Saturday, May 18, 2013Mostly Cloudy 20°C
City

Toronto Police to Crack Down on Cycle-Unfriendly Drivers

Posted by Tatiana / June 19, 2007

20070619_bikelanepark.jpg

Photo: "Twice as Dangerous!" by goofibulator

If you've ever had to navigate around cars parked in the bike lane or dodge the oblivious cell-phone-yakking drivers who cut you off as you pedal along, you'll welcome the news of the "Safe Cycling" campaign by the Toronto Police. Announced yesterday, the campaign will run until Sunday, June 24. I expect many a scofflaw cyclist will receive a well-deserved ticket, but the main focus of the campaign is drivers who endanger cyclists by driving like jerks, parking in bike lanes and flinging car doors open without so much as a glance in the mirror.

All of this is swell, of course, but I can't help but wonder how come drivers are allowed to get away with this sort of behaviour the other 51 weeks of the year. Case in point: bike lane parking. A quick glance at MyBikeLane (a website documenting bike lane parking violations) or a short ride along College St. will immediately confirm that this is something drivers do quite often and get away with most of the time. This is especially perplexing given that parking tickets are a money-maker for the City. And yet the sheer number of cars I encounter in bike lanes every day suggests that the law enforcement in this case is not particularly aggressive, to put it mildly.

At any rate, perhaps our streets will become a little more bikeable, even if only for a week. It will be interesting to see whether there is any noticeable difference in how cyclists are treated on the road this week, and how soon things return to business-as-usual after the blitz ends.

Discussion

17 Comments

Matt / June 19, 2007 at 02:28 pm
user-pic
If I might extend an appeal to my fellow cyclists, let's use this as an opportunity to show drivers that we observe the rules of the road, and not be darting up onto sidewalks and through red lights like crazy people. :)
Justin / June 19, 2007 at 02:36 pm
user-pic
If only this would extend throughout the rest of the year....those FedEx/USB trucks on College are ridiculous....
brokenengine / June 19, 2007 at 03:08 pm
user-pic
Wow, about time! Should be year round though, yeah!
Dan / June 19, 2007 at 04:00 pm
user-pic
holy shit yes! this picture instantly conjured feelings of utter hate. i have had to swerve around so many of these fat ass death machines because idiots think that toronto is a good place to drive.
Ian / June 19, 2007 at 04:07 pm
user-pic
Awesome news, though I have no idea how they'll stop people from opening their doors on to cyclists. I have some shiny new paint on my handlebars from some dufus who opened his door on to me just today. Hopefully he's got some black paint on his car as a reminder to look out next time.
MattAlexander / June 19, 2007 at 05:39 pm
user-pic
My favourite is how anyone dropping off or picking up someone thinks that the bike lane is actually an extra line of parallel parking space when the street parking is already full.

I just hope there's some focus on cabbie's with no knowledge of the rights of cyclists. They have no clue.
Eugenia / June 19, 2007 at 06:37 pm
user-pic
I think a lot of times the "jerk" drivers don't really mean to endanger or inconvenience anyone, but they simply don't have a clue what it's like to be a cyclist. In Vancouver, so many drivers are also cyclists themselves so cyclists get so much more respect. So many times I've had cars stop and let me cross on my bike even though I had the stop sign. Many of the drivers in TO are 905ers who see very few cyclists in their own area. As nice as it would be if everyone just voluntarily went to read about cyclist safety, it's just not going to happen. The government needs to push, hopefully province-wide, bike-car coexistence safety knowledge to the public. I hope they're doing that already.
aidan / June 19, 2007 at 06:51 pm
user-pic
Eugenia, you are completely correct: it is about the proportion of the population which also cycle. I rarely felt endangered in Japan, even in the busiest parts of Tokyo: Japanese commuters cycle to their train stations. Cars and motorcyclist would cheer me on in the mountains, even after I had held them up on a narrow road. I hear the lifestyle, and safety, is similar in Holland.

How do we get a 'critical mass' of cyclists here? Bike lanes are nice, but enforce the heck out of the laws against poor automobile driving, until the roads are safe again. It's more work for the police than the easy speeding ticket, but it's going to save more lives: on the road, and cardio-vascularly.
rpto / June 19, 2007 at 07:30 pm
user-pic
Toronto is hell for cycling,everyday brings a new bad driving situation. the best place to cycle that ive been to aside from Amsterdam is china, not all parts but in some of the most populous major cities in china, possess bike lanes wide enough to drive a car down with the added safety bonus of a curb separation between the bike lanes and the car lanes with openings at stop lites and crosswalks,that way drivers are not going to enter your lane at all.if Toronto is serious about cycling and doing something good for the future generations and get people out of their fat machines they need to protect the ones doing good. some driver fines are only going to make the aggressive drivers more rabid.
Tatiana / June 19, 2007 at 08:05 pm
user-pic
> I think a lot of times the "jerk" drivers don't really
> mean to endanger or inconvenience anyone, but they
> simply don't have a clue what it's like to be a cyclist.

I agree. That's why I didn't call them "jerks" per se, I said they drive *like* jerks. Still, many drivers in Toronto are openly hostile towards cyclists. Also, driving is a privilege, and drivers are supposed to be competent at sharing the road with all road users. Ignorance is no excuse for incompetence.

> In Vancouver, so many drivers are also cyclists themselves
> so cyclists get so much more respect. So many times I've
> had cars stop and let me cross on my bike even though I
> had the stop sign.

This happens to me in Toronto too, but I'm not sure it's such a good thing. Right-of-way rules are there to keep things predictable; if you start giving up ROW arbitrarily, some dangerous situations may result and you may disrupt the flow of things as everyone's trying to figure out what's going on...

> bike lanes wide enough to drive a car down with the added
> safety bonus of a curb separation between the bike lanes
> and the car lanes with openings at stop lites and
> crosswalks,that way drivers are not going to enter your
> lane at all

However, most collisions do happen at intersections, and placing cyclists to the right of right-turning traffic is not at all a good idea. This might be fine for cycling slowly, but if we really want to encourage cycling for transportation, I think we should make it possible to ride at decent speeds, otherwise cycling becomes impractical as a mode of transportation except for very short distances.
rpto / June 19, 2007 at 10:58 pm
user-pic
---However, most collisions do happen at intersections, and placing cyclists to the right of right-turning traffic is not at all a good idea. This might be fine for cycling slowly, but if we really want to encourage cycling for transportation, I think we should make it possible to ride at decent speeds, otherwise cycling becomes impractical as a mode of transportation except for very short distances.

if you look at the picture for this article,a curb would not let these people from coming into the bike lane. at intersections this can be a problem but all these steps,lanes, curbs make drivers a bit more aware of cyclists out there. ive used these lanes in china and they work great,i ride under the dufferin bridge every morning and drivers are swerving into me looking ahead trying to see if they can get ahead and generally being cut off.this will not change because we are in the perceived less superior vehicle,radical steps need to be taken if it is to be encouraged as a form of transportation,i can see why people take cars,your safe from other drivers.
aidan / June 19, 2007 at 11:40 pm
user-pic
rpto, your ideas are interesting, but please use grammar conventions! The point is to communicate.
Tatiana / June 19, 2007 at 11:40 pm
user-pic
> if you look at the picture for this article,a curb would
> not let these people from coming into the bike lane.

You must not have seen a YouTube video of a Chinese driver driving over that curb and getting into bikelane to bypass congestion. He got into a heated argument with a cyclist who refused to yield (threw her bike on the ground at some point). The attitudes there are getting worse: apparently a car means that you're rich and can do anything you want on the road.

> at
> intersections this can be a problem but all these
> steps,lanes, curbs make drivers a bit more aware of
> cyclists out there.

I understand that. However, I heard that in China oftentimes right-turners will be pretty aggressive because once they let one biker go, the whole stream will follow. So as a cyclist you basically have to slow down to a crawl at every intersection, even if you have a green light. Also you can't make left turns very easily, can't bypass obstacles in that lane... I agree it's all wonderful for low-speed cycling, but can be frustrating for higher-speed cyclists. It might also create a false sense of security (I know Toronto bike paths do, I've seen instances of that...) Anyway, the success of cycling is way more than just bike lanes. It's a whole driving/riding culture (that seems to be getting worse for cyclists).

I definitely agree that something should be done to make cycling safer in the city. I just don't think separated curb lanes are the answer. At least not in the core urban area with a lot of intersections. They actually tried them in New York a while back and got rid of them because the cyclists weren't using them.
Gregg / June 20, 2007 at 09:48 am
user-pic
I recently put an air-horn on my bike .. that way when I have a problem with someone .. they know about it.
John / June 20, 2007 at 10:39 am
user-pic
Warning - during past blitzes, the cops have sat on bike trails and nabbed cyclists for not coming to a full stop, ie. one foot must be on the ground. A favourite spot is Russell Hill Road south of St. Clair. The intersection is only 3-way and many cyclists whiz right through it. So be warned - these blitzes are more about generating tickets from unwary cyclists than changing driver behaviour.
LAT / June 20, 2007 at 11:23 am
user-pic
I know I'm gonna get blasted and I'm glad the city is cracking down on stupid drivers.

However if I had a dime everytime I saw a biker break the law...well you know. I'd guess that their is a higher percentage of "Jerk" cyclists than drivers in this city. The majority of drivers do respect bikers and probably praise them for easing the traffic burden on the streets.

I'd definately like to see cyclists tagged for breaking the law as much as drivers during these blitzes. Alot of driver frustration towards cyclists comes from the apparent higher than thow feeling SOME cyclists have in this city.
Bradford Hovinen / June 21, 2007 at 02:50 am
user-pic
Indeed it is really only a relatively small portion of motorists who act like jerks. The trouble is that one does not remember the vast majority who don't. It is likely also true that a greater portion of cyclists fail to respect the rules of the road than of motorists. I would say that the trouble is greater with motorists simply because they are operating larger and more dangerous vehicles. The truth is, while I am often witness to illegal and dangerous cycling, I rarely encounter cyclists acting in such a manner as to place other people's lives in grave danger. Nevertheless, we cyclists should strive to set a good example by obeying the law.

I welcome this police blitz, but one week of real enforcement is woefully inadequate. The police need to commit to a long-term enforcement strategy if any real improvement is to be made.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal