Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 20°C
City

Toronto for Free Speech or Human Rights?

Posted by Jenny / March 12, 2006

danish-flag.jpg
Yesterday, on International Women's Day, a packed crowd gathered at OISE on Bloor West. Shaila Kibria from the university's administrative council spoke of a recent incident at Hart House where a Muslim student was followed into the bathroom and shoved.

The assailant pushed a flyer for the Toronto Supports Denmark rally scheduled the same time as the Women's Day march and said, "You're a Muslim, you should learn from this."

The student ran away from a second person charging at her, shouting racial slurs. When Kibria heard of this incident, she was so furious, she and about 25 other Muslim students, proudly sporting Hijabs, held a demonstration the following day. They had eggs thrown at them.

"When the university makes an statement that Freedom of Expression should not be curbed, yet human rights must be respected, what does that mean," says Kibria. "Every since 9/11, we're all afraid to speak up. No Muslim on campus feels safe now."

Down the street at the Danish Consulate, the Toronto Supports Denmark rally was to encourage freedom of speech in a friendly, peaceful way -- and to condemn the worldwide violence springing from the published Muhammad cartoons.

Organizers Nav Purewal (a 21-year-old blogger) and Daniel Dale say they had not heard of this incident before I brought it up and said they were appalled.

"We don't condone that at all," says Dale. "We're going to have Muslims here as friends and it's an insult. That incident there wasn't freedom of speech, that was violence, same as reaction to the cartoons around the world."

One sign at the rally read "All We Are Saying is Give Speech a Chance" while another read "Freedom Rings Whenever Opinions Clash."

Former broadcast journalist and Conservative candidate Peter Kent spoke the rally as a representative of the non-profit group Canadian Coalition for Democracies (CCD).

"Any democracy worth its salt should be strong enough to endure the most controversial speech," says Kent. "That speech cannot be corrupted or compromised or silenced by intimidation or fear of violent reprisal."

Discussion

15 Comments

Nav Purewal / March 13, 2006 at 01:04 am
user-pic
Hey, I guess Daniel commented on these horrible incidents because I didn't know about them at all until reading them here. They are no less deplorable than the violent opposition to the Danish cartoons.
Katherine / March 13, 2006 at 10:21 am
user-pic
That's appalling! I can't believe university students at a place like U of T would <i>throw eggs</i> at protesters - you'd think a place with such a good reputation would be fostering respect and intelligence in students, rather than insult and intolerance.
Shame shame shame on the people who behaved so wrongly.
Neha / March 13, 2006 at 10:24 am
user-pic
Makes you wonder how many more demonstrators took "Toronto Supports Denmark" to mean "Toronto Doesn't Support Muslims". I am put off by that protest because I can't understand how a protest against violence and for free speech has completely overlooked the responsibility that comes with being able to speak as you want by giving the event such a sensational, us vs. them, name. People knock being p.c. a lot but being p.c. has its purpose in situations like these...

Wouldn't it have been more useful to invite Muslims with different beliefs on the situation and other critics to protest against the violence?
Nav Purewal / March 13, 2006 at 04:01 pm
user-pic
How is "Toronto Supports Denmark" a "sensational, us vs. them, name"? As for inviting Muslims, we did. Some came, others decided not to.

Attacking protestors at UofT is deplorable, but also deplorable is the stifling of free speech that occurs at the university. It's impossible to flyer for an event at all critical of Islamism without having those flyers torn down. That doesn't happen to other events.
Nav Purewal / March 13, 2006 at 04:02 pm
user-pic
Also, where can I read more about these violent occurances?
Neha / March 14, 2006 at 09:49 am
user-pic
"others decided not to"

Ya think that maybe if the protest had been named "Toronto Against Violence" more would've turned up?

When using "Toronto Supports Denmark" I think you ended up alienating those moderate Muslims who found the whole deal controversial, those that did not support printing of those toons, and those that are already having a hard time dealing with being compared to Islamic fundies.

"It's impossible to flyer for an event at all critical of Islamism without having those flyers torn down."

Having known this, could some smart not have been used to ensure the largest possible gathering? Unless of course the aim was to cause drama and in that case, well done.
Nav Purewal / March 15, 2006 at 12:40 am
user-pic
"Unless of course the aim was to cause drama and in that case, well done."

You're right. It's my fault this girl was attacked.
Dave / March 15, 2006 at 10:25 am
user-pic
Who the hell came up with the name Toronto Supports Demnark?? The name alone gives the impression that you are chosing sides and supporting Demnark over Muslims. That should have been obvious when the name was sugested. Who ever came up with that name for the march should be kicked in the gnads.
Neha / March 15, 2006 at 05:22 pm
user-pic
Nav-ji, you're putting words in my mouth. The girl was attacked by a horribly ignorant and heartless human being. You didn't have anything to do with it. I should've made myself clearer, I wasn't referring to you causing anyone physical harm, I was just saying that perhaps you were out to disturb some shit with the whole name-game instead of trying to educate the masses on any coherent cause.
Nav Purewal / March 17, 2006 at 02:14 am
user-pic
Neha: Fair enough, I shouldn't have assumed that was what you were implying.

"Who ever came up with that name for the march should be kicked in the gnads."

Dave: Ask me if I'm surprised that those opposing the rally advocate violence.
Dave / March 17, 2006 at 11:22 am
user-pic
My point is that the name selected for the rally has created opposition from people who might not actually oppose it. The name of the rally simply implies that the rally is against them. It is completely obvious which is why I am so shocked at the name selected. I was in complete awe that you used that name. You selected on side of the issue and said "We support that sied".
Dave / March 17, 2006 at 11:23 am
user-pic
Meh, I'm in such a rush I can't even correct spelling.
Nav Purewal / March 17, 2006 at 01:27 pm
user-pic
I think you definitely have a valid point, to which I can only say I have no problem picking a side. Denmark's embassies were attacked, its export economy damaged, its citizens threatened with assassination. Denmark is our ally and I support them against these forces of clerical barbarism. We could have definitely got more people out if we named it "Toronto Supports Free Speech" or "No to violence, no to racism" but I didn't feel like castrating our message just to make it more popular.
Nav Purewal / March 17, 2006 at 01:32 pm
user-pic
Also: I'm not sure I understand the implication in this post's name. Is free speech not a human right?
Cam Hardy / March 17, 2006 at 04:55 pm
user-pic
"Toronto Supports Denmark" is not a sensational name, nor does it even imply that those who attended the rally agree with the cartoons or the newspaper that published them. It means that we support a country that is being targetted because its free press published something offensive to a number of people.
<br><br>
Unlike in the Middle East, where, in many countries, the media is policed or openly controlled by the state, Denmark is a democratic country that allows newspapers to print what they like. What I was supporting was Denmark, which has faced threats, boycotts, etc. just because they allowed a right-wing newspaper to print something controversial.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal