Morning Brew: April 17th, 2008

20080417_mb.jpgPhoto: "92/365 - Green Sprout" by blogTO Flickr pooler ericrobinson.

Your Toronto morning news roundup for Thursday April 17th, 2008:

TTC strike watch:
Unconfirmed reports have it that there's a good chance that Monday morning will mark the start of a TTC strike (and will be a complete clusterfu*k on our roads and on GO transit). An announcement to come at a news conference later this morning should confirm/dismiss our fears. Watch for an announcement on blogTO.

Here's a grrrreat idea: arm TTC special constables with tasers, bro!

Here's (actually) a great idea: free clotheslines for 75,000 Toronto residents! But be sure your municipal laws permit you to hang your undies before you race off to take advantage of this freebie.

--

Even if you don't use a car, the effect of rising fuel costs is going to bite you - at the grocery store. Proponents for the local food movement are looking smarter and smarter by the day. Eating seasonal/local is good for both the environment and the wallet.

Toronto schools are about to take a major hacking. Being eyed: smaller city schools with low enrollment will potentially be on the chopping block, along with school pools and ESL classes (which could affect as many as 30,000 students).

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

The private covenants property developers had with councils regarding clotheslines should be considered null and void.
End-use of one's land should remain the sovereignty of the owner, not the developer.

Imagine if a developer had a thing against barbecues or trampolines or basketball hoops or garden gnomes. That would be more oppressive that the original Flemingdon Park.
Flemingdon Park was developed by EP Taylor who did not like blue roofs.

Posted by: David Toronto at April 17, 2008 9:18 AM

If public money didn't fund "segregationist" schooling at the CDSBs, maybe those schools wouldn't have to close, would they Dalton?

Posted by: Mark Dowling at April 17, 2008 9:32 AM

I agree, 100%. The fact that there are still municipal laws that make clothesline use illegal is, disappointing and embarrassing.

Posted by: Jerrold at April 17, 2008 9:35 AM

re: school boards low on money, why can't they have a bake sale?

Posted by: Ben at April 17, 2008 9:45 AM

Eating seasonal/local is good for both the environment and the wallet.
-----------------------------
I think that it's a bit of a myth that eating locally is necessarily better for the environment.

Think about this: huge quantities of food shipped in from a developing country, by boat or plane, does spend a lot of fuel. However, a lot of the times the food is picked manually. Once it gets here, it gets put on a truck, travels from a harbor to the grocery store. Ok, that's quite a bit of distance to travel ? but huge amounts of food are traveling.

Now, in Ontario - huge amounts of gas are spent on using tractors, aerial spraying, diesel for trucks carrying food (now, since it's not done in huge quantities like on a giant shipping boat this means multiple trips back and forth on highways), electricity might be spent heating hot houses to get the plants to sprout earlier on, and then machines to plant them. The net result may be that it's practically the same. Factor in that people may have to drive a distance to farmer's markets then you've got hundreds of cars on the road to get to the markets rather than walking or biking to their local grocery store.

In the winter, you've got tons of coal being burned to create electricity for hot houses to grow more local food, cold storage of seasonal foods, etc. Or you can get them from a developing country for less...

Also, think of the benefit that trade will have on the economies of developing countries. The important thing that should be stressed is sustainable harvests.

Don't forget how difficult it would be to feed all of the GTA, well over 3 million people with food grown within our region, year round. You?ll find that a great majority of people who support eating locally are usually in warmer climates with longer growing seasons. Oh, and a lot of great food comes from places outside of Ontario - like coffee, tea, bananas, kiwis, pineapples, melons, oh and I don't know if that much wheat is grown close to Toronto, so maybe even bread...

Posted by: Dave at April 17, 2008 10:03 AM

Re: the broke School board.

Last month, I watched Garden Ave. Public School install a lighted sign on its front lawn, advertising the school. It lights up the whole block. Yes, the several grand this would have cost is a drop in the bucket, but c'mon folks.

Posted by: Patrick at April 17, 2008 10:45 AM

Imagine if a developer had a thing against barbecues or trampolines or basketball hoops or garden gnomes.

Or Black people, Hispanics, or students, etc.

Sound extreme? My old landlord is in the process of selling his house after the neighbourhood decided they didn't want him to live there anymore after they found out he was letting...gasp!... students live in their upscale suburban neighbourhood.

Of course, in that case it was the neighbourhood residents and not the city responsible...or was it?

Turns out several council members lived in the area and not only supported their rich friends, but used their power to harass the landlord until he finally gave in.

My favourite part is how they went about it.

They first harassed him with monthly fire marshal visits, trying to find ways in which the building could be a fire hazard. After ongoing visits and countless upgrades to the house costing thousands of dollars, it would be safe to say it is now more fire proof than fort knox.

So what then? The council then decided with all those upgrades the house could no longer be considered a house with rented rooms and was now, in their view, an apartment building. They then pulled out an old, vague bylaw, whose wording could let them outlaw pink bunny slippers if they wanted. Basically they said that an 'apartment building' didn't fit in with the 'character' of the neighbourhood.

And of course it wasn't an apartment building. It was just a house that happened to have a few upgrades that THEY ordered done.

Posted by: Ryan L. at April 17, 2008 11:56 AM

@Ryan L.
--------
I certainly hope that the property owner takes these people to court and proves their devious scheme and collects big time.

I'd love to know what councillors were involved or--failing that--the nearest main intersection to where this occurred.
This is worse than the foolishness of Mammoliti or Ford or Ootes or Minnan Wong.

Posted by: David Toronto at April 17, 2008 12:22 PM

My favourite part was when the landlord showed up at the meeting to address his concerns he noticed someone a little familiar. He had seen one of the accusers before. A little while prior they had posed as a student and pretended they were looking for a room so they could get a tour of the house and get any dirt on him.

The landlord of course mentioned this. The 'spy' denied it, asked for proof (of course he had none), and labelled the landlord a liar.

He won't take them to court because he can't afford to. He's spent thousands of dollars upgrading his house to appease the council. Taken countless days off of work to be at home when they send the fire marshal and paid who knows how much on applications and permits.

Posted by: Ryan L. at April 17, 2008 1:29 PM

That's shocking. It amounts to harassment and abuse of power and the councillors responsible should be held accountable. Not to mention pretentious elitists who don't want to live anywhere near young people. Not like a couple of students living in an apartment would have a real effect on property values or anything.

Posted by: Mark at April 17, 2008 1:37 PM

Oh, young people are tolerated. Just as long as they're rich/have rich parents.

I always enjoyed going to the nearby drug store for shampoo or toilet paper and being treated like a criminal. People who know me can attest that I certainly don't look like one.

Posted by: Ryan L. at April 17, 2008 1:59 PM

Name names or shut up. This drive-by smear job makes every councillor look bad.

Posted by: ???? at April 17, 2008 4:49 PM

It isn't my place to give any names. If the landlord wants to take any legal action, he can. I won't jeopardize that by giving any details over an internet blog. Sorry, but that'd be kind of stupid.

Posted by: Ryan L. at April 17, 2008 9:13 PM

Thank you, Ryan.

Posted by: Jerrold at April 17, 2008 9:20 PM

Post a comment

   
Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Morning Brew: April 17th, 2008' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.