City
Did Toronto Nightclub Bouncers Cross the Line?
Photo: Barry Ward's injuries, allegedly sustained from being beaten by bouncers of Kool Haus (via Facebook)
"The first thing i saw when i was thrown onto the sidewalk was 2 other bouncers throw Michelle (a 130lb. woman for those who do not know her) down to the sidewalk, and KICK HER IN THE HEAD REPEATEDLY!!! Obviously, Barry and I tried to defend her with our lives, but were outnumbered 10 bouncers to the two of us. After a futile attempt at defending eachother [sic], we were both head stomped into unconsciousness. When i was revived, i saw Michelle, lying in a pool of blood pouring from her right ear." ~ Kevin Turlo
A Toronto Facebook group called "Boycott The Guvernment Nightclub!!!" has recently been home to some heated internet debate. The group description outlines club patron Kevin Tulo's account of what happened on the night of September 19th at the Guvernment/Kool Haus club complex. The victim alleges that he and a couple of friends inadvertently entered a restricted area of the club, were found by club security staff, and were then systematically taken out of the club by force and excessively and violently beaten.
Photo: Michelle Emond's injuries, allegedly sustained from being beaten by bouncers of Kool Haus (via Facebook)
Other members in the group have voiced alternative versions of the story (via wall posts), claiming that the three clubbers intentionally entered the clearly delineated, restricted area and began to steal alcohol when they were caught, resisted, and attacked security staff.
Regardless of the cause of the intervention by the nightclub's bouncers, the incident leaves me wondering where the line should be drawn. Ontario's Private Security and Investigative Services Act grants bouncers the legal right to use "reasonable force" to remove unruly patrons, but in this instance a woman allegedly sustained some serious injuries in the altercation (including "a broken ear drum, shattered bones in her right ear, a broken clavical [sic], and multiple bruises and cuts").
If this case goes to court, it'll be interesting to see how the story unfolds.
In the meantime, I'll continue to behave myself and do my best to avoid trouble when I go out to Toronto bars.
UPDATE: a blogTO reader who identied himself as "Joe" pointed us to images from a separate, unrelated incident allegedly involving bouncers working at Kool Haus. Here is an image his sister's boyfriend, Brendan Wallace, after the alleged encounter during a concert (image source):

Again, I can't quite understand why a patron should get this beaten up.


Discussion
90 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Although Barry and Michelle's tale is alleged, it's not unbelievable. All the night clubs I've worked at have had hot-headed security staff, that carried illegal weapons and were always looking for a fight.
What could anyone do in a club to deserve that? And ask yourself, could it happen to you.
These guys snuck into another room, tried to steal booze from a bar and got caught. the bouncer tried to escort them out and they both got physical. thats when the other bouncers came in and helped their colleague.
Mr. Turlo, get your facts straight, your boy attacked the bouncer first. that's assault. Your Boy who's a rugby player 6'5" attacked a doorman who is 5'9.
The female victim did not get kicked repeatedly in the head by all the bouncers. She also attacked the doorman and she fell, on more than one occasion. that's how she got injured.
Mr. Turlo, from what I've heard is that you and your friends were wasted, broke into a restricted area and stole booze.
What's not cool is that you and your friends are trying to milk this situation. Aggravated assault is not a funny thing, I hope you sleep well at night and can look at yourself in the mirror. Like you said, you and your friends are victims and you did absolutely nothing wrong and got beaten up for it.
WOW.....
This dude's story totally doesn't make sense. The bouncers just randomly beat him and his friends up for no reason? Yeah, right.
RS's version of the events is much more logical and makes the entire thing clear as a bell. They were drunk, tried to steal booze, etc, etc.
Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining. Another Judge Judy bon mot.
And yeah, James, don't give us the nonsense like "the woman slipped and fell, and that's how she broke bones and shattered her eardrum". Don't treat us like fools, ok?
Takes 2 to tangle like that in this incident. I'm not going to side with either side. Violence begets violence in the end.
I'm certain that are also security cameras in the club for these and other sorts of incidents, just in case. So one way or another the truth will come out.
Unbelievable.
I'm not saying the ensuing melee didn't get out of hand, but I suspect it was more of a two-way fight fuelled by alcohol and shame.
Yeah, I'm sure it was a two-way fight. One drunk and his girlfriend vs how many stone-sober bouncers? And they
couldn't just hold them? They had to beat them unconscious?
Sure, A two way fight, what a JOKE.
I hope this story blows up so these thugs can finally have the spotlight shone on them. But, alas, I doubt it will.
And as for the cops, see the following and search for "protection racket":
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/torontopolice/2004.html
- blik, blik, blik...Come on. Really? So a drunk kid and a woman attack seasoned bouncers and this makes it justifiable? I've seen bouncers get people bigger than these two out of a club and off the protperty and eliminated the threat to the patrons with much less effort and violence (their ONLY job). At what point were the cops called? How much time lapsed between the call and their arrival? No. Sorry. This would be bad enough if the cops had beat these two like this. So, how far into this beating were this girl and this man no longer a threat to anyone? Listen, but anyone who would stil patronize this club should have their head examined. These are cowboys looking for an excuse to beat the crap out of someone. Have fun in this facist club. If these creeps get away with this, they'll push the envelope a little farther next time.
The only thing I've ever seen is drunk patrons getting violent, and doormen (and women) protecting establishments from vandalism, workers from assault and the club owners from lawsuits.
I've been in numerous situations where bouncers have saved me from physical attack. If a drunk becomes violent bouncers should have the right to use as much force as they need to to get the situation taken care of quickly. Not excessive force mind you, but enough to get the job done.
I've never been to the Guvernment, but I can't see the alleged scenario taking place anywhere. First of all, to enter a restricted area of any establishment is asking for immediate removal. I am sure these areas are very clearly marked, especially if you're getting anywhere near the booze. Secondly, to be outnumbered 10 to two, while defending your lives? It's hard to manage ten (normally larger) men around two curled up bodies. It just doesn't seem like there would be enough room for ten men to "stomp" effectively. It seems more likely that any surrounding doormen would be keeping other patrons (potentially friends or girlfriends) out of the fray, which happens a lot.
This past Sunday the CBC ran a great doc. about the club district in Toronto. I suggest everyone watch it, it was really well done. You can watch it here: http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/2007/10/100707_1.html
It may put things in a little more perspective.
I don't think anyone should be punched in the face under very many circumstances, but security staff puts their lives on the line nightly to keep everyone in their establishment safe. It isn't an easy job. Unless you've worked a night in a club it's hard to describe the number of destructive drunk incidences you have to deal with every single night. A bouncer can be as polite as all get out, and still get punched in the face.
I'm sure there are some overly aggressive bouncers out there, who get into the industry because they've got some anger management issues and something to prove. A lot of bouncers grease doors, a lot of them drink on the job. But I'm willing to bet a lot of money that the angry, "lookin' for a fight" types are in the minority. I don't think all bouncers should all be lumped into the category of "hired goons"
If they'd been drinking, falling unconscious isn't unheard of.
I'm sure if the scenario took place exactly as portrayed there would have been hundreds of witnesses who can help testify.
I'm sure I would if I saw three helpless, unwitting patrons dragged through a club, tossed on the pavement, curb stomped by ten men and then ignored by the cops.
easy solution:
cut the unhinged testosterone out the equation entirely by attending venues that don't have bouncers nor hooligans running amok. they appear to have a symbiotic relationship, those 2.
I'd be curious about the people on here defending the bouncers, if their kids/brother/sister came home looking like these 3, would they feel the same?
If they got blind drunk and acted like a neanderthal idiot, yes.
Your point about being allowed to steal booze without repurcussions because clubs overcharge for drinks is total nonsense and you know it.
I think you're living in a dreamworld if you've worked in a bar and never seen a bouncer be violent or vindictive.
I know lots of people who have been worked over by these hired goons.
The story from the victims in this case is almost certainly elaborated, and they were almost certainly in the wrong, but that is ENTIRELY IMMATERIAL as the issue is the amount of force that the bouncers used (and in general, abuse) when ejecting the pair.
Police sympathize with the bouncers because they deal with the same types of problems, so yes, these incidents are generally ignored by the cops. I'm sure they'd swear otherwise but if you spent some time downtown I'm sure you'd see it for yourself.
If the patron says they'll sue, then the cops say they'll charge them with public intoxication. That's usually enough to make the problem go away, and the bartenders keep their money.
Honestly Rebecca, to deny this is happening makes me think you're either complicit in the whole think, or just don't know what you're talking about.
You mean like beating the crap out of a couple of kids who were, at worst, trying to snatch some alcohol?
You've never done anything stupid when you were drunk? The bouncers were sober.
And I didn't say I'd never seen a bouncer be violent, I'd said I didn't know any who were violent and vindictive. I'm talking personality.
Nor did I say that it didn't ever happen. I just said that those types of people were in the minority.
I'm not sure how me not knowing any vindictive bouncers makes me complicit in using unnecessary force...
I didn't beat anyone up Andrew, I'm just a student who needs to work nights.
I hope the new megaclub Circa eventually bankrupts him, he is a piece of human garbage.
If what Sam says above is true, and the guy is trafficking drugs (would explain a lot) he is then poisoning Torontonians and also beating the crap out them. Nice, neighborly kinda guy. I didn't know it was 1920.
Honestly that is exactly what I would probably have thought, except I experienced something very similar at the Guvernment in 2004. Am I going to say I did nothing wrong? No. What I did do was spend a lot of money at their establishment on alcohol, and then when walking through the extremely crowded club I tripped over a friend's foot and stumbled to my knees. As I was attempting to get back up I felt a hand grab my arm around the bicep and haul me up to my feet. It was a bouncer, and, without releasing my arm, he told me I had to leave the club. I wasn't rude, and I didn't yell, or swear, or even fight back. I simply explained that I had tripped over a friend's foot, and that it was a friend's birthday and I asked that he not kick me out. Instead of responding, or even kicking me out, he picked me up and carried me into a back office in the club. I was then surrounded by a couple of bouncers, as well as police officers, with all of them in my face, accusing me of taking ecstacy (which, I have actually never done in my life). Their reason for thinking this? I had large pupils. That was the entire basis of this assumption. The yelled at me, berated me and threatened me, telling me I wasn't allowed to leave unless I admitted to being high and told them where I got the drugs from. My friends showed up and tried to get them to let me leave but they refused. When I stood up and attempted to go, stating that they didn't have the right to detain me against my will, I was shoved back down by one of the police officers, so hard that I actually hit my head on the back of the seat and ended up with severe brusing and swelling at the base of my head and behind my ear. When I stood up again I had both arms grabbed by the wrists and yanked behind my back, and was yelled at again. When I stuggled and fought to leave the room (at this point I was literally in tears) I was hauled back, and when the officer approached me I was frightened, and did the only thing I could think to do to fight him off (with my hands pinned behind my back)and I spit at him. I was then slammed up against the wall, handcuffed and arrested. The charge? Assaulting a polic officer. I was then taken outside (in the middle of February), refused my coat and forced to sit in a police car for 45 minutes (it wasn't running and I was wearing a t-shirt) while we waited for other officers to come transport me to the police station. Why? Because the officer charging me was working security FOR the club. Although he was wearing his full police uniform, he was not acting as a police officer, he was acting in the best interests of his employer, which was the nightclub.
Was what I did wrong? Yes, it most certainly was, and I am the first person to admit it. And I would completely agree with anyone who said that no matter what was done to me, my response was still unacceptable. But I would ask you if it is acceptable for 5'6 120llb female to be held against her will in the back of a club, illegally interrogated and bullied to the point of tears simply because she tripped and fell?
I don't know the exact details of what happeded to Kevin, Barry and Michelle. But what I DO know is the bouncers at the Guvernment are fully capable of an attack like this without justification, and the police officers on the scene are fully capable of turning a blind eye to the actions of their co-workers.
I'm sure I would if I saw three helpless, unwitting patrons dragged through a club, tossed on the pavement, curb stomped by ten men and then ignored by the cops. "
I was thinking the same thing. Their story doesn't make any sense. If they're talking 90% bullshit, why should I try to decipher what the 10% is?
I don't think people seem to realize how serious it is to make false accusations towards someone (especially when those accusations are filed to the police).
The bouncers are not in the right for beating 3 patrons beyond what would have been reasonable in the obvious two-sided scuffle. But the 3 people were certainly not in the right for lying to the public and the police about what happened.
In this scenario, I'd say it's even.
In general, its patrons like these guys that make bouncers like these a sad necessity.
If you don't like the bouncers, then go someplace where asshole shit disturbers tend to to go. You'll notice far fewer bouncers, and especially ones with aggressive tendencies.
http://www.theguvernment.com/forum_new/viewforum.php?f=1
"I'm sure if the scenario took place exactly as portrayed there would have been hundreds of witnesses who can help testify... I'm sure I would if I saw three helpless, unwitting patrons dragged through a club, tossed on the pavement, curb stomped by ten men and then ignored by the cops."
"Hundreds" of people may have seen them dragged outside, but do "hundreds" of otherwise uninvolved people typically follow such an altercation-in-progress out into the street with the intention of bearing witness to injustice? Or do the bystanders just shrug off the "bouncing" as likely being for cause, and return to their drinking/revelry/whatever?
Most people are not good samaritans under benign circumstances, let alone when a gang of beefy security guys is in the middle of "resolving" a conflict.
but the truth will only be revealed when the actual facts are identified...its really that simple...speculation brings nothing..
If you choose to patronize a club like Guvernment, then a good beating is just something you have to expect from time to time. Perhaps you even deserve one.
Yet another reason to avoid Toronto's club scene.
-Wow.
So if you don't like the guv for whatever reason, don't go,
don't go clubbing cause, all clubs got bouncers
don't generalize and stereotype all bouncers as animals, juice bags, and a**holes, not all of them are like that.
I also believe that even doormen have the rights to defend themselves with whatever force necessary when attacked. You'll never know nowadays with all the crap that is happening in the ent. district.
As to doormen, ganging up on individuals? This makes me laugh, I haven't seen a one on one sinces the early nineties, Now adays every young punk is brave if their friends are around and it is usually these punks who starts the altercations, cause they're "hood". When their friends runs away, and that one left surrounded by cops or doormen, then it is cry wolf time. "I've been ganged up on" "where's Justice" yeah, some friends you've got.
believe it or not, if at any point an officer feels that he/she is threaten, they have the right to restraint you.
and not to mention, you spiting on an officer constitutes as "assaulting an officer"
it seems a lot of these individuals who've had unfortunate incidents with doormen and officers at bar and clubs have something in common.
they didn't "do anything"
they did "nothing wrong"
it just "happened to us"
"we're innocent"
I want to get my point straight, no one deserves to get hurt or injure. it takes two to tangle and I truely believe that if you are out to have a good time, then have a good time, pick up a chick (or not) and go home. Girls usually don't think that guys with black eyes are "tough" or "hot".
Seriously, how hard can it be to follow a 400 pound meat head out of a bar at 5 am once they close down, and wait until they get somewhere isolated? Specifically, the Kool Haus and Guvernment meat heads.
Worth pursuing.
If an officer feels threatened, then certainly they do. But how would he have felt threatened by my tripping and falling? And they do NOT have the right to detain you for falling (yes they can kick you out of the club, but not detain you) nor do they have the right to attempt to threaten you into admitting to committing a crime (especially one you did not commit). And if you read what I wrote carefully you'll notice I made a point of saying my response was not appropriate or condonable. But I did nothing to provoke or threaten until I had been severely physically assaulted. And that is exactly why all criminal charges against me were dropped and the crown attourney was disgusted by the photographic evidence of my injuries.
People can believe what they want, but situations like this are dangerous for patrons AND bar staff. Not all bouncers are like this, but the ones that are make it a dangerous situation for everyone. If you choose not to listen or believe this could happen, that's your choice...but until it happened to me, I wouldn't have believed it true either. The thing is, the police and bouncers are human, and as with all humans, power can corrupt some. And you're very naive if you think it hasn't.
I don't know much about the new Act & Regs that came out recently on private security but what I do hope is that it sets some sort of standard for use of force training.
It is hard to *really* know what happened the night that's described above (by so many different people) - but it looks as though the situation was poorly handled (judging only by what I can see here - I don't know if the photos were altered or if there are self-inflicted or otherwise inflicted injuries on here too). If you know what you are doing against an unarmed person the amount of force you apply should not generally result in the injuries described.
That said, I've seen insane melees on the dance floor before and broken-up a number of fights myself. You have to be quick and you have to be good at grappling. If you're dealing with someone armed you need to disarm or disable quickly, otherwise disengage (hard to do in a crowd however).
Now that they have brought in the new regulations, this could be a test case. If the doormen are determined (in a proper hearing) to have gone over the line, they should lose their license and be subject to possible civil or criminal charges.
Similarly, if it turns-out that the people who started the above have grossly exaggerated and lied in this public posting, they should be subject to tort cases (I forget which would be the appropriate law - slander?).
We all have the right to our day in court and a fair trial. One hopes that the Acts & Regs on security will also add to the protection of our rights as citizen patrons, security guards or nightclub staff.
And for the guy who got the shit kicked out of by the cops...you just had a reality check buddy, now you know what to expect next time that happens. Wasnt worth now was it? Know your role. Life isnt fair.
I guess you've never been to Europe or the U.S. (Hint)in New York, most bouncers carries guns...Also I like to see how you would look the next day after following a doorman to his car and try to assault him. What they can't use in the club, they can use in the parking lot and the list of toys goes on and on and on...
I agree with you 100%, i remember about a year ago i got thrown out of republic for someone elses mistake of throwing a drink which is wasnt me. I got taken out in a headlock and broke my glasses. So when i was outside i called about 4 of my friends. We waited till about 4:30 when the bouncer came outside, we followed him to his car which he parked about a block away. When we all approached him and he reconized me his face was priceless. We ended up throwing him on the ground and he was appologizing to me. I also told him i know what kinda car he drives now too. I goto the club all the time and havent seen him since, nothing beat that tho, his face was priceless, like a dear in head lights, haha stupid meat heat.
First, the argument that "if you don't want to risk beat-downs at clubs, then don't go". Huh? That's about as sophisticated an argument as "if you don't want to risk rape, wear frumpy clothes".
When crimes occur -- such as unlawful beat-downs -- the appropriate response is to put legal pressure on the culprits -- not blame the victims.
Next is the absurd argument that "if you provoke, you deserve what you get." Huh? This is about as sophisticated as saying that if you disrespect a dude and he shoots you in the knee-cap, you got what you deserve.
Even where violence is taken in cases of "real" self-defence (like in response to a weapon attack), the reaction has to be proportional to the threat. It's hard to understand the threat that would have warranted this type of 'self-defence' toward a petite girl, unless maybe she was openly wielding a gun.
Third is the argument that "there must be something more to this story" or else there would be a bigger public outcry. Well, there MIGHT have been more of an outcry if people like you weren't so quick to discount the need. Yet you do dismiss the need, then fail to consider your role in facilitating the very lack of outcry you claim to need. But look at how circular this argument is -- even if facts ARE egregious enough for an outcry, you say there must be 'more to the story' -- and therefore it isn't worth giving rise to an outcry.
In short, not only is there therefore never a scenario that could warrant an outcry in your mind (for if facts aren't egregious then clearly no outcry is required, and if they are egregious then 'there must be something more to it'), but the more people who adopt this argument, the harder it is to ever get a critical mass for an outcry that you claim to need. Therefore, it's a self-fulfilling point.
Think before you speak, and there won't be so much disagreement.
Cheers.
I also knew someone that got extorted by bouncer, so they the bouncer would not beat him up. He had to pay whatever money he had in his pocket to avoid it, it was like $30.
Crazy isn't it. Seedy the club scene sometimes.
Das Brain
I have been punched in the face for kicking someone out. I have been punched in the face for not letting someone in for free. I have been bitten for kicking someone out. I've had my face scratched by a man. I've been kicked in the back repeatedly for trying to defend a patron who was getting his ass kicked. I have had my knee blasted full force into a barricade with the weight of a 250lb gorilla plus my own weight because he was being ejected and wanted to hurt me. Finally I hurt my neck severely and remained in pain for 6 weeks because I was trying to 'restrain' a large patron instead of stomping his face when me and another bouncer got jumped by him and his four friends.
After learning to deal with this type of element, when a patron attacked me because we were kicking him and his friends out, I hit him back. When this patron came at me and struck me in the side of the head I was a little scared, because even though we outnumbered him and his friends, he was about 4 inches taller than me and looked like he could ruin my $10,000 mouth (3 years of adult braces) if he connected on his next punch. I'm not a big guy (6'1", under 200lbs), but when I hit this patron back I ripped his eye open with one punch. Turns out his eye had already been softened up by a recent rugby match injury. He continued to tussle with me until another security staff grabbed him and helped me pull him to the ground.
We restrained the patron on the ground for a minute which was difficult because this guy was so big and strong and driven by booze which, low and behold, he HAD also stolen from our club. The head doorman told us to let him up, so I thought it was all done, but he got up and went and attacked the doormen who had just let his friend up off the ground.
I went back to the guy to try and restrain him again and when I grabbed him away from the other security staff, I started choking him in a head-lock until the situation was truly under control.
During the second time that I was taking the big patron down, I saw his girlfriend attack our staff for like the fifth time, but this time when she ran at them with her claws out one of our guys straight-armed her and she fell back cracking her head on the curb of the sidewalk. She probably suffered some broken bones too cuz it looked bad how she hit the curb. That kind of fall could have easily broken an eardrum and a clavicle. But hey I'm not talking about the same incident as Barry and his drunken band of massive Rugby friends who like to get drunk every weekend and cause shit.
Oh, and by the way, even though I just defended myself in this incident, after getting hurt repeatedly because I didn't want to hit people, eventually I got fired from that job. The reason? Too many people blamed the 'goon' doormen for beating these people up, even though it was entirely their fault. Finallyl, the club owner wrongfully assumed that we were at fault, and since I was the senior guy on scene when the incident started, I was eventually the guy who took the fall for the whole incident.
Of course, I get fired right after my wife gives birth to our first child. Do you clowns who think the Guvernment bouncers are completely at fault for this incident really think that there's only the "victim's" side to this story? Not all bouncers are neandrathals like you think they are. I probably have 2 more university degrees than half of you people writing on this site and I can see that there is more to this than you close-minded morons see. Maybe the bouncers went a little hard on these people at Guvernment, or maybe they just defended themselves against dangerous, theiving and aggressive patrons who think that a club is the best place to try hit people like they do on the rugby field!
Ultimately, bouncers are there to remove patrons. They can use force to remove them. Once outside, they are not allowed to beat patrons to a pulp.
I was at the guvernment on Halloween. As I was walking upstairs from downstairs, one of the bouncers grabbed my hand and pulled me back downstairs. I said what are you doing? He said he was trying to split me up from my group so I would get lost in the crowd, and when I looked dumbfounded, he said he was just helping our the single guys. WHAAAA? Manifestation of a small penis issue, I think so.
I met back up with them eventually, and when we left the club we saw several bouncers kicking a man while he was completely incapacitated from the previous kicks and not a threat to anyone. Again, I suspect penile issues and associated insecurity.
Andrew Olszanowski
Australia
if i was in that situation ..
i would round up a few friends
and wait for these guys 1 by 1
and give them a nice beating as they leave home that night
revenge is a bitch
It's a sad reality.
In my six months working at The Guvernment, I never hit a patron, never greased a door, allthough I was offered. The guy who offered got fired shortly thereafter. When we were involved in a fracas, we were expected to write a report on it at the end of shift, and pass this report on to police.
The only real danger I saw in those six months happened in Charlies Bar, where I used to stand by the toilets. African men collected on one side of Charlies and Carribean men on the other. There was a woman in the middle stirring the shit. I didn't call anyone, mediating between both factions until one by one, everyone went home. I don't believe anyone outside of that room was aware. Like an African night.
Truly dangerous people? In the six months I worked there I remember seeing four. I remember each one clear as day. I remember also that a bouncer was shot and killed at a door before I started working there.
In Johannesburg, I've been shot at twice by complete strangers, caught in a traffic jam in the middle of a shoot-out between cops and hijackers on my way to a study group meeting, seen two people shot, one right in front of me at a family fun day, seen more beatings and stabbings, sucked more teargas, than I care to remember. I've seen more freaky violent shit than you can see in a lifetime of Hollywood movies, up close, personal, in heat, blood, dust, concrete, tar, glass, sunlight and darkness. And I'm not a hard man here by any means.
I grew up in clubs while the country was in chaos. When I was fifteen, I saw this: a patron would leave, come back and buy everyone drinks, leave, come back and buy everyone drinks. Suspicious bouncers followed him the next time he left, saw him stab and mug a passerby, and come back and buy everyone drinks. When we went to the club the next night and heard the story, they had had him in the basement after torturing him for 24 hours with water and salt. When the cops came to get him, they smashed both his collar bones with a pick axe handle, then smashed both his feet from above with the end of the pick axe handle. They left him in the veld by the mine dumps.
My point is - in South Africa, like I'm sure happens in many parts of the world, bouncer organisations have full-on wars with each other. People get tortured, beat, shot and killed. Everyones been smacked in a club. It's part of growing up here. It's a big world - there are people at Guvernment from everywhere. Relax, someone got a few smacks, don't stereotype people. Everyone has thier own story. From the pictures, those people didn't get badly fucked up - some scrapes - the guys eye is still open. Not much swelling. The girl suffered some damage. I don't agree with that, but that said, I remember that woman could cause more serious shit than any man could at Guvernment.
Don't stereotype bouncers. I worked with a bouncer at Guvernment who looked like a total heavy, but was studying opera singing. People mix it up, people make shit, it's human nature. I wouldn't work as a bouncer in South Africa if you paid me in gold. In Canada, it was a decent job, 12 dollars an hour, better than the 8 dollars an hour I made at the misery saga cardboard factory (funny thing about the factory - I was the only white face there).
The person I remember most strongly from six months at Guvernment? The 60 year old Carribean grandmother who used to clean the toilets next to where I stood. Ever notice her?
The lesson I learnt at Guvernment came from this vision: with the saturday night crowd, everyone came in with thier own faces on. At 10, as regular as clockwork, everybody put on the same identical face. At six in the morning, when the lights came on, they'd put thier own faces back on, rubbing at thier cheeks and wondering where they were. In the middle of the dance floor, after staring at it for weeks on end, I saw a large rock. I saw the kids each walk up to the rock and splash a cup of thier lifeblood onto the rock, their lifeblood being the 8 hours of their lives where they didn't wear thier own faces. The rock turns the lifeblood into money - What a bargain!
The other, more meaningfull lesson I learnt, was this: the friday night crowd wore thier own faces, all night long. They paid cash direct, and they looked you in the eye while they did it.
My point? You wanna stereotype me, come to South Africa like I went to Canada, look me in the eye like a Rexdale crowd on DJ Scratch night, and call me meat heat to my face. My real point? Open your half-swollen eyes clublubbers, and shrug it off - the sun's coming up and it's another beautifull day in Africa.
They deserve what they got.
Oh yea cut your damn hair punk bitch.
Anger-management problems are a constant issue with these doormen -that's just a FACT.
My daughter is planning go and see a concert there?
However - safety wise - Kool Haus is located down by the water and I'd recommend getting your kid a ride to/from the parking lot at the place... they can walk in from the main road but it's a real mess to take TTC and you end up walking a ways in the dark.