Friday, May 25, 2012Clear 21°C
Arts

Vincent Lam Wins the Giller

Posted by Katherine / November 9, 2006

2006118_bmc.jpgAs you hopefully all know, Vincent Lam won the Giller Prize Tuesday night for his collection of stories Bloodletting and Miraculous Cures.

The ceremony was broadcast on CTV (during prime time, which is pretty sweet), and bookish types unable to squeeze in at the Four Seasons hung out at the (surprisingly cozy) Steamwhistle Brewery Roundhouse for the Scotia Giller Light Bash.

There's something so endearing about publishing types having a party.

The event raised money for a charity dedicated to promoting literacy, Frontier College, (so impressed was I that I'm going to hunt down the volunteering information) - aside from the ticket price, there were a few raffles going.

We were also entertained (albeit briefly) after the awards show by Chantal Kreviazuk.

Debate over the winner should ensue - is Hage being overlooked because he may win the Governor General? Were the translations shut out because they were, well, French? Does a book that's essentially a treatment for a few episodes of ER/Grey's Anatomy/Scrubs deserve the award? Lam's a doctor, does he even need the prize money?

And of course, Lam's was the only book from a major publisher. I think this whole think is ripe for some serious gossip/debate.

image from flickr.com user Rather Salty

Discussion

2 Comments

Sameer Vasta / November 9, 2006 at 10:12 am
user-pic
Katherine, a friend of mine works (part-time) for Frontier College, if you're interested, I get you in touch with her. They ran "reading tents" out of some of the recreation centres I managed in the city this past summer.

And as for the party, I must admit (from what I got watching the event on television) that the Gillers does seem like Canada's biggest and glitziest award show. Sure they're in different media, but the Genies and the Junos pale in comparison to the Giller.

It's nice to see people truly celebrating literature in this country.
August / November 9, 2006 at 01:49 pm
user-pic
I stopped paying attention to the Gillers a while back. There was a feeling (not necessarily because of who won, but sometimes because of the makeup of the jury) that it was simply the "Friends of Margaret Atwood Award" (I didn't coin that phrase). I would prefer to see our awards go to a writer with something genuinely new to say, or to someone who has taken a genuine literary risk (stylistically or whatever) rather than have them a) given to somebody that travels in the right circles or b) chosen over and over again by jury members whose tastes seem to be confined to those circles.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal