Tax on Waste Removal Aims to Reduce

  • Posted by Kari
  • Filed in City
  • April 3, 2007

garbage.jpgToronto residents may have to pay more, or less, to get their garbage picked up, according to a new tax being proposed by the City. The new policy calls for an equal rate, regardless of your property's assessed value. That means urbanites living a sustainable life downtown in their upscale homes will get a break (woo hoo!), while gas-guzzling climate-crisis-perpetuating suburbanites living in cookie-cutters will have to pay more, compared to what they're used to.

It's a step along the right path, in my opinion- promoting the sustainable lifestyle. The more you recycle/reuse items, the less garbage you make, the less you have to pay for the city to come pick it up. In Vancouver, where a similar scheme is already in place, homeowners choose from four different sized garbage bins, which determines the cost of schlepping your waste away.

The new levy may work the same way the hydro company does, with monthly bills being sent out to homeowners. The goal, besides trying to convince us to waste less, is to reduce the strain on property taxes (property taxes in Toronto are set to increase by 3.8% this year). It's really more of a money re-shuffle- instead of an even higher rate of increase for your property taxes; the money for waste removal will be collected as a "user fee" or "parcel tax".

The critics are up in arms though, touting this as another "rich get richer, poor get poorer" tactic. I can see the potential for concern, but with this system, the onus is really on the homeowner. Everyone will be charged equally, depending on how much garbage you throw away. Another worry is the fact that while City hall has said there will be no new sales or income taxes, no parameters have been set to control these parcel taxes. Services like street lighting and road maintenance might be regulated this way in the future, too.

The new waste removal tax is labeled as a "pay-as-you-throw" system, and I think it's about time we're personally held accountable for the amount of waste we produce. It should be noted, filling up extra blue or green bins will not incur more tax, which will hopefully motivate people to throw less into the waste bin, and more into the recycling/compost.

Heck, you could even go as far as decreasing the amount of pre-packaged foods you buy, getting take-out from restaurants that only use recyclable containers, and bringing your groceries home in reusable cotton bags instead of those omnipresent plastic buggers. Reducing your waste is now not only a personal, karma-boosting decision, but a decision that could save you some cash!

Photo: Stephanie Town

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

What if you run a business from your home? How does this affect the taxes charged?

Posted by: Jerrold at April 3, 2007 7:31 PM

I don't think they've quite worked out all of the kinks... they didn't really talk about how this new tax would affect renters, either, who don't normally have to pay property taxes, but could easily be billed for their waste disposal (like "utilities extra"). The tax proposal gets presented to councilors sometime this week, so I'm sure we'll hear more about it very soon!

Posted by: Kari at April 3, 2007 10:02 PM

How would this work in practical terms? I mean, what's to stop you from placing your extra garbage on your neighbour's lawn? And are the garbage collectors going to be outfitted with some sort of wireless GPS device so they can make notes on who the excess garbage offenders are? Finally, will this, instead of making people put out less garbage, instead start putting non-compostable things in their green bins in order to avoid paying the additional tax?

Posted by: GaryC [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 3, 2007 11:31 PM

I have to agree with the person above. All of this is already incredibly naive. In the west end, park garbage containers are always full of home garbage (in grocery bags), as are bus stop garbage bins and some areas already have terrible dumping problems. People already dump trash in parks, now they have an incentive to do so!

Posted by: A.R. at April 4, 2007 1:57 AM

Great points by Gary and A.R. People abiding by the rules will only be punished by others who skirt them.

Posted by: Gloria at April 4, 2007 8:38 AM

Good points above ^^ as there will always be risks of those who will abuse the system. But to the average household, I think this plan could work. If families regularly fill up their bins every week, it may affect their purchasing habits when they're at the grocery store, and they'd be more likely to make sure all their recyclables are recycled. I doubt a significant portion of the population will be hauling their trash to the nearby park every week. This idea is only PART of a solution as well. Stricter enforcement, increasing recyclable materials and packaging guidelines are also a necessary compliment to waste reduction.

Posted by: Dan at April 4, 2007 9:40 AM

All those businesses that don't lock up their dumpsters at night better do it NOW!

Posted by: brokenengine at April 4, 2007 10:54 AM

I have to say that i am concerned as i live in a house with 4 other people and we already pay through the nose in utilities.

Posted by: Jackie Brown at April 4, 2007 11:12 AM

a tax on extra garbage may not seem fair, but niether is me having to pay to truck my neighbors garbage down to Michigan because he is too lazy to: RECYCLE, USE THE GREEN BIN, AND DONATE USED STUFF. If you do these things your garbage for a family of 3 for 2 weeks can easily fit into a single black garbage bag.

Posted by: Dave at April 4, 2007 12:26 PM

I saw on the news last night that the City's actually got staff that go around opening up garbage that's clearly been illegally dumped. If there's any personal information in the bag with your name on it, they'll find you, and fine you! I had no idea.

They also check (and issue fines) for any recyclables that have been tossed erroneously into the garbage.

Posted by: Kari at April 5, 2007 1:28 PM

Also, a letter in the Star brought up the point of unfairly punishing large households. What if it ends up that a household of five is actually producing less garbage per capita than a person living alone, yet because of their sheer numbers, produce more in total? Why should people be punished for simply living together? Sometimes people have more garbage just because there are more of them -- not because they're failing to recycle and compost.

I support Dan's idea especially about reducing packaging in the first place. I hate it when I have to buy something that's clearly overpackaged, and I end up paying for what turns into litter, or has to be recycled and reprocessed right away. Why spend all this energy, legislation, and resources on dealing with the refuse when we can prevent it in the first place?

Posted by: Gloria at April 5, 2007 2:43 PM

Gloria I don't think anybody is punishing people for living together. They're simply being asked to finally pay their fair share. If a household of 5 produces less per capita than a household of 1 that's great, but the household of 1 should not have to pay for his garbage plus the 4 people living with you. I'll give you an example. Last year my water was on a flat rate and I was paying $202.18 for a 6 month period. Later in the year I had a water meter installed and now I only pay for my actual usage. My water bill is now down to $100 for a 6 month period. Now that I'm not paying for my water and the water of my neighbors with their "household of 5" that is. Presumably the household of 5 has enough earning potential to pay their own way anyways. I just want to pay for the garbage I produce, and nobdoy elses.

Posted by: david at April 10, 2007 10:32 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Tax on Waste Removal Aims to Reduce' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.