Saturday, May 26, 2012Partly Cloudy 17°C
City

Morning Brew: April 9th, 2008

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / April 9, 2008

20080409_mb.jpgPhoto: "Make a difference" by blogTO Flickr pooler alexindigo.

Your morning news roundup for Wednesday April 9th, 2008:

Revival of the Toronto-Rochester ferry service may one day see the light, employing old hovercraft that used to do the English Channel run connecting France and England. And their idea to couple the lake crossing with a rush hour commuter run from Hamilton to Toronto is ingenious.

Remember that string of deliberately set laneway and garbage bin fires last summer? Police have a Burlington man in custody, who they believe may be responsible for the arsons. Hopefully they have the right guy, and this summer doesn't see any more pyro-destruction.

--

TTC Strike Watch:
Talks are ongoing, but the Union is not pleased by the slow pace and the public are pretty much in the dark. They are now suggesting that the fate of the system and potential for strike will likely be clearer tomorrow, when the Union holds a press conference (which is sure to piss off the vast majority of Torontonians). If Giambrone is so optimistic that a strike can be averted, does this mean that the Union once again gets everything it has demanded?

The dark cloth-covered pillars at the Museum subway station were finally disrobed yesterday, revealing the ornate decor and making critics ooh and aah before asking themselves if the upgrade was worth $5-million. If you can't make a quick stop at the station to see them in their full glory, be sure to check out Torontoist photographer Miles Storey's most incredible shots.

And in news outside of Toronto, over at our sister site Beyond Robson in Vancouver they've reported on a creative strategy to turn Google Maps into a giant game of Where's Waldo. They've also posted an interesting piece about the shortcomings and potential of the Vancouver forum on stillepost.ca . The Toronto and Montreal forums on Stillepost have thrived but the Vancouver forum remains rather stagnant.

Discussion

22 Comments

A|Layton / April 9, 2008 at 08:51 am
user-pic
The museum station reno is pathetic. It just looks tacky. Way to go TTC...how about next time you spend 5 million dollars on something that actually looks good and is needed, like, oh I dunno, service improvements or hiring staff that don't feel the need to strike every time they are told to do their job.
apetimberlake / April 9, 2008 at 09:03 am
user-pic
I really like what the station looks like..Really sharp..
Although at my own station (Royal york) has massive puddles of water all over the place and a cieling that looks like its about to colapse...

That $5 million could have been pu to better work :(
Josh / April 9, 2008 at 09:50 am
user-pic
I think you mean 'union', not 'Union'. Also, 'averted', not 'diverted'.
Gregg / April 9, 2008 at 10:00 am
user-pic
It's usually the union that feels like striking and not the workers, as they don't get paid.
Patrick / April 9, 2008 at 10:07 am
user-pic
Museum station is just awful. Looks like something you'd see in a theme park or a shopping mall. A wasted opportunity to do something great.

As for the hovercraft proposal, COOL! I'd love to ride on one of those old-timers. Once. By the way, the plural of hovercraft is "hovercraft."


chephy / April 9, 2008 at 10:07 am
user-pic
Better go see the station now before it's vandalised. :-(
Elle Driver / April 9, 2008 at 10:21 am
user-pic
I'm fairly certain (and someone can correct me if I'm wrong) but most (or all) of the $5 million came from private donors, so it's a bit pointless to complain that "it should have been spent elsewhere", because no money was taken out of the TTC's meager coffers in the first place.
MIJ / April 9, 2008 at 10:38 am
user-pic

According to the Toronto Star on Sunday:

"Toronto Community Foundation, which contributed $2 million to the Museum station redesign. (The province put in $2 million and the Toronto Transit Commission, the final million."

Raven / April 9, 2008 at 10:42 am
user-pic
"hovercraft... rush hour commuter run from Hamilton to Toronto"

I can just see ridiculous people asking now: "But do they have WiFi?"

And perhaps one can make a profit by selling waterproof covers/flotation devices for Blackberries.
Mark / April 9, 2008 at 10:49 am
user-pic
Gregg: I was under the impression that union members (the workers) have to vote to go on strike, thus it is usually both the union and the workers that are in favour of striking.
Adam / April 9, 2008 at 11:00 am
user-pic
It's a step in the right direction, I think.

As many Torontoist commenters pointed out, the best part to me is the cleanliness and how well lit the station is. I also agree with Topping that they missed the boat on refinishing the platform.
Ryan L. / April 9, 2008 at 11:20 am
user-pic
If someone was willing to give you 80% of the money require to renovate a room in your crumbling house, but only under the condition that they get to pick the room that gets rennovated, you'd be pretty stupid not to take it.

Maybe your bedroom needs it more than the living room that the donor was willing to pay for, but your living room could certainly use the sprucing up, and getting the opportunity to fix it up at a 5th of the cost isn't one most people would turn away.
jt / April 9, 2008 at 12:00 pm
user-pic
Toronto def. dropped the ball again. Why does a city fill itself with commodified architecture? why does a city kill its history? why does a city ruin its heritage with kitsch?

More importantly, (in the national post article) why is a u of t architecture student praising the museum reno? wth are they teaching there? The crystal has no architectural merits. why is she studying it?
chardy / April 9, 2008 at 12:05 pm
user-pic
"It's usually the union that feels like striking and not the workers, as they don't get paid."

What's the difference? The ATU workers voted to reject the TTC offer 99-1. That's a strike mandate if I ever saw one.
A|Layton / April 9, 2008 at 12:11 pm
user-pic
Would somebody just make the TTC an essential service already and end all this strike silliness.
gillian / April 9, 2008 at 12:14 pm
user-pic
I was really like the look of the new museum station (at least from the inside of a subway car while whizzing by). The 5 million dollar price tag may be steep, but better to spend it on something tangible than a subcommitee to investigate the finding of another subcommittee on the possiblity of increasing the excellence of ridership provided by the TTC.
Jerrold / April 9, 2008 at 04:53 pm
user-pic
Fixed hovercraft and diverted. But I reserve the right to capitalize Union if I so choose :P
Gloria / April 9, 2008 at 04:59 pm
user-pic
JT: Oh, man, you totally got us. We're all double-majoring in Un-Architecture and How to Piss Off Bloggers, because it's all they'll teach us middling kids! Forget you, Medicine and Law!
Paulo / April 10, 2008 at 10:06 am
user-pic
I find it funny that people are arguing about the city "[ruining] it's heritage"...Puleeez...This is "heritage" which is < 50 years old, was built with cheap bathtub tiles, is dirty, and in dire need of updating -- it has no value. Heritage must of something that is preserved because it has collective value to citizens -- just because something is old means it has heritage-value; there is nothing wrong with creating new higher-quality "heritage" for future generations. It's not like we're talking about renovating Osgoode Hall here, which ironically, IS being "renovated" to add a poorly-designed access ramp which WILL ruin heritage.

I guarantee you that in 50 years, the new Museum station will be looked are more fondly than the old one.
Paulo / April 10, 2008 at 10:08 am
user-pic
(sorry...my last post got cut-off because of an angle bracket)

I find it funny that people are arguing about the city "[ruining] it's heritage"...Puleeez...This is "heritage" which is less than 50 years old, was built with cheap bathtub tiles, is dirty, and in dire need of updating -- it has no value. Heritage must of something that is preserved because it has collective value to citizens -- just because something is old means it has heritage-value; there is nothing wrong with creating new higher-quality "heritage" for future generations. It's not like we're talking about renovating Osgoode Hall here, which ironically, IS being "renovated" to add a poorly-designed access ramp which WILL ruin heritage.

I guarantee you that in 50 years, the new Museum station will be looked are more fondly than the old one.
Mark Dowling / April 10, 2008 at 10:47 am
user-pic
$5m and no disabled access. Money well spent?

GO are looking at extending GO trains to Niagara - a hovercraft would give much more direct service, at least to downtown. It's 111km from St. Catharines to Queens Quay but only about 45km by water.
Gloria / April 10, 2008 at 12:36 pm
user-pic
Paulo: Bizarre you'd slam the definition of "heritage" for indiscriminately including anything that's "old", but then criticize our stations for NOT being old ... being "less than 50 years old." So is it one or the other?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal