Should the High Park Zoo Still Exist?

  • Posted by Tim
  • Filed in City
  • May 13, 2008

High Park ZooA small zoo has long been a feature of Toronto's High Park, but is it time to shut it down and send the animals back to their natural habitat?

That's certainly the verdict of one black-marker-armed visitor whose commentary I recently spotted on the sign (pictured above) in front of the llama cage. It's perhaps a reflection of the growing movement among the current generation of 20 and 30 somethings who believe that animals have an intrinsic right to live free in their natural habitat; and that the whole concept of zoos is therefore misguided.

It's a debate that obviously has two sides to the story - with many agreeing that a well run zoo does have a purpose beyond a mere entertainment and educational value. The primary benefit (and strongest argument for those in favour of zoos) is one of conservation - a mandate that the Toronto Zoo is very keen to communicate.

But looking closer at the High Park Zoo it's tough to rationalize that there's much in the way of conservation efforts going on here. None of the animals on display are anywhere close to nearing extinction, and some - including sheep, cattle, bison, peacocks and llamas are so common that it might surprise some visitors that they're even here.

The photos below are ones I took earlier this month. I have to say that in particular the bisons looked pretty unimpressed with the lack of room they have to roam.

Llama

Zoo

Zoo Animals

Zoo Feeding

Zoo Lounging

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

Some zoos do have an important conservation/education purpose, and many of the High Park zoo's animals are domesticated and effectively have no natural habitat. That being said, the HP zoo is a depressing eyesore and should be disbanded.

Posted by: Jack at May 13, 2008 12:04 PM

The land area currently occupied by this rather modest zoo would better serve a mandate of conservation by being restored to its natural state.

There is an argument to be made in favour of zoos for conservation and education, though I'm not entirely persauded, but I am clear this zoo meets neither of those goals, and children can go to Riverdale Farm to see farm animals and the Toronto Zoo to see other species.

This site has long since past its best before date.

Posted by: Kevin at May 13, 2008 12:44 PM

The High Park Zoo is extremely depressing. The path is not well maintained, neither is the signage or even the pens the animals live in (pens, not environments) and the ostrich has worn several feet deep a tread into the ground by the fence. Time to get rid of it already.

Posted by: Danielle at May 13, 2008 1:34 PM

I basically think zoos are fine. Humans have taken over the Earth, animals get to play second fiddle, and as long as the animals are well treated I have no problem with them.

That said, the High Park zoo is an eyesore. Perhaps a new facility could be designed, with a half-dozen secure enclosures, and the animals could be rotated from the Toronto Zoo. I.E., in May, there's a tiger. In June, there's a zebra. In July, there's a lion. Whatever. High Park humans would appreciate the variety. Toronto Zoo animals would probably appreciate a vacation.

Posted by: Anon at May 13, 2008 1:57 PM

I'm not sure animals crave vacations like we do. I know it takes house pets a while to adjust to new surroundings. I can imagine wild animals having a tough time with the rotation idea.

That said, I think (well-run) zoos are important in exposing people to the creatures that their actions could potentially affect. I think it's easier for people to be less destructive in their habits when they've first hand seen a baby Panda or Polar Bear, etc.

Posted by: Ryan L. at May 13, 2008 2:03 PM

I'm pretty sure all those animals shown there are domesticated (including the Llama) for eating purposes and would otherwise be turned into Burgers were they not in that zoo.

An upgrade would be nice and I personally always find zoos depressing. But at least they're only farm animals.

Posted by: LAT at May 13, 2008 2:28 PM

When I was a kid, I lived a couple blocks from High Park. I was able to always visit the High Park Zoo. Because it was in my vicinity, it was worth a few minutes of my time to visit.

To visit the Metro Zoo, it can be an all day expedition to the far reaches of uncharted Scarborough.

I wish they could improve the High Park Zoo. I do hope that the animals are rotated with animals from the Metro Zoo.

Posted by: W. K. Lis at May 13, 2008 2:32 PM
Humans have taken over the Earth
Would you care to elaborate? I wouldn't say that being (by some measures) the dominant species qualifies us as the conquerors of the Earth.

You could probably make just as convincing an argument that sea sponges have taken over the Earth.

Posted by: Ben at May 13, 2008 3:03 PM

Maybe you could dispense with some of the animals that aren't really well suited - llamas and ostriches perhaps.

But the goats aren't particularly demanding. I'd say they're fine to stay.

Posted by: David at May 13, 2008 9:50 PM

I grew up in Parkdale and the High Park Zoo was the biggest highlight of my childhood visits to the park. I still go and check out the animals every time I'm there. For an inner-city kid like myself, it was my only chance to see those animals - the yak was a family favourite. The Metro Zoo and Riverdale Farm were too far away. Freshen it up if needed, but I believe it needs to remain.

Posted by: MK at May 14, 2008 1:13 AM

I grew up in Parkdale and the High Park Zoo was seriously lame. I didn't care that they had Zoo Animals in High Park. I didn't even remember until you brought up this story. I still go to High Park only for a quickie or a BBQ or a spark up every time I'm there.
For an inner-city punk like myself, I didn't care about these third rate zoo animals. The Metro Zoo and Riverdale Farm are probably classes above this - but of course I don't know where they are.
I guess you can freshen this "High Park Zoo" up a little bit, or else take it down, give these animals a real home, and make better use of the High Park definition.

Therefore Should the High Park Zoo Still Exist?
can be answered with High Park has a Zoo? .

Posted by: SCREWFACE at May 14, 2008 1:52 AM

No, humans have totally taken over the earth. You don't see anybody else with condos and ipods do you? I say if the llamas and porpoises and whatnot don't like it, they can either grow opposable thumbs or STFU.

Humans #1!!

Posted by: Loozrboy at May 14, 2008 11:27 AM

The High Park Zoo need's to either be taken down, or get a severe overhaul. I've only been there once, and it was a rather depressing end to an otherwise nice day in the park.

Posted by: es at May 14, 2008 4:45 PM

Yeah we straggle by the zoo everytime we walk though HP and its pretty lame. The riverdale farm is far more interesting and hands on. I would rather pet a plain old cow than stare at a Himalyayn yak from 50 feet away behind a chain link fence.

Posted by: Marcel at May 16, 2008 2:49 PM

Seeing that these are domesticated animals, why not turn the entire area into a naturalized grassland habitat and let the animals roam (provided they get along with each other) leaving park patrons to view from a farther distance.

Posted by: NC at June 16, 2008 12:54 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Should the High Park Zoo Still Exist?' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.