people would find that offensive and hateful. Most certainly my dog would. But it is an opinion and I should be able to freely express it.

Heather Mallick says today that she is an "emetophobe," a word which I must confess I had never heard. Apparently emetophobes vomit when they find something unpleasant looking. Having seen Heather Mallick's saggy, pasty, blotchy, leperous face on the CBC website, I nearly vomited, leading me to suspect that I might be an emetophobe. So she and I actually have something in common.
Jonathan / September 29, 2008 at 12:40 pm
user-pic
http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_cruickshank/20080928.html
breerion / September 29, 2008 at 04:57 pm
user-pic
if the US vote McCain/Palin, I have lost all faith in humanity. scary.
mallick probably had too much to drink when she wrote her commentary, that's how we all talk when we're sauced!
Alex / September 30, 2008 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
Q: What's the difference between Heather Mallick and a pile of shit?

A: I WANT to step on Heather Mallick.
robo / September 30, 2008 at 03:07 pm
user-pic
breerion said:
"mallick probably had too much to drink when she wrote her commentary, that's how we all talk when we're sauced!"

I thought she said Alaskans were drunks, eh? Having read a few of her articles now, she must be sauced 24x7. Then again, she says she is an emetophoe; maybe she has other mental disorders.
asdf / October 1, 2008 at 12:22 am
user-pic
Robo: You totally misdefine emetophobe. Shame on you for dismantling the term for an insult.

Emetophobes don't vomit when they see something unpleasant. It's quite the opposite. They hardly ever vomit, because that's the phobia: a fear of vomiting.
I'm one myself. It's not a mental disorder any more than a fear of spiders or heights might be considered one.
robo / October 1, 2008 at 02:18 am
user-pic
asdf, thanks for the correction. My first post should be corrected to read: "Having seen Heather Mallick's saggy, pasty, blotchy, wretched face on the CBC website, I was afraid I would vomit, leading me to suspect that I might be an emetophobe. So she and I actually have something in common."

Sorry, I shouldn't have referred to emetophobia as a mental disorder. Nearly everyone has some sort of phobia. Personally I have a preternatural dread of ugly, shrill, hateful animals... such as Heather Mallick.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal