Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 19°C
City

Cloudy with a Chance of Partisan Ads?

Posted by Rick Moldovanyi / October 19, 2007

20071019_ad.jpg
It was unseasonably warm today. As I write this it's already gotten dark out, and it's 17 degrees in Toronto. The average temperature for October is typically around 9 degrees.

But that's not the only strange thing about today's Environment Canada weather map. Looking above the map of the country I saw a banner ad.

A banner ad? On a government website? Yes. And not only is it a banner ad but it reads "Speech from the Throne - Strong Leadership. A Better Canada." Okay, if the government is going to put ads on the weather website the Speech from the Throne is a good thing to advertise about. More Canadians should be knowledgeable about what is announced in the Speech from the Throne. But look closer at it. It's blue. And white. And that slogan seems familiar. Of course, that's the slogan of the Conservatives' "election campaign before there's an election" campaign.

A partisan banner ad on a government website?

Is it just me, or does anyone else consider this crossing the line? The Environment Canada website is meant to be a source of information for all Canadians. People come to this site to find out what it will be like outside today. They don't come to the site to be told who to vote for. There isn't even an election going on. In fact, since there isn't an election going on, it seems that this ad is perfectly acceptable - at least in the eyes of the law.

In February Elections Canada spokesperson Stephane Bechand told the Toronto Star that "election advertising means the transmission to the public by any means during an election period of an advertising message that promotes or opposes a registered party or the election of a candidate." Of course, at this point there is nothing to prove that this advertisement was paid for by the Conservative party of Canada, but it seems awfully unlikely that anyone else would have asked for the ad to be placed there. However, since there isn't an election campaign going on no one needs to declare where the funding came from - so we will likely never know.

Could it be that the Stephen Harper's office realised that the Environment Canada Weatheroffice website is frequently visited by all Canadians and placed an ad there? There's no way to prove that either. However, regardless of how the ad got there or who paid for it the fact remains that it's quite blatantly advertising the Conservative Party. And I think that's wrong.

It's at least as bad as using a penny in an ad.

Image: "What the hell?" by blogTO Flickr Pooler Jamuudsen

Discussion

14 Comments

Greg / October 19, 2007 at 10:03 pm
user-pic
Where did the banner link to? If it linked to an official government website related to the speech, well, scandal averted. Can't the government link to itself? The speech is a formal, traditional parliamentary event after all, not just some opportunistic press conference.
Rick / October 19, 2007 at 10:06 pm
user-pic
It links to a Government of Canada page with the text of the speech which IS called "Strong Leadership. A Better Canada."

Point taken, but I'm still not a fan.
David E / October 20, 2007 at 01:41 am
user-pic
I'd rather think that the link is more partisan or political than informational. If it were for passport applications or linking to helpful information, I'd have no problem with it.

This is just a shameless party political just like most of the governemnt's website since the election.

Let's get Harper out and common sense back in.
Chris Orbz / October 20, 2007 at 03:25 am
user-pic
Shudder... please don't say Common Sense in political discussions in Ontario, most of us are still dealing with Harris post-trauma.
Ryan Coleman / October 20, 2007 at 09:47 am
user-pic
Every government pulls these stunts regardless of party.

Whenever you get Liberals in power (at any level) then the colour tone of all government materials changes to red tones, and with the conservatives blue.

Take a look at the current www.gov.on.ca (click through to your language of choice) - lots of red highlights. A red background with white text link to the budget and a button below it labelled "Fairness. It's time for fairness for all" sounds pretty marketing-ish to me. Hell they even changed the provinces logo this time around to look more like their own.

None of this crap is new. They all do it and it's equally as shameless.
Eric S. Smith / October 20, 2007 at 10:06 am
user-pic
Ontario? Post-Harris? The entire country is in the grip of Harris-ite government. Harper's cabinet and his policy shop are salted not just with people who think very much in the Klein/Harris way, but with actual Harris-era provincial politicians. The Minister of Finance is only the most obvious example.

For more proof that the Nonsense Revolution is open for business as usual, consider the posturing around the Speech from the Throne and particularly the blustery "tough on crime" omnibus bill. One of the first moves of the Harris government in Ontario was the introduction of an omnibus bill that shoved through plenty of the odious policies that many voters no doubt thought were going to disappear once the election was over. The federal Conservatives' omnibus bill is nowhere nearly as "revolutionary," but the attitude to compromise -- which is to say, the belief that there must be none, ever -- is the same.

These people hate government. The very idea of it revolts them. There should be cops, of course, to beat down the scum, but the rest of the state is not so much useless as actively bad. Their mission is to ruin things badly enough that the rest of us agree.
Rick / October 20, 2007 at 10:53 am
user-pic
I think the reason this "ad" seems so obvious is that it's blue and white. It's easier for the Liberals to get away with this stuff because their colours are red and white. It doesn't look odd if you see red and white on a Canadian website.
mongo / October 20, 2007 at 11:05 am
user-pic
stop griping. the PCs have been delivering us warm weather for months -- they're clearly superior to the grits at weather management. suck it, liberals
Ninja-bot / October 20, 2007 at 11:09 am
user-pic
The content of the throne speech is way more fury-makin' than a small government banner ad on a government website linking to a government website from the government.

I'd say more, except Jerrold has firmly stated that he will, in fact, decapitate me and feed my severed head to wild dogs.
Al / October 20, 2007 at 11:14 am
user-pic
A link to an agenda-setting throne speech on a government webpage is nothing to get excited about. Why not take your energy and devote it to parsing the throne speech itself? Kyoto is dead? We're staying in Afghanistan until 2011? Not a mention of culture or education in Canada? Or let's talk at the meta-level about how this throne speech is a chance to overthrown a minority government and how the chances of that happening are incredibly slim and why. Let's not waste time talking about the marketing tactics of political parties, in power or not. Partisan advertising is one of the cornerstones of contemporary media (newspaper anyone?), so this is a less than a minor occurance. Let's not be naive and think that anything on the government website is less than partisan.
Anna C / October 20, 2007 at 11:31 am
user-pic
I think discussing marketing tactics of political parties is very valid in this country, particularly because of the concentration of media. Most Canadians do not take the time to read 3 newspapers and watch several broadcasts to get a bit of a varying viewpoint. They only get their news from one source. Canadians passively take in so much information they're not even aware of. I think it's important for this information to be dissected as well.
Jerrold / October 20, 2007 at 11:57 am
user-pic
Regardless of the party in power, the government shouldn't be advertising that
the throne speech is "insert whatever" on the weather page. The throne
speech itself should be advertising that it is "insert whatever".

Whether it's the governing party's stance on war or
kittens or strong throne speeches using the weather page to spread propaganda is just wrong, IMO.
Al / October 20, 2007 at 12:03 pm
user-pic
Propaganda is a moot term- any communication meant to sway anyway (ie, all of it) is propaganda. Using the word implies that you believe some communication can be objective, which is cannot be. Everything is propaganda. And I don't think we can realistically believe that the messages coming from the ruling party are neutral, no matter what venue they use.

And I agree with Anna C. that we should be dissecting the political messages imbedded within our narrow national media- but thinking that we can expect some sort of objective fact in any media is very naive (consider BlogTo for instance).
Rick / October 20, 2007 at 12:39 pm
user-pic
I think the point here is that very few people assume that television or radio or newspapers or blogs will be objective.

People assume that THE NATIONAL WEATHER OFFICE will be. It's a website that gives us weather, that's it. It shouldn't be throwing in a political message alongside today's highs.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal