City
Cars in Toronto: Kill or be Killed
Former blogTO contributor and rant-vlogger-extraordinaire Mark McKay did a cool spot on MTV Live last night. In this short, Mark draws our attention to the killers that are cars, and the new legislation to curb them.
In my opinion, no one needs to be doing 150km/hr - ever. I fully support the suspension of licenses and impounding of cars when drivers are caught driving at these insanely dangerous speeds. Furthermore, I have zero sympathy for those that are left in a bind or caught by surprise and claiming that they weren't aware of the laws. As clichéd as it may sound, ignorance of the law is no excuse.


Discussion
22 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
"I drive the 407 all the time. Before the new penalties the average speed was about 150 . Since they brought in the penaltes, the average speed instantly dropped to 120 or so"
Sounds like the law is working as intended!
150 is extreme but 100 is extreme at the other end of the spectrum. The limit really should be 120 on our major highways (especially outside of Toronto).
The real danger on the highway though is people who just don't drive properly, regardless of speed. i.e. Merging: It's NOT OK to merge onto a highway at anything less than the flow of traffic (in fact it's far safer to be going slightly faster and ease your car into the flow rather than accelerate to match it). The number of times I've seen people entering at 60 km/h and causing a mad scramble behind them as other drivers try to slow-up or get around them is maddening.
The other issue is the left lane. If you aren't passing someone get the hell out of it. If people followed this one rule there would be far fewer people weaving in and out of traffic. Yes he's a dick going 150. It's not your job to slow him up, you're just going to make them do something stupid to get around you. It drives me mental when I coast along and empty middle or right lane and have to pass a string of cars hanging out in the left.
http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/275114
I asked a bunch of people who have driven me why they stay in the left lane if they're going below the limit. The reason? "It's so dangerous in the right lane, people are always merging and turning in." It's crazy talk.
I wouldn't know, I drive a Smart car, the damn thing starts shaking like a leaf as soon as it's north of 131 km/h. :)
Have to call BS on that - the problem with the right line is no one knows how to merge. If people merged at the speed of traffic and didn't start slowing until they were off on the exit ramp there would be no issue. If people just "zippered" at merge points everything would move smoothly.
I can't tell you how many times I've been driving on a highway, in the Toronto area with the two right lanes COMPLETELY open and the left one jammed with cars.
You have no opportunity to defend yourself in a court of law before being punished for the crime you're being accused of.
I have no problem with ridiculously high fines/points, but giving officers the discretion to take away peoples cars without due process is a serious blow to our rights.
On a side note, this new law was passed using the media frenzy over street racing. I would like to see what percentage of people nabbed in this current blitz were actually "street racers".
As someone who depends on being able to get around by car much of the workday, I have taken time to notice people's driving patterns and then compared them to the person I see behind the wheel or out as a pedestrian (though of course, not because i was stalking them).
I found that, of the few cars that I witnessed driving 'questionably', where I could then view the driver, then see them park and walk; i noticed:
- those drivers who take up the middle lane, drive 10 or more km/h below the speed of traffic, leave 20+ car lengths ahead of them for safety(?), and merge in from an on-ramp at 25 km/h below the speed of traffic; are typically hunched 'intensely' over their steering wheel or barely able to see over it, and then, when out and about as a pedestrian, are also very slow, hesitant, and seemingly unable to move through heavy crowds easily. As corroboration, I notice almost all of my 'older' relatives are like this (both in driving and walking);
- those drivers who weave through traffic and are able to somehow slip ahead of a vehicle when there is barely a car-length of gap (all at high speed), all seem to have one hand on the wheel and have this maniacal sean penn look on their face (whether they are wrench jockeys or bay street investors), They then park in a handi-cap spot, in an unloading zone, or at some ridiculous angle that makes it difficult to park nearby. They leave their car by either looking around to see if anyone is watching them and/or with a defiant glare. Walking near them, one notices that they have a rushed (or defiantly slow) pace with a decided chip-on-their shoulder aura.
I know that many would say that I am deliberately generalizing, but in all honesty, the personality categories are so clear - a person's personality seems to relate directly to their driving style.
My point is that while there is this wide variety of personality types, you will consequently then have a wide variety of driving styles. And.. since efficient flow of traffic depends on everyone driving similarly and consistently, and since this is not the case, we will always have traffic tie-ups and other problems. I think that that is why the 407 is usually so much better, there is a smaller variety of personality types (and fewer hesitant and overly-cautious ones).
If officers had the ability to immediately impound a vehicle that was going in excess of 120km/hr, then your point may be valid. But 150km/hr is beyond excessive, and anyone who is unaware of the fact that they are going that fast should not be allowed to defend themselves.
I can't imagine very many people having a valid explanation as to why they were going that fast other than impatience or sheer ignorance/recklessness.
What if you weren't going 150km/h but a cop decided that you were? I can't really think of a reason for a cop to try and falsely bust you on street racing laws, but you never know...
Personally I'd lower the number to 130 as well as introduce impounding to anyone doing over 70 kph within the city.
Yes a serious blow to our rights. The officer in question does not have to prove to anyone that I was going over 150 in order to impound my car on the spot. I have no option of due process like i would if I were issued a fine/court date.
I'll spare you a list or slippery slope arguments.
Any questions? Contact me at community@blogtv.com
Thanks,
Kara-Hannah
Community Developer
blogTV.com