Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 17°C
City

Election Problems & Civic Duty

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / November 13, 2006

20061113_electionproblem.jpg
I hope you voted. More importantly, I hope your voting experience wasn't as troubling as mine was. I could have been a non-citizen, a repeat voter, or Borat Sagdiyev and still cast a vote. This is how it happened.

I went to my local voting station. At the entrance of the school gymnasium, a friendly woman directed me to an open registration table. I approached the smiling ballot officials, with a smile. My name wasn't on the voter list, but my address was (along with the name of another, different resident of the same house). I was given a form to complete (to add myself as a voter). I completed and returned the form, and was given a ballot in a secrecy folder and oral instructions on how to complete it....

I walked over to the tables where the marking of ballots was to take place. I tried to squeeze my ballot, hand, and marker into the tiny box shield but could no longer see the ballot when I did this. There was another voting box right next to me, and an older fellow approached and fumbled around in his tiny box as well. I wondered why there weren't any voter screens. I also wondered if they are mandatory or not. We exchanged confused/surprised glances and both pulled our uncompleted ballots out from the boxes and used our folders to shield our ballots as we completed them in more plain view. The tabulator officer then put our completed cards through the computer. Voting completed.

As I walked towards the exit, I realized something. I had cast a vote, but wasn't on the voters list, at no point was I asked to show identification, and I could have been anyone really. That's not right.

I returned to the officials at registration, showed them my driver's license and insisted that they cross-reference it with the information I wrote on the forms I completed. Smiles dropped. They apologized for their negligence, and when I suggested that I would have to report the incident, they agreed. I haven't filed an official complaint yet. Should I?

(image: City of Toronto)

Discussion

20 Comments

Carrie / November 13, 2006 at 05:18 pm
user-pic
According to the City of Toronto website

"If you do not have acceptable identification you will be asked to swear an oath before being issued a ballot."

<a href="http://www.toronto.ca/vote2006/voter-faq.htm";>http://www.toronto.ca/vote2006/voter-faq.htm<;/a>

So I guess it doesn't matter if you have ID or not.
jerrold / November 13, 2006 at 05:24 pm
user-pic
So there's nothing to stop someone from driving around town voting at multiple stations without ID - just by taking an oath?

What does this oath entail?
Tyson Williams / November 13, 2006 at 05:24 pm
user-pic
If I were you I would...

I share your experience with the MINI voting screens which would be good only to sign a credit card receipt. As for ID: driver's license in no way means you are a Canadian citizen, anyone who lives in Toronto for more than 60 days would have to change their license into Ontario license by law. But they could be just a landed immigrant or a foreigner living here on business visa or a foreign student etc.
jerrold / November 13, 2006 at 05:33 pm
user-pic
I'm baffled by those tiny screening boxes. How were they approved for use with those giant ballots?
Nadia / November 13, 2006 at 06:01 pm
user-pic
They made me swear the oath when I went in. (I brought my elector card, which used to be enough for municipal elections, but now they also want a piece of ID with your address on it, which I didn't have as I don't have a driver's license.) The oath states that you're a citizen, over 18 years old and a resident of the ward where you're voting; they have you read that part, then you have to say aloud, "I, [name], solemnly swear that the above is true and that I have not voted in this election already." You don't have to sign anything, but you do have to say the oath out loud.

I was also baffled by the midget "screening" boxes on the voting tables.
Gloria / November 13, 2006 at 06:38 pm
user-pic
Hmm, they never asked for my ID either.

How is an oath effective in any way? If someone's ALREADY trying to commit voting fraud, they clearly won't have any scruples about uttering a false oath.
Christine / November 13, 2006 at 07:37 pm
user-pic
I forgot to bring my ID, but they let me vote anyways, because apparently I looked like "An Honest Person."
cb / November 13, 2006 at 07:40 pm
user-pic
They asked me for ID even though I had a card, which was the first time that's ever happened to me aside from when I wasn't on the voter's list.

I agree there should be procedures in place to prevent it from happening, but I've got to say...is there anyone, really, who gets such a kick out of voting that they go and do it fraudulently around town?
ramanna / November 13, 2006 at 07:57 pm
user-pic
If it makes you feel better, my voting station had screens, and we were asked for ID. It seems a bit insecure the way you can register to vote in a new Ward, but I suspect abuse isn't a big issue.
Drey / November 13, 2006 at 08:06 pm
user-pic
I had the exact same experience, I complained to the people there and will contact the elections people tomorrow.
jerrold / November 13, 2006 at 08:06 pm
user-pic
Because it seems inconceivable that anyone would want to tamper with municipal election results, doesn't mean officials should let anyone that walks into a polling station vote without ID!
Sam / November 13, 2006 at 08:57 pm
user-pic
Not only did I have to show ID, which I did (my driver's license) but I had to swear on oath as well. Kind of overkill if you ask me.
jerrold / November 13, 2006 at 09:00 pm
user-pic
Do you have to put your hand on a *insert holy book* when you give oath? ;)
sookie / November 14, 2006 at 12:16 am
user-pic
I went in and they couldn't find me (strangely) on the voter's list so they had me complete some pink piece of paper with my name and address. "Do you have ID?" I was asked. I put down my driver's license on the table, nowhere near her and upside down (I'd read this blog and wanted to test them) and the offical didn't take one look at it. Next table I went to I handed in my pink papers, they asked if the other table had checked my ID, I said yes and off I went with my ballot. Even with all the extra officals (about 8 of them) sitting behind this one to oversee every move no one seemed to care enough to vaildate my identity.
kevin bracken / November 14, 2006 at 02:12 am
user-pic
i think non-citizens should be able to vote anyway. obviously i care enough about toronto to be doing the things i do. the law is unjust and i feel obligated to break it. however, i did not vote because my choices were all incumbents anyway.
Tim / November 14, 2006 at 05:47 am
user-pic
EveryoneWinsByVoting / November 14, 2006 at 10:50 am
user-pic
On the matter of small privacy screens: This is not a high-school multiple choice test. No one is peeking over your shoulder to see your answers. How does a small privacy screen affect your voting experience enough to whine about it?--Worried that you will be ridiculed by your fellow citizen for voting LeDrew? At any rate, if you are worth your salt you should have completed your ballot in a matter of seconds... far too short a period for anyone to see your votes.

By the way, if anyone has hard numbers about how 'the rest of the world' uses the 'X' ballot-marking system, I'd like to see them. Until then, stop making bogus claims about which ballot system is the 'right' one to use. You sure didn't need a Master's degree to cast this ballot, that's all that matters.
jerrold / November 14, 2006 at 11:15 am
user-pic
In my opinion, we should be able to vote without anyone else watching our pens, or even having the opportunity to.

Why?

In order to ensure a fair election, isolated voting booths reduce the probability of bias/persuasion at the most crucial moment in the campaign. Just as important is the simple fact that many people prefer to keep their vote private.

They should have that right. And election day planners should provide a voting environment that allows for ample privacy.

HiMY SYeD / November 14, 2006 at 02:40 pm
user-pic
Did anyone else feel like they were feeding their marked ballot into an electronic paper shredder ?
Greg Smith / November 15, 2006 at 10:50 am
user-pic
"Complete the arrow" is so that you'll shade the boxes in such a way that the optical scanners can recognize the (up to) three selections you make on one ballot.

Provincial and federal ballots only have one race on each piece of paper and are counted by hand, so you can mark 'em any old way (as long as it's no so wild that a scrutineer will complain).

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal