Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 19°C
City

Cars in Toronto: Kill or be Killed

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / November 9, 2007

Former blogTO contributor and rant-vlogger-extraordinaire Mark McKay did a cool spot on MTV Live last night. In this short, Mark draws our attention to the killers that are cars, and the new legislation to curb them.

In my opinion, no one needs to be doing 150km/hr - ever. I fully support the suspension of licenses and impounding of cars when drivers are caught driving at these insanely dangerous speeds. Furthermore, I have zero sympathy for those that are left in a bind or caught by surprise and claiming that they weren't aware of the laws. As clichéd as it may sound, ignorance of the law is no excuse.

Discussion

22 Comments

Sean Galbraith / November 9, 2007 at 12:07 pm
user-pic
As someone who has driven over 150.. you either are lying when you say that you didn't know, OR (worse) you're so distracted or unfocused as a driver, that you don't notice you're blowing by people or that your speedometre is ticking higher. No sympathy for anyone who gets caught going that fast (including myself if I did).
james a / November 9, 2007 at 12:20 pm
user-pic
Direct quote from a co-worker who is into cars:

"I drive the 407 all the time. Before the new penalties the average speed was about 150 . Since they brought in the penaltes, the average speed instantly dropped to 120 or so"

Sounds like the law is working as intended!
Ryan Coleman / November 9, 2007 at 12:27 pm
user-pic
Yeah - the 407 out Burlington way was a regular super-speedway. It wasn't uncommon to get your doors blown off even if you were moving @130-140.

150 is extreme but 100 is extreme at the other end of the spectrum. The limit really should be 120 on our major highways (especially outside of Toronto).

The real danger on the highway though is people who just don't drive properly, regardless of speed. i.e. Merging: It's NOT OK to merge onto a highway at anything less than the flow of traffic (in fact it's far safer to be going slightly faster and ease your car into the flow rather than accelerate to match it). The number of times I've seen people entering at 60 km/h and causing a mad scramble behind them as other drivers try to slow-up or get around them is maddening.

The other issue is the left lane. If you aren't passing someone get the hell out of it. If people followed this one rule there would be far fewer people weaving in and out of traffic. Yes he's a dick going 150. It's not your job to slow him up, you're just going to make them do something stupid to get around you. It drives me mental when I coast along and empty middle or right lane and have to pass a string of cars hanging out in the left.
Jerrold / November 9, 2007 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
I hate being passed to my right, especially when I'm trying to get into the rightmost lane to exit the highway. People moving slowly in the left lane AND the center lane are a real problem, but I think the bastards that want to puch through at 130-150km/hr are the real problem.
Mary / November 9, 2007 at 12:37 pm
user-pic
Kars in Bike Lanes should be Killed.
Harry Jones / November 9, 2007 at 12:54 pm
user-pic
Girl hurt in hit-and-run accident
http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/275114
Chris / November 9, 2007 at 12:57 pm
user-pic
Absolutely agreed on all points, Ryan. I blame the folks who drive inconsiderately (ie. way too slowly) and in the wrong lanes for a lot of accidents because they force other drivers who are driving <i>normally</i> to try and get around them. Slow people in the left lane are the worst.

I asked a bunch of people who have driven me why they stay in the left lane if they're going below the limit. The reason? "It's so dangerous in the right lane, people are always merging and turning in." It's crazy talk.
uSkyscraper / November 9, 2007 at 01:20 pm
user-pic
I lost a cousin and aunt to a high-speed accident. There is no excuse for going 150. None. Yes, the speed limit should be raised where reasonable to 115 or 120, if only to stop everyone from breaking the law. As for left-lane drivers, it's not really a valid complaint in the Toronto area, where there are too many exits and entrances on both sides and too much traffic to make for consistent flow. It's a more valid point in inter-city driving.
Matt / November 9, 2007 at 02:14 pm
user-pic
I don't know, uSkyscraper, wouldn't raising the limit only encourage people to take that "bonus" 20 K and drive 140?

I wouldn't know, I drive a Smart car, the damn thing starts shaking like a leaf as soon as it's north of 131 km/h. :)
Ryan Coleman / November 9, 2007 at 02:25 pm
user-pic
"it's not really a valid complaint in the Toronto area, where there are too many exits and entrances on both sides and too much traffic to make for consistent flow"

Have to call BS on that - the problem with the right line is no one knows how to merge. If people merged at the speed of traffic and didn't start slowing until they were off on the exit ramp there would be no issue. If people just "zippered" at merge points everything would move smoothly.

I can't tell you how many times I've been driving on a highway, in the Toronto area with the two right lanes COMPLETELY open and the left one jammed with cars.

Nandes / November 9, 2007 at 02:53 pm
user-pic
The problem with the ability of the officer to immediately impound your car it the lack of due process.

You have no opportunity to defend yourself in a court of law before being punished for the crime you're being accused of.

I have no problem with ridiculously high fines/points, but giving officers the discretion to take away peoples cars without due process is a serious blow to our rights.

On a side note, this new law was passed using the media frenzy over street racing. I would like to see what percentage of people nabbed in this current blitz were actually "street racers".
Jer / November 9, 2007 at 04:12 pm
user-pic
I am always fascinated to see people chime in on all the inconsistencies of other people's driving. Though, I doubt that much will ever likely change.
As someone who depends on being able to get around by car much of the workday, I have taken time to notice people's driving patterns and then compared them to the person I see behind the wheel or out as a pedestrian (though of course, not because i was stalking them).
I found that, of the few cars that I witnessed driving 'questionably', where I could then view the driver, then see them park and walk; i noticed:
- those drivers who take up the middle lane, drive 10 or more km/h below the speed of traffic, leave 20+ car lengths ahead of them for safety(?), and merge in from an on-ramp at 25 km/h below the speed of traffic; are typically hunched 'intensely' over their steering wheel or barely able to see over it, and then, when out and about as a pedestrian, are also very slow, hesitant, and seemingly unable to move through heavy crowds easily. As corroboration, I notice almost all of my 'older' relatives are like this (both in driving and walking);
- those drivers who weave through traffic and are able to somehow slip ahead of a vehicle when there is barely a car-length of gap (all at high speed), all seem to have one hand on the wheel and have this maniacal sean penn look on their face (whether they are wrench jockeys or bay street investors), They then park in a handi-cap spot, in an unloading zone, or at some ridiculous angle that makes it difficult to park nearby. They leave their car by either looking around to see if anyone is watching them and/or with a defiant glare. Walking near them, one notices that they have a rushed (or defiantly slow) pace with a decided chip-on-their shoulder aura.
I know that many would say that I am deliberately generalizing, but in all honesty, the personality categories are so clear - a person's personality seems to relate directly to their driving style.
My point is that while there is this wide variety of personality types, you will consequently then have a wide variety of driving styles. And.. since efficient flow of traffic depends on everyone driving similarly and consistently, and since this is not the case, we will always have traffic tie-ups and other problems. I think that that is why the 407 is usually so much better, there is a smaller variety of personality types (and fewer hesitant and overly-cautious ones).
Aaron / November 9, 2007 at 04:28 pm
user-pic
Serious blow to our rights? You can't be serious.
If officers had the ability to immediately impound a vehicle that was going in excess of 120km/hr, then your point may be valid. But 150km/hr is beyond excessive, and anyone who is unaware of the fact that they are going that fast should not be allowed to defend themselves.

I can't imagine very many people having a valid explanation as to why they were going that fast other than impatience or sheer ignorance/recklessness.
Kevin Bracken / November 9, 2007 at 04:33 pm
user-pic
Burn cars, not oil!
rpto / November 9, 2007 at 04:51 pm
user-pic
cars breed cowards,that's why these people are speeding away all the time(running), are the plague of our health and are they really necessary in this day and age with all the conveniences of life close to home?. To me I witness the lazy, apathetic, and selfish drive to work down town everyday.cars should only be what they are intended for, moving of goods, the sick and the old.
SH / November 10, 2007 at 06:28 am
user-pic
Hate to bring up this cliche BUT... the Autobahn in Germany. Though I think this may no longer be the case AND of course they have their heavy German cars, they typically drive (or drove) 200 k/h without any problem, of course when there is an accident it is big. But the point is, you can drive 150, 130, or more realisticlly, 120 without any problem if you obey some etiquette. Living in Europe at the moment I find that European drivers (for the most part) follow a certain driving etiquette which is severely lacking in Toronto, and which is why every morning there is huge traffic back-up because someone couldn't merge properly. I have said this before, but I think the police should really target the root of the problem which is making fatal driving errors, rather than minor speeding infractions (ie; people going 120-140, anything above is kind of ridiculous and unsafe unless you're out on an open country road). If people were aware that merging unsafely, passing on the right, driving slowly in the passing lane, weaving through traffic and TALKING ON CELL PHONES were as dangerous or more dangerous than speeding and illegally parking they would also stop.
Chris / November 10, 2007 at 07:56 am
user-pic
Aaron, I agree with you <i>but</i> to play Devil's Advocate, what if you weren't going 150km/h? For example, one instance that makes me think that might happen is when my friend was pulled over by a cop and was accused not wearing his seatbelt (and they were doing so the entire time) but being bullied and cowed into accepting the ticket anyway.

What if you weren't going 150km/h but a cop decided that you were? I can't really think of a reason for a cop to try and falsely bust you on street racing laws, but you never know...
Dan / November 11, 2007 at 11:54 am
user-pic
Impounding cars going over 150 is the best thing they could do, there is no excuse for this recklessness.
Personally I'd lower the number to 130 as well as introduce impounding to anyone doing over 70 kph within the city.
Jerrold / November 11, 2007 at 11:58 am
user-pic
What about on streets within the city where 70km/hr is the posted speed limit?
Nandes / November 12, 2007 at 04:59 pm
user-pic
Aaron:

Yes a serious blow to our rights. The officer in question does not have to prove to anyone that I was going over 150 in order to impound my car on the spot. I have no option of due process like i would if I were issued a fine/court date.

I'll spare you a list or slippery slope arguments.
Kara-Hannah / November 15, 2007 at 05:43 am
user-pic
I would love to see you do your vlog on blogtv.com especially given our giant Canadian community and the fact that you can embedd your broadcasts on any of your other favorite sites. Come check it out, I think you will fit right in!

Any questions? Contact me at community@blogtv.com

Thanks,
Kara-Hannah
Community Developer
blogTV.com
kman / February 14, 2008 at 09:41 pm
user-pic
Well..it happened to me. I was doing 139 because i was late to pick up my date on Valentines. I got pulled over and told that i was doing 152. My jaw dropped because i knew i had never crossed 140 and i had been watching the speedo religiously, as i always do. The officer, who was in an unmarked grey pacifica, not in uniform, told me that he had been following me and paced me at that speed. I told him i had never crossed 140 and he basically said take it up in court. Then he drove off and some other officer wrote me the ticket as my truck was impounded. My date was left out on the street without a cellphone because i never showed up. I was 80km from home when this happened, on the side of the highway. I have no problem with the police impounding cars going over 150, but when they totally lie and impound cars not going that fast because they are trying to prove a point, then that is an infringement of my rights. I have to fly out west on Sunday. I have no driver's license for a crime i did not commit. I have no right to contest. Since when did Ontario start aligning with Nazi Germany standards?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal