Arts
Talking (not Tackling) Street Art at Housepaint
What is the definition of vandalism with regard to street art and graffiti? What is the municipal policy and possible penalties for street artists? As street artists become more enmeshed with the art world, how do they maintain their street credibility? How is street art different from tagging and vandalism? Is street art simply a short cut into the art establishment?
These important questions were the full nelsons of the Wednesday night throw down I attended - between artists and establishment at the ROM's Signy and Cléophée Eaton Theatre as part of their current exhibition, Housepaint.
Adam Vaughan (Councillor, City of Toronto), Dan Bergeron (aka fauxreel), David Liss (artistic director, MOCCA) and Devon Ostrom (curator, Housepaint) faced off on the above questions in an attempt to shed light, not on the answers but on the perspectives that make them so unanswerable. In truth, I was glad to see that those who went to see the hate being flung between "high" and "low" class had to wait through a lot of the civilized logic being traded on stage. A testament to the character of the panelists, each seemed resigned that divisions of institutional versus street art - namely, those imposed by notions of class (as pointed out by David Liss) - run deep but are still worthy of measured debate.
Though they addressed policies, processes and social aspects of street art, the conversation often returned to the very nature of street art. One of the most evident fault lines of discussion, during Talking Street Art was the perception that street art is a culmination of graffiti, hip hop culture, dissenting youth and poverty.
Given some time to reflect after the panel, Devon Ostrom reiterates a point from the Housepaint exhibition statement: Street art is often associated with graffiti. In fact, since the earliest cave dwellers, people have been drawing in places where they forgot to ask permission first. Hip-hop culture took this tendency and gave the form a massive boost in innovation, technical skill, and style. Almost overnight, bathroom scribbles took a giant leap in evolution, vibrantly turning New York City's subway cars into giant rolling art galleries. "My point being credit is owed, but hip-hop graffiti was not the start of drawing on things."
The current popularization of street art and it's inception to the mainstream had the panel agreeing on the shift in ideologies and practice of individual artists, some of whom have made the leap into gallery and commercial space. For the artists, one of the more important shifts came in the form of civil leniency toward artists who stick to the street. "In some ways the city has actually made a lot of progress in how graffiti and street artists are dealt with," says Devon. "Not too long ago it was not uncommon for artists to be beaten, let alone fined. I personally have a friend who was beaten to the point of internal bleeding by the police. Actually participation in institutional shows can be great for getting artists out of court. Most Judges are well educated and love good art."
Administering the panel was Francisco Alvarez, the Managing Director of the Institute for Contemporary Culture (ICC) at the ROM, "It went very well, with a good variety of perspectives represented. In particular, it was interesting to hear from City Councillor Adam Vaughn how the City is attempting to deal with graffiti while still viewing artistic mural painting as a positive force. Clearly, we did not arrive at a definite answer, it's like asking "what is art?", a question that has been debated endlessly."
Francisco culled the discussion topics from ICC members and the panelists themselves. "Three main themes emerged: Street art and the Municipality, Street art and the mainstream art world, How street artists have evolved since the original of graffiti."
I'm rather amazed and think that it's incredible that Housepaint is really the first exhibition by a major Canadian museum to address street art and it's surrounding issues. An art form that has been developed for decades - and centuries, when considering Devon's earlier sentiments - and practiced world wide. Francisco explains that Housepaint presented the ICC with an opportunity to bridge solid context with innovation. "Our mandate is to present exhibitions and programs that examine cultural, social and/or political issues in societies around the world. In this case, we look at homelessness and poverty through the lens of socially-concerned street artists."
The panel talk was one of the many layers of this ode to street art, including the Housepaint at Tent City - Phase 1 Hug Me Tree installation by Elicser Elliot, the screenings of BOMB IT and NEXT: A Primer on Urban Painting (my particular favourite).
Images by: Roger Cullman


Discussion
23 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Art is expression, as long as it doesn't do anyone any direct harm then it's just art. If it's good it will make you think, obviously even bad art makes people think. Let it be. The worse penalty for creating art without permission should be cleaning it up. If it's in a public space, and no one makes a formal complaint let it be.
Never heard of him. Do you mean Gustav Klimt?
Not sure if I understand what you are talking about with high-brow / low brow, anarchy or eating rich people, does not seem to make sense – would you mind rewording it a bit? Sorry.
What I find interesting is how expressions of youth culture are suppressed while the bigger picture is totally missed. The dominant culture is over-run with illegal advertising yet gets its knickers in a knot over some amazing artists who feel really strongly about making their communities more beautiful places to live (and also some destructive kids). Or, that the pharmaceutical industry is overmedicating every facet of human existence -- yet kids are getting criminal records for smoking pot. We can’t crack down on cars that kill thousands in Toronto every year from pollution or unsafe sport utility vehicles – but damn, we sure can kick those physically active kids out of the park for skateboarding…
"The dominant culture is over-run with illegal advertising yet gets its knickers in a knot over some amazing artists who feel really strongly about making their communities more beautiful places to live (and also some destructive kids)." ....those illegal signs are paid for to landlords who pay taxes that go towards community issues.don't attack that influx of cash, it pays welfare.
" but damn, we sure can kick those physically active kids out of the park for skateboarding… " so?
1. More than anything artists themselves subsidize their work, most have to work second and third jobs etc. Keeping in mind that you have probably not seen the show, or went to the talk, what would you have preferred the funds were spent on?
2. You have a weird sense of the public. They are not a thoughtless drudging mass.
3. I would rather remove the illegal signs.
4. “So?” Please re-read the paragraph.
Re: 11:47 PM
1. What is the real issue that we should be attacking? How could we do this better? Most people are quite happy that we inserted tent city narrative into the institutional / collective memory of Canada (i.e. ROM) via street art.
Re: 11:50 PM
1. Hmm? I’ll use whatever arguments I feel like using thanks.
I would also say that hip-hop is not the problem, but its bastard stepchild, the commercialized version: blingpop. This shit is more targeted and modified to tap into the base desires (tits and guns) of suburban basement dwelling teenagers. Real gangsters listen to Yanni.
Blingpop, i agree is shit ...what you're promoting is far superior....yanni?....now that really makes me angry ...nonetheless, best of luck in regards to your well produced, and well thought out efforts...we can't all agree, but that's what makes art and expression a wonderful thing...and i defend your right to paint, just not on my wall k?;)
I think you are refering to the 'broken windows theory?' I don't buy that. I think the reverse, that larger crimes in society set the example that creates the smaller stuff. Generaly, people are very moral until given 'permission' to act otherwise. (Also, from what I know, organized crime hates vandals and will do nasty things to them if caught near their turf.)
Also also, I have never painted on your house and I don't know any serious artist that would do that.
(From a mobile device)
I mean't Gustave Courbet...Thank's for that note...ddt, your an artist...do you paint..have you faced any of the negative results of graffiti (street art) expression...All I can say is that I all too familiar with it..And for what, in an attempt to potentially allow others and myself discover that to change our perspective through the actions of graffiti we can possibly change the outcome of how graffiti changes its meaning and sense of expression within the system in which it lives. Graffiti is beautiful, it must stay where it started for people to understand that it is not bad in its association as a true form of artistic expression..
Not sure which is which. The real art world that you speak of (which doesn't include street art in your eyes) would not exist without the marketing side of the galleries, museums, other groups, and even the artists creating it. I would almost argue that street art, which until recently existed outside "the real" art world, is an art movement that is more sincere and "art for art's sake" than the art world that you identify with.