Saturday, May 26, 2012Partly Cloudy 17°C
City

Toronto Photo Essay: Anti-abortion Activism

Posted by Guest Contributor / July 11, 2008

200807011_abortion02.jpgPhotos and writing by guest contributor Sam Obeid.

WARNING: Extremely graphic, morbid images within.

Anti-abortion Activism

I drive by this clinic almost daily, and usually see one or two people outside, holding up signs (some pointing passersby to a website called Show the Truth). But on this particular morning, anti-abortion protestors were fully organized and had about 10 people lined up on both sides of the street, displaying some very disturbing, poster-sized photos of dead and dismembered fetuses.

200807011_abortion01.jpgIf I agree with a cause or not, I will always support the right to peaceful protest. This one appeared to be peaceful, but I was still bothered by the fact that they had a little boy holding up one of the graphic signs. This little boy should be out playing in a park, not protesting an abortion clinic!

I also question the photo - not necessarily the use of them, but I do wonder if they're actual abortion photos or not. I could be wrong, but I suspect they're from another source, such as medical school text books.

200807011_abortion03.jpg

200807011_abortion04.jpgThis series is viewable larger via this fullscreen slideshow.

Toronto Photo Essays are visual, themed collections of photographs submitted by readers of blogTO and members of the blogTO Flickr Pool. We embrace the interactive, collaborative nature of this column, and encourage readers to submit photo essays for future consideration.

Discussion

46 Comments

Ry-Tron / July 11, 2008 at 03:48 pm
user-pic
The old guy witht he Killing Center billboard is the result of the load his mom should've swallowed.
Pamela / July 11, 2008 at 03:55 pm
user-pic
I never understood pro-lifers, to be honest. Me, myself, I would never get an abortion, but I'm happy that it's my choice, and mine alone. There are so many children today being raised in despicable conditions because their parents never had the capacity to care for another human being.
Eric / July 11, 2008 at 03:58 pm
user-pic
Well the last picture which I find the most disgusting is also not accurate. It has a healthy head of hair and fetal hair does not begin to grow until between 19 & 23 weeks and hair follicles only begin to develop between 32 & 36 weeks. That means a fetus with that much hair would be almost 8 months old, far more developed then abortions done in clinics.
Gloria / July 11, 2008 at 04:04 pm
user-pic
Which clinic? This column started off a bit abruptly, without mentioning any establishing details (or was that the point?). Guessing from the photos, it's on Gerrard St near Parliament.
Jordan / July 11, 2008 at 04:05 pm
user-pic
Gloria, that's the one.
Dan / July 11, 2008 at 04:25 pm
user-pic
This is morbid and disturbing. People don't get abortions for fun. Abortions are painful. Yes, obviously we know that the fetus is being killed, but this is not a case of social injustice. Abortion is the end result of a difficult decision process in a difficult time of one's life. No one needs to see such senseless graphic images, especially just driving down the street. Have some respect for the women who've endured this difficult process. Grotesque horror show slasher photos are not helping anyone.
Joshua / July 11, 2008 at 04:42 pm
user-pic
This is obnoxious - both the signs and the post. What is the purpose of writing about a minuscule protest of such an old issue? Other than to be obnoxious, that is. There were several protests in the city yesterday, this one being the most trivial. Aren't you simply publicizing these activists' cause? Or was there an editorial reason? Explain?
Jerrold / July 11, 2008 at 04:47 pm
user-pic
Editor's note: The purpose of this post (and this column in general) is to present the people, places, and things seen in and around Toronto, by Torontonians. We're not promoting viewpoints or taking a political stance here - we're simply presenting a Toronto photographer's series of photos, and leaving the discussion and opinions up to the readers.
David Toronto / July 11, 2008 at 05:24 pm
user-pic
The anti-abortionists like to hijack common
sensibilities of the general public to make
their point.

Rather like hitting a person over the head
to get their attention. Self-defeating at best.
Joshua / July 11, 2008 at 05:43 pm
user-pic
So there's no relevancy other than this took place on a street in Toronto?

My point is, some editorial discretion is needed. I could submit a picture of some guy picking his nose on Bathurst, which fits the stated criteria of this column, but I would hope the editors do his/her job and not publish that.
somechick / July 11, 2008 at 05:56 pm
user-pic
If BlogTO wants to cover a protest in the city, that's fine. I also respect that they kept the more gruesome photos for later in the article, so they aren't the first thing that you see. However, I find it slightly disturbing that the article beneath this one is for a Steakhouse with a photograph of meat.

Abortions and Steakhouses shouldn't really be beside each other. You could have put the FRINGE article between them for some breathing space between these two examples of different bodily procedures - Abortion and Eating.

It's poor taste.


Secondly, to tie it in to recent news, you could have mentioned Dr. Morgentaler's entry into the Order of Canada, and the surrounding current opinions recently, in this article. This protest outside this clinic has been occuring since my grade school days. This isn't really anything new or shocking, whether I agree with it or not.
David / July 11, 2008 at 06:11 pm
user-pic
I'd tend to agree. Reporting this as a 'current happening' is one thing, but please, some discretion with respect to photos. I don't really care to give these lunatics another forum, and I don't think these photos should even be displayed publicly on the street.

When the 'abortion = genocide' circus came to UofT, they were required to have their little 'exhibition' set up in a closed circle outside of public view. Passers by could be invited in and go look if they so chose, but it wasn't gruesomely assaulting the sensibilities of just anyone making their way to class.
Me / July 11, 2008 at 06:56 pm
user-pic
so what you're all saying is... freedom of speech but only where you agree, right? i am a grey area dweller, i suppose. i agree with the person who said i would never get one, but am glad that it's a choice. life is not always the best option, but... on the flipside, they are equally as entitled to their display as someone who might display pictures of the atrocities of war.

that being said, i don't agree with this display. i know of these people and definitely think this is more traumatic thank helpful.

oh, and in response to this:
"Well the last picture which I find the most disgusting is also not accurate. It has a healthy head of hair and fetal hair does not begin to grow until between 19 & 23 weeks and hair follicles only begin to develop between 32 & 36 weeks. That means a fetus with that much hair would be almost 8 months old, far more developed then abortions done in clinics.
Posted by: Eric at July 11, 2008 3:58 PM"

Actually, part of the reason so many people protest is because in Canada there is no law governing abortion. A woman can have one right up to term if the baby has not yet been born.

freedom ain't always pretty...
Joe / July 11, 2008 at 06:56 pm
user-pic
It's pretty awesome that the title of this contains "anti-abortion" instead of "pro-life." I'm so sick of the "pro-everything" titles the pro- and anti-abortionists put upon themselves. Pro-life should mean something entirely different from anti-abortion.

I do find it odd that presumably progressive and open-minded inhabitants of the comments section are so intolerant of a different viewpoint than theirs. This is a topic on which reasonable people can disagree, as far as I'm concerned, so calling one side "lunatics" seems pretty ridiculous.
chephy / July 11, 2008 at 07:47 pm
user-pic
"Abortions and Steakhouses shouldn't really be beside each other. You could have put the FRINGE article between them for some breathing space between these two examples of different bodily procedures - Abortion and Eating."

LOL. That's funny.
bbpsi / July 11, 2008 at 08:36 pm
user-pic
These dicks set up at Bayview and Eglinton as well outside my store. (No, I am not an abortionist, and as far as I know there are no abortion clinics anywhere near Bayview and Eg.)

I don't give a crap about whatever little protest you want to have, please don't try and drive away my customers.
Jordan / July 11, 2008 at 09:30 pm
user-pic
bbpsi ? the Morgentaler Clinic is at Bayview and Eglinton.
Elle Driver / July 11, 2008 at 10:45 pm
user-pic
Wow, what a lousy start to the summer break that kid is having. And to think that I got mad at my parents for forcing me to take summer school.

Absolutely demented.
rek / July 11, 2008 at 11:03 pm
user-pic
If it looks gross it must be wrong!
aahhrrgg / July 12, 2008 at 12:44 am
user-pic
I pass those protesters at Gerrard and Parliament every day too. I have three words for them. 'Order of Canada'
n / July 12, 2008 at 02:43 am
user-pic
never mind abortion, how dare they indoctrinate a child obviously too young to form his own opinions
CH / July 12, 2008 at 03:26 am
user-pic
It'd be fun to stand outside Scarborough General with photos of a kindney transplant(gross!), and signs saying "Transplants are evil!".
Zack / July 12, 2008 at 11:52 am
user-pic
Taking photo of another photo is never a good idea. lol
leprechaun / July 12, 2008 at 12:29 pm
user-pic
These peaople are child abusers. The kid shouldn't be there, exposed to this kind of bullshit.
Michele Champagne / July 12, 2008 at 01:58 pm
user-pic
Eric's comment is correct: The pictures used in the protest are not from abortions. Abortions done safelly and legally in Ontario are performed 4-14 weeks (1st trimester) after pregnancy was engaged. The babies seen in the photographs are clearly older. Images of real fetal development: <a href="http://www.pregnancy.org/pregnancy/fetaldevelopment1.php";>http://www.pregnancy.org/pregnancy/fetaldevelopment1.php<;/a>
person / July 12, 2008 at 05:43 pm
user-pic
The reason people don't like seeing these signs, and don't like them being posted here, is that they don't like being reminded of reality. Because they'd much rather continue doing what they want and is convenient for them, even if it means the ugly murder of an innocent little human being.

As someone else said, reality ain't pretty.
Donny Hathaway / July 12, 2008 at 07:00 pm
user-pic
Am I supposed to be grossed out by these pictures? All I see is a fetus that was spared a childhood of neglectful parenting.
Scott Evans / July 13, 2008 at 10:13 am
user-pic
No one (except a moron) would say we shouldn't be reminded of the German holocaust by no one ever showing the photos of piles of murdered Jews. These anti-abortion protesters are accurately showing the reality of the modern-day holocaust. If abortion is such a good thing, then why is it a difficult decision for women to make? Oh, and there is no limit to how old an unborn child is for someone to take his or her life, that's why the last picture shows such an older child. Anyone who wants to ignore the abortion holocaust is just as despicable as anyone who wants to ignore the German holocaust.
somechick / July 13, 2008 at 12:03 pm
user-pic
Hey Scott,

As a Jew I find it offensive that you'd compare abortion to the holocaust. Comparing everything to the holocaust is a weak attempt at justifying your hatred for women's rights. Jews that that got killed in the holocaust were already living, breathing individuals with no umbilical cord attached to their mothers. They didn't have much choice whether or not they were going to be killed. You are using the deaths of my people as a way of pushing your own agenda. That is disgusting.

Who do you think you are, telling women they are killing their own kids? Are you waiting in line to adopt all these children? Abortion is a difficult decision because it involves complex biological and psychological issues. It isn't that simple. But you are not a woman, so you wouldn't know how it feels to even get a period. Go tell a rape victim she's evil. You sound like you belong in Saudi Arabia.

According to Jewish law, A baby isn't a full human being until half of the body is out of the mother and it takes it's first breath of air. We also believe that during pregnancy, should an emergency arise, the life of the mother is more important than the life of the unborn child. These are the same laws your Jesus would have believed.

Go ask a Rabbi if you don't believe me. (not a jews for jesus one please)
person / July 13, 2008 at 03:05 pm
user-pic
somechick: so unborn babies have a choice whether or not they are going to be killed?

"Women's rights" is a shorthand for the right to kill someone. An unborn baby isn't not a person because he/she has no ability to protest their death.
Gregg / July 14, 2008 at 09:16 am
user-pic
"You sound like you belong in Saudi Arabia."
^^^ You should have left this out somechick because it makes you sound disgusting despite your well thought out arguement.
Jay / July 14, 2008 at 10:43 am
user-pic
It's always entertaining reading posts that actually deal with real issues. The fact of the matter is that people have a right to protest and blogTo has a right to report on said protest. Let's all keep in mind that this is a fucking blog and not a newspaper - so there are fewer options as to where to place the story.

Really - I think people just like having things to bitch about.
Thivyan / July 14, 2008 at 08:42 pm
user-pic
I remember seeing these signs set up in front of union station. They actually had a few younger kids (i would say 9-15 year olds?) holding up the large signs and handing out little papers with the same images on them.

I don't mind the fact that it was there, but some people may not appreciate them due to their graphic nature (I heard a few people mumbling how protests like this would probably change their minds on abortion... AWAY from the anti abortion front) But to each their own.

What annoyed me is that they were using little kids to hold and hand out these images.
somechick / July 15, 2008 at 02:35 am
user-pic
Women's Rights is nota short hand word for "the right to kill some one".

Women's rights are about the freedom to have control over our own bodies. It's about having the right to have a job, own a home, drive a car and geting an education. It's about being autonomous and deciding whether or not to have children, whether or not to get married and having the right to vote in elections and become active members of society. It's about deciding what is right for us and not letting men decide what's best for women. Just because abortion is legal, doesn't mean women are gonna rush out and get them. It's about having a choice to do so or not based on a woman's own values or beliefs. if a women chooses not to have an abortion, I support that decision as much as that of a woman that chooses to have one.

There are lot of progeressive,supportive men out there. Unfortunately, you "person" aren't one of them.
john / September 15, 2008 at 05:21 pm
user-pic
abortion is wrong plain and simple
funbaybear / November 15, 2008 at 08:41 pm
user-pic
In response to Ry-Tron at July 11, 2008 entry: What is this "choice" you speak of? You are happy to have the right to choose whether to kill or not to kill another human being? The life of a baby begins long before he or she is born. A new individual human being begins at fertilization, when the sperm and ovum meet to form a single cell. If the baby's life is not interrupted, he or she will someday become an adult man or woman. Worldwide, millions of unborn babies are killed each year. In the United States over 40 million unborn babies have been killed in the 29 years since abortion was legalized and more than 1.3 million are killed each year.
funbaybear / November 15, 2008 at 08:43 pm
user-pic
In response to Ry-Tron at July 11, 2008 entry: Grow up!
funbaybear / November 15, 2008 at 08:48 pm
user-pic
This is in response to Dan's message of July 11, 2008: I agree that this is morbid and disturbing! And it should be. Why because a human being, a fetus, is being killed. Any violation of innocent human life IS a social injustice. The purpose of the posters is to raise the consciousness of what is happening in the killing factories. People DO NEED to realize what is occurring and to be disturbed in order to facilitate change. We need to protect the rights of unborn humans who can not speak out for themselves.
casey / January 31, 2011 at 05:17 pm
user-pic
abortion is not debatable. it is a legal right. the pictures are not accurate representations of abortion. I want to know where and how these anti choicers got their hands on a picture of a nine month old dead baby? because the final picture is not the result of an abortion. and, until they can answer that question, they have no reason to say anything negative about abortion. hey, you guys are the ones with all the pictures of dead babies. no uterus, no opinion.
hey / January 31, 2011 at 05:19 pm
user-pic
the description of these images are wrong. the last image is not a fetus. it is a full grown baby.
um replying to a comment from funbaybear / January 31, 2011 at 05:26 pm
user-pic
how do you know what occurs in 'killing factories' if you've never been in one.
KL replying to a comment from john / January 31, 2011 at 06:19 pm
user-pic
Well, that's settled.

Thanks John!
Newly / December 6, 2011 at 05:44 pm
user-pic
click to view kids ugg boots clearance fake ugg boots with confident online shopping
Newly / December 14, 2011 at 06:56 pm
user-pic
view converting dvd to avi xilisoft avi to dvd converter to take huge discount and get big save
dioxralo / February 14, 2012 at 09:37 pm
user-pic
you will like african american hairstyles with low price
Jeseduem / April 18, 2012 at 12:20 pm
user-pic
sell outlet-louisvuitton.yolasite.com/ at my estore

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal