Friday, May 25, 2012Partly Cloudy 20°C
Arts

Dead Sexy Magazine Debuts

Posted by Tim / May 14, 2009

Dead Sexy MagazineIt's no secret that launching a magazine is akin to a death wish these days. As much fun as they're to use as office and bathroom decor, they're dying both north and south of the border as advertising dries up, costs escalate and readership migrates to the web. So it's no surprise that those in love with the look of a magazine are trying to make a go of it with online interpretations.

The latest one of these online magazines to cross my radar is called Dead Sexy. It promises to launch in cities around the world, but for now we have a Toronto version and its debut issue just hit the interweb this month.

Like the many online magazines that have preceded it, it's heavy on the photography, light on the word count and is all about scrolling across the screen to flip between pages.

Because I'm a sucker for anything Toronto culture, I'm a fan of the first issue. I like its photos of Ossington, profile on Ezra's Pound and feature on the Gladstone's Christina Zeidler. They also take a look at Meta Gallery, FAT and Sukhothai. Of course, I'm linking to related content on blogTO because one of the issues with this format is that you can't hyperlink to specific pages of their magazine. There's also no RSS, no hyperlinks within the articles and no ability to add a comment. Basically, everything that's great about the web - and reading content like this online - isn't available.

And that makes me worried. The world is already fretting about the print magazine death spiral, I'd hate to see the process get repeated for these aspirational online versions.

Discussion

12 Comments

Roger / May 14, 2009 at 11:42 pm
user-pic
I agree with the sentiment about the lack of links and such. It's almost as if they want to take the Sexy out of their name and write their own obit.
Face Palm / May 15, 2009 at 08:00 am
user-pic
Worst. Name. Ever.

I guess Sexy 2.0 didn't quite get enough votes in the internal brainstorming.

Best of luck, but you need a lot more meat on the bones than this.

Chester Pape / May 15, 2009 at 08:46 am
user-pic
Do we really need another Toro?
eric / May 15, 2009 at 09:04 am
user-pic
This is a good example of how not to make the jump from print to digital. Poor interface, awful readability and a name that just... Makes the collective internet groan. If you're going to survive as an online Toronto street mag, you had better wise up, stop covering things like the "hot Ossington strip" because its been done to death.
George K / May 15, 2009 at 09:37 am
user-pic
I really like the photographs I will at least say. Kinda covering old hat for us Toronto folk however I think they might be gearing more to the visitors than us jaded locals.
I will give them the benefit of the doubt until I see the second issue. Good luck!
G / May 15, 2009 at 09:52 am
user-pic
"no hyperlinks within the articles" - Actually, there are. The URL in the Christina Zeidler article is a link, for example.

Still - aside from the pretty pictures, this thing is a piece o' crap. Awful format, and stunningly bad writing aside from one or two articles that are bearable. Completely vapid.

But then again, vapid is what seems to sell nowadays... sigh.
jrocc / May 15, 2009 at 10:19 am
user-pic
Terrible navigation and design that's not much better. I don't see the appeal.
Tom J / May 15, 2009 at 12:51 pm
user-pic
Hello everyone - thanks for all the feedback!

Thanks Tim for the kind mention, its much appreciated but kinda surprising considering how "new" we are. We are getting daily feedback and constantly making upgrades to the site. We WANT to make it better and maybe it wasn't quite "ready" for a professional review. But hey when you throw yourself onto the web, thats how it shakes out so its all good.
We aren't some big media conglom (we are just 2 guys doing everything) that thinks it is all that and we strive to offer the best experience to our readers!

Just to answer all the questions: "why another 'zine?" cue sigh, rolled eyes...
It's simple - we are in love with Toronto and all its ambitious people, places and things that are doing something interesting. As much as we are in love with BlogTo, our goal is to present a more photographic and scenic Toronto without all the politics and drama. We want to highlight local talent in a more photographic way without information overload. (There is already enough raw info out there).

We also want to only present original (recent) photographs using young local talent. We could have gone the stock photo route like so many other mags and blogs but we believe in the talent and want to show them off!
We don't want intensive articles, cause again you can get that elsewhere, our format is to just present what you need to know!

As for the name we aren't in the business of taking ourselves so seriously so the title is meant to be tongue in cheek.

As for why Ossington? "Done to death". Believe it or not, all you jaded downtowners would be knocked over to learn how many times daily I am asked about what is going on, where to go out in this great city of ours.. Not everyone is as plugged in and aware of what is going on in all the everchanging parts of the city as you dear BlogTO regulars. Many of my friends are from out of town, country and continent and don't always want to read BlogTO, Now or other content heavy media.

Resources such as BlogTo are wonderful but can be a daunting read to someone visiting the city. More than a few times I have had friends tell me that the comments sections make Torontonians seems really meanspirited and it's a challenge to convince them Toronto is worth a visit! We want to avoid that and just try to present Toronto and a selection of our other fav cities. Yeah nowhere is perfect, but we have all the traditional media pointing out Toronto's shortcomings on a daily basis.

We aren't trying to reinvent the wheel here, just to present the people, places and things in Toronto we love!

cheer up and love all.
TJ

P.S. there are hyperlinks to every place, person we profiled. Maybe it needs to be more apparent? thanks!
eric / May 15, 2009 at 02:45 pm
user-pic
Apologies if I came across as harsh in my previous posting, it's a morning thing. As an art director who has worked in both print and digital (including digital magazines) I do have to stand by the point that your user interface needs help, and that type wise you should look at some other options as the readability of your existing type is pretty off putting. Why not tap the resource of young designers like you are with photographers (which I do support and applaud by the way), and let get some help with your layouts? I'd also be sure to assess your audience and just who you are going after and how you go about it. Its an important step in establishing your voice and is a vital thing for advertisers as well. I won't apologize for being harsh about the Ossington story, and you can call me jaded or snooty but it is flogging a dead horse at this point, and there are a number of other much more interesting up and coming areas that would prove a much more intriguing read. Best of luck to you and to your endeavor.
Senior Coconut / May 15, 2009 at 09:27 pm
user-pic
haha love the crickets and back pedaling.

is html enabled in comments on this site?

<center><img src="http://joeydevilla.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2004/03/greater_internet_fuckwad_theory.jpg";></center>
Joe Howell / May 16, 2009 at 03:19 pm
user-pic
I have a bit more unsolicited advice for Tom J, in case he's still checking the comments here. Read the first issue cover to cover, and I sincerely enjoyed the striking visual style. Few publications or sites look this good in their formative days, and I think you could really carve a niche out for yourselves. That being said, you guys desperately need a copy editor. And even if you don't change the name, could you do away with the "What Turns You On?" tag line? It's really turning me off.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal