Sunday, February 12, 2012Cloudy -3°C
City

U of T Professor Killed In Bike Collision

Posted by Zach / April 24, 2006

Van_Tol_Hubert_hs.jpg
I don't take the TTC, I avoid cabs, and I just don't have the patience to do any real walking. I bike everywhere. So whenever I hear about a biker being killed in Toronto, I take it to heart. On April 20th, Hubert van Tol, professor of pharmacology at U of T, was killed when he was struck by a dump truck biking at Avenue Rd. and Briar Hill Ave.

Torontoist, Eye, Spacing, and Reading Toronto are all blaming this death on the lack of side-guard regulations for trucks.

From the Eye article:

"this man's death was entirely preventable. In fact, if he'd been involved in a similar accident in the UK or Europe, he'd likely be alive right now. That's because, on the other side of the Atlantic, trucks are required to have side guards that prevent cyclists, pedestrians and small cars from getting underneath transport trucks. When a cyclist in France strikes the side of a truck, instead of falling underneath the truck and being run over, she bounces off the guard and falls away from the path of the wheels. Such a cyclist may be injured, but in most cases she'll still be alive."

Since we can't expect the city to suddenly start doing the right thing, bikers need to take safety into their own hands. I just bought myself a new helmet, and I am constantly thinking about ways to avoid dangerous biking situations. Please honour Hubert van Tol by protecting yourself too. [Originally posted on The Newspaper]

Discussion

25 Comments

St Dan / April 24, 2006 at 02:12 am
user-pic
With all due respect to Professor van Tol, I don't think a helmet would really have helped him.
Wrenkin / April 24, 2006 at 04:27 am
user-pic
It was further up, at Cortleigh.
Genet / April 24, 2006 at 10:56 am
user-pic
Mary Hansen (of Stereolab) was killed while cycling in London when a truck hit her, so it would seem that this unfortunate accident most likely would have occurred there too.
phoenix / April 24, 2006 at 02:39 pm
user-pic
maybe cyclists should start carrying car insurance just like any car owners do, and stop treating themselves like a pedestrians, disobeying traffic lights, bike on side walk, walk way etc...plus they should also get a license
Just look at how many bicyclists driving recklessly on the road!
Tanya / April 24, 2006 at 04:25 pm
user-pic
He was wearing a helmet (according to a newspaper article I read) - it didn't save him. You don't stand much of a chance against a large truck. You can stay away from the blind spots of large trucks, never pass one on the right side, and try to bike in a way that's visible, predictable, and assertive of space. That's all you can do personally to protect yourself. But hopefully we can encourage governments to introduce regulations to make the roads safer, and as a society take a stance of zero tolerance against dangerous driving habits.
phoenix / April 24, 2006 at 06:04 pm
user-pic
"as a society take a stance of zero tolerance against dangerous driving habits"

exactly.. let's start off by giving tickets to bicylists who are cycling below speed limit, not stopping at red light, crash into cars that are making a right turn, cycling against traffic or turning themselves into pedestrians cycling on side walk...
Zach / April 25, 2006 at 12:25 am
user-pic
When bikers crash into cars making a right turn, it is often the car driver--not checking their blindspot--that is at fault. Unfortunatly, whether you have the right of way or not as a biker won't save your life.

They already give tickets to bicyclists who run red lights, and even stop signs (I got one once, but the cop didn't show up in court and it was dismissed). But, if I run a red light, chances are that I will only get myself killed. Cars are much more fatal to others.
St Dan / April 25, 2006 at 12:33 am
user-pic
"exactly.. let's start off by giving tickets to bicylists who are cycling below speed limit, not stopping at red light, crash into cars that are making a right turn, cycling against traffic or turning themselves into pedestrians cycling on side walk..."

Phoenix:

Firstly, there's no such thing as driving 'below speed limit'. Speed limits are MAXIMUM speeds, not minimums.

Cops absolutely should (and do!) ticket cyclists who run reds, drive on the sidewalk (a personal pet peeve of mine) and the like.

But as for hitting cars doing right turns, traffic moving straight has right-of-way over turning traffic. It is the responsibility of the car drivers to make sure they don't hit a cyclist (or get into the cyclists lane) when turning right.

Remember: Bikes were on the roads long before cars were.
phoenix / April 25, 2006 at 09:33 am
user-pic
"Firstly, there's no such thing as driving 'below speed limit'. Speed limits are MAXIMUM speeds, not minimums."

sure there is, try driving 10km/hr on 401 and see if you will get a ticket
mongo / April 25, 2006 at 12:14 pm
user-pic
phoenix, you jackass,
you pretentious, sneering, miserable asshat,
we are talking about people's lives, not dents in your car
phoenix / April 25, 2006 at 01:26 pm
user-pic
excuse me.. I am talking about people's lives too.. obviously, the genius in our transportation department are not able to resolve this.. the traffic cops can't either.. then the responsibilities lie on the drivers and bikers themselves..there is something called human errors.. so mongo, what is your suggestion since you are so smart?(other than name calling, which seems to be your specialty)... there are also those who drive under the influence of alchohol, etc etc.. oh, and there are pedestrians who jay walk and get hit by cars, then what? How about banning cyclists biking downtown? If you drive, you should know how difficult it is to predict where these cyclists are going, some don't even give a hand signal when making a turn
Richard / April 25, 2006 at 01:41 pm
user-pic
Both drivers and bikers are to blame.
I bike and drive and I see them both make mistakes. Bikers who do the following should have their bikes taken away or write their own death certificate:
-bike on the sidewalk
-run red lights
-don't bike next to the cub and take up an entire lane
-get to a stopsign/traffic light and move to the front of the que (don't pass a stationary car that's already passed you or you'll really piss someone off)
-never signal turns

and drivers, drive with your heads out of your asses and stop parking in the bike lanes.
Zach / April 25, 2006 at 02:43 pm
user-pic
Biking on the sidewalk is bad, but not as bad as everyone makes it out to be. The biker just needs to realize that the speed limit is now that of the pedestrians, and that they own that piece of cement.

Pedestrians need to realize that it is dangerous drivers that force nervous bikers onto the sidewalk. Although it is my opinion, that if you are that nervous then you shouldn't be biking.

Turn signals are useful sometimes, but again, thanks to bad drivers they are only so useful. My philosophy is that if you need to make a hand signal just to make a turn safely, then don't make that turn.

I have learned never to trust drivers, and always expect the worst from them. They will always redefine your concept of worst.
In_sorrow / April 25, 2006 at 08:21 pm
user-pic
Had Huub been 30 sec. before the truck or 30 sec. after the truck turned right, he would have arrived in his lab on time and ready to work like he did everyday. He was not a 'typical' reckless or disobediant cyclist. He obeyed the rules of the road, so trying to blame either the truck driver or cyclist is pointless (especially if you have no idea about the situation!). We live in a day and age where the road is not only for the automobile and yet people feel that having something bigger means having power and that the car/truck rules the road. The problem is that we can't seem to share. I fear this was a freak accident that just should not have happened to someone so incredible.
ajr / April 25, 2006 at 09:00 pm
user-pic
phoenix, restricted access freeways have some kind of minimum highway speed, but other roadways don't IIRC.

Zach, taking the lane is sometimes the safest thing that a cyclist can do. For example, on narrow roadways with parked cars, the cyclist can either risk getting doored by riding too far to the right, risk getting hit from the car passing them too closely, or take the lane and piss of some motorists for a block or so.
Greg / April 26, 2006 at 09:30 am
user-pic
The minumum speed required on any road according to the Highway Traffic Act is 25km on a 50 or 60km max road, 35 on a 70 or 80 and 70km on any of the highways.
Matt / April 26, 2006 at 10:16 am
user-pic
Guys, there's no definitive here. There are a gigantic quantity of stupid people in the world. There are exceptionally stupid drivers who think that bikes do not classify as motor vehicles and therefore should not be given any right of way, even where such right is legally guaranteed. There are exceptionally stupid cyclists who think that the entire planet is their personal DVP and that it's perfectly justifiable to run lights, ride the sidewalk, or cut in front of cars to make a sharp right.

The stupid people are the problem. Not the bikes, not the cars, not even the laws. The stupid, obnoxious, self-absorbed people who, no matter what they're driving/riding, think they are the most important thing on the road.
ajr / April 26, 2006 at 10:55 am
user-pic
Thanks Greg.
Zach / April 26, 2006 at 03:34 pm
user-pic
Torontoist <a href="http://www.torontoist.com/archives/2006/04/memorial_x_2.php";>reports</a>: "Toronto cyclists will be holding two separate memorials for Hubert Van Tol and Bianca, the two cyclists killed on April 20th. Both rides will be leaving Bloor and Spadina The memorial for Hubert leaves Bloor and Spadina 7:45AM. The memorial for Bianca leaves Bloor and Spadina at 6:45pm. Riders will also be installing a ghost bike at both sites, a memorial that cyclists were killed at that location and a reminder that sadly they're still not safe on the city's roads."
beeswax / April 26, 2006 at 11:39 pm
user-pic
in all this bruhaha over who has the right of way, has any one ever rated the deadliness of cyclists versus cars? isn't it like comparing "apples to oranges"?
chephy / April 30, 2006 at 02:17 am
user-pic
Richard, I agree with most of your post, but the part about the need to be close to the curb is ridiculous. Keeping extremely far to the right is a very dangerous practice referred to as curb-hugging. Some of the consequences of keeping are as following:<br><br>

- reduced visibility to both same- and cross-directional traffic (a lot of accidents happen because drivers don't notice cyclists - this was one such accident apparently!)<br>
- increased number of close passes<br>
- increased possibility of right hooks<br>
- no room for swerving should something unexpected occur (like a pedestrian suddenly stepping off the sidewalk or a car right-hooking you)<br>
- inability to make left turns<br>
- the door prize (being struck by a parked car door)<br>
- running into debris, potholes, improperly installed sewer grates (they are very slippery in the rain too!)<br><br>

Sometimes it is imperative for the biker's safety that he take the full lane to discourage cars from passing him when it isn't safe to do so. Some stupid drivers might get irritated at that because of their ignorance, but they aren't likely to run you over. They are far more likely to run over you if they don't notice you... Of course, you should keep to the right if it is safe and practicable to do so but in a lot of situations (lane too narrow to share, you're approaching an intersection with the intention of going straight or turning right etc) staying to the right is attempted suicide!<br><br>

Do you know that it's in the books that cyclists should stay AT LEAST half a meter from a curb while biking? In fact I wonder if keeping too far to the right wasn't a factor in this tragic accident.<br><br>

Read a book by J. Forester called "Effective Cycling". You might be surprised at what you learn.
Zach / April 30, 2006 at 06:18 pm
user-pic
Taking a whole lane when needed is so important but can be so counter-intuitive too. I do this a lot on small streets and big streets when it become to narrow for a car to pass me safely. I just won't give the driver the chance to make a bad decision.

If every biker in Toronto was more active in claiming their space I think that drivers would begin to realize that it is THEIR space (too).
Krupo / April 30, 2006 at 11:26 pm
user-pic
Very good points; I wholeheartedly agree with the call to claim the whole lane when necessary.

Installing a powerful airhorn is also a good idea - I made a large truck grind to a halt when I opened on it with my horn (with its own 80-100 psi refillable reservoir of compressed air).

Ironically, I just saw a pedestrian bodycheck a cyclist in an ad for suits just now.
ROb / May 3, 2006 at 02:07 am
user-pic
As a newcomer to TO i have to say there seems to be a more general lack of respect for cyclists in this town than in my own home town of London (UK), this may of course be a slightly harsh judgement as i'm a little more sensitive to it all over here at the moment, however i do seem to have been cut up on junctions and railroaded into lines of parked cars far more often over here than i ever was before, however i do agree that cyclists themselves need to set their own precedent by obeying the rules of the road (ie: stopping at red lights, signalling turns etc) if we can't respect those rules we have no right to expect anyone else to play by them for us.
Auto Loan / May 13, 2006 at 04:30 am
user-pic
Bad Credit Auto Loans http://www.americascarcredit.com

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal