Friday, May 25, 2012Partly Cloudy 20°C
Arts

Let the AGO, Gehry Love-In Begin

Posted by Tim / November 8, 2008

AGO Frank GehryThe new AGO is just days away from its official opening and already critics are lining up to sing its praises. In an article in today's Globe and Mail, Lisa Richon has this to say about Frank Gehry's new design:

This is not a stylistic flash in the pan by another architect in designer glasses. Thankfully, for Toronto and the rest of Canada, Gehry's transformation of the AGO is inspired not by personal ego but by allowing for a journey that goes deep into art and the city.

Hmmm...who might this other artist in designer glasses be that she is referring to? Oh, right, that would be Daniel Libeskind of the much vilified Michael Lee-Chin Crystal.

So, I think I know how this is going to play out. Despite the fact Gehry's transformation of the AGO received a mixed response when it was unveiled back in 2004, the Toronto art-critic elite are just desperate to further slam Libeskind and the ROM and will overlook whatever flaws (if any) to praise the new AGO as everything the ROM should have been.

For further proof of this theory, there's also the article in today's Toronto section of the National Post in which Robert Fulford slightly more diplomatically observes that Frank Gehry, the architect, has delivered an impressive building. Don't worry, there's more praise. The article is three pages.

For more props (not exactly objective but that's not the point), Shawn Micallef is penning the Art Matters blog over on the AGO web site.

And when will the rest of us be able to chime in? The official FREE opening is this upcoming Friday, November 14th.

Photos by Alfred Ng in the AGO Flickr Pool.

Discussion

5 Comments

Elle Driver / November 9, 2008 at 07:30 pm
user-pic
Can't wait to see the new building in person! (I hope they won't be jacking-up the admission and skimping on the "free hours" like the ROM did.)
Karim / November 10, 2008 at 06:44 am
user-pic
While Gehry's building may not be great, it will inherently be better than Daniel Libeskind's Crystal. Libeskind's work is the low point of pretentious, self-indulgent and crass egotism. The only thing Libeskind offered Toronto was the low watermark for comparing other structures.
Ariel / November 12, 2008 at 12:34 pm
user-pic
Having just visited the new AGO, i was thoroughly impressed by it's many new aquisitions. It's increased focus on contemporary art in the top floors is a breath of fresh air from the darker rooms downstairs. Although i was a little confused as to why they mixed different styles by arranging pieces by themes. I found myself enjoying classic eurepean art than BAM... a modern piece(in the same room) Overall, a good experience and the new Ghery second floor corridor is beautiful.
Careygrrl / November 14, 2008 at 10:21 am
user-pic
I went yesterday on a media tour and have to say the top two contemporary floors are reminiscent of the exhibition space on the second floor of the MoMA in New York: there's a surprise around every corner and there isn't a bad view in the place. It is just pure fun, plain and simple. The staircase connecting the fourth floors to those below was still closed (even the elevator is slow, but fun), but the smaller, south-facing staircase between the 5th and 4th floors was open and has a most impressive. The third floor is just a big hall for private functions, and the second floor is worth an afternoon all in itself. They kept the parts everybody loves, like the atrium and the crowded Masters halls and the Moore sculpture centre, and have lept forward 20 years into a very creative approach to curation in the Canadian wing, mixing colonial-era portraits with First Nations costumes and still-wet Kent Monkmans that consume an entire wall. All in all, it's freaking stunning inside, and at the same time it's showcasing the city outside in all directions, which is sadly not the case at the ROM (just thinking about the staircase in the crystal makes me depressed). Even the smaller rooms like the new sculpture room, which could have been treated as afterthoughts, are thought-provoking and surprising. The only thing that sucks is that they haven't put their collection online in any comprehensive way, so when you go home after you can't look up what you just saw.
Careygrrl / November 14, 2008 at 10:24 am
user-pic
Sorry, that should read: "has a most impressive view of the Grange park, OCAD, etc."

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal