Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 20°C
City

Development: Out with the Old, In with the New?

Posted by Andrew / June 25, 2007

demo590.jpgToronto is a city in transition. The debate goes on as to whether or not we are truly one of the world's greatest cities, or we are simply a contender; waiting in the wings for our moment to show the world what we can do. Along the way one of the major growing pains that we are dealing with is what should we do with our old buildings?

The scarcity of land combined with the never-been-higher demand for condos and housing in the downtown core means many old buildings are being bought simply for the dirt that's under them rather than the 100+ years of history that they contain inside their 4 walls. Should we fight to preserve our history, or should we stop being so sentimental and grow up (literally).

When it comes to the developers, the worst is often assumed as the recent case of Walnut Hall on Shuter Street illustrated. When the historic building collapsed a few weeks back, rumors immediately started that it might have been deliberate sabotage. Would a developer or land owner stoop so low as to destroy an historic building just so that they wouldn't have to worry about what to do with it?

The latest case in the save it or scrap it debate is the Pretzel Bell building at Adelaide and Simcoe. The ultra-chic Shangri-La condo development is wrestling with what to do with the nearly 200 year old Georgian-style building. The hope is that it can be salvaged or incorporated into the building in some way.

Photo from thebackboneflute from blogTO's Flickr Pool.

Discussion

4 Comments

Sean Galbraith / June 26, 2007 at 04:28 am
user-pic
Having visited New York, San Fran and London (where I currently am. And Paris next week). I sadly no longer think Toronto is a world class city. We just are not in their league. Whatever the level below world class, we'd likely be at or near the top of the category.. but not world class. I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing, mind you, but just a recognition of reality.
protogenes / June 26, 2007 at 08:44 am
user-pic
"or should we stop being so sentimental and grow up"

That one reason why Toronto may never be a *great* city. With no sense of history & "sentimentality" (what would a condo filled Paris be like), contemporary Toronto has little of interest to offer on a world scale, unless the flaunting of wealth is considered *great*.
Jonathan / June 26, 2007 at 09:38 am
user-pic
The "world class" obsession is driven by select media and politicians and those who rabidly consume everything they put out. As an idea, it has no traction or is even thought of by the overwhelming majority of people on the street, however it seems all our decision makers are stuck in a mindset that if it doesn't cost many billions and isn't really shiny, it's not good enough for us!

People just need to chill out and let the city go back to developing naturally. The hyper-gentrification of some areas is turning them into bland repetitive wastelands not unique neighbourhoods, which are one the cities strengths.
Andrew (author) / June 26, 2007 at 11:25 am
user-pic
Excellent comments to all.

We are undoubtedly obsessed with being 'world class'-whatever that means.

Personally I define our stature on the world scale by our incredibly high level of livability. On a global scale, and compared to other major metropolitan centres, our city is affordable, safe, clean, offers plenty to see and do, and offers a wide variety of architecture-much of which you won't see in a Paris, London, or New York.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal